Demonstrators
protest President Trump's plan to build a border wall along the U.S-Mexico border on January 26 in Chicago. (photo: Joshua Lott/AFP)
27 January 17
he
“sanctuary cities” that President Trump has repeatedly characterized as
incubators of crime are generally safer than other cities, according to
a new analysis of FBI crime data.
There's no legal definition of a sanctuary city, but most observers adopt criteria used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
to identify cities and counties where local authorities refuse to hand
over illegal immigrants to federal agents for deportation.
Throughout his presidential campaign, Trump often
characterized these locales as dangerous hotbeds of criminal activity
and promised to suspend all federal funding to them.
“We will end the sanctuary cities that have resulted in so many needless deaths,” he told a crowd in Phoenix in the fall.
But an analysis of FBI crime data by Tom Wong,
a professor of political science at the University of California at San
Diego, finds that counties designated as “sanctuary” areas by ICE
typically experience significantly lower rates of all types of crime,
including lower homicide rates, than comparable non-sanctuary counties.
The analysis was published by the Center for American Progress, a
progressive think tank.
In 2015, the typical sanctuary county in a large
metropolitan area experienced 654 fewer crimes per 100,000 residents
than the typical non-sanctuary county in a big, metropolitan area.
That's an overall crime rate approximately 15 percent lower.
In smaller counties and even rural areas, crime rates were also lower for sanctuary areas, Wong found.
In smaller counties and even rural areas, crime rates were also lower for sanctuary areas, Wong found.
The exception is medium metros and counties on the
fringes of large metro areas, which had slightly higher crime rates if
they were sanctuary areas.
Overall, across all counties, there are on average 355 crimes per 100,000 in sanctuary counties.
“The data are clear that sanctuary counties aren't crime-ridden hellholes,” Wong said in an interview.
The data only shows correlation; Wong says more
research needs to be done to determine whether a causal effect is at
work here. But he said he suspects that, by becoming a sanctuary area
and refusing to involve local authorities in deportation matters, a city
or county may actually make itself safer. If immigrants who came to the
United States illegally fear working with police will lead to
deportation, they're less likely to report crimes and assist with
investigations.
This is the position of a number of law enforcement
groups. The Major Cities Chiefs Association, representing the 63 largest
urban areas in the United States, said that
“immigration enforcement by local police would likely negatively effect
and undermine the level of trust and cooperation between local police
and immigrant communities,” which would “would result in increased crime
against immigrants and in the broader community, create a class of
silent victims and eliminate the potential for assistance from
immigrants in solving crimes or preventing future terroristic acts.”
Similarly, the International Association of Chiefs of Police said that
“state and local law enforcement should not be involved in the
enforcement of civil immigration laws since such involvement would
likely have a chilling effect on both legal and illegal aliens reporting
criminal activity or assisting police in criminal investigations.”
Wong also looked at a number of economic indicators in
his analysis and found that in sanctuary counties, income tends to be
higher while poverty tends to be lower. He said the he suspects a causal
mechanism at work here, too.
“If you deport the breadwinner [of an immigrant
family], that leaves families more economically vulnerable,” he said.
“That means that these economically vulnerable families are more reliant
on public assistance.”
No comments:
Post a Comment