I strongly support Obamacare (actually known as the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010). Not because its the best
solution to a difficult problem.
I am at a loss as to the vehement rhetoric that surrounds the issue. A
reader of the conservative press would quickly conclude that ObamaCare
was developed by an UnAmerican anti-Christ. That isn’t the case. On the
basis of open-mindedness and fairness, we Americans need to give it a
chance to be successful. Really, what other options do we have?
Let’s be honest. All of us who have used or dealt with the American
health care system in the last 30 years knows there were some very
serious problems. I myself had such an experience in 2010. A heart
condition is no laughing matter. After several months of standard
protocol attempts to treat my condition, it became obvious that more
serious treatment methods were necessary. I underwent a surgical
procedure in December 2010. The treatment was successful and I am
thankfully restored to a healthy state again. But, at what cost?
I chose one of the best medical facilities in the country. I had some
of the best doctors available for this kind of problem. The treatment
was excellent, the doctors were brilliant, and the caring staff treated
me like family instead of a patient. Best of all I left the hospital
after one night feeling better than I had in many years. I was lucky.
However, the cost was about $125,000 – for one night’s stay in the
hospital! I am grateful for the care, the treatment, and the result.
When I curiously asked the doctor what this procedure would cost he
replied, pausing, “I have no idea”. Nor did he care. It wasn’t his job
to care. His job was to treat me to better health.
My point is this: America’s health care system is not just broken, as
so many like to refer to it as. Its unaffordable, unworkable,
unreasonable, unfair, unavailable for many, and statistically comparable
to other countries in the world, not as good. Period. I am lucky. I had
insurance and the tenacity to research where I wanted to go, who I
wanted to see, and what I wanted done. I could afford the deductible
which, by comparison, seemed almost embarrassingly modest. Most
importantly, I had time to await these results. Without insurance this
option would have been unaffordable for me.
For far too long too many people have dealt with a health care system
that has been unmanageable and inefficient on its best day. On its
worst day, its dangerous. Let’s be honest. Despite all we know and all
we have achieved the medical system hasn’t been successful. If we simply
trade a medical problem for an economic problem for a service that is
unaffordable, what have we accomplished? The widespread desire of
immortality for most Americans is bankrupting this country. The medical
profession knows it, the insurance industry knows it, the legal
profession knows it, and the politicians have known it for decades. As
my cardiologist told me, “Hey, we have figured it out. Most people will
transfer most of their estate to the medical profession in their last
1-2 years of life”. He was right.
After his election in 2008, President Obama set an initial course of
correction of this problem. He specifically warned us it wouldn’t be
perfect, would require modification as we went, and likely would take
years to correct an out-of-control condition that had been exasperated
for more than 30 years. He wanted an individal mandate to be included
but Congress wouldn’t approve any of the health care act with such a
provision included. So, he settled for what he could get.
Obama has taken unmerciful criticism over the act. He has been
labeled everything from unAmerican, to a socialist, to a traitor, an
idiot, and an amateur. He told us, years in advance, this would be the
case. He told us there would be much criticism. He also told us, with
the present system, we really had no choice. We all knew it. The gravy
train had stopped. There was no way to manage the financial and economic
crisis in this country without better control of the health care
system. I applaud the President for his vision, strength and stand on
this issue.
The criticism of the Act is fair to some degree. Criticism of Obama
for the Act isn’t fair. ObamaCare isn’t perfect by any means. It isn’t
entirely fair. It isn’t inexpensive. But it will be more inclusive of
the 30-40 millions Americans that were not covered by insurance that the
rest of us were paying for anyway. Despite the criticism, warranted or
not, was there really any alternative to simply continue on the course
we were on for another 20 or 30 years? We surely knew what outcome that
would bring. Every political administration in power has tried to bring
about small modifications to the health care system for two or three
decades. For numerous reasons they were unsuccessful. At least now the
Act gives us a chance at reforming a system we know was broken. It will
need revision and modification, no doubt. It will need to be changed.
But at least its a start. If we can build on this new beginning, maybe,
we will reach a conclusion we all need and one we all can afford.
Before we dismiss the Act before it takes effect, let’s give it a
chance to be successful. The system we came from had already failed.
There was no hope in where we were. Let’s look forward and stop looking
in the rear view mirror.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
You might start by looking at the tort law system. It probably cost the heart surgeon $150,000 for malpratice insurance. The objective of Obamacare is to provide health insurance to those who don't want to get health insurance. $17 T in debt and spending like there was no tomorrow has been tried by a number of countries. You really have to be uninformed not to see the plain, obvious facts when they are in the news month after month.
Post a Comment