Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Sunday, September 27, 2026

America Last

America Last     A car draped by an American flag and displaying hats in support of President Donald Trump is seen near the president's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, Feb. 22, 2026. (photo: Marco Bello/Reuters)
 
17,500 white Afrikaners settling here will cost taxpayers $500 million; meanwhile ordinary American citizens struggle as prices soar
 
Sarah Jones / New York Magazine
 

Earlier this week, the Trump administration told Congress it planned to resettle up to 17,500 white Afrikaners in the United States over the next year. The project will cost an estimated $500 million, CBS reported. 

The White House “anticipates” their assimilation “in a manner that preserves taxpayer resources for U.S. citizens and does not anticipate other countries resettling Afrikaners,” but the statement does not actually explain why it is so concerned with this group but not other refugees or migrants, who face gang violence, repression, and economic collapse in their home countries. 

What distinguishes white Afrikaners from Haitians, Venezuelans, and Mexicans, whom the administration deports en masse? The most obvious difference — skin color — gets us most of the way to an answer.

The administration believes, falsely, that white farmers face disproportionate rates of racially motivated violence in South Africa, citing high-profile incidents, such as murders and robberies. The lie began with the far right, where South Africa and Zimbabwe “have exerted a fascination” because they allegedly “show what happens to a white minority after they lose control of countries they once ruled,” The Guardian explained. 

Far-right Afrikaners speak to National Conservatism conferences and groups like the New York Young Republican Club to stir up support for their cause. Tucker Carlson, Ann Coulter, and Michael Savage have all joined in, eager to promote the idea of white genocide. 

They’ve found a willing mark in Trump, who said last year there’s “a genocide that’s taking place” that the media doesn’t “want to write about.”

This is, of course, not true. 

In 2025, Gareth Newham of the South Africa-based Institute for Security Studies told Politifact that the motive for most farm attacks appears to be robbery, not anti-white racism. A 2019 analysis by Carolyn Holmes of Mississippi State University found that, overall, farmers are far less likely to be the targets of violent crime than the general population. 

The South African author and filmmaker Richard Poplak had even blunter words about the white-genocide myth in a 2025 New York Times op-ed: “Indeed, South Africa helped define and perfect white supremacy, so take it from an expert: This is an effort to flip the narrative of apartheid, and cast former oppressors as victims,” he wrote.

The Trump administration’s sympathy for white Afrikaners is pivotal to a much broader betrayal of the American people. The Trump campaign promised voters in 2024 that he would be a president for them, unlike Kamala Harris, who would serve the shadowy other. Through mass deportations and industry deregulation, the new administration would usher in a era of prosperity. 

A year after Trump took office, however, the administration mostly caters to the whims of select, wealthy interests and prioritizes the appearance of strength on the international stage over sound economics, justice, or diplomacy at home. The U.S. war on Iran has cost $43.6 billion to date, the Pentagon said this month. Military operations in Venezuela, the Caribbean, and the east Pacific have cost “at least $4.7 billion from August 1, 2025—March 31, 2026,” according to a paper from Brown University researchers. The administration steals from taxpayers to enrich the powerful and commit probable war crimes abroad.

Meanwhile, the fabric of American public life unravels at a staggering pace. Although Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed in August that our “K-shaped,” or unequal, economy “is over,” CBS News reports that wealth inequality has reached its widest gap in decades. 

Native-born unemployment has risen, according to one analysis by economist Mike Konczal. In fact, employment rates for native-born men, a fixation for J.D. Vance in particular, have fallen below 2024 rates, Konczal added. By the end of June, the Affordable Care Act’s marketplace enrolled nearly 3 million fewer people, the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities found. On Monday, Vance’s antifraud task force said it would un-enroll a further 760,000 accounts from the ACA’s public exchanges. 

Experts fear that legitimate enrollments may become “collateral damage,” as Cynthia Cox of KFF told The Wall Street Journal. The Department of Health and Human Services has cut grants addressing maternal mortality rates and health disparities in favor of “addressing the root causes of infertility,” including low sperm count, the Washington Sun reported this month. Trump and congressional Republicans have cut billions from SNAP with profound consequences for rural communities, where “a larger share” of residents “have low incomes and experience material hardship,” CBPP reported. Gas prices are rising and so is inflation. More renters are struggling to stay housed.

Now the public grows skeptical of Trump’s dedication to American greatness. An August poll from Politico found that half of all voters, and nearly a quarter of Trump’s 2024 supporters, “say the president’s mass deportation campaign is too aggressive.” The administration’s war with Iran is even more unpopular. Six months after the American military bombed an Iranian school and killed 123 children, 71 percent of Americans say they disapprove of Trump’s foreign policy and 26 percent approve of his handling of Iran, CNN reported. 

According to other news reports, Trump has approved a $2.8 billion sale of heavy bombs to Israel as it wages genocide in Gaza. The sale is morally abhorrent — and politically unwise, as slightly more Americans now sympathize with the Palestinians over Israelis in some polls. Among rural voters, who tend to favor Republican candidates, “frustrations about the cost of living” are beginning to eat away at enthusiasm for the GOP, a new KFF/AP survey says.

The American public was never a priority for MAGA. From the beginning, Trump promised spectacle; endless displays of nationalism punctuated by violence. Conservatives obsess over birth rates and trans kids because they are more concerned with a racial and gender hierarchy than wage growth or affordable health care. 

Afrikaners are learning this, too. Nearly 6,500 have already arrived in the U.S. under a special refugee program Trump created last year, but some are deciding to go home. Several told the right-wing Free Press they’d been “left to fend for themselves.” One couple said they eat one meal a day to preserve their resettlement funds, and no one took them to buy winter coats, though they’d been placed near Detroit. Other white Afrikaners reject the idea that they’re victims of anything like genocide, and few appear interested in applying for asylum in the U.S., which sets up a question: Who is this all for?

Nero fiddled while Rome burned; Trump snoozes while life becomes increasingly unaffordable for most Americans.

Friday, September 25, 2026

Trump accuser E Jean Carroll finally has her damages in the bank

  NOT HIS TYPE: American journalist and writer E. Jean Carroll poses during a photo session in Paris on September 24, 2026 American journalist and writer E. Jean Carroll, the only person to successfully sue Donald Trump for sexual assault, told AFP that she is finally free to spend the damages awarded to her from the US president - but she won't be splurging on herself.© Simon WOHLFAHRT

Millions will all "go to everything he hates"

Story by AFP

American journalist and writer E. Jean Carroll, the only person to successfully sue Donald Trump for sexual assault, told AFP she is finally free to spend the damages awarded to her from the US president.

But she won't be splurging on herself. 

In late June, the US Supreme Court rejected what was thought to be a final appeal from Trump against Carroll's civil claim over a 1996 assault, meaning $5.6 million in damages which had been deposited by the president could be finally released to her.

But the fight did not end there for a woman whose seven-year legal battle against the Republican head of state has turned her into the standard bearer for dozens of others who have accused the US leader of sexual misconduct.

"So I have the money in my account, and Trump goes off his rocker and tries to bring a court injunction to get the money back!" Carroll told AFP of the pay-out.

"Why? Because he wants the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision."

Now, this week, "the Trump lawyers and the Carroll lawyers have now signed an agreement that the injunction is moot", the 82-year-old said in Paris, where she is promoting a French-language version of her book.

Although she can now spend the money, she says she has little need for it.  

"I don't buy stuff. I know how to be happy," she said, before joking about the possibility of AI-created Armageddon: "I mean, you don't really need a bunch of money now, not with the world ending."

A second, much larger pay-out from Trump is also working its way through the US court system, with Carroll promising that the money "is going to go to everything he hates" -- women's rights, minority rights, the environment. 

Damages of $83.3 million were awarded from a defamation case that Carroll launched against Trump after he denied sexually assaulting her in the changing room of a Manhattan department store and called her a liar. 

Carroll recounted her ordeal and her excruciating legal fight in her book last year -- "Not My Type" -- which showcases her talent for observation and acid humour that made her a well-known columnist in New York in the 80s and 90s.

The title was a reference to Trump's infamous statement about her when she first aired her allegations.

The fight, she says, has been "hard, every single minute".

Meanwhile back at the ranch as Melania nurses her newborn infant...

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Insider unveils Trump’s plan to declare 'martial law' and mobilize military against protestors

U.S. President Donald Trump gestures during a press conference at a NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands June 25, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman © provided by AlterNet

Even threatens that U.S. military will outnumber any protestors

Story by Nick Hilden

Alternet 

On Wednesday, new reporting revealed that many in President Donald Trump's orbit believe he will declare "martial law" to seize control of the midterms. 

This is according to the Atlantic, which spoke with several people close to Trump who asserted he is likely to claim a "national security emergency" to justify efforts to "seize control of the federal elections."

For example, attorney Peter Ticktin -- who went to school with Trump when they were teenagers, helped Trump sue Hillary Clinton, and pushed the president to pardon convicted election equipment tamperer Tina Peters — said there are three possible outcomes in November. As the Atlantic writes, he asserts that, 

"The first — a smooth election — won’t happen in his view because, he claims without evidence, Democrats already cheated in the primaries. 

The second is that Trump takes action before the election to prevent cheating. 

The last option is that Trump tries to declare martial law on or around November 3." Or in Ticktin's words, "Either martial law, or step aside." 

When the Atlantic raised the possibility of riots if Trump were to overturn the election results, Ticken said he was not concerned, asserting, "Believe me, our armed forces are a lot bigger than they are."

rump has not been shy about signaling his intention to meddle in the midterms. 

As the Atlantic explains, "In August, when the television and radio host Wayne Allyn Root pushed Trump to declare a 'national-security emergency' to require proof of citizenship, voter ID, and other measures, Trump played coy: 'Let me just say that stranger things have happened, okay? I’ll leave it at that.' 

Later that month, Trump posted a Root column on the topic, with a headline that described the plan as 'foolproof.' Peters announced after meeting with Trump in June that the president 'basically said to his lead counsel to do what I was asking.' 

In a prime-time address at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, Trump again repeated the false claim that he had won the 2020 election, and sarcastically encouraged his supporters to 'cheat like hell' in the upcoming elections."

And MAGA literally applauds such plans. Speaking at a recent conference for election deniers, Root described a "nightmare scenario" in which Democrats won, flipped Congress, then impeached the president. He received a standing ovation after assuring attendees that, according to research done by a friend, the election would be upended if Trump were to declare a national-security emergency."

Trump is so adamant about these efforts that, according to the Atlantic, "Trump’s White House and Cabinet advisers have been working for months to move Trump’s focus away from baseless theories of election fraud peddled by people like Ticktin, Root and Peters ... But the prospect of Trump deciding to act on the demands of his most fervent election-denying supporters has remained a constant threat, one that even Trump’s inner circle admits remains possible."

One thing we know for sure: This bone spurious coward will not be leading his troops into battle with protestors.  He'll be back in the people's house watching TV and throwing ketchup at the walls.

Saturday, September 19, 2026

Thousands Rally Outside Shuttered Kennedy Center, Chanting ‘Hands Off!’

Thousands Rally Outside Shuttered Kennedy Center, Chanting ‘Hands Off!’     Demonstrators gather outside of the Kennedy Center in protest of Trump's takeover and closure of the building. (photo: Craig Hudson/WP)
 
“Nobody’s name belongs on this center except John Kennedy’s.”

Sophia Solano and Jade Tran / The Washington Post

Hundreds of supporters of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts gathered Friday as the sun set over the Potomac, surrounded as much of the building as they could, linked arms and chanted, “Hands off! Hands off!”

For the first time in what felt to them like ages, their beloved arts center was brimming with life.

The vigil, which had been in the works for months, took on fresh urgency at the end of a week that saw the doors to the marble building locked shut, while President Donald Trump indicated the structure could be “ripped down” if his name isn’t added to the institution.

There were dogs and bikers; elders with gray hair and babies with no hair; people in Nationals jerseys and business casual attire (equally ubiquitous D.C. uniforms). Most wore one common item: a red pin that read, “Hands Off the Arts.”

The protest was organized by an advocacy group of the same name, which was founded by Kennedy Center staff in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s takeover last spring and has since campaigned against his changes to the institution.

“The center had more or less become like a mausoleum rather than a vibrant cultural center,” co-organizer Mallory Miller said before the vigil. “But a lot of us have amazing memories of the center hustling and bustling with people. We wanted to kind of bring that feeling back.”

The event was initially planned for July as a cap to the group’s 172-day protest of Trump’s changes at the center. It was intended to celebrate what they saw as victories — Richard Grenell’s stepping down from his role as interim head and the center’s continued operations past July 4, when it had been previously scheduled to close. The vigil was postponed due to wildfire smoke and rescheduled for the third Friday in September — a date organizers didn’t expect to have any special significance.

Then came the events of this week. On Tuesday, the Kennedy Center’s board voted to close its main building for two years and Trump threatened to cancel a roughly $250 million renovation unless his name was added to the center. On Wednesday, fencing was erected around the arts center and, that evening, Trump was photographed on Air Force One examining a printout with a partially visible title that appeared to read “Kennedy Center DEMOLIS[HED].” Thursday, a federal judge turned down a request for an emergency hearing about potential demolition but ordered the center to provide notice ahead of any construction, including demolition.

So by Friday, many arts patrons were ready to protest — more than 1,000 of them showed up, according to estimates from organizers.

Tara Hoot, a prominent D.C. drag performer and event co-organizer, hosted a storytime event at the center before Trump’s takeover. Appearances like hers were cited by Trump and his new leadership team as an examples of the kind of woke programming they wanted gone. She said she carries what feels like a responsibility to protect the institution now.

“It’s an obligation for me to be out there fighting back,” she said in an interview with The Post.

On Friday, Hoot dressed in honor of the American flag — long red dress, white floral pin, blue shawl. “It’s time to take that tarp down,” she said, pointing to the sheet behind her that has covered the building’s facade since Trump’s name was ordered to be removed.

“Take it down!” the crowd chanted back to her.

Donna Smits, 67, traveled from Delaware early Friday morning after learning about the planned protest around 11 p.m. the night before.

She stood in the plaza’s garden and looked up at the tarp through her gold-detailed RayBans. She was close to tears.

“It hurts a lot to look at it like that, to see all the beautiful fountains off,” Smits said. “Nobody’s name belongs on this center except John Kennedy’s.”

The rally began with impassioned speeches from activists, artists and politicians, including D.C. Council Member Robert C. White Jr., who recalled being introduced the arts as a third-grader visiting the center and returning decades later to watch his own third-grade daughter perform.

Lynda Carter, the actress known to most as Wonder Woman, made a surprise appearance to stress the importance of arts for humanity. “Music and the arts is how we actually survive,” she said. “It is how we learn. It is about vibration in the universe. It is about gravity, it’s about our souls.”

Additional fencing was constructed Friday and some parts of the campus have been closed to the public for several weeks, so the attendees were not able to encircle the main building as initially planned. Organizers posited that were it not for the barriers, the crowd that assembled could’ve circled the structure two and a half times.

Jasmine Small, who worked in ticket sales at the Kennedy Center for seven years, watched the human chain form from her perch on the plaza. She was among the first layoffs last year.

“I’m showing up today, because no one showed up with my colleagues,” Small said. “I’m going to have a voice for them to say that we won’t be forgotten.”

The Gay Men’s Chorus of Washington, whose show at the Kennedy Center for World Pride last May was canceled days after the president was announced as chair person of the institution, returned to perform at the vigil.

While the sky grew dark, they began a song from “Ragtime.”

“Will justice be demanded by 10 million righteous men? Make them hear you / When they hear you / I’ll be near you again.”

Then, as if on cue, the exterior lights of the building flickered to life.

What else can the man destroy?  Oh yeah, our country.

Friday, September 18, 2026

The Two Stooges Take Another Crack at Ukraine

The Two Stooges Take Another Crack at UkraineTrump special envoy Steve Witkoff and presidential son-in-law Jared Kushner are back in the picture.

Russia’s imaginary victories meet Trump’s imaginary diplomacy.
 
Cathy Young / The Bulwark

MORE THAN A YEAR AND A HALF after Donald Trump was supposed to end the war in Ukraine on Day One of his second presidency—remember that promise?—his administration’s Russia/Ukraine peace effort may be limping back into action. 

Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff and presidential son-in-law Jared Kushner are back in the picture: Earlier this month, the duo traveled to Moscow—for at least the ninth time, in Witkoff’s case—and then finally made it to Kyiv for a sitdown with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. 

There are also reports that CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who made a trip to Moscow last month with an undisclosed mission that may have involved warning Vladimir Putin off military action against NATO countries, may be stepping into a more extensive role in the negotiations. Also, Congress seems about to pass tough new sanctions against Russia; Trump seems to be back to his old Ukraine-bashing tricks; and Ukraine seems to be having a remarkably good week on the front lines.

Meanwhile, winter gets closer, and with it new hardships and dangers for Ukraine’s civilian population. Is there any chance of a breakthrough—at the front lines or at the negotiating table?

LET’S START WITH THE OBVIOUS: It’s safe to say that in the entire known history of diplomacy, there has never been a more clownish team of envoys than Witkoff and Kushner. It’s hard to find as much unanimity on anything in the Ukrainian media and among the independent Russian punditry as there is on this pair: The contempt in which they are held is reflected in the widely circulating sobriquet Vityok i zyatyok, a pun involving a Russian nickname for “Victor” and a diminutive for “son-in-law.” (It’s untranslatable, but “the Two Stooges” would do nicely in English.) 

Witkoff’s cluelessness and obsequiousness with Putin have long been legendary, and this time he did not disappoint: “When we retire, we’ll have all these incredible stories and incredible memories, and yours will be right at the top of it all,” he gushed to the Kremlin autocrat.

Tweedledum and Tweedledumber reportedly came to Moscow with nothing but updates to the same old “peace proposals”—and came away with nothing beyond the usual verbiage about “constructive” and “candid” conversations. However, most Russian-speaking observers noticed one richly symbolic detail. At one point on their visit to Moscow, the envoys had dinner with Putin’s special envoy Kirill Dmitriev at a Moscow restaurant whose exterior featured the large slogan, “EVERYTHING FOR VICTORY!” It doesn’t seem especially suggestive of a desire for peace.

The Witkoff/Kushner trip to Ukraine was also notable mainly for the symbolism: The fact that it happened at all brought at least a semblance of balance to the blatantly skewed optics of their earlier missions: “Thank God they finally came to Kyiv too,” expatriate Russian journalist and fierce Putin critic Evgenia Albats remarked on her YouTube channel. 

The visit also brought Trump’s envoys into active contact with some outspoken Ukrainians. Perhaps most memorably, during the Witkoff/Kushner press conference with Zelensky, Ukrainian journalist and television host Dmytro Gordon asked Witkoff about his past meetings with Putin with a very undiplomatic bluntness:

Don’t you think Putin has been lying to you all along? Don’t you think that Putin, the Russians, and Russia understand only one language—the language of strength? And finally, aren’t you disgusted to sit at the same table with an international war criminal, a butcher of the Ukrainian people who is personally responsible for Ukraine’s tragedy?

“Told Witkoff the whole truth,” Gordon wrote on his Instagram page. Witkoff, of course, responded with platitudes about the need for better communication channels and the “respect” with which Putin has always treated him.

Albats believes, like many other observers, that the comeback of the Kushner/Witkoff diplomatic shuffle is largely intended for American domestic consumption: stuck in the Iran quagmire, Trump desperately wants to score some points somewhere before the midterms. 

It’s hard to say if that’s part of the calculus, given that Ukraine is not a particularly high priority for most American voters in 2026. However, there is no question that Trump tried to use Ukraine for deflection from Iran on Sunday when, on his trip to Ireland, he blamed Zelensky for “causing a shortage of diesel fuel” by continuing to order Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil processing facilities: “This isn’t done by the Middle East, this is done by what’s happening with Russia and Ukraine.” (He then doubled down on this claim.)

Even aside from the fact that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz as a result of the war in Iran is the principal factor in the spike in fuel prices, the sniping at Ukraine and Zelensky omits a key fact: Zelensky has repeatedly proposed an “energy truce” in which both countries would refrain from striking at energy-related targets, including power stations and fuel-processing facilities, at least for the winter months. The Kremlin, meanwhile, says only that “no talks are being held” on an energy truce.

Most likely, Putin believes that Ukraine has more to gain from such a truce—just as he believes, more generally, that time is on his side. In any case, the salient fact is that Moscow, not Kyiv, is rejecting a suspension of strikes on oil facilities (just as Putin is the one rejecting Zelensky’s proposals for a meeting).1 “Maybe Trump doesn’t know that,” Russian émigré military analyst Yuri Fedorov speculated, charitably, in a YouTube interview. 

But ignorance is hardly an excuse. It seems that every time Trump remembers that Putin is the problem, he promptly unremembers it. And, while his hostility toward Zelensky is at far lower levels than in early 2025, thanks partly to Zelensky’s considerable skills at Trump ego management, the Ukrainian president remains his scapegoat of choice.

Put that together with Kushner’s comments, which amount, at best, to a both-sidesism that treats Russian and Ukrainian goals in this war as equally legitimate—while stressing Ukraine’s unwillingness to give up land as the obstacle to a peace deal—and it seems clear that the Trump administration’s peace efforts remain favorable to the Kremlin. 

You don’t need to believe that Trump is literally on Putin’s payroll or in his pocket via blackmail; it can be simply his dictator-fanboy instinct, or his belief that Putin can offer him a better deal. Either way, it doesn’t bode well for a just peace.

WHAT NEXT? The reports that Ratcliffe is gearing up to take a more prominent role in the negotiations apparently have some Republican insiders thrilled. But while Ratcliffe will likely prove more professional than the Two Stooges, his handling of Russiagate-related inquiries, first as director of national intelligence in the first Trump administration and more recently as CIA director, leaves no doubt that he is, first and foremost, a Trump loyalist who will do his master’s bidding. 

Any real breakthrough would require a willingness to recognize that Putin, not Zelensky, is the problem—and to apply pressure accordingly. Zelensky has urged the House to pass the sanctions package named after the late Lindsey Graham and already approved by the Senate. 

That legislation would target Russia’s energy companies and financial institutions, as well as purchasers of Russian energy; but its passage is far from certain, and the fine print shows that the administration could gut it by waiving some sanctions while using it to impose tariffs on U.S. allies.

It will be a tough winter for Ukraine, whose air defenses are badly depleted (though still functional and shored up by some European assistance). But the Ukrainians have shown their grit and spirit through four winters. And while Putin may believe that time is on his side, there is plenty of evidence that his conviction is based largely on fake reports and imaginary victories. 

Recall all the times he supposedly took the town of Kupyansk earlier this year. His most recent claims of Russian gains in the Donbas have been equally fictional; in fact, Ukrainian forces appear to have made one of their most successful counterattacks near the ruined city of Lyman, cutting off a route that would have facilitated further Russian advances toward Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, the key cities Russia would have to seize to complete its seizure of the region.

When Trump and Putin met in Alaska last year, Putin was convinced that he could hammer Ukraine hard enough in the first months of 2026—both by plunging Ukrainian cities into darkness and cold and by biting off more Ukrainian land on the frontlines—to achieve two goals: weaken Ukraine’s will to resist, and reinforce Trump’s default belief that a Russian victory is inevitable. Neither of those things happened. It’s likely that he has now shifted his timetable to 2027. Ukraine is on track to thwart him again.

"Do you even own a suit?" VP J.D. Vance bellowed at Zelensky during that infamous visit to the White House.

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Destroying Humanity Is Against the Law

 Destroying Humanity Is Against the Law(photo: Brendan Smialowski/Julien De Rosa/Matt Ramey/AFP/Getty Images)

World can’t wait for a mass-extinction event before holding AI developers accountable.
Juliette Kayyem / The Atlantic
  

This weekend, the AI executives Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and Dario Amodei agreed with the need to slow the pace of AI development. In light of the potentially apocalyptic capabilities of the products they have created, the AI titans would like a little more time to figure out how to safeguard the systems they have been rushing to build.

A smattering of employees throughout the industry have quit their jobs and expressed alarm over the rapidly evolving technology. One Anthropic researcher claimed recently that there is a greater than 10 percent chance that AI could “kill all humans,” aggravating fears created by recent incidents in which OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta models reportedly hacked into other companies. 

OpenAI recently revealed that some of its own models colluded for months to break into and steal information from Hugging Face, a website that offers tools for AI developers.

But surely the job of addressing the perils of AI shouldn’t be left to executives who stand to earn billions from the technology. Ideally, the federal government would regulate these companies, creating the guardrails necessary for the industry to operate safely. 

Short of that, some tools to address the harms from AI already exist: States have civil and criminal laws against conduct that threatens the security of life and property, and against commercial products that pose a danger to consumers. This includes new technology, as Meta’s recent $17 billion settlement over claims its products harm children makes clear. The work now before prosecutors and enforcement agencies is to create a precedent for holding AI companies responsible for what their models do.

Prosecutors should hold AI companies legally accountable for creating models that behave in ways that would be obviously unlawful if committed by a human being: hacking into banks to steal funds, impersonating a human to harvest sensitive personal data, breaking into an air-traffic-control system. 

By imposing legal penalties on AI developers for relatively modest offenses, prosecutors will force these firms to internalize the legal risk of more dramatic and dangerous crimes. In an essay posted online Saturday, Amodei proposed that every major AI firm collaborate on common safety practices and allow third-party agents to monitor compliance. In theory, the threat of prosecution and other legal sanctions could hinder companies from coming clean about how their models are trained and where they go wrong. But ultimately, oversight won’t prove effective if AI companies bear no legal responsibility for what their models do in the world.

The rapid development of AI has caused widespread speculation about what will happen when the technology “goes rogue.” This metaphor should be retired, because it implies that the companies and individuals that build and deploy these models aren’t culpable for building products that are supposedly too smart to control. Dealing with autonomous technology may be unprecedented, but creating a product that might “kill us all by the end of the decade,” as a former Anthropic employee has warned, surely qualifies as a criminally negligent harm.

Skeptics may wonder whether AI CEOs are expressing apocalyptic concerns as a backhanded way of boasting about the colossal power of their technology. The companies’ behavior on a variety of fronts does not indicate that humanity’s safety is their top concern. Some AI executives in the United States have donated millions of dollars to benefit President Trump, who has largely dismissed concerns about AI safety and has already said that he has no intention of stepping in. The Anthropic CEO’s essay praised his own company for prioritizing “prudence over profit”—and yet he is steering it toward what may be the biggest IPO in history.

AI firms will resist efforts to use the legal system to constrain their conduct. An OpenAI lawyer recently argued that “post-hoc law enforcement is a terrible tool” to manage the potential harms of generative AI. This would certainly be true in the case of a mass-extinction event, if no one is left to file charges. 

But despite what seems like an alarming consensus about the stakes of AI, the CEOs appear to be calling for some unenforceable “code of conduct” and a slower pace for developing the technology, whatever that means. If the dangers they are warning about are indeed real, then our criminal statutes should ensure that the offenders can be prosecuted. Given that vague threats about the perils of AI have not yielded meaningful changes in how these companies behave, perhaps the prospect of prison time will spur AI companies to take safety precautions more seriously.

“There’s no AI exemption from laws already on the books,” Lina Khan, the former head of the Federal Trade Commission, recently noted. Criminal prosecutions have occurred after oil spills, airline disasters, and toxic-waste dumps. The criminal liability was obvious in those instances. AI companies deserve no special treatment.

When AI executives warn of a catastrophe, they are not describing a product that is “going rogue.” Rather, the product is using capabilities that they have created. And if this product behaves negligently or criminally, its creators should face the consequences.

 An AI data center.

Monday, September 14, 2026

WHOSE SIDE IS HE ON? Trump Tells Zelenskiy to Stop Hitting Russian Diesel

Trump Tells Zelenskiy to Stop Hitting Russian Diesel     Ukainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. (photo: Ronaldo Schemidt/Getty Images)
 
INCREDULOUS: Prez says spiraling oil prices caused by Ukraine, not Iran War.
Bo Erickson
Reuters 

U.S. President Donald ‌Trump on Sunday called on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to stop targeting Russian diesel infrastructure, saying the attacks were causing a shortage of the fuel that is "hurting the world".

A wave of long-distance Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian oil refineries in recent months ⁠has reduced that country's fuel production, triggering gasoline shortages across the country.

Ukraine, which faces regular Russian attacks on its own energy infrastructure, says refineries are legitimate military targets.

The U.S. national average price for diesel, which is used by trucks, trains, ships and farm equipment, rose over $6 a gallon for the first time on Thursday, according to price tracker GasBuddy.

"Mr. Zelenskiy has to do one thing: He has to ‌stop ⁠knocking out diesel fuel in Russia," Trump told journalists during a visit to the Irish Open, which is being held in the west of Ireland on a golf course owned by his family.

"We spoke to Mr. ⁠Zelenskiy about it. There are plenty of other targets. Don't hit diesel fuel. That's hurting the world," he said.

The global shortage "isn't done by the Middle East, ⁠this is done by what's happening with Russia and Ukraine," Trump added.

Russia downgraded its oil output forecast for this year to a 17-year low ⁠and revised its fuel exports outlook for 2026 and 2027 due to the war, according to a government draft forecast seen by Reuters.

"Screw you" to yet another ally.