Like it or not, Monsanto’s genetically modified sweet corn
will soon be arriving on grocery store shelves of the world’s largest
retailer, Walmart Stores, Inc., and will not be labeled as such. Despite
an onslaught of consumer pressure, the company confirmed late last week with the Chicago Tribune that it has no objection to selling the new crop of Monsanto’s genetically modified (GE) sweet corn.
Other retailers, including the grocery chains Safeway and
Kroger, have not responded on the issue, however Whole Foods, Trader
Joes and General Mills have all vowed to not carry or use the GE sweet
corn. As the country’s largest grocery retailer, Walmart sells $129
billion worth of food a year, giving it unmatched power in shaping the
food supply chain.
The GE sweet corn is the first consumer product developed by Monsanto that will go straight from the farm to the consumer’s plate, rather than first being processed into animal feed, sugars, oils, fibers and other ingredients found in a wide variety of conventional food. It is engineered to be resistant to Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, the active ingredient of which is glyphosate. The product is also designed to produce a Bt toxin that will kill insects that feed on the plant. Monsanto’s new sweet corn is being harvested in the Midwest, Northwest, Southeast and Texas.
The GE sweet corn is the first consumer product developed by Monsanto that will go straight from the farm to the consumer’s plate, rather than first being processed into animal feed, sugars, oils, fibers and other ingredients found in a wide variety of conventional food. It is engineered to be resistant to Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, the active ingredient of which is glyphosate. The product is also designed to produce a Bt toxin that will kill insects that feed on the plant. Monsanto’s new sweet corn is being harvested in the Midwest, Northwest, Southeast and Texas.
“After closely looking at both sides of the debate and
collaborating with a number of respected food safety experts, we see no
scientifically validated safety reasons to implement restrictions on
this product,” Walmart officials told the Tribune.
However, there has been growing concern over the increasing prevalence of insect resistance to Bt crops. Earlier this year,
a group of prominent entomologists sent a letter to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) urging caution in the agency’s
approach to Bt crops. Additionally, in April researchers at Portland
State University found that GE corn modified to express Bt negatively impacts
beneficial soil life. Their results reveal a decreased presence of
beneficial mycorrhizal fungi, which are important for nutrient and water
uptake, in the roots of Bt corn when compared to non-Bt corn. Experts
have recently warned EPA that “refugees” of non-GE crops should be increased due to the growing threat of insect resistance to Bt corn.
Furthermore, GE crops present a unique risk to organic
growers. Wind-pollinated and bee-pollinated crops, such as corn and
alfalfa, have higher risks of cross pollination between GE crops and
unmodified varieties. Pollen from GE crops can potentially drift and
wreak havoc on both the surrounding ecosystem and for organic and non-GE
farms. If organic farmers’ crops become polluted with GE pollen, they
may be subject to loss of their organic certification and financial
losses. Unfortunately, the burden to protect against genetic drift falls
on organic farmers and conventional farmers who do not use GE products.
Labeling GE products is a crucial way to identify products containing GE ingredients in an effort to sway consumer demand. The European Union, Japan, Australia, Brazil, Russia and China, require labeling for GE foods. Earlier this year, the German corporation BASF announced that it would stop developing genetically engineered products targeting the European market, in part due to low consumer demand. Given that 93 percent of Americans support mandatory labeling of genetically engineered (GE) foods, Beyond Pesticides believes that we can have the same impact here as in Europe. Enough signatures have been collected to put on the California ballot Prop 37—Genetically Engineered Foods. Mandatory Labeling. Initiative Statute—to require labeling of food produced with GE ingredients, and the industry is now fighting back with a well-funded campaign campaign. More information on the campaign for PROP 37 can be found at the California Right-to-Know website.
Labeling GE products is a crucial way to identify products containing GE ingredients in an effort to sway consumer demand. The European Union, Japan, Australia, Brazil, Russia and China, require labeling for GE foods. Earlier this year, the German corporation BASF announced that it would stop developing genetically engineered products targeting the European market, in part due to low consumer demand. Given that 93 percent of Americans support mandatory labeling of genetically engineered (GE) foods, Beyond Pesticides believes that we can have the same impact here as in Europe. Enough signatures have been collected to put on the California ballot Prop 37—Genetically Engineered Foods. Mandatory Labeling. Initiative Statute—to require labeling of food produced with GE ingredients, and the industry is now fighting back with a well-funded campaign campaign. More information on the campaign for PROP 37 can be found at the California Right-to-Know website.
However, the only sure-fire way you can avoid the
genetically modified food is to buy and support organic. Genetically
modified crops are not permitted in organic food production. Researchers
are continuing to discover the environmental and health benefits of
eating and growing organic food.
No comments:
Post a Comment