Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Saturday, April 30, 2022

Ukraine update: Weakening Russia's military capability is a noble goal, well worth the cost

LVIV, UKRAINE - APRIL 24: A man stops to look at a floral memorial wall for Ukrainian civilians killed during the Russian invasion on April 24, 2022 in Lviv, Ukraine. Lviv has served as a stopover and shelter for the millions of Ukrainians fleeing the Russian invasion, either to the safety of nearby countries or the relative security of western Ukraine. (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)
A memorial wall for Ukrainian civilians killed during the Russian invasion, Lviv, UKraine, April 24, 2022.

On Monday, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin made it clear that the U.S. has a broader goal in assisting Ukraine against the invasion by Russian forces. “We want to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can't do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine,” said Austin.

The secretary of defence’s words have generated a good deal of faux outrage and blustering from those who claim this represents some sort of change from the mission of seeing Ukraine preserve its nation against an illegal and brutal invasion. It’s not. This is that same goal, elevated

In 1987, historian Barbara Fields said this about of the importance of battles and tactics when discussing the American Civil War: “It’s not about soldiers except to the extent that weapons and soldiers at that crucial moment joined a discussion about something higher, about humanity, about human dignity, about human freedom.”

That’s where we are in Russian invasion of Ukraine. This is, as Fields said then, not about “battles and glory and carnage.” If that’s all there was to it, this would be a very ugly story, no matter which side we were on. For this story to mean something, for the cost of the war in both blood and money to be redeemed, requires a greater goal. The weakening of Russian power under Vladimir Putin might not have the same incalculable good as equality and freedom, but it is an almost unsullied good.

Decades ago, Putin turned his back on joining the family of nations and recreated Russia as an engine of destruction. He has used that engine in disrupting democracies and furthering authoritarian governments, not just in Russia, but around the world—including the United States. He’s used the Russian military to expand his own power by systematically attacking civilian populations in Georgia, Syria, Ukraine, and elsewhere. He’s turned his own nation into a crime-driven and criminal-obsessed parody of what it could be.

Reducing Russia’s ability to conduct more invasions like the one underway in Ukraine isn’t just a side note, it’s a noble goal. It’s a goal that elevates both the contributions we are making to this cause, and the suffering and sacrifice by the Ukrainian people.

Putin's tanks in search of more innocent civilians to slaughter in Ukraine.

Friday, April 29, 2022

Could Marjorie Taylor Greene's "Satan's Controlling" the Catholic Church Stance Break Up the GOP?


 
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-GA, at the U.S. Capitol.

In an interview with a far-right Roman Catholic pundit, conspiracy theorist and extremist white nationalist Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) discussed those church groups, such as Catholic Relief Services, who seek to help resettled undocumented immigrants and refugees as satanic.

She said, “What it is, is Satan’s controlling the church. The church is not doing its job, and it’s not adhering to the teachings of Christ, and it’s not adhering to what the word of God says we’re supposed to do and how we’re supposed to live.”

In many ways the success of the contemporary Republican Party depends on an Evangelical-Catholic political alliance against abortion rights and the sexual revolution. Evangelicals in Congress have been willing to vote six Catholics onto the Supreme Court for this reason. Greene’s vitriolic diatribe, however, raises the possibility that the QAnon white nationalists who are taking over the Republican Party are breaking with the Church over some of its social policies, which are often liberal or at least humanitarian.

She later said that foreign aid should be cut to countries from which refugees are fleeing to the US and that “If the bishops were reading the Bible and truly preaching the word of God to their flock and not covering up child sex abuse and pedophilia, loving one another would have the true meaning and not the perversion and the twisted lie that they’re making it to be.”

She had said that the Christian principle of “loving one another” should not involve surrendering to a “globalist agenda” to make “America become something that we are not supposed to be.”

I have thought about her diction here and I can’t make it mean anything other than “we Christian white people are supposed to love one another but that doesn’t mean we have to love brown or Black people, and certainly doesn’t mean we have to minister to non-white refugees. And if the Roman Catholic Church interprets Christianity as requiring charity to all, then it has itself become a tool of Satan.”

In other words, she views Christianity only through the lens of white nationalism.

But the (literal) demonization of Catholicism stands out in her remarks because it resonates with a long-term strand of Protestant white nationalism, as with the mid-19th century “Know-Nothing Movement,” a conspiratorial hate group that burned Catholic churches and attacked Catholic Americans.

Although Greene was brought up Catholic, she says she fell away from the church.

Being an army brat, I traveled around the world growing up, but in between postings we would spend time in Northern Virginia. I can’t remember now how it happened, but somebody once dragged me to a Baptist revival meeting when I was a kid and I was given a pamphlet about how the Pope was the antichrist and had 666 sewn into his mitre. Our branch of the Coles are fallen-away Catholics, but I remember being appalled. My generation had a positive impression of Pope John XXIII and the reforms of Vatican II. In fact, the latter helped inspire my BA thesis, the field work for which I conducted in Beirut, about the inter-religious dialogue it kicked off with Muslims.

The vicious anti-Roman Catholic sentiments expressed by Greene, as I said, evoke an ugly side of American history.

Three decades ago, historian Bryan Le Beau wrote in his address “Saving the West from the Pope”: Anti-Catholic Propaganda and the Settlement of the Mississippi River Valley,”

“Arthur M. Schlesinger, the elder, once told John Tracy Ellis, dean of the historians of American Catholicism, that he regarded prejudice against Roman Catholics to be “the deepest bias in the history of the American people.” By this, he did not intend to suggest that it was the most violent, though at times it certainly was; or that it was the most consistent, as it tended to wax and wane throughout American history; but rather, that the roots of anti-Catholicism lay buried in the depths of the American consciousness, bearing fruit over time across the American cultural landscape.”

On the East Coast from the 1820s forward, as German and Irish Catholics came to the country, the slogan of “no popery” was raised and riots were staged against the latter. In 1844 St. Michael’s Catholic Church in Philadelphia was burned and 20 people were killed. Between 1800 and 1840 a million Roman Catholics immigrated. (My paternal ancestor Georg Kohl [Anglicized as Cole] arrived in 1830, so he and his family would have known that atmosphere.) A Protestant riot greeted papal nuncio Archbishop Gaetano Bedini when he came to Cincinnati in 1853, Le Beau reminds us.

Catholic associations that had begun in Austria and France were attacked as threats to Republican liberties, since, it was alleged, the Church supported royal absolutism and opposed the idea of a Republic with the sort of individual rights adumbrated in the US constitution. Although it is true that the 19th-century Church profoundly disliked the French Revolution and its ideals, and much preferred monarchies that would back Catholicism, it isn’t the case that American Catholics were seditious. Some did object to Protestant hegemony, especially in public schools, and one man burned some King James Version Bibles, which made a bad impression.

It is ironic that in the 19th century Catholic Americans were attacked for being too conservative, and now Greene is attacking them for being too liberal. I pointed out some time ago that some right-wing Catholics make a big deal of their faith but completely ignore or even oppose the contemporary church’s social teachings.

The 19th century hate groups, however, did associate Catholics with immigration and saw a danger that they would convert the other immigrants, so that Nativist concern is common to our moment and the 1840s.

If Greene’s anti-Catholic sentiment becomes widespread in today’s GOP, it could be fatal to the party, since of the 72 million Catholic Americans, about half now vote Republican.

"Ohmigod, it's a Catholic!  That means Satan is here pulling the strings!"

Thursday, April 28, 2022

FUNNY AND SCARY: Great moments in the American presidency: 'They were going to do fruit'

 US President Donald Trump speaks during a retreat with Republican lawmakers at Camp David in Thurmont, Maryland, January 6, 2018. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

"Bad: throwing fruit at me. Good: attacking the U.S. Capitol, resulting in deaths. It's all in my new book, 'Very Dangerous Stuff'."

Your day probably hasn't been weird enough, so let's fix that right now with a quote from an ex-President of These United States.

"I wanted to have people be ready because we were put on alert that they were going to do fruit," said Donald J. Trump, previously in charge of this nation's nuclear arsenal.

As reported by The Daily Beast, this and many other important fruit-related quotes have now surfaced thanks to an October deposition just now being filed in the civil lawsuit against Trump brought by Trump Tower protesters who were assaulted by Trump's private security force back in 2015. Lawyers for those protesters were probing Trump's history of encouraging violence against protesters in general, including his public request to a crowd at one of his 2016 rallies that "If you see someone getting ready to throw a tomato, just knock the crap out of them, would you?"

This led the man who could once issue orders to nuclear submarines, perhaps orders demanding that they pull up to a seaside McDonalds and order him some fries, to explain that he was justified in asking the crowd to "knock the crap" out of anyone who might try to throw fruit because his campaign had learned somebody might possibly be planning to throw fruit and the fruit-throwing could have been "very dangerous."

Via The Daily Beast, then, are some of the fruit-related highlights of Trump's testimony:

"You get hit with fruit, it's—no, it’s very violent stuff. We were on alert for that."

Tomatoes are: "very dangerous stuff."

"You can get killed with those things."

"Some fruit is a lot worse than—tomatoes are bad, by the way. But it’s very dangerous. No, I wanted them to watch. They were on alert. I remember that specific event because everybody was on alert. They were going to hit, they were going to hit hard."

"You can be killed if that happens."

The specific fruits Trump enumerated as "dangerous stuff" consist of "pineapples, tomatoes, bananas, stuff like that." While the threat of pineapples is obvious, there remain few to no incidents of American politicians being pelted by pineapples, because they are simply too heavy to throw very far. Bananas could potentially be dangerous because, being of a boomerang-like shape, a skilled thrower could potentially throw a banana that would approach from an unexpected direction, foiling even the most skilled of Secret Service agents and resulting in a potential Dear Leader being poked somewhat annoyingly by one of the banana's two somewhat pointy ends.

As for the "very dangerous," "very violent," and "you can be killed if that happens" nature of a thrown tomato, the dangers are a bit less clear. Is it possible the tomato juice could have combined with Trump's velvety facial make-up to produce some sort of napalm-like solution? Is there a way for tomatoes and other thrown fruits to combine to produce, say, thermite?

These mysteries have not been cleared up, no doubt because government agents demanded that those explanations be deleted from deposition tapes lest terrorists from fruit-rich nations discover them.

Or, possibly, Trump had a dream about somebody pelting him with fruit onstage and was so terrified of such humiliation that the next day he ordered an entire rally crowd of chanting weirdos to "knock the crap" out of anyone in the building who was suspected of having fruit.

I mean, you could probably poke an eye out if you threw a chicken wing at someone—but Trump didn't request similar assaults on those holding meat. Very suspicious if you ask me.

And how did the Trump campaign make it through such a trying time without any announcement, ever, declaring that from now on Jared Kushner was going to be put in charge of Fruit and Fruit Trajectories? How are we supposed to believe that Trump’s inner circle was concerned about fruit attacks if Kushner was tasked with authoring not even one Google-researched report on fruit dangers?

Anyhoo, this has been your regular reminder that the Republican Party put Donald Freaking Trump in a position of mind-boggling power on purpose, knowing full well his positions and histories and having many, many videotapes, some of them pornographic, on hand as documentation. And a bunch of preachers came to lay hands on him, and a bunch of top intelligence analysts tried to wedge a bit of vital knowledge into his head by giving him pretty pictures to look at when it became clear he wasn't going to read intelligence briefings that weren't pretty-picture based, and a bunch of Republican lawmakers stepped forward one by one to declare that Donald Trump was the most brilliant tax-dodging rapist they had ever met even after a lifetime of sucking up to other tax-dodging rapists, and none of it stuck and the man who wanted to dissolve NATO and proposed bombing a hurricane and thought that he and he alone had the chops to stand up to world dictators and bravely do, er, whatever they asked him to do ...

... left office only after violence and is now carrying on a quiet life of explaining which fruits are dangerous (spoiler: all of them) and what his crack security team or just random Trump devotees ought to be able to do to someone Suspected Of Holding Fruit.

Enjoy the rest of your day, America. This is not, by any means, the last you will be hearing about this.

"Fruit is very scary.  It can kill you.  Especially tomatoes.  If you see someone getting ready to throw a tomato, just knock the crap out of them, would you?"

Wednesday, April 27, 2022

Poll: 69 Percent of Adults Support Legalizing Marijuana, Most Say It’s Less Harmful Than Alcohol

 

Marijuana, here we come...

NORML

April 25, 2022

Contact:
media@norml.org

readersupportednews.org

Washington, DC: A super-majority of Americans say that the use of marijuana should be made legal for adults, and most respondents agree that it is less harmful to health than drinking alcohol, according to national survey data compiled by the market research firm SSRS.

Sixty-nine percent of respondents – including 78 percent of Democrats, 74 percent of Independents, and 54 percent of Republicans – support legalization. When asked whether cannabis ought to be permitted for therapeutic purposes, support rises to 92 percent.

Commenting on the polling data, NORML’s Deputy Director Paul Armentano said: “Voters support legalizing marijuana regardless of political party affiliation. At a time when national politics remain acutely polarized, elected officials ought to come together in a bipartisan manner to repeal the failed policy of cannabis prohibition. It is one of the few policy reforms that voters on the right and on the left can all agree upon.”

Fifty-eight percent of respondents, including 71 percent of millennials, said that “alcohol is more harmful to a person’s health than marijuana.” Only four percent of respondents perceive marijuana to be more harmful. Prior surveys have similarly reported that most Americans say that cannabis is far less harmful than either alcohol or tobacco.

Sixty-five percent of respondents, including 72 percent of ‘Baby Boomers,’ acknowledge having tried cannabis at least once during their lifetime. That percentage is significantly higher than has been reported in other national surveys. Members of ‘Gen Z’ and the ‘Silent Generation’ are least likely to report having ever used cannabis.

The poll possesses a margin of error of +/– 3.5 percentage points.

The United States of Weed.

NORML advocates for changes in public policy so that the responsible possession and use of marijuana by adults is no longer subject to criminal penalties. NORML further advocates for a regulated commercial cannabis market so that activities involving the for-profit production and retail sale of cannabis and cannabis products are safe, transparent, consumer-friendly, and are subject to state and/or local licensure. Finally, NORML advocates for additional changes in legal and regulatory policies so that those who use marijuana responsibly no longer face either social stigma or workplace discrimination, and so that those with past criminal records for marijuana-related violations have the opportunity to have their records automatically expunged.

Find out more at norml.org and read our Fact Sheets on the most common misconceptions and myths regarding reform efforts around the country

Tuesday, April 26, 2022

PENNYFARTHING: Trump brags that he told NATO allies he might not defend them against Russia

TOPSHOT - (From L) US First Lady Melania Trump, US President Donald Trump, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Emmanuel Macron and French President's wife Brigitte Macron react as Russian President Vladimir Putin (front C) arrives to attend a ceremony at the Arc de Triomphe in Paris on November 11, 2018 as part of commemorations marking the 100th anniversary of the 11 November 1918 armistice, ending World War I. (Photo by BENOIT TESSIER / POOL / AFP)        (Photo credit should read BENOIT TESSIER/AFP/Getty Images) 
World leaders watch as Putin arrives for ceremony in Paris.

I can’t say for certain that Vladimir Putin has kompromat on Donald Trump. It seems just as likely that Putin feeds him McRibs and Filet-O-Fishes like a SeaWorld dolphin whenever they visit, and along with repeatedly telling Trump how beautiful Melania’s husband is, that’s enough to make the big ocher arschloch a de facto Russian agent.

For a while we all fixated on the alleged pee tape, as if that was the smoking gun that would finally reveal Trump’s perfidy to the world. Well, we have something worse than the pee tape—it’s the record of everything that happened at the 2018 NATO summit in Brussels, where Trump micturated upon the post-World War II security apparatus like the reincarnation of Hitler’s beloved German shepherd, Stephen Miller. (Hitler was way into the occult. He knew what was coming.)

We knew all about Trump’s serial attempts to undermine NATO, of course. In 2016, while he was campaigning to purple-nurple the tender areola of our eternal, numinous souls, he set off waves of alarm in Europe and some of the less benighted regions of the U.S. when he suggested he might not come to the defense of other NATO countries if they were attacked by—oh, I don’t know, let’s just pull an example out of thin air—Russia or something. He couched his criticism in bullshit, claiming other NATO countries weren’t making their “payments” (NATO countries don’t make payments, of course), but even if he was sending a message to other NATO members, he was sending a much stronger message to Vladimir Putin, who somehow got the idea over the past several years that the West was divided and lacked the resolve to fight creeping authoritarianism.

Of course, Trump’s comments in 2016 should have been immediately disqualifying. You can’t have the leader of the free world wavering on one of the United States’ most sacred and vital commitments. That kind of loose talk makes (and made) Russian aggression far more likely—and now here we are. Yet as we all know, Trump’s incandescent stink lines blanched the Oval Office wallpaper for four woeful years before someone with a firmer grasp of history thankfully replaced him. But not before Trump spent those four years undermining our alliances and—most alarmingly—our most important military alliance. 

And now, as if we hadn’t already made this mole, Trump has blurted out what we’d all pretty much assumed. He threw acid on the foundations of our post-World War II Pax Americana while implausibly claiming he was trying to make the alliance stronger:

Appearing at an event held by the Heritage Foundation in Florida, Trump claimed that he told fellow NATO leaders that he might not abide by NATO’s Article 5 collective-defense clause if those countries didn’t pay more for the alliance.

A fellow leader “said, ‘Does that mean that you won’t protect us in case — if we don’t pay, you won’t protect us from Russia’ — was the Soviet Union, but now Russia,” Trump said. “I said, ‘That’s exactly what it means.’”

Now, the idea that NATO countries somehow have “dues”—and that several of them were in arrears—has been repeatedly debunked. But once an idea has settled into Trump’s head, it’s almost impossible to dislodge it without a heavy crowbar and an Adderall suppository the size of a Learjet battery. And so Russia’s Hero of Helsinki plowed full steam ahead. 

Of course, this was hardly the only time Trump played coy when it came to fulfilling our NATO commitments.

Trump has previously danced around whether he would commit to Article 5, including conspicuously declining to endorse it in May 2017. The following month, he did endorse it. But by the summer of 2018, he was again calling that into question, suggesting it might not be worthwhile for NATO countries to commit to defending “tiny” Montenegro, which was at the time a new member.

Again, it’s super shocking that Putin thought the West couldn’t mount a unified response to his invasion of Ukraine. Where did he ever get that idea, I wonder?

Pretty much everything Trump did as president—from pulling out of Syria (while betraying our Kurdish allies in the process) to (oh, this seems significant!) seriously mulling a complete U.S. withdrawal from NATO—seemed specially designed to palpate Putin’s pud. 

So how is this guy still in the 2024 conversation? Is it just because the media love a horse race? Well, what if one of the horses carries a horseman of the apocalypse? Here come War, Famine, Death, and—bringing up the rear on the syphilitic pinto—Lunch Meat Sweats!

Do your job, media. Do the job you were supposed to do in 2016 before the unthinkable happened. Donald Trump is a Russian asset and a clear and present danger to liberal democracy. The evidence is everywhere. Stop tiptoeing around it and do your jobs!


You can’t have the leader of the free world wavering on one of the United States’ most sacred and vital commitments. That kind of loose talk by  Donald Trump made Russian aggression far more likely—and now here we are.

Monday, April 25, 2022

The Rich Haven't Just Gotten Richer - They've Also Gotten a Lot More Selfish

 The Rich Haven't Just Gotten Richer - They've Also Gotten a Lot More Selfish 

Elon Musk and Chris Anderson, the head of TED, during an interview in Vancouver, Canada, on 14 April. (photo: Stacie Mcchesney/TED/AFP/Getty Images)

US billionaires now own a combined $4.7tn, according to a new analysis – but to Elon Musk, since he doesn’t have a yacht or own a home, that’s totally OK

Us billionaires now own $4.7tn –but that’s OK, says Elon Musk.

“We’re all in this together.” Remember that corny catchphrase from the early days of the pandemic? Remember when there was a smidgen of hope that the collective trauma the world was facing would reshape people’s priorities and the pandemic could be a portal to a better, fairer society?

Well, two years on, precisely none of that has happened. People clapped for essential workers for a bit but didn’t stop exploiting them. Meanwhile it’s boom time for billionaires, who saw their already obscene wealth grow exponentially during the pandemic. 

A new analysis released by Oxfam America on Monday, to mark tax day in the US, found US billionaires now own a combined $4.7tn in wealth. Much of this goes untaxed; last year ProPublica analyzed leaked tax returns and found the 25 richest people in the US paid a true tax rate of just 3.4% from 2014 to 2018. The average taxpayer, meanwhile, pays a true tax rate of 13%. 

It wasn’t always like this. As Oxfam notes, it really wasn’t that long ago that the ultra-wealthy paid their fair share in tax; during the second world war, the federal income tax rate peaked at 94% and was still 70% three decades later. The rich haven’t just gotten richer, they’ve also gotten a lot more selfish.

While billionaires have seen their bank accounts balloon and corporations are raking in record profits, ordinary people are hurting from decades-high inflation. By some accounts, the inequality gap in the US is worse now than it was in France in the 1780s just before the French Revolution. 

It’s easy to get angry about all this, but you might want to wait a moment before jumping to the seemingly obvious conclusion that gross inequality is bad and we really ought to do something about it. You see, in a recent (embarrassingly fawning) interview with Chris Anderson, the head of Ted, Elon Musk helpfully billionaire-splained why it’s actually OK for a handful of people to hoard obscene amounts of wealth.

“There are many people out there who can’t stand this world of billionaires,” Anderson said to Musk in the interview. “Like, they are hugely offended by the notion that an individual can have the same wealth as, say, a billion or more of the world’s poorest people.”

Only an idiot would be offended by something like that, Musk essentially replied. “I think there’s some axiomatic flaws that are leading them to that conclusion,” he told Anderson. “For sure, it would be very problematic if I was consuming, you know, billions of dollars a year in personal consumption. But that is not the case. In fact, I don’t even own a home right now. I’m literally staying at friends’ places … I don’t have a yacht, I really don’t take vacations. It’s not as though my personal consumption is high.”

Musk, who is worth almost $300bn, did concede that the one exception to his incredibly ascetic lifestyle is his $70m private jet, but said its use was justified because it gives him more hours to work. It’s essentially in the public good.

So there you go. Put down your pitchforks everyone! Stop sharpening your guillotines! Anyone getting angry about inequality simply needs to examine their “axiomatic flaws”. It’s perfectly OK that the world’s billionaires have more wealth than 60% of the world’s population combined, as long as they buy private jets instead of yachts and couchsurf at their mate’s mansion instead of paying property tax on their own house. Really glad Musk cleared that up for us all.

“There are many people out there who can’t stand this world of billionaires.”

Sunday, April 24, 2022

Here's why a Michigan State senator's fiery response to GOP 'groomer' smears went viral

ScreenShot2022-04-20at1.14.20PM.png

Congressional Democrats had apparently decided to do zip in the face of Republican attacks that they are nothing but a den of pedophiles "grooming" children for sexual abuse.

After GOP representative and MAGA enthusiast Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia called Democrats the "party of pedophiles," a member of the House Democratic leadership offered that the best response was effectively no response.

"I don’t even really pay attention to anything she says because she has nothing rational to say," Rep. Jeffries told VICE News reporter Cameron Joseph last week. “We’re focused right now on getting things done for everyday Americans: lowering costs, addressing gas prices, and inflation. They can continue to peddle lies and conspiracy theories,” Jeffries added.

It's kitchen table issues, stupid. That has been the Democratic mantra for years, and it worked spectacularly in 2018 when Donald Trump was a one-man wrecking ball tearing down the GOP on a daily basis from within the White House. Trump was a walking, talking human advertisement for why Americans should reevaluate their political priorities and general sense of urgency.

Fortunately, Trump remains a factor today, but his toxicity isn't quite as omnipresent for Americans as it was when he occupied the Oval Office. That means Democrats don't have the luxury now of focusing exclusively on kitchen table issues while Trump single-handedly dooms Republicans at the polls the way he did in 2018. Instead, Democrats must accomplish two things at once: telling people what they stand for while also indicting the GOP.

That's where Michigan state Sen. Mallory McMorrow's impassioned rebuttal of GOP smears that she is grooming and sexualizing kindergartners comes in. A Republican colleague, Sen. Lana Theis, made the accusation in a fundraising email after McMorrow and two other Democrats walked out of an invocation Theis delivered on the Senate floor in which she claimed children were "under attack" from "forces."

To put it mildly, McMorrow was on fire when she delivered a response that was anything but a bland recitation of Democratic work on pocketbook issues.

McMorrow stated who she is and what she stands for:

"I am a straight, white, Christian, married, suburban mom. I want my daughter to know that she is loved, supported, and seen for whoever she becomes. I want her to be curious, empathetic, and kind. ... I want every child in this state to feel seen, heard, and supported, not marginalized and targeted because they are not straight white and Christian.

She named the trick Republicans are trying to play on voters:

People who are different are not the reason that our roads are in bad shape after decades of disinvestment or that health care costs are too high or that teachers are leaving the profession. ... We cannot let hateful people tell you otherwise to scapegoat and deflect from the fact that they are not doing anything to fix the real issues that impact people's lives.

She enlisted voters in her righteous cause:

Each and every single one of us bears responsibility for writing the next chapter of history. Each and every single one of us decides what happens next and how we respond to history and the world around us. ... And I know that hate will only win, if people like me stand by, let it happen.

The nearly five-minute speech certainly qualifies as textbook, but frankly, it was a little piece of genius, which is why the YouTube video of it currently has more than 13.7 million views.

Sen. McMorrow told The Washington Post that the widespread interest in her speech “sends a really clear message" that Democrats have to "stand up and we can’t be afraid of going in on social issues."

“We have to talk about hate and identify it and say it’s ugly and disgusting and what it means as a deflection of other issues,” she added.

Amen.

Congressional Democrats absolutely must walk and chew gum this election season: highlighting their successes while calling out the morally bankrupt duplicity of Republicans—who have no plan whatsoever to help Americans weather inflation along with the overall uncertainty of the times in which we live. Doing both in tandem is not only politically smart, it’s the right thing to do, and voters will reward Democrats who follow McMorrow’s lead.

We need to remember the fighting spirit of Democrats like RBG.

Saturday, April 23, 2022

GARRISON KEILLOR: The World's Problems Solved in One Word: WOMEN

The Country’s Problems Solved in 800 Words Author and radio host Garrison Keillor. (photo: MPR)

I was in Minnesota for a while in April but weather systems can’t read a calendar and they were delivering more of November, which is satisfying to us Minnesotans. We are great complainers. God made children short so they wouldn’t have far to fall and God put us in Minnesota because joyfulness is absolutely not our thing, Easter is a holiday we dread, the enforced jubilation, the trumpets in the choir loft, and when you wake up Easter morning and a cold rain is falling it’s very very satisfying.

I went to Minnesota alone and it was interesting discover that without my wife, I don’t know where things are or how to get the washer to work when it stops in mid-cycle and won’t resume. I can’t make sense of the instruction manual so I call her back in New York and she tells me to press START and hold it in and I do and the washer resumes. It’s downright embarrassing — my dad did his own auto repair and carpentry and I can’t operate an automatic washer. Thank goodness I still have a sense of shame.

Men are lonely hunters and herdsmen and I turned down dinner invitations because I struggle in social situations. I invited three women friends, strangers to each other, to lunch Saturday and they conversed easily among themselves and I sat at the end of the table, a silent observer. I thought to myself, “Their gender can get along fine without mine, and what will we do when they discover it?”

This was never so clear as in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, watching the hunters Graham, Hawley, Cruz, Cornyn, Cotton, go after Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who sat with calm and patient dignity and said, “Thank you, Senator” to each one and tried to answer their spitballs with reasoned comment. My gender looked stupid and craven on national TV that week and I cannot get that out of my mind, listening to elderly juveniles harass the teacher.

It was enough to make me wonder if men in public office should be required to wear a defibrillator that will shock them when they tell a fib, a little kick in the chest that says, “Shape up or ship out.”

Maybe warfare is the result of sheer stupidity, men needing to find something to do with themselves. The uniforms are wonderful, precision marching is satisfying, but there needs to be a larger purpose and why not go find men in another uniform and shoot them? My Minnesota friends of Viking heritage lead peaceful lives for the most part but in the fall they feel an overwhelming urge to get in a longboat and go burn a village and capture all the women and they satisfy the urge by going to a football game and getting good and drunk and then they’re good again.

The Great War of 1918 was the dumbest war that ever was and it was caused in part by the fact that armies had so much great new stuff they were desperate to use — tanks, planes, armored ships, bigger artillery — and the rulers and prime ministers strove to find an excuse to let them go to it and men marched off to war with bounding enthusiasm and about ten million soldiers died and twelve million civilians in a conflict that accomplished nothing except to lay the groundwork for the War of 1939.

Our institutions are busy pursuing diversity and inclusivity but it’s mostly cosmetic and what we need is detestosteronation of politics. The current Congress is gridlocked and I suggest we give them all a two-year sabbatical and elect a new one — we hope, with a female majority — and take a break from stupidity. Some things need to happen in America. Climate change must be addressed. A system of excellent affordable health care so that people, regardless of race or class, can take advantage of the advances in medical science. Child support and capable public education that guarantees every child a chance in life. Decent care for mentally ill, who now wind up homeless or in prison or in hopeless squalor. And fair taxation to pay for it.

All this can be done in two years if we elect representatives who have the caregiver gene — in other words, women — and then in two years the clown show can return and maybe we can declare war on Canada. Why not? Are you afraid of Canadians? Montreal must fall. Send the dogs to lift a leg on Winnipeg. Use judo on Trudeau. Improve Vancouver with stain remover. Nuts to the North!

"I don't care if it's this big, Senator Cruz.  You are a coward, you are a bully, and you are despicable."