Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Friday, November 17, 2017

CEO pens viral piece exposing the Republican tax cut as a lie to the middle class

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 14:  Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) arrives for a press conference following a weekly meeting of the House Republican caucus November 14, 2017 in Washington, DC. Republicans plan to bring their version of a tax reform bill to the House floor for a vote on Thursday of this week.  (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
David Mendels is the former CEO of Brightcove as well as Adobe executive. Writing on LinkedIn Mr. Mendels broke down the lie that is the GOP tax cut plan. Specifically, Mendels attacked Trump senior economic adviser Gary Cohn and Speaker Paul Ryan’s assertions that this tax cut is about helping the middle class by easing their burdens and creating wage increases across the board. The latter mythology has been spread by GOP officials for weeks, including this amazing claim:

Sarah Sanders @PressSec
The average American family would get a $4,000 raise under the President’s tax cut plan. So how could any member of Congress be against it?

Mendels uses this outrageous claim as his jumping off point to explain the very simple ways in which companies decide on who they will hire and how much they will pay them, and it turns out that tax cuts DO NOT figure into those equations ever.

Starting with the hiring and expansion of hiring in a company, Mendels explains that tax cuts affect one’s profits but the consumers’ demand is what dictates how many people he might hire.
We had clear metrics we followed in most areas--for every additional $ in sales growth we committed to, we could hire a roughly fixed ratio of addition sales reps.  For every increase in call volume, we would hire a roughly fixed ratio of customer service reps. For new product ideas, we would expect management to sign up for significant and specific revenue goals. It is a simple but true concept, customers drive business growth, not tax rates, not mythical “job creators.”  Tax rates impact profitability, but are only very indirectly tied to hiring.
After mentioning how misleading a statement like Huckabee Sanders’ was (i.e. “average” in regards to wage increases being a meaningless metric), Mendels gives the simple fact of business and the wages businesses pay.
Again, simple concept: the market for labor determines what CEOs/management/investors pay employees. Tax rates are not a factor. If I want to hire an engineer with experience in machine learning, the demand in the market right now is tremendous and the supply of people with that experience is limited. Salaries are going through the roof. If I want to hire a young person out of college for a junior sales or customer service job, it is a buyer’s market and wages are moderate.  Neither of those realities change if my tax rate changes.
Finally, Mendel goes directly at what CEOs would do if they were to receive a profit windfall from a corporate tax cut. Exactly what you imagine they would do.
First of all, Occam’s Razor suggests that cutting corporate taxes will benefit the owners of corporations--the investor class. It it is pretty simple and obvious concept.  The leap of faith required to argue the the goal is not that, but to benefit the working class, is such a stretch that it really can not be taken seriously. We know this because we have already tested this proposition and seen the results.  Broadly in the US economy, we have seen a massive increase in corporate profits at the same time as we have seen stagnant wages. That increase in corporate profits has lead to a record stock market and a dramatic increase in wealth for investors, not to significant increases in wages for working people. A tax cut for corporations will increase their profitability. Why we should believe that this increase in profitability will lead to wage increases when we have already seen that increases in profitability over the last 10 years did not, but rather went to stock buybacks and dividend increases that benefitted the investors?
Mendel says when he was the CEO he would have been very happy if his company saw a rise in profits, but that would not move him or his board toward new hiring and wage philosophies. Mendels makes a pledge to donate any money he makes on a GOP tax cut toward groups fighting to bring more equality to our country.

Unfortunately, people like Gary Cohn don’t seem to care about people in our country.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...


You need to check the author’s background a little more closely.

David Mendels is not a CEO, he is an EX-CEO that was forced to step down on 26 July 2017 due to his repeated failures in the Market.

David missed hitting the numbers in FY17 Q1 so badly that on 17 March 2017 Board Member Chet Kapoor (also managing director of the investment firm Tenzing Global) resigned over the company’s “disappointing” performance and called for the firm to sell itself. Then, during the 10 May 2017 Annual Meeting, less than a majority of outstanding shares (only 46%) supported the re-election of David Mendels as the Company's CEO.

Under David’s “leadership” the company missed the FY17 Q2 numbers so badly that he was replaced by the EVP and Chief Legal Officer, Andrew Feinberg, who became the Acting CEO.
In fact David’s performance as the CEO was so poor that during his 4-1/3 year tenure (1 Feb 2013 to 26 Jul 2017) the Company’s stock decreased 4% (from 7.14 to 6.85) while the DJIA increased 55% (from 14,059 to 21,711). The company was never profitable under David and actually lost more than $57 million during his tenure as the CEO (9.6% on a Total Revenue base of $596 million).

As proof that there is no correlation between success and Executive compensation these days, for his failures Mendels will be given $700,000 in salary and incentive compensation between his 26 July 2017 forced departure and 31 July 2018. In addition, the vesting schedule for his stock options and other stock-based awards will accelerate by 25 percent. Mendels received $926,704 in total compensation in 2016.

So, based on his track record, it’s not clear to me that David Mendels is actually a very credible source for financial analysis, advice or prognostication.

James Keyworth said...

I have been unable go verify the accuracy of the above comment. Still looking.
James Keyworth
Gazette Blog Editor

Anonymous said...

With respect to Arizona, here's an article on Mendels $49M acquisition of Unicorn Media, located in Tempe. After the acquisition the Unicorn technology proved to be problematic and consequently the estimated revenue never materialized - proving the massive investment to be a failure.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/1931451-my-thoughts-on-brightcove-acquiring-unicorn-media-why-company-wont-be-profitable-in-2014

Anonymous said...

Since you are looking for verification of the information in my first comment here are some links to help you out:

"Brightcove board member resigns, suggests selling the company"
https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2017/03/24/brightcove-board-member-resigns-suggests-selling.html

"Tenzing Global Urges Brightcove Stockholders to Hold CEO and Board Accountable for Significant Underperformance"
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/tenzing-global-urges-brightcove-stockholders-to-hold-ceo-and-board-accountable-for-significant-underperformance-by-voting-against-david-mendels-and-derek-harrar-at-upcoming-annual-meeting-300453180.html

"Brightcove CEO David Mendels steps down"
https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2017/07/26/brightcove-ceo-david-mendels-steps-down.html

Anonymous said...

Good article on decision making for hiring Do not see why first comment is to attack the author except for the types of people in this country that continue to try to divide us!

We need more Sr Leadership from Corp explaining the real economics of creating jobs and not the GOP view

Anonymous said...

David Medel's performance as a CEO has no baring on the fact that he is 100% correct in that companies will not just hand out raises because they get a tax break. Nor will they hire more people. They will increase profits, contribute to their reserves or reinvest in the company. This later part could mean more people but not necessarily. It could mean software, hardware, acquisitions, etc. I am not completely against trickle down economics. A company needs to be successful and make a profit in or to support any workforce. The GOPs spin however, that companies will "trickle down" the tax savings to employees is wrong and irresponsible. I hope that the American people have the courage to hold those accountable for these blatant lies during election season.