Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Thursday, March 31, 2022

PENNYFARTHING RETURNS: Russian state TV: 'It's time for us ... to again help our partner Trump to become president'

Wait a tick! Didn’t Vladimir Putin deny all that election interference folderol? And didn’t our fake president eagerly take his side? Now Russia is just going to admit to the world that they were both lying all along?

Things are not going well for Li’l Vlad in Ukraine. I’ve seen Walmart Black Friday stampedes that were better organized. And his generals are dying faster than Dick Cheney’s cavalcade of gently used baboon hearts. So it stands to reason that the feckless flacks at Russian state TV are starting to lose their shit over Vlad and Sergei’s Bogus Journey.

In fact, they’ve gotten so desperate, they want their sleeper agent back in the White House, tout de suite.

According to Julia Davis, a Daily Beast columnist and tireless monitor of Russian media, TV host Evgeny Popov is begging us Yanks to reinstall Putie’s puppet before it’s too late.

POPOV: “It’s time for us, for our people to call on the people of the United States to change the regime in the U.S. … and to again help our partner Trump to become president.”

Oh, and Popov isn’t just some random asshole. He’s an extremely important and influential asshole:

Of course, this isn’t the first time Putin’s official propagandists have pined for the return of their sudoriferous smegma golem. In her Monday column, Davis noted how much Russia was already missing Trump last year: 

Back in 2021, during his TV show The Evening With Vladimir Soloviev, the host pined for the return of his favorite American president: “Things were so good under Trump... Listen to Trumpushka.” After playing a clip of Trump’s interview with Sean Hannity, wherein the former president dismissed the idea of helping Ukraine fight off Russian aggression, Soloviev sighed: “[He is] so sorely missed.” Between the war in Ukraine, which is likely to become a prolonged struggle, and the crushing U.S. sanctions, only one candidate shows the promise of potentially erasing the consequences of Russian aggression and dramatically limiting America’s support for Ukraine. Clutching to these prospects, the Kremlin’s mouthpieces are openly signaling Russia’s intent to involve themselves in yet another U.S. election.

Isn’t it weird that the guy who was tougher on Russia than anyone in the history of the universe is so sorely missed by the very people whose feet he was holding to the fire? Why would they ever want that ferocious adversary back in power? It doesn’t make any sense!

Unless, you know, they’re convinced the ocher abomination would step aside while Putin curb-stomped former Soviet republics to his heart’s content. Who knows, really? Other than anyone whose brain is still connected to their ears, that is.

Wednesday, March 30, 2022

Ukraine update: Trump again boosts Putin, calling the war a 'great negotiation' that went wrong

We still don't know what the two talked about during their private one-on-one meeting, and likely never will, but Putie seems pleased.

Donald Trump continues to heap praise on the world's most notorious authoritarians. During a Saturday rally for his slobbering acolytes, Trump called China's leader “smart” for ruling over his country "with an iron fist," praised North Korea's murderous dictator as "tough," but of course spent most of his time waffling between praise for Russian kleptocrat Vladimir Putin and halfhearted condemnations of Putin's invasion.

Mostly, however, Trump once again proved why he was the most brazenly incompetent, ignorant, and dull-minded person ever thrown into the Oval Office. To Donald Trump, deciding to murder tens of thousands for the sake of annexing a country is no different from any other botched business deal. Trump, who embodies narcissism down to every last clinical detail, still appears unable to grasp even the most catastrophic of world events in any capacity except as they relate to his own ambitions or goals.

There are a great many Americans who can listen to this weird, nonsensical rambling without getting the urge to shove screwdrivers in both ears, which says more about the current state of America than historians will ever be able to. The man is an incompetent, sociopathic ass.

Yes, Putin is "smart," says Donald Trump, having already explained to us that his definition of "smart" is when a person disregards all law and morality rule over others or just kills them outright. And "that's a hell of a way to negotiate," putting "200,000 troops on the border."

It was "a big mistake, but it looked like a great negotiation." But it "didn't work out too well for him."

It's not often that Trump can still muster anything but word salad in his rally speeches, but an extended riff comparing a murderous war of conquest as a "great negotiation" that was flawed only because it "didn't work out too well" does manage to be quite emphatically worse.

A business deal. Leveling Ukrainian cities is, to the man who himself tried to join the dictators of the world with a violent coup of his own, just a business deal.

It should go without saying at this point, but we're going to say it anyway: Anyone who so much as remains in the Republican Party as a voter, anywhere in America, is in league with this walking horror show. The extortion, the coup attempt, the eagerness to lie and mislead and harm for personal benefit, the mocking of pandemic deaths and of international war—all of it. The fascist party can no longer keep government running, much less respond to a worldwide crisis, but the contempt for basic human decency is the most defining.

Trump has tried mightily to distance himself from his past support for Putin, now that Putin has launched an all-out war to attempt to boost his own domestic glory, but he just cannot stomach doing it for long. This clip shows why; to him, large-scale, industrialized murder is merely another negotiation, one that he can only judge based on whether the murder is proving effective or whether it "didn't work out." It's the same reason he was glued to his television set during the Jan. 6 violence, refusing to take action; in his own head, there was no action he should take until his television set told him who was most likely to win.


Pitchfork Putin and his obedient, obeisant wife, Donaldo, subserviently standing by her man.

Tuesday, March 29, 2022

Ukraine update: Stink, stank, stunk. The Russian military has always been awful

A youth sits on the top of a hill watching dark smoke and flames rising from a fire following an air strike in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv, on March 26, 2022. - At least five people wounded in two strikes on Lviv, the regional governor said, in a rare attack on a city that has escaped serious fighting since Russian troops invaded last month. (Photo by Aleksey Filippov / AFP) (Photo by ALEKSEY FILIPPOV/AFP via Getty Images)
A girl watches smoke rise from the site of a missile strike in Lviv. March 26, 2022.

In 1962, Barbara Tuchman wrote the Pulitzer Prize-winning book, The Guns of August. The book tells the story of the first weeks of World War I, and in particular how assumptions and alliances that were supposed to make sure that such a war could not happen, turned into a house of cards that guaranteed a continent-spanning catastrophe.

The fifth chapter of that classic text is called “The Russian Steam Roller,” and it focuses on the assumptions that Europe made about the key role Russia would play in preventing, or ending, any war. “The Russian colossus exercised a spell upon Europe,” wrote Tuchman. The perception of Russia’s size and might gave the French reassurance that the Germans would not dare to attack them. And perversely made the Germans anxious to attack quickly and conquer France before that “steam roller” could sweep them from the east.

“Although the defects of the Russian army were notorious, although the Russian winter, not the Russian army had turned back Napoleon from Moscow, although it had been defeated on its own soil by the French and British in Crimea, although the Turks in 1877 had outfought it at the siege of Plevna, although the Japanese had outfought it in Manchuria, a myth of its invincibility prevailed. The savage cavalry charge of yelling Cossacks was such a fixture in European minds that newspaper artists in August 1914, were able to draw it in stirring detail without having been within a thousand miles of the Russian front.”

Everyone knew that in Russia’s last engagement against Japan, that army’s performance had been nothing short of abysmal, and despite bringing huge numbers to the field, it has been simply taken apart in battle. Even so, “The army’s efforts to purge incompetence and corruption since the war with Japan were believed to have brought improvement.”

Does any of that sound familiar? In much more recent writing (as in this Twitter thread posted earlier today), University of Chicago foreign policy professor Paul Poast picks up the theme.

“Many are surprised by the poor performance of Russia's military in Ukraine,” writes Poast. “But let's be honest: when it comes to fighting wars, Russia has always -- to use the formal term -- ‘stunk’.”

Poast cites one of histories most famous infographics to show how Russia’s victory against Napoleon is really one of cold weather and distance reducing a force to a shadow.

He points out that even in the Russo-Finnish “Winter War” of 1939, Russia “won” the conflict by simply piling on the bodies. giving up between five and seven soldiers for every one lost by Finland. The ratio of losses when it came to tanks and aircraft were even worse. 

Let’s look at what that least Pulitzery of sources, Wikipedia, has to say about the Winter War.

“The Soviets made several demands, including that Finland cede substantial border territories … Most sources conclude that the Soviet Union had intended to conquer all of Finland, and [establish a] puppet Finnish Communist government.”

Instead, Russia settled for those small border territories after four months of fighting, in which its total casualties were 168,000 killed, 207,000 wounded, and 5,600 captured. Of the Russian wounded, over 61,000 suffered from frostbite. 

Russia demanded territory, then made a move to capture the whole nation, then suffered extraordinary casualties before signing onto a deal for a chunk of territory roughly the size of its initial demands. The only reason Russia was able to get even that much was that … there was no organized opposition to assist Finland. Busy fretting over Germany, Europe and the U.S. watched from the sidelines. Meanwhile, it was Russia’s miserable performance that convinced Hitler to turn on them and attack. Because he forgot that Napoleon thing, about all the distance and cold.

As Poast points out, even Russia’s wars on Chechen separatists, largely ignored by the West, were anything but romps. Russia genuinely lost the first of these wars, and before reducing Chechnya to rubble in the second, Russia suffered 160,000 casualties. Poast produces this graph, looking not so much at “wins” but at casualties.

Chart of Russia losses, Paul Poast

In half the wars that Russia has participated in, Russia lost more people than anyone else, regardless of the number of participants. Whether fighting someone head to head, or as one of several nations in a more extended conflict, Russia “won” the contest for losing more of its own.

With all the pundits talking about the war now turning into a “war of attrition,” this is what that really means.

“The Russian military essentially uses an ‘attrition model,’” writes Poast. “Keep take losses until the other side quits, is destroyed, or, if the fighting goes long enough, Russia itself decides to stop fighting.”

Russia has not changed these tactics in two centuries. Its miserably equipped, miserably led army wins conflicts not by defeating enemies on the battlefield, but by being willing to keep taking losses long after there is no rational way of achieving anything that makes sense as “victory” in a sense of value for the lives and cost expended. It’s a model that’s made possible by an almost unbroken of autocratic rule that makes it possible to feed intolerable numbers into the meat grinder without political consequences.

Right now, the Ukrainian government sets Russia’s casualties at over 40,000 after a month, with 15,500 killed. That’s actually less than the rate at which Russia burned through its troops in the Winter War. For Ukraine, the losses are around 1,300 killed and 5,000 wounded. Russia will take those odds. And if feeding the new crop of spring conscripts into the mix elevates the ratio to 15:1 or 20:1, they’ll do that, too.

The only way to stop it is to stop the war is to stop Russia’s ability to use the artillery, missiles, and bombs it uses to savage Ukrainian civilians. And to do that, Ukraine needs a steady resupply from the West — the one thing Finland did not have in 1940.


“But let's be honest: when it comes to fighting wars, Russia has always -- to use the formal term -- ‘stunk’.”

Monday, March 28, 2022

Why Do Putin, Trump, Tucker Carlson, and the GOP Sound So Much Alike?

Why Do Putin, Trump, Tucker Carlson, and the GOP Sound So Much Alike?  

Robert Reich. (photo: unknown)


It's not just that they're all authoritarians. Their culture wars have similar agendas.

In a speech on Friday delivered from his office in the Kremlin, Putin criticized the West’s “cancel culture” which, he charged, is “canceling” Russia -- “an entire thousand-year-old country, our people.” It was the third time in recent months Putin has blasted the so-called “cancel culture.”

Which is exactly what Trump, Tucker Carlson, and the GOP have blasted for several years.

"The goal of cancel culture is to make decent Americans live in fear of being fired, expelled, shamed, humiliated and driven from society as we know it," Trump said as he accepted his party's nomination at the Republican National Convention in 2020.

Tucker Carlson, one of Fox News’s most prominent personalities, has charged that liberals have been trying to cancel everything from Space Jam to the Fourth of July.

Putin’s fixation on transgender and gay people has also been echoed on the American right. Republican state bills aimed at limiting LGBTQ rights or discussion in schools are soaring. Last fall — months before Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott threatened to criminalize parents who give their transgender children gender-affirming care — Putin argued that teaching children about different gender identities was “on the verge of a crime against humanity.”

Then there’s admiration for Putin himself. Just before Putin ordered a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Trump deemed him "savvy," "genius," and "smart” for “taking over a country, literally, a vast, vast, location, a great piece of land with a lot of people, and just walking right in.”

On his Fox News program Carlson asked, rhetorically, “why do I hate Putin so much? Has Putin ever called me a racist? Has he threatened to get me fired for disagreeing with him?” But Carlson called Ukraine “an obedient puppet of the Biden State Department,” and suggests Putin’s invasion was nothing more than a “border dispute.”

Putin’s lies and the lies coming from America’s extreme right are mutually reenforcing. Carlson’s Fox News segments show up in Russian propaganda. And when the American site “Infowars” resurrected an unfounded Russian claim that the United States funded biological weapons labs in Ukraine, Putin repeated the Infowars story.

To conclude from all of this that authoritarians think alike is to miss a deeper truth. Putin, Trump, Carlson, and a growing number of rightwing commentators and activists have been promoting much the same narrative — for much the same reason.

Remember, Putin was put into power by a Russian oligarchy made fabulously rich by siphoning off the wealth of the former Soviet Union. Likewise, Trump and the radical right in America have been bankrolled by an American oligarchy — Rupert Murdoch, Charles Koch, Rebekah Mercer (daughter of hedge fund tycoon Robert Mercer), Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman, and other billionaires.

What do these two sets of oligarchs get in return? Strongmen divert the public’s attention away from the oligarchs’ hijacking of their economies toward cultural fears of being overwhelmed by the “other.” Putin’s MO has been to fuel Russian ethnic pride and nationalism. The Trump-Carlson-radical right’s MO has been to fuel white American nationalism.

In both cases, strongmen and their allies have mythologized a “superior” culture (replete with creation stories of blood ties, motherlands, and religion) supposedly endangered by decadent forces intent on attacking and overwhelming it.

To Putin, the decadent force is the West. As he put it Friday, “domestic culture at all times protected the identity of Russia,” which “accepted all the best and creative, but rejected the deceitful and fleeting, that which destroyed continuity of our spiritual values, moral principles and historical memory.” Hence, a mythic justification for taking Ukraine back from a seductive but inferior Western culture that threatens to overwhelm it and Russia.

The Trump-Carlson-white nationalist narrative is similar: America’s dominant white Christian culture is endangered by Black people, immigrants, and coastal elites who threaten to overwhelm it.

The culture wars now being orchestrated by the Republican Party against transgender people, gay people, poor women seeking abortions, and schools that teach about sex and America’s history of racism, emerge from the same narrative as Putin’s culture war against a “decadent” West filled with “sociocultural disturbances.” As does the right’s claim that “secularists” have, in the words of former Trump Attorney General William Barr, mounted “an unremitting assault on religion and traditional values.”

These tropes have served to distract attention from the systemic economic looting that oligarchs have been undertaking, leaving most people poor and anxious. Which is why the grievances that Putin, Trump, Carlson, and the GOP use are unremittingly cultural; they are never economic, never about class, and most assuredly not about the predations of the super-rich.

Reduced to basics, today’s oligarchs and strongmen (along with their mouthpieces and lackeys) are trying to justify their wealth and power by attacking liberal values that have shaped the West, beginning with the enlightenment of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries – the values of tolerance, openness, democracy, self-government, equal rights, and the rule of law. These values are incompatible with a society of oligarchs and strongmen.

Ultimately, the oligarchs and strongmen will lose. Putin won’t succeed in subduing Ukraine, Trump won’t be reelected president, and Carlson and his ilk won’t persuade Americans to give up on American ideals. But the culture wars won’t end anytime soon because so much wealth and power have consolidated at the top of America, Russia, and elsewhere around the world that anti-liberal forces have risen to justify it.



Sunday, March 27, 2022

We Have Two Political Parties and One of Them Has Gone Stark-Raving Insane

  We Have Two Political Parties and One of Them Has Gone Insane 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Half the political ecosystem of the United States has gone completely feral, like the wilderness around Chernobyl did.

Over the past six or seven years, I've had one line of Elvis Costello’s that keeps banging around in my head. It was there as I sat through the amazing confirmation hearings of the collection of unemployables that the previous president* installed in his Cabinet. It was there during the hearing on Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court. It sounded like the genuine trumpet of doom during Brett Kavanaugh’s extended manic episode before the Senate Judiciary Committee. And it was back this week as I watched the rancid flotsam of the Republican senatorial caucus treat Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as though she’d been caught stealing silverware from the Harvard Club. And this is what I’ve kept hearing through most of this wretched decade.

I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused.

I try, but I can’t do it. I can’t look at what’s going on and find any of it clever or funny. I can’t use, “but it works” as an excuse for dangerous political foolishness anymore. I’m still willing to chuckle over past political shenanigans. But what’s going on now comes too damn close to the violent politics of the 1850s for me to chuckle wisely at it. Preston Brooks was not a million laughs.

We have two political parties and only two political parties, and one of them has gone utterly insane. Half the political ecosystem of the United States has gone completely feral, like the wilderness around Chernobyl did. They conduct their politics on a poisoned landscape. Here, for example, is Mitch McConnell, leader of the Republicans in the Senate, explaining why, consarn it, he just can’t vote for Judge KBJ, a decision that was approximately as unexpected as the rising of the sun.

“I went into this process with an open mind…”

That’s as far as you have to go to know that on this, as on most things, McConnell is even more truthless than he is ruthless. He voted against Judge Jackson when she was nominated to the position she currently holds. A month ago, upon the announcement of her nomination to the Supreme Court, he said in a statement:

I voted against confirming Judge Jackson to her current position less than a year ago. Since then, I understand that she has published a total of two opinions, both in the last few weeks, and that one of her prior rulings was just reversed by a unanimous panel of her present colleagues on the D.C. Circuit. I also understand Judge Jackson was the favored choice of far-left dark-money groups that have spent years attacking the legitimacy and structure of the Court itself.

Mitch McConnell’s mind was not open on this nomination, but it remains open for business. They’re all corrupt and/or crazy. But they’re not funny and they mean what they say.

Apparently, Vladimir Putin has been browsing a lot of American substackery these days. From the Guardian:

He went on to compare the treatment Russia had received with the controversy surrounding Rowling’s comments on transgender people. “Recently they cancelled the children’s writer Joanne Rowling because she – the author of books that have sold hundreds of millions of copies worldwide – fell out of favor with fans of so-called gender freedoms,” Putin said.

Those Ukrainians with the rocket launchers are not defending their homes and families. They’re cancelling Putin. Maybe he should start a blog. Freedom!!!!

Weekly WWOZ Pick To Click: “Chilly Winds” (Wade Ward): Yeah, I still pretty much love New Orleans.

Weekly Visit To The Pathe Archives: Here, from 1937, are senators talking about FDR’s new ideas on the Supreme Court. Alas, unless you can lip read, you can’t hear what the senators are saying. Your mileage may vary on whether or not that adds to the quality of the film. History is so cool.

Most of the elders of the Republican party very much would like disgraced Missouri Governor Eric Greitens out of the race for the Senate seat held by retiring Republican Roy Blunt. Greitens resigned as governor after allegations surfaced that he had physically abused a woman with whom he was having an affair. Now, in a filing submitted by his ex-wife, Greitens is accused of physically abusing both his wife and his children. From the Washington Post:

Sheena Greitens, who now lives with their children in Austin, where she works as a university associate professor, described for the first time publicly what she says she experienced at the end of their marriage, in documents filed as part of an ongoing child custody dispute in Missouri state court. “In early June 2018, I became afraid for my safety and that of our children at our home, which was fairly isolated, due to Eric’s unstable and coercive behavior,” she wrote in the filing, which was obtained from Boone County Circuit Court. “This behavior included physical violence toward our children, such as cuffing our then three-year-old son across the face at the dinner table in front of me and yanking him around by the hair.”

Incumbent Republican senators raced to throw Greitens overboard. For his part, Greitens has posted a video in which he goes seriously bananas. From Mediaite:

I wanna tell you directly, Karl Rove and Mitch McConnell. Hear me now. You are disgusting cowards and we are coming for you. We are no longer going to allow you – not just to attack me and attack my kids, but to destroy this country, and that’s what you’re doing. You’re making life hard for millions of families around this country by cooperating with the left, by stabbing President Trump in the back, by stabbing the people of America in the back, and we’re not gonna stand for it anymore.

Know this. The freedom wing of the Republican Party, true patriots, true conservatives, we are coming for you. And we’re not just taking back our party, we’re taking back our country. We see your game, we see your lies, but we also know this: that at the end of the day, truth prevails.

The prion disease is particularly acute in Missouri. Greitens is leading almost all of the polls taken in this Senate primary. However, he does worse than all the other prospective Republican candidates against the prospective Democratic candidates. But, of course, it’s the Democrats who never can get along with each other.

Hey, Smithsonian, is it a good day for dinosaur news? It’s always a good day for dinosaur news!

Spinosaurs broke all the rules. Where most carnivorous dinosaurs had knife-like, curved teeth, spinosaurs had conical chompers more like those of crocodiles. Even the snouts of these dinosaurs were long, giving them a crocodile-like look, instead of the familiar profiles of Tyrannosaurus and Allosaurus. Some species even had prominent sails growing from their backs, ornate biological billboards that acted as social signals. But that’s hardly all. Some spinosaurs – including the immense Spinosaurus itself—were the only non-avian dinosaurs known to split their time between land and water.

To hell with the rules, says Spinosaurus. I got me some penguin bones! From National Geographic, where it’s also a good day for dinosaur news!

Now, using the biggest dataset of its kind, researchers have compared the density of the prehistoric carnivore’s bones to a wide array of living and extinct animals. The analysis found that Spinosaurus—and, surprisingly, its British cousin Baryonyx—had highly dense bone walls like penguins do, suggesting they likely spent much of their time in the water and hunted down aquatic prey.

Rules are made for lesser creatures. A few had to be broken so as to live then to make us happy now.

I’ll be back on Monday, looking forward to the full Senate’s debating the Judge KBJ nomination, which I’m sure will be engaging, and enlightening, and an embarrassment to democracies all the way back to Pericles. Be well and play nice, ya bastids. Stay above the snake-line, wear the damn masks, and get the damn shots, especially the damn boosters.

KBJ - bigger (and better) than life.

Saturday, March 26, 2022

Ginni Thomas wanted to overturn the election. About Clarence Thomas' Jan. 6 documents dissent

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 21: (L-R) Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas sits with his wife and conservative activist Virginia Thomas while he waits to speak at the Heritage Foundation on October 21, 2021 in Washington, DC. Clarence Thomas has now served on the Supreme Court for 30 years. He was nominated by former President George H. W.  Bush in 1991 and is the second African-American to serve on the high court, following Justice Thurgood Marshall. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) Clarence and Ginni Thomas



From now on, every Supreme Court decision on which Justice Clarence Thomas is the deciding vote comes with a giant asterisk: This matter was decided by a man whose wife advocated for the overthrow of the government. Those aren’t the only Thomas votes that require the asterisk, though. Take the Supreme Court’s January rejection of Donald Trump’s attempt to block the Jan. 6 select committee from getting White House documents. Thomas was the only dissent on that.

Now we know that, during the same period as the White House documents Thomas would not have allowed to be sent to the select committee, his wife, Ginni Thomas, was furiously texting away with then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows about the need to overturn the election, sending him conspiracy theory videos and texts like, “Do not concede. It takes time for the army who is gathering for [Trump’s] back.”

In late 2021, Trump tried to assert executive privilege over hundreds of pages of documents relating to Jan. 6, even though he was no longer the executive. The actual executive, President Joe Biden, had declined to assert the privilege and hold back the documents. Trump lost in district court and appeals court and then at the Supreme Court, where Justices John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all agreed that Trump could not block the national archivist from turning over the documents to the select committee.

Ginni Thomas’ texts came not in those documents, but in documents voluntarily turned over to the select committee by Meadows in the brief window before he stopped cooperating. So it’s not that Clarence Thomas knew—for sure, at least—that his wife would show up in the White House documents Trump was seeking directly to block. But, while the Thomases claim to keep his work as a Supreme Court justice and her work as a right-wing activist separate, they also describe themselves as “best friends” (interestingly, a term that shows up in one of Ginni’s texts to Meadows). It seems unlikely that she exchanged 29 texts with Mark Meadows and just never mentioned it to her best friend. Ginni also attended the Jan. 6 rally before the storming of the Capitol, and she has ties to some of the organizers of that event.

Even if Clarence didn’t oppose the rejection of Trump’s post-executive privilege claim because he thought there might be documents relating to his wife in those documents, he opposed it as the husband of someone who was, at that moment, cheering on Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, even offering (terrible) advice to Trump’s chief of staff about which lawyers’ efforts should be promoted. That’s a glaring conflict of interest, but it’s just one of many cases in which Thomas failed to recuse himself from matters in which his wife was at least tangentially involved. They are a walking ethics violation—or they would be if judicial ethics was something that applied to conservative members of the Supreme Court.

Clarence Thomas has said that Ginni works “24/7 every day in defense of liberty” and that they “are equally yoked, and we love being with each other because we love the same things.” Being “equally yoked” is a reference to the biblical injunction against being unequally yoked in a relationship with an unbeliever. An equally yoked team of oxen means they are pulling in the same direction with the same strength, getting the job done, whereas an unequally yoked team of oxen would be unable to do so. That’s an explicit statement that he sees her work—which includes sitting on the board of multiple far-right groups—as linked to and aligned with his own.

Husbands and wives have to be able to engage in separate work and separate lives to be independent of each other. But they also have to be able to acknowledge that sometimes their partners’ work has an effect on their own, and to do the ethical thing in stepping back in those moments. (I am married to a regular old lawyer. On at least one occasion he has asked his employer to screen him from a matter I have written about.) Clarence Thomas, by contrast, is not just refusing to recuse himself where his wife is involved, he is telling us that his work and his wife’s work are actively linked. That they share a project of remaking the nation’s laws, she from the outside and he from the inside. This is deeply corrupt, and not just where Jan. 6 is concerned.

We can only imagine what RBG would have to say about the shenanigans of the Dishonorable Justice Thomas and his Q-anonsense wife.  The Supreme Court is truly at the lowest point in its history.  Is that a pubic hair on your Coke can?

 

Friday, March 25, 2022

The insurrection of Jan. 6 gave Putin all the motivation he needed to attack Ukraine

 Demonstrators attempt to enter the Capitol building during a protest in Washington, on Jan. 6, 2021.