Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Monday, July 11, 2011

Close loopholes, tax the rich: problem solved

By Carl Gibson

What if there was a group of terrorists holding your family hostage with a gun pointed at themselves, demanding the account number to your pension fund? Would you negotiate with the terrorists by allowing them access to your savings, or would you let them shoot themselves and keep your retirement money intact?

Congressional Republicans are threatening to default on the debt unless President Obama caves to their demands to cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security spending. Regardless of the market-crashing consequences of a debt default, actually doing so would be unconstitutional. Section 4 of the 14th Amendment clearly states that “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions…shall not be questioned.” Republicans are violating the constitution by threatening a debt default. End of discussion.

Credible economists and lawmakers on both sides generally agree that raising the debt ceiling is an essential part of governing, and that a large deficit can pose a danger to economic security. But if Speaker Boehner genuinely cares about deficit reduction, he need only look to ending his own party’s policies and shifting the tax burden. Swearing allegiance to Grover Norquist’s no-new-taxes pledge, the GOP will only allow room for $4 trillion in cuts, arguing this is a spending problem, not a revenue problem. However, their budget would collect exactly $4 trillion less over the next decade through even more tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy.

Contrary to Republican claims, the United States is one of the lowest-tax countries in the world– U.S. corporations and wealthy citizens pay far less in taxes than other developed nations. Since 1950, capital gains taxes have dropped 10 percent, tax rates for million-dollar households have decreased 10 percent since the mid-nineties, and the estate tax has virtually disappeared for those with the largest fortunes since the onset of the Bush presidency. Four simple solutions would close that $4 trillion budget gap in the next decade, without even touching Social Security or Medicare.

By passing laws like Sen. Carl Levin’s Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act, we could generate over $100 billion in new revenue from closing loopholes that allow corporations to shift profits to overseas bank accounts. Through modest taxation of speculative Wall Street trading, we could bring in another $150 billion per year. With higher income tax brackets for households earning over $1 million annually, as Rep. Jan Schakowsky has proposed, we would gain another $100 billion. And progressively taxing estates worth $5 million or more would mean an extra $45 billion in tax revenue.

A truly principled leader would refuse to negotiate with terrorists, and allow them to turn the gun on themselves. Our President needs to stand firmly behind these common-sense proposals, and remove from the table any cuts to the programs we’ve spent our lives funding from our own paychecks. No exceptions. 

Carl Gibson is co-founder of USUncut, a grassroots movements to stop budget cuts by getting corporations to pay their fair share.  Reprinted with permission of Reader Supported News, http://www.readersupportednews.org/

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

This guy is bull of B.S.

Anonymous said...

Full of B.S.? Do you have an facts to back that up, or are you just repeating what you've been told to say by Limbaugh, Beck etc.

All American said...

How about close the loopholes, everybody pays a fair flat tax and no more B.S. deductions? Corporations pay their fair share of taxes instead of not paying a dam cent.

Or what about a National 1% sales tax on everything and get rid of the income tax sham?

The rich pay all the dam taxes anyway. Now before you call me names, let me tell ya, with my military retirement and SS, I take home less than 40k a year. So I'm not rich by any standard. I worked all my life.

When you add all this guys numbers, it's still a small drop in the bucket. He is talkin BILIIONS and we need to cut TRILLIONS. We do not have a revenue problem, our Govt has a spending problem. It's so simple to see it. No sane person could argue that anyone other than the Govt could get away with this.

A any ordinary person cannot spend more than they make. It's the same for a small business. Why should it be any different for the United States Government? Someone please explain it to me like I'm a seven year old!

Simple plan. Cut spending, balance the budget, have a fair and equal tax system for all.

God Bless America

Noble said...

If the honorable gentleman (and the Tea Party and Right Wing Republicans ) believe we can implement his suggestions by August 2, he (and they ) is/are delusional.
If the present debt ceiling is not raised to cover promised payments like Iraq, Afghanastan, and other promised but UNFUNDED by the Bush gang, his suggestions are moot.
We either pay our due bills, or
the economic circumstances will make things far worse than they are.
The President has offered several reasonable plans to begin paying down our debt and cut spending drastically, but these things take time, believe it or not. And, in spite of ranting by the right - there is not one single proposal for raising taxes in any plan he has offered.
Regardless of their lack of understanding, the Tea Party and Right Wing Republicans are threatening to bring down The United States. without attempting to reach a realistic long term solution.

Noble said...

If the honorable gentleman is under an impression that all his suggestions can be implemented by August 2nd, he (along with the Tea Party and right wing Republican)
is/are delusional.
A realistic long term plan is all that has a chance of working without causing more harm than good in our economy.
The President has offered several such plans which include huge spending cuts and (in spite of ranting by the Tea Party) do not propose a single tax increase.!)

If payment on the debt we already owe is not approved, everything else will be moot. We have to sell debt instruments in order to raise money. Anyone buying those instruments will demand much greater interest paid to take on greater risk. It's a fact of economics. More interest paid to debt buyers means less money to pay bills. It's a rat race we shouldn;t even contemplate, but apparently there are people who are
in favor of this.

Getting our house in order will take time and realistic planning. It has taken long years and many different administrations to get where we are. If the Tea Party and right wing Republicans aren't willing to understand that and work to solve the problems in an orderly manner, then we will all be pulled under with the drowning economy. Democrats don't want that. We are willing to do what's right - just not before Aug. 2.
That can't be done.

Anonymous said...

It is clear that the GOP has no real desire to get the economy moving before next year's election. The worse it gets, the better their chances are in 2012. The tea party zealots don't get that, but it can't possibly have escaped the GOP establishment.