Trump rally. (photo: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
01 November 19
readersupportednews.org
Of course a renegade president* should be heckled at a baseball game. It's the least we can do.never have seen a politician yet who wasn't booed if he or she showed up at the ballpark. But, I have to admit, the reception given to El Caudillo del Mar-a-Lago at the World Series on Monday night in Washington, D.C., was a remarkable exercise of the First Amendment right to deliver the ol' bazoo. And the "Lock him up!" chant was a sauce for the goose moment to end all sauce for the goose moments.
Nobody who sat through the orgy of unbridled hate
in Cleveland in 2016 could see it as anything but a comeuppance richly
deserved.
But the Civility Police never sleep. By Monday morning, a panel convened on Morning Joe was deploring the whole scene, and Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Delaware had found something to meep about on CNN.
"I have a hard time with the idea of a crowd on a globally televised sporting event chanting 'lock him up' about our President. I frankly think the office of the President deserves respect, even when the actions of our President at times don't," Coons told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." He continued: "I certainly hope that we won't hear 'lock him up' chants at Democratic rallies or at our convention. I think that's one of the most regrettable, even at times despicable, actions by candidate Trump when he was running for president in 2016."
That was the election that Going Low won and Going High lost.
This was 12 hours after he greeted Sunday morning by
treating some heroic work by the U.S. military—and by the Kurdish forces
he'd sold out a week earlier—as though those troops were his own
personal button men. For that, I would argue, he at least deserved the
same reception at the ballpark as a shortstop does when he boots three
easy grounders in an inning, or as a manager does who leaves a reliever
in one pitch too many. And, as for "Lock him up," well, since he still
uses the original chant as a highlight at every stop in his traveling
wankfests, I'd say it's well inbounds at least until the country is rid
of him and the posse of fools he brought to the game with him.
But Coons's argument is one I've heard all too often
in my lifetime, very often as a dodge for inexcusable conduct and
outright crimes. "Respect for the office" is a self-governing citizen's
sin of idolatry. In that context, the Presidency is a graven image. Why
should I respect the office of the president when the occupant so
clearly doesn't? Why should I respect the office of the president when
it serves as a clubhouse for cheap crooks and mountebanks? Guns don't
kill people, we hear after every mass shooting, only people kill people.
So, The Presidency doesn't commit crimes, only presidents do?
In my lifetime alone, from The Office of the
Presidency, I have seen mass murder from the skies, torture, the
overthrow of governments, burglaries and the cover-up of same, the
selling of missiles to a terrorist state and the cover-up of same, the
arming of distant murderers, and that was all before this president*
even got there—and even he, with his exceedingly dim wits, saw the
potential for high crimes that long had become inherent in the office.
So, no, I don't Respect The Office any more (or less)
than I respect the Congress or the federal judiciary or the Department
of Agriculture, for all that. Right now, all over the world, from
Lebanon to Chile, hundreds of thousands of people are in the streets
demanding a voice in their governments. Capital cities are being shut
down. And we're all supposed to be alarmed that a renegade president*
got heckled at a baseball game? For a country founded through acts of
unruly dissent, that's as mild as milk.
No comments:
Post a Comment