Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Wednesday, October 9, 2024

A Hurricane of Lies

"Trump’s claims are absurd and disgusting"

By Dan Rather | Substack 

Journalist, storyteller, and lifelong reader. A Texan, by birth and by choice. 

https://substack.com/@steady 

Oct 09, 2024

What’s happening right now in the warming waters of the Gulf of Mexico is extremely dangerous. The disinformation and outright lies about it — and about Hurricane Helene before it — are a disgrace. 

I’ve witnessed a lot of hurricanes form in my lifetime, but never have I seen one grow from a tropical storm to a Category 5 monster in a single day. Warm waters feed hurricanes, and the current temperatures in the Gulf, usually found in mid-summer, are the hottest on record. With Hurricane Milton, we are officially in uncharted waters. 

This mega-storm comes as folks who were in the path of Helene are just beginning to clean up and assess their lives. That Category 4 storm dumped so much rain that whole inland towns are gone, hundreds of miles from where the hurricane first made landfall. It could soon be a double dose of disaster when Milton strikes Florida early Wednesday. 

Make that a triple dose, now that Donald Trump has decided to weigh in with nonsense that has already slowed the recovery effort. For someone who has witnessed firsthand the tragedy and human suffering in the wake of extreme weather, there is nothing more callous and heartless than interfering with a relief effort. Yet that’s exactly what the Republican presidential nominee is doing. 

How bad is it? At a time when the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) should be focusing on helping victims of Helene and preparing for Milton, it is having to expend energy to battle an insidious deluge: Donald Trump’s disinformation. 

I want to make sure everyone understands the distinction between misinformation, which is an unintentional omission or untruth, and disinformation, deliberately misleading information with the intent to manipulate. Though you may see the words used interchangeably, they shouldn’t be. 

FEMA has had to allocate resources to set up a “Rumor Response” page on its website to battle Trump’s intentional lies. FEMA’s director says the disinformation campaign is demoralizing to aid workers. 

Trump’s claims are so absurd and disgusting it is hard to imagine anyone would believe them, but just because they are objectively outrageous doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be called out. Many have said this, more than once. We have repeatedly written it in this space. But the lies and disinformation too often get ignored or down-played. Facts are too often shoved aside with the excuse that they are “old news.” But attention should be paid each and every time. 

And especially now. Trump said that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have stolen $1 billion from FEMA and are spending it on housing for “illegal migrants.” Perhaps he got the idea for this abject bunk from his own time in office when his administration moved $155 million from FEMA to pay for migrant detention centers. 

Trump lied when he said Biden was refusing to help people in Republican areas and would not take calls from Republican governors in hard-hit states. You know who proved him wrong? The Republican governors in hard-hit states. These guys aren’t usually cheerleaders for the Biden-Harris administration. 

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin said he is “incredibly appreciative of the rapid response.” 

Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia told reporters he spoke with the president. “[Biden] just said, ‘Hey, what do you need?’ And I told him, you know, ‘We got what we need. We’ll work through the federal process.’ He offered that if there’s other things we need, just to call him directly.” 

If you think all this sounds bad, it will only be worse if Trump is returned to the White House. Fast-forward to next hurricane season and Project 2025 has been implemented. The far-right blueprint for the next Republican administration would gut FEMA, including eliminating flood insurance. Governors would have to come up with most of the disaster relief money from their own state coffers. 

Project 2025 would also disband the National Weather Service (NWS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), agencies responsible for predicting storms and providing forecasts. That weather app on your phone and the meteorologist on your local news? Neither would be able to provide complete weather forecasts, which they get from NWS, if Project 2025 is realized. 

Project 2025 declares that NWS and NOAA are part of a “colossal operation that has become one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry and, as such, is harmful to future U.S. prosperity.” 

Project 2025 would kneecap the ability of the federal government to respond to disasters — at a time when they are growing more intense and more frequent. Without forecasts and data, the government would be unable to future-proof our most at-risk communities. 

These MAGA extremists want to put their heads in the sand and bury everyone along with them. Two weeks ago, Hurricane Helene slammed into the northern gulf coast of Florida before devastating much of the southeast up to Virginia. More than 225 people have died, while the hurricane has caused billions of dollars in property damage. Millions of Americans have been displaced, and thousands are still without electricity. 

The Biden administration was quick to mobilize FEMA, whose mission is to help communities recover and rebuild after natural disasters strike. The response to Helene, the largest mobilization of people and resources in recent history, has so far provided millions of meals and millions of gallons of water, thousands of National Guardsmen and emergency response personnel to help with search-and-rescue and relief efforts, and millions of dollars in direct funds. 

We can all wish we were surprised that Trump is politicizing human suffering for his own benefit. Sadly, it is on-brand for a cognitively impaired convicted felon who wants to be president in order to stay out of prison. 

If the idea of Trump destroying American democracy is too amorphous for your undecided friends and family, perhaps the very concrete idea that Trump would put his rich friends’ interests and his willful ignorance about climate change above millions of American citizens in their time of need will get their attention.

No caption needed.

Tuesday, October 8, 2024

Here's a fact-checked reminder of how bad Trump is at handling disasters

no image description available
REMEMBER THIS SHINING MOMENT: Then-President Donald Trump throws  paper towel rolls to hurricane survivors in Puerto Rico, on Oct. 3, 2017.  What a grand gesture by a glorious leader.

Donald Trump and his allies have been misinforming the public about the federal response to Hurricane Helene, be it with lies or conspiracy theories

Trump’s first administration was a disaster for our environment—but he and his friends are far from done. Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s agenda for a potential second Trump administration, includes dismantling the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Agency—the U.S. agency that forecasts weather—and greatly limiting the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s ability to respond.

Here are some examples of how poorly the Trump administration managed our country’s toughest times.

Trump didn’t staff the federal agencies tasked with disaster response.

Trump’s administration did not sufficiently staff FEMA or NOAA with administrators for months after he came into office. Worse, he imposed a government-wide hiring freeze that affected hundreds of unfilled positions at the National Weather Service, and that was called “a contributing factor” in a renewed decline in NOAA staff.

Trump initially refused to send aid to California during wildfires because it was a blue state.

When wildfires ravaged California in 2018, Trump attacked the state for its “mismanagement” of the fires. Meanwhile, a former senior director on Trump’s National Security Council staff told E&E News that when Trump resisted sending wildfire assistance to the Golden State, staffers “went as far as looking up how many votes he got in those impacted areas … to show him these are people who voted for you.”

Trump delayed and obstructed getting federal aid to Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. 

The Trump administration’s initial neglect in helping Puerto Rico was outshined only by his administration’s continued delays in congressionally allotted aid for years after. At every step, Trump looked to block further aid to the U.S. territory. Trump also reportedly joked about trading Puerto Rico for Greenland as he faced criticism for his response to Hurricane Maria.

Hurricane Dorian and the infamous black Sharpie marker.

In 2019, during the leadup to Hurricane Dorian, Trump made an incorrect assessment that the state of Alabama was in the projected path of the approaching storm. His assessment was then corrected by the National Weather Service office in Birmingham, leading Trump to double down on being wrong. Eventually, he held a press conference where he showed a conspicuously doctored map of Dorian’s path to support his lie. The sloppy use of black marker on the map became emblematic of how unserious Trump’s approach to disaster was.

Trump uses flooding in Michigan to try and stop absentee voting.

When flooding hit Michigan in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, Trump tweeted out a threat to withhold federal aid if absentee ballots were sent out to voters ahead of the 2020 primary and general elections. Of course, the only thing being sent out at the time were applications for absentee ballots. 

COVID-19.

Research finds that Trump’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic led to hundreds of thousands of excess deaths. His incompetence began early on as he downplayed the severity and spread of the global pandemic. He then offered up a barrage of fake cures and other misinformation, from shilling for the ineffective hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin to disinfecting the blood with something like Clorox.

Trump's history of (mis)managing disasters is pretty craven, and his lies about the current administration’s management of this newest natural disaster are a true new low for that lowlife.

On the other hand, here is an example of leadership.

President Biden
I just approved an emergency declaration from the State of Florida and ordered federal assistance to supplement response efforts that may arise due to emergency conditions resulting from Hurricane Milton. We expect this storm to again make landfall in western Florida and are working quickly to preposition federal response personnel and assets.
 
Who is this man to talk about disaster relief?  His administration was an absolute and deadly disaster when it came to disaster relief. 

Monday, October 7, 2024

Bruce Springsteen Endorses Harris, Calls Trump ‘Most Dangerous Candidate in My Lifetime’

Bruce Springsteen Endorses Kamala Harris, Calls Trump the ‘Most Dangerous Candidate for President in My Lifetime’  Bruce Springsteen performing at the 2024 Sea.Hear.Now Festival in Asbury Park, New Jersey. (photo: Getty)
Harris, Walz "committed to a vision of this country that respects and includes everyone," musician says
Jon Blistein / Rolling Stone

Bruce Springsteen delivered a powerful endorsement of Kamala Harris for president, calling Donald Trump “the most dangerous candidate for president in my lifetime,” and saying Harris and VP candidate Tim Walz are “committed to a vision of this country that respects and includes everyone.”

Springsteen shared his endorsement in a video on Instagram, delivering a short, uninterrupted speech from (fittingly enough) a very classic-looking diner. Along with citing Harris’ and Walz’s commitment to inclusivity regardless of “class, religion, race, your political point of view, or sexual identity,” Springsteen said, “They want to grow our economy in a way that benefits all, not just the few like me on top. That’s the vision of America I’ve been consistently writing about for 55 years.”

Along with heaping praise on Harris and Walz, Springsteen shared some harsh words for Trump. “His disdain for the sanctity of our Constitution, the sanctity of democracy, the sanctity of the rule of law, and the sanctity of the peaceful transfer of power should disqualify him from the office of president ever again,” Springsteen said. “He doesn’t understand the meaning of this country, its history or what it means to be deeply American.”

Springsteen called the 2024 election “one of the most consequential” in U.S. history, arguing that not since the Civil War has the country been so “politically, spiritually, and emotionally divided.”

He then stated plainly, “It doesn’t have to be this way. The common values, the shared stories that make us a great and united nation, our waiting to be rediscovered and retold once again. Now, that will take time. Hard work, intelligence, faith, and women and men with the national good guiding their hearts. America’s the most powerful nation on Earth, not just because of our overwhelming military strength or economic power — but because of what she stands for, what she means, what she believes in. Freedom, social justice, equal opportunity, the right to be in love with who you want.”

Springsteen’s endorsement of Harris and Walz should come as no surprise, as he’s been regularly endorsing (and often campaigning for) Democratic candidates for years. He endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016 and called Trump a “moron” in a 2016 interview with Rolling Stone; in 2020 he gave his support to Joe Biden, even narrating and soundtracking a campaign ad for the future president.

Springsteen joins an ever-growing list of big names — especially musicians — who’ve given their support to Harris and Walz. Others include Taylor Swift, Billie Eilish, Cardi B, Megan Thee Stallion, Barbra Streisand, Bon Iver, Jason Isbell, Maren Morris, John Legend, and Stevie Wonder.



Sunday, October 6, 2024

Inside the Jack Smith court filing Trump didn’t want anyone to see

"Multiple allies told Trump he had lost and his fraud claims were false. He didn’t care."

By Lisa Needham 
Daily Kos Contributor
at 12:15:15p MDT

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case unsealed special counsel Jack Smith’s 165-page behemoth of a motion about Trump’s immunity claims on Wednesday. What Smith makes clear is that even though the conservative justices on the United States Supreme Court invented a brand new doctrine of presidential immunity just for Trump, it isn’t enough to save him from needing to stand trial for his criminal actions.

Before digging into Smith’s motion, it’s worth remembering how out-of-pocket the Supreme Court’s immunity decision was. The court’s six conservatives—three of whom were appointed by the person they decided to swaddle in immunity—decided that Trump was absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for actions within his “conclusive and preclusive” authority, presumptively immune from prosecution for all official acts, and not immune for unofficial acts.

It was a wildly ahistorical decision with no basis in the Constitution and one that, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent, made the president “a king above the law.” Now, if a president can somehow pair his criminal act with one of his official duties, he can’t be prosecuted.

“Orders the Navy's Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune,” Sotomayor wrote. “Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune.”

Smith’s challenge was to explain how Trump’s actions to overturn the election were unofficial acts, not a function of his office. To anyone not wholly poisoned by conservative rhetoric, this is a no-brainer, as there’s no way to genuinely assert Trump’s increasingly frantic attempts to undo the 2020 election were related to his role as president. But given that the Supreme Court is currently dominated by people wholly poisoned by conservative rhetoric, Smith had to spend 165 pages carefully detailing each step Trump took to undermine the election, arguing that those steps were taken as a private citizen and candidate, and showing that the people conspiring with Trump were private attorneys and campaign personnel, not members of the government.

For anyone familiar with Trump’s shambolic post-election efforts and the myriad criminal cases he’s faced, much of what is in the motion isn’t new. The biggest bombshells are about then-Vice President Mike Pence, who Trump treats with such disdain that you’d almost feel sorry for him if he wasn’t, well, Mike Pence. Trump spent weeks pressuring Pence, and apparently Pence spent weeks trying to gently cajole Trump, much like one would coax a toddler, into understanding the election was over.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: Pro-Trump supporters storm the U.S. Capitol following a rally with President Donald Trump on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC. Trump supporters gathered in the nation's capital today to protest the ratification of President-elect Joe Biden's Electoral College victory over President Trump in the 2020 election. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Donald Trump supporters storm the Capitol following a rally on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C. 

After it became clear that Joe Biden won the election, Pence told Trump, “Don’t concede, but recognize the process is over.” Pence also encouraged Trump to look at the election not as a loss but “just an intermission.” In return, on Jan. 6, Trump told rallygoers Pence had the power to overturn the election and then attacked Pence via tweet for his refusal to do so. After Pence was rushed to a secure location as Trump supporters stormed the Capitol, a staffer told Trump, hoping he’d take action to protect Pence.

Instead, Trump responded, “So what?”

Smith also uses the motion to preemptively undercut any Trump assertion that he was acting in his official capacity to protect election integrity. First, in reaching out to various officials in swing states Biden won, Trump only contacted Republicans. A genuine inquiry into the election would have required him to talk to, for example, the secretary of state in Michigan, who oversees elections. However, that person is a Democrat, so Trump instead talked to Republican members of the state legislature. Next, despite his sweeping assertions of fraud, Trump only focused on his own race rather than raising any general concerns about voting issues.

Trump has repeatedly claimed that he was not allowed to present evidence of this vast voter fraud conspiracy in the dozens of post-election cases he brought. But Smith’s motion shows that Trump and his assorted hangers-on didn’t even attempt to provide that evidence to other Republicans who would have, presumably, been more than happy to find a way forward for Trump.

When Trump raised claims of election fraud with then-Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, Ducey asked Trump to send him evidence. Trump declared, "We’re packaging it up,” but never sent anything. Trump tweeted that he would show “massive and unprecedented fraud” in Michigan, only to have the campaign decline to pursue a state-wide recount. As late as Nov. 30, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani was still shopping voter fraud in Arizona, admitting that “[w]e don’t have the evidence, but we have lots of theories.”

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 01:  Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks on a recently unsealed indictment including four felony counts against former U.S. President Donald Trump at the Justice Department on August 1, 2023 in Washington, DC. Trump was indicted on four felony counts for his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Special counsel Jack Smith

Smith also highlights that Trump and his co-conspirators knew they were lying because they kept changing the numbers of allegedly fraudulent votes. In Arizona, Trump and friends first alleged that 36,000 noncitizens voted in the state. Five days later, it was suddenly a few hundred thousand, then back down to a “bare minimum” of 40 or 50,000, then back up to 250,000, plummeting to 32,000, only to return to the original, never verified, 36,000.

Trump attorney John Eastman sounded even more unhinged when trying to explain how the ostensible fraud worked: “They put those ballots in a secret folder in the machines sitting there waiting, until they know how many they need. And then the machine after the close of polls, we now know who's voted. And we know who hasn't. And I can now in that machine match those unvoted ballots with an unvoted voter and put them together in the machine.”

Finally, Smith describes multiple Republican allies telling Trump that he would likely lose the election, that he had indeed lost the election, and that his fraud claims were false. Trump simply didn’t care.

“It doesn’t matter if you won or lost the election. You still have to fight like hell,” Trump declared. Though not strictly related to the immunity issue, including this tidbit allows Smith to push back on the inevitable defense claim that Trump sincerely believed he won.

Trump’s legal team has now proposed that he get an additional five weeks to file his response, pushing it out comfortably past the election to Nov. 21 instead of the required deadline of Oct. 17, along with a request to file an additional reply brief by Dec. 19.

His only real plan is to drag this out past Election Day and hope he wins. That’s just another reason why Trump needs to lose.

...if we mobilize, vote, and "fight like hell" when Trump inevitably tries to steal the election again.

Saturday, October 5, 2024

JD Vance doubles down on wanting to help Trump steal an election

 

no image description availableRepublican vice presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance

By Oliver Willis Daily Kos Staff   During the vice presidential debate Tuesday night, Sen. JD Vance was asked about comments he made in September when he said he would have helped try to subvert the election results.

Vance: What President Trump has said is that there were problems in 2020, and my own belief is that we should fight about those issues, debate those issues, peacefully in the public square and that’s all I’ve said, and that’s all that Donald Trump has said.

But that isn’t true. In his appearance at All-In Summit, Vance said that during the congressional election certification process, he “would have asked the states to submit alternative slates of electors.”

Allies of Trump offered up fraudulent electors after millions of votes had been cast for President Joe Biden in 2020, binding electors to vote for him to become president. If the scheme had proceeded as Trump wanted, legal votes would have been nullified and the outcome of the election would not have represented the will of the public.

At the debate, Vance also characterized Trump’s call to his supporters to march on the Capitol as peaceful, but Trump described the planned event at the time as “wild.” He was later impeached for inciting the attack and currently faces federal charges for his attempt to overturn the election.

The Orange Adolf has found the perfect Nazi clone in JD.

Friday, October 4, 2024

Yes, JD Vance Lied About Abortion, and No, You Shouldn’t Trust Anything He or Donald Trump Says About Reproductive Rights

Yes, JD Vance Lied About Abortion, and No, You Shouldn’t Trust Anything He or Donald Trump Says About Reproductive Rights  Sen. JD Vance forms a zero to indicate the number of abortions he and the orange man will allow if elected. (photo: Kent Nishimura/Getty)
 
A national abortion ban—or whatever they want to call it—is a foregone conclusion if Trump wins.

Bess Levin / Vanity Fair 

JD Vance outright lied about his calls for a national abortion ban during Tuesday night’s vice-presidential debate, falsely declaring he “never supported a national ban.” 

That is categorically untrue and yet another reason why no one should believe him or Donald Trump when they make promises about reproductive rights, which they will absolutely shred given the opportunity.

But, first, a quick fact-check regarding Vance’s debate claim. In 2022, while running for Senate in Ohio, Vance said on a podcast, “I certainly would like abortion to be illegal nationally.” During that same campaign, he stated on his website for all the world to see that he was “100 percent pro-life” and that he was in favor of “eliminating abortion.” In fact, those words were on Vance’s website until July of this year, when Trump announced the senator as his running mate.

Then there’s Trump, who all caps screamed to his followers on social media last night:

“EVERYONE KNOWS I WOULD NOT SUPPORT A FEDERAL ABORTION BAN, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, AND WOULD, IN FACT, VETO IT, BECAUSE IT IS UP TO THE STATES TO DECIDE BASED ON THE WILL OF THEIR VOTERS (THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!). LIKE RONALD REAGAN BEFORE ME, I FULLY SUPPORT THE THREE EXCEPTIONS FOR RAPE, INCEST, AND THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER.”

But there’s also the matter of the very sneaky way Trump, Vance, and other Republicans have taken to talking about abortion bans. As abortion rights advocate Jessica Valenti has written, “Republicans know abortion bans are deeply unpopular, so they’ve come up with this cheap rhetorical trick to fool voters,” wherein they claim not to support bans but “minimum standards.“ 

In this context, “ban” means no abortions at any time for any reason, whereas the latter could mean something like no abortions after six weeks—which, of course, would effectively be a ban on abortion. 

For instance, when asked during an interview about Senator Lindsey Graham’s proposed 15-week abortion ban, Vance insisted it was not a ban at all but a “federal minimum standard.” 

As Valenti wrote following the debate: “Vance has adopted the anti-abortion redefinition of ‘ban’ that says the word means a prohibition on abortion in all cases, even when a woman’s life is at risk. Under this definition, there are no abortion bans in America! 

That switch up provides Republicans a lot of political cover: When Donald Trump says, for example, that he would veto a federal abortion ban, it simply means that he would veto a ban that has no exceptions for women’s lives.”

Andrea González-Ramírez, a writer for the Cut, asked the Trump campaign the following questions:

Does Trump support any sort of national minimum standard that includes exceptions for rape, incest, and life of the mother? If so, would that minimum standard be at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 15 weeks, etc.?

Would he sign or veto a national minimum standard bill?

Does he support the use of the Comstock Act (18 U.S.C. § 1461) to restrict abortion? If not, would he commit not to direct the U.S. Department of Justice to enforce this law?*

Not surprisingly, the campaign did not answer any of those specific questions, instead saying in a statement: “President Trump has long been consistent in supporting the rights of states to make decisions on abortion and has been very clear that he will NOT sign a federal ban when he is back in the White House.” The refusal to say something like “no, Trump will not sign a bill preventing abortions after six weeks” should set off deafening alarm bells.

*Project 25, which is deeply tied to Trump despite his claims to the contrary, has said the Justice Department should invoke the Comstock Act to prosecute people who send abortion pills via the mail; it has also said the Food and Drug Administration should rescind its approval of mifepristone, one of the two pills necessary for medication abortions.

This issue alone should be enough to spell the defeat of Trump and Vance.  But it won't unless we mobilize and get everybody to the polls.  And then be ready to "fight like hell" when Trump challenges the results, as he surely will. 

Thursday, October 3, 2024

Why Tim Walz is a gem—and JD Vance is a jerk

 walz_vance2.jpgThe joy and the agony: Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance

To provide perspective following the vice presidential debate, here are the significant differences between the candidates.  Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has won us over as “America’s dad” while Ohio Sen. JD Vance remains weird and unlikeable

As the candidates return to their respective corners following Tuesday evening’s debate, here is a look at where they diverge on their policy positions—and their rhetoric.

Approach to fatherhood 

It’s obvious that Walz is a caring family man. His son Gus’ love was on full display during Walz’s Democratic National Convention speech where, full of emotion and overcome with tears, he stood up and shouted, “That’s my dad!” 

Walz’s love of being a father is seen in numerous social media posts with his daughter, Hope. The videos show them spending time on the thrilling Slingshot attraction at the Minnesota State Fair and testing out fair food, or doing a PSA together cautioning young people against texting while driving.  

On the other hand, Vance recounted in an interview that he told his son to “shut the hell up” about playing Pokemon when Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump called to ask him to join the GOP ticket. And during a recent campaign stop at a Pennsylvania supermarket, Vance seemed to have trouble corralling his antsy sons.

“Can you guys act like normal kids for three minutes?” Vance asked the young boys before launching into a stump speech and lying about the price of eggs.

On the fight for—and against—reproductive rights 

Walz is a vocal advocate of access to fertility treatments including IVF, and champions reproductive rights. He shared memories of he and his wife Gwen’s 7-year struggle with infertility during his speech at the DNC.

“I can remember praying each night for a phone call, the pit in your stomach when the phone would ring and the absolute agony that we heard the treatments hadn’t worked,” he said. “It took Gwen and I one year, but we had access to fertility treatments”

Vance skipped a Senate vote on a bill that aims to protect access to IVF, and the legislation was ultimately voted down. He has repeatedly said he wants to leave it up to states to enact strict abortion bans.

“What we really want is when states and voters in those states make decisions, we, of course, want the states and the federal government to respect those decisions,” he said in an interview with CBS News. “We need to get out of the culture war side of the abortion issue, we need to let states decide their specific abortion policy.” 

Respectful ally vs. misogynistic cat-caller

Walz lifts women up by speaking about them respectfully and putting his money where his mouth is when it comes to policy. He invested $6 million in child care in Minnesota in an effort to make it more accessible. When asked why he’s successful as governor, he said “It’s because I surround myself with competent women.”

“Here’s my life hack, for all the guys out there,” he said at a rally in Wisconsin. “Surround yourself with smart women and listen to them. You’ll be just fine.”

Vance infamously called Democratic women “childless cat ladies” and has referred to those who choose not to have kids as “sociopathic” and “psychotic.” On Saturday, he shared a stage with Christian televangelist Lance Wallnau, who has called Vice President Kamala Harris “the devil’s choice” and lobbed the historically sexist claim of “witchcraft” at the Democratic presidential nominee.

Taking the high (or low) road on military service

Walz has respected Vance’s service in the Marines. 

“I am damn proud of my service to this country. And I firmly believe you should never denigrate another person’s service record,” Walz said to the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union in Los Angeles in August. “To anyone brave enough to put on that uniform for our great country, including my opponent, I just have a few simple words: Thank you for your service and sacrifice.” 

Meanwhile, Vance questioned Walz’s military service after he served 24 years in the National Guard. While speaking in favor of gun control, Walz said, “We can make sure that those weapons of war, that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at.” 

In a press conference, Vance accused Walz of lying about serving in a combat zone and used the term “stolen valor, which ” describes a person who has lied about their military service. 

“Well I wonder, Tim Walz, when were you ever in war,” Vance said. "What was this weapon that you carried into war, given that you abandoned your unit right before they went to Iraq, and he has not spent a day in a combat zone."

The National Guard has confirmed that Walz announced his retirement in order to run for Congress before his unit was mobilized or deployed to Iraq.

Hometown adoration vs. detestation

Walz has also enjoyed careers as a high school social studies teacher and football coach. His former students wrote about how “passionate and service-driven” he was. His neighbors and fellow community members adore and respect him.

Not as much can be said of Vance’s hometown legacy. Appalachians were deeply critical of the way Vance portrayed his adopted community in his memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy,” calling it “a political platform masquerading as a memoir.” 

Vance was raised in suburban Ohio but spent summers with his grandmother in Kentucky. His book purported to be an analysis of “a culture in crisis.” But author and West Virginia native Neema Avashia voiced many residents’ thoughts when she wrote, “JD Vance doesn’t represent Appalachia. JD Vance only represents himself.”

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has won us over as “America’s dad”