Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Fox's Shep Smith comes through with immediate fact-check of Trump's lie-a-thon


Normally, Fox News viewers can count on watching hours and hours of regularly scheduled programming without getting a whiff of an inconvenient truth, but tonight Shepard Smith, one of the few (only?) honest brokers on the network, called Trump out on the steaming pile of racist offal he was serving the nation tonight. 

From The Daily Beast:
Immediately following Trump’s approximately 10 minute speech, Smith broke down a “number of claims” that were deliberately misleading. While Trump issued scary warnings about murders by immigrants, Smith said, “Statistics show that there is less violent crime by the undocumented immigrant population than by the general population.”
In response to Trump claiming his wall would stop drug trafficking across the border, Smith said, “Government statistics show much of the heroin actually comes not over the unguarded border but through ports of call.”
The anchor also informed viewers that the number of illegal border crossings has been going “steadily down over the past 10 years” despite Trump’s assertion that they are on the rise and the government reports that “there is more outward traffic than inward traffic.”
Smith also informed his information-challenged audience that that new trade deal with Mexico that’s supposed to pay for all this isn’t actually a thing yet: “As for the trade deal he mentioned with Mexico, which he said would pay for the wall, that trade deal is not yet complete.”

Gee, if Trump can’t get away with his torrent of lies on Fox, what does he have left? Basically Rush Limbaugh’s mic, Ann Coulter’s pen, and Alex Jones’ perduring cascade of mouth effluvium.

Sunday, January 6, 2019

First openly bisexual senator takes oath with hand on law book as Mike Pence looks on in horror


How can you tell when Mike Pence looks ashen? Does his complexion change 10,000 shades of white, all the way from ecru to ivory to eggshell to scared-shitless-Mike-Pence*?

Regardless, he sure doesn’t look comfortable here as he swears in a bisexual woman who’s opted to take her oath with her hand on a law book. (I suppose the only way this could have been worse for him is if she’d brought her own table and bowl of pasta and forced him to sit down to dinner.)


💙💜.@kyrstensinema, the first openly bisexual Senator in U.S. history, has been sworn into office. Looking like a BOSS. 🏳️‍🌈✊

Today was filled with a lot of heartening moments, but I’m not sure anything is as emblematic of today’s triumph as this photo.
 View image on Twitter
Thank you, Sen. Sinema. You look fierce.
*Now available at Home Depot
***
Yo! Dear F*cking Lunatic: 101 Obscenely Rude Letters to Donald Trump by Aldous J. Pennyfarthing is now available at Amazon! Buy there (or at one of the other fine online retailers carrying it), or be square.
****
But wait, there’s more! The Fierce, Fabulous (and Mostly Fictional) Adventures of Mike Ponce, America’s First Gay Vice President is also available at Amazon! You can get two great political humor ebooks for less than the price of the coffee you’ll be spitting out on your tablet when you read them

Rashida Tlaib Is a Breath of Fresh Air

Filmmaker Michael Moore. (photo: Sacha Lecca)
Filmmaker Michael Moore. (photo: Sacha Lecca)

By Michael Moore, Michael Moore's Facebook Page
05 January 19 
 
e, the people of the United States, were forced to wait 230 years -- until yesterday -- before we finally got a Muslim woman in Congress (and we got two) who could finally say the plain truth that no one had dared yet uttered:

"We're gonna impeach the motherfucker!"

Oh, what a breath of fresh air when Rashida Tlaib, the oldest of 14 children and the newly elected member of Congress from Detroit, took to the stage at the MoveOn party in DC last night and spoke the unspeakable. Watch this: https://youtu.be/5FbsTVQWCJw 

Rep. Tlaib said out loud what tens of millions of us were already thinking -- "We're gonna impeach the motherfucker!" Yes I realize that to some moderate wimpy Dems that's a dirty word which should not be spoken. But, after two years of Trump, if we can't say a forbidden, nasty word like "impeachment," then we are never going to be able to remove this autocratic, malignant narcissist who has no intention of leaving.

And I know some of you are sticklers for proper language, and that saying slang like “gonna” instead of “going to” is just plain wrong.

Ok, yes, some of you also don't like the word "motherfucker." Fine. So don't say it. I don't like the word "keenwa" so I never say it (or eat it). I can't even spell it.

Now, there some amongst you, the Super Adults and Pundits, who believe Dems in Congress shouldn't tip their hand about impeachment before the Mueller investigation is completed. As if the Republicans and the media and Trump don't know EXACTLY what is going to happen in 2019! Ha! Quit kidding yourselves -- they know perfectly well what we are up to. We are removing Trump! A landslide majority of citizens in November went to the polls to do one thing: Elect the jury for the Impeachment Trial of Donald J. Trump. And that’s what we did. Whether the rational-thinking, self-contained people with a stick up their ass like it or not, we are going to impeach Trump (a.k.a., "The Motherfucker").

This isn't a random, unfounded threat. It is based on real facts (a.k.a. "High crimes and misdemeanors"). We don't need the special prosecutor to explain to us what we've witnessed with our own two eyes:

THE PARTIAL LIST OF IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES COMMITTED BY DONALD J. TRUMP:
      The Obstruction of Justice

      Violating the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution

      Conspiring with Others to Commit Crimes Against the United States, and Attempting to Conceal Those Violations

      Advocating Violence and Undermining Equal Protection Under the Law

      Abusing the Pardon Power

      Engaging in Conduct that Grossly Endangers the Peace and Security of the United States

      Directing Law Enforcement to Investigate and Prosecute Political Adversaries for Improper and Unjustifiable Purposes

      Undermining the Freedom of the Press

      Cruelly and Unconstitutionally Imprisoning Children and their Families

      Doing the Bidding of the Leader of a Hostile Foreign Power.

      Eliminating Environmental Regulations that Severely Threaten the Health of the Public.

      Losing the Needed Support of Trusted Allies.

      Starting a Trade War that Has Harmed Americans.

      Given Away Federal Lands at the Behest of Oil and Gas Companies.

      Consistently Acts on a Daily Basis in Reckless Ways that Indicate He Is Mentally Unstable and not Fit to Carry Out the Duties of President of the United States.
Thank you, Rashida, for saying what we're ALL feeling, thinking, saying, demanding and desperately yearning for. Whether or not the Senate convicts him (and, frankly, why they would stand up for a traitor is beyond me -- well, actually it's not beyond me, they love money and hate immigrants more than they hate Trump's treasonous acts) -- it doesn't matter now. The House has a responsibility to say these actions by a President are wrong, they're despicable and we must send a message to future generations by going on the record that we did not approve of this behavior.

Be sure to call the Congressional switchboard TODAY -- 202-225-3121 -- ask for the office of your representative in the House (they'll ask for your zip code) and tell the assistant who answers the phone that you want Congress to "Impeach the... (fill in the blank -- and don't be afraid to be creative -- or to talk like a Muslim woman from Detroit)."

Now is our moment. Thank you, #YesRashida. #ImpeachTheMoFo

-- Michael Moore

Saturday, January 5, 2019

Individual-1's unhingery on full display in nonsense "cabinet meeting"




large_1_
Note the poster on the desk
Note the poster on the desk, not this photoshopped one below but definitely a Bill Shiney object, because 45* loves his props.



Indictments-are-Coming.png


WaPo headline https://t.co/ydiEIPkx13


The shake-down continues...

"If Romney fought as hard against Obama as he does me, he'd be president."


"I think I would have been a good general, but who knows?"


“Iran is a MUCH DIFFERENT COUNTRY than it was when I became president.”

  • Trump said European leaders have told him they don't know how they've gotten away with taking advantage of the U.S. so long.  (This is one of the many Trump claims that can't be definitively called false but sure is super-false sounding.)
  • Trump scoffs at the military contributions of U.S. allies to U.S.-led coalitions, saying that a mere "200 soldiers to Iraq" or "100 soldiers from a big country to Syria or Afghanistan" doesn't make up for how these countries take advantage of the U.S. on trade and such.
  • Trump mocked Modi, I think, for reminding Trump that India built "a library" in Afghanistan: "We're supposed to say thank you for the library. I don't know who's using it, in Afghanistan..."
  • Trump criticized the late John McCain by name, twice, for voting against Obamacare repeal. He was very ranty at this Cabinet meeting.
  • Trump said he gave U.S. generals "all the money they wanted" for Afghanistan, but they did a bad job. Of Mattis, he says, "What's he done for me? How has he done in Afghanistan? Not too good. Not too good."
  • Trump: "Russia used to be the Soviet Union. Afghanistan made it Russia. Because they went bankrupt fighting in Afghanistan. Russia."
  • Trump's assessment of Syria: "We're talking about sand and death. That's what we're talking about."
  • Trump says he'll protect the Kurds anyway, but: "I don't want to be in Syria forever. It's SAND. And it's DEATH."
  • Trump's hingedness level was not high today.
  • Trump says he had a meeting about Iran and the Middle East with lots of good-looking generals: "Like from a movie. Better looking than Tom Cruise, and stronger."
  • Trump again falsely claims that Iran is having bigger protests ("riots") than "they've ever had before." The protests in the past year aren't nearly as big as the 2009 "Green Revolution" protests, let alone the Islamic Revolution.
  • Trump added that there were many "computer boards" in this Iran meeting with the hottie generals. (I had to wait until other people tweeted "computer boards" to make sure I wasn't imagining this phrase.)
  • Trump angrily complains about inspectors general doing public reports about the conduct of U.S. wars: "What kind of stuff is this? We're fighting wars and they're doing reports?" He says: "'The public' means the enemy. The enemy reads those reports."
  • Asked about the Syria withdrawal, Trump said he never said it would be "fast." He said it would happen in 30 days.
  • Trump says that if the courts say Obama had the right to do DACA unilaterally, he can do whatever he wants on lots of other stuff. He adds: "Can you imagine me having this power? Wouldn't that be scary?"
  • Trump says he was all alone in his "big house" over the holidays -- "except for all of the guys out on the lawn with machine guns." He says that he's never seen so many machine guns, and they didn't even wave at him. He adds, "All alone with the machine-gunners."

Friday, January 4, 2019

2019 Will Be the Worst Year of Donald Trump's Life

Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer. (photo: Getty)
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer. (photo: Getty)

By Jon Wiener, Los Angeles Times
04 January 19
 
ome presidents have really bad years.

For Nixon, it was 1974 — the Watergate year, which ended with his resignation. For Clinton, it was 1998 — the Monica year, which culminated with an impeachment trial in the Senate in 1999. He won that vote easily and came out more popular than before.

It’s a good guess that Donald Trump’s really bad year will be 2019. And it’s not yet clear whether he’ll survive, like Clinton, or be forced out of office, like Nixon.

Nixon’s worst year resulted from crimes in his 1972 reelection effort, when burglars working for the campaign got caught breaking into the Democratic headquarters, and then Nixon and others conspired to stop the break-in investigation and cover up what had happened.

The events that brought Clinton to an impeachment trial in the Senate had nothing to do with his political campaigns. His misdeeds were strictly personal: He had sex with a White House intern, Monica Lewinsky, and then denied it under oath.

The storm clouds gathering around Trump involve both the personal and the political.

More than a dozen federal and state investigations are underway focused on Trump and those who worked on his election effort. He will also soon be facing aggressive congressional investigations by the House Democrats.

It’s easy to get lost in the details of Russiagate and the guilty pleas of Trump associates involved in a range of crimes, but what is developing is not that complicated: It’s a political corruption scandal with the potential to be larger than anything we’ve seen before in American history.

The infamous Trump Tower meeting, where Don Jr., Jared Kushner and campaign chief Paul Manafort met with a Russian operative offering help in the election, could turn out to be far worse than anything that happened in Watergate. And Trump’s sexual troubles would be worse than Clinton’s, too, if he is found to have violated campaign funding laws in trying to buy the silence of women he slept with.

Still, there are many similarities between Trump’s troubles and earlier presidential scandals — along with some differences.

Both Nixon and Clinton faced allegations of obstruction of justice. They were tripped up not so much by the acts themselves, but rather by attempts to cover them up.

Obstruction is also a focus of the investigations facing Trump. For Trump, the possible obstruction involves his efforts to stop the Russiagate investigation and his firing of FBI Director James Comey.

Trump is also facing potential charges that neither Nixon nor Clinton had to deal with.

The biggest question is whether Russiagate was a quid pro quo in which Russia offered to help Trump win the election in exchange for Trump easing Russia sanctions. We will probably learn more this year about what Russia did, exactly, during the election, both with “information influence” spread through social media and cyberattacks on the Dems. But the big question will remain what the Trump campaign knew about those efforts, and who exactly was in the loop.

Trump also faces campaign finance issues that neither Nixon nor Clinton had to deal with. If, as Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen has said, Trump directed that payments be made to two women to keep them silent during the election campaign, then the payments could be construed as illegal campaign contributions.

Trump also faces allegations that he violated the emoluments provision of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits federal officeholders from receiving payments from foreign or state governments while in office. The attorneys general of the District of Columbia and Maryland argue that Trump violated the emoluments clause by receiving money from foreign governments while holding office, through hotels owned by his family.

And if that weren’t enough, Trump also faces investigations into alleged illegalities at the Trump Foundation and in the fundraising and spending by his inauguration committee.

Nixon’s troubles hold another possible caution for Trump in a year when committees in the House will almost certainly be subpoenaing the president’s tax returns. For Nixon, news that he had violated tax laws by taking an illegal write-off did a lot to turn the public against him. Nixon had backdated the deed of gift of his papers to the National Archives in order to take his write-off in a more advantageous year.

People who shrugged off Watergate on the grounds that “everybody does it” were outraged that the president had claimed an illegal deduction of $576,000 — the equivalent today of more than $3 million.

We don’t know whether Trump’s tax returns contain dubious write-offs, but it seems likely we’ll find that out this year — and also, perhaps, whether the public is more forgiving of him than of Nixon for tax shenanigans.

Both Clinton and Nixon faced impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee voted articles of impeachment in 1974 against Nixon, but the full House never voted on them, and the Senate never held an impeachment trial. He resigned before that — and was promptly pardoned by his successor, his former vice president, Gerald Ford, for any crimes he may have committed. Clinton was impeached by the House and went on to face a Senate trial, which fell far short of the required two-thirds vote for conviction.

I’m betting that, in the end, Trump resigns and gets an advance pardon for himself and his children. That may not happen until 2020, but in the meantime, 2019 will be the worst year of his life.

Thursday, January 3, 2019

China, Partner or Enemy

  GEORGE TEMPLETON: COMMENTARY  

By George Templeton
Rim Country Gazette Columnist
“No people can live to itself alone.  The unity of all who dwell in freedom is their only sure defense….  No nation can longer be a fortress, lone and strong and safe.  And any people, seeking such shelter for themselves, can now build only their own prison.”   Dwight D. Eisenhower
The Price of Free Trade
A dozen of us engaged in idle chat prior to a business meeting in the mid-seventies.  We were middle managers, responsible for everything but with authority over nothing.  How was it that we got our privileged position?  Some of us had taken steps that increased the probability that we would evolve in particular directions.  None of us had planned or asked for it.  It is remarkable how things turn out.  We thought, if we outsource manufacturing, won’t it eventually mean that middle class America will have to decline in standard of living to compete with cheap overseas labor?  No job will be safe from international competition.  But it isn’t just cheap labor that matters.  It’s also government, infrastructure, and education.
The salary difference is on the order of ten to one, less within free-trade zones, more in rural communities.  How about our leaders?  Can they really control what the world will become?  There are not enough resources on the planet for everyone to live like Americans.  Nature has a way of establishing equilibrium.  The truth has a spreading velocity.
Wolves don’t care what Sheep Think
“Tariff man” welcomes economic warfare.  It’s national defense!   Tariffs are not paid by our manufacturers or the Chinese as Trump claimed.  When prices go up, importers eventually have to pass them on to you.  Tariffs hurt our friends.  They create winners and losers.  Trump wins when foreigners lose, but what about American consumers?  The Chinese are gaining on us.  Exactly how is it unfair?  What should China do to restore equity?  We must have a plan.  Have we forgotten what it takes to be a world leader?
There are three sides to this.  The first argues that we must embrace China as a partner.  The third worries about America’s fate in the coming era of Chinese influence.  Between them we find the Senate Committee on Chinese Espionage along with the FBI, Homeland Security, and the Justice Department.  They don’t see our challenge as spy versus spy.  It is country against country, a well-organized conspiracy, patient, persistent, and intense, with thousands of participants, who may never be held accountable in a court room. They are “weaponized to vacuum up U.S. industrial capabilities and emerging technologies”.   Retired General Keith Alexander, a NSA man, credits Chinese espionage with “the greatest transfer of wealth in history” ($600 billion).  However, Wikipedia lists only 28 spy cases dating back to the eighties.  In the past nine months there have been 16 individuals and four corporations charged in eight separate cases.  The increase may be a consequence of slow legal processes and a more intense focus by the FBI.
The Chinese identified the world’s needs, like the relays in smart electrical meters, and motors below fifty horsepower.  Hidden in numerous places, they have greatly reduced our costs.  Now there is the 2025 Chinese government strategy, called the “wheel of doom” by the Senate Committee.  To prevent our demise, they say that we should prohibit Chinese investment in technical start-ups, scientific research, and education.  America may abandon the World Trade Organization because it has only the force of persuasion, but the Russian meddling in the 2016 election shows how powerful opinion can be.  Influence is malleable.  It is subject to ignorance and propaganda.  Fact Check needed 3441 words to adequately respond to Sarah Sander’s recent 24 word tweet concerning the National Climate Assessment.  A good writer of propaganda can imbed a dozen propaganda techniques in a single paragraph.  We have to develop a pallet for the details.
It Never Entered Their Mind
The Confucian goal was perfect harmony, from the bottom to the top, not top down.  Rulers were to be accountable for their decisions.  They were to be moral, ensure the well-being of the people, and promote harmony through management and coordination.  Constructive criticism, accountability and public-mindedness described the relationship.  These are lofty goals, but people found a way to let self-interest take over.
Chinese Communism has an uneasy relationship with Confucianism, but they are not anti-science like our religious right.  It’s a false choice:  faith, instinct, and belief or secularism, rationality, and empiricism.   Both are human, but a choice of only one leads to missing the other.  Will China be a partner or an enemy?  Trust and participation are not among the mechanisms of war.  Influence isn’t spying.  Chinese business practice is based on long term relationships instead of contracts and lawyers.  They value the wisdom that comes along with age and experience over novelty.
Is plagiarism is a word in the Chinese vocabulary?  Cheap labor makes the manufacture of simple things in high demand profitable.  Learn the details later!  It is deep in the Asian subconscious.  It makes it easier to violate copyright laws.  But we taught them the how and why of technology and we did this although our company claimed that we have only three years to capitalize on new innovations before others figure it out.
The Committee on Chinese Espionage wrung its hands over the Confucius Institutes.  Their charter promotes Chinese culture, language, and good will, but staffing, academic freedom, curriculum, censorship, and spying are concerns.  Conservatives would rather not have college students exposed to controversy.  Communism is reluctant to privatize.  It maintains control over business, banking, and the judiciary, but it has learned from Hong Kong and Taiwan.  It bends the rules in free trade zones where many have allegiance to their family and culture, but are not enthusiastic about their government.  These are small potatoes compared with the future of our food, energy, artificial intelligence, robotics, automobile and telecommunications industries.  If we can’t solve them, how can we deal with global warming, sustainability, mass immigration, and war?
A Paranoid Style
The most useful patents are for clever things that are obvious.  They are easy to copy.  To patent is to publicize.  Historically, America has born development costs and market timing risks that are absent in copying.  Being first provides an opportunity to corner the market, but manufacturing technology progresses and making millions of anything is a challenge.  The recent Micron Technology intellectual property lawsuit involves DRAMs, an old commodity widely used since the seventies, in computers, military equipment, and even children’s toys.  The new creation shrinks chip sizes and expands memory capacity.  It takes billions of dollars and equipment available only from the USA to make the improved version.  Micron is the only American manufacturer, but they have collaborated with Taiwan.  Their competitors are in Korea.  It’s the kind of thing the Chinese government conspires to get.  Now we have three countries and four companies suing each other.
My company would not allow any unattended documents on your desk.  If you got up to go to the bathroom, you locked up all your desk drawers and filing cabinets.  A cluttered desk reveals a muddled mind!  More than one computer was required.  You periodically updated the password for each piece of software.  It took a half-hour to unlock and type in numerous passwords.  The paperless society made the only valid document the one stored on the computer.  Anything in print was obsolete and illegal.   Security police enforced this.  When companies outsource sunset technologies, they are not giving away their secret sauce.
The electro-mechanical designer’s job went away, replaced by a computer system that instantly made every change simultaneously available to those who needed to know everywhere in the world.  It increased efficiency.  Communication and automation explains why the cost of electronic components declined by a factor of one hundred since 1965, in spite of inflation.  But now prying eyes need only one thing, the computer.  Social media, the internet, and business that wants to know you, proves that nothing on the internet is secure.  Is any cryptography immune to theft and hacking?  A secret is hard to keep!
Your computer does not contain a hidden Chinese spy chip and they don’t hear your every word through the ac power line.  It is not technically feasible and even if it were, there are standards for electromagnetic compatibility and an entire industry that implements them.  It is not about security.  It’s about control.  What should be classified?  Consider non-commercial university research on quantum entanglement.  What is real and does it exist at a time and place?  Is the moon there when I am not looking at it?   Are we waves or particles?  How is it that things are true even though they are mutually exclusive?
Dragon or Very Hungry Caterpillar
There was a time when America had to go it alone.  The rest of the world had been destroyed by wars.  Nationalism argues for returning to the world of the 1950’s, but the boundary conditions of that equation are not the same.  It was before refrigeration, television, woman drivers, and jet planes.  America was still on the gold standard.  It was a world that was much less affluent and not addicted to smart phones, consumerism, and credit.  It was a world before travel and the diffusion of foreigners.  The thrill is gone.  Our culture has changed.  There is no high school electronics course. There is no kid next door with a new Corvette and less than 2 years of education.  Of course, there is a new profitable frontier and it is all around us, but not advertised.
Can we return to the fifties by introducing a 25 percent tariff on all manufactured imports?  Our government would have to take steps to discourage consumption, increase investment, and emphasize education.  Knowledge changes reality.  It’s a knowledge economy!  Education makes the future, but it needs to lead to a job first, and then continue in any subject of interest.   It must cooperate with industry and business, but then knowledge will get around.
Travels with George
The world I visited in the nineties did not have paved roads or electricity at night, yet they were making transistors.  In India, a manager proudly showed me their new semiconductor device.  I wondered if they had the government registration I signed thirty years ago.  That device was nostalgia.  So was their American factory automation.  The Japanese supplied automation in China and Taiwan outsourced jobs to them.  The world is not our adversary.  A weak competitor is better than none at all.  A more prosperous world does not mean a poorer USA.
Dealing with the decline of our middle class will require regulations and strategy.  There’s something wrong with a society that justifies a salary of eighty million dollars a year and a severance package of one hundred and twenty million dollars for a company CEO, but ignores the plight of direct-labor workers who lose their source of livelihood.  We have to be concerned, not with just profit, but with the loss of our dream and the devaluation of humanity.  That can only lead to our alienation from one another and a failure to address our common challenges.

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

Happy New Year? Tell That to the Natural World We Are Furiously Destroying

An orca. (photo: Thinkstock)
An orca. (photo: Thinkstock)

By Philip Hoare, Guardian UK
01 January 19

As humans slow down for the holidays, so does the environmental damage they inflict – if only briefly

o the animals must pay for our dysfunctionality. Japan, swayed by some notion of nationhood, asserts itself by declaring its resumption of whaling. Revenge is being wreaked on the Save the Whale campaigns of the 1970s and 80s – the bedrock of modern environmentalism – and all those yoghurt-knitting hippies. Killer whales and belugas are kept in “whale jail” in the far east of Russia, as far from prying eyes as possible – ready to be sold to marine parks in China. Highly evolved animals are stolen from the sea and people buy tickets so their family can watch them perform in artificial pools thousands of miles from home.

Meanwhile people stand on the banks of the Thames, at the aptly named Gravesend, hoping for a peek at a lone lost beluga. (I decline to call it by its presumptively gendered and anthropomorphic name). Animals have become entertainment, and must therefore bend to our will, adopt our demotic. There are protests when prisoners are allowed to pet goats for therapeutic purposes, but plaudits when spy cams are sent into the natural world as if in extension of our own over-surveilled and tracked existence, and serious public discussions as to whether a film crew in the Antarctic should dig some penguins out of a hole. As if we weren’t in a deep enough one already.

We have to deny the innate beauty of animals because we know we are destroying their world. Newly discovered species can barely raise their heads in the jungle or the ocean depths. “On every new thing there lies already the shadow of annihilation,” as WG Sebald wrote in his melancholy The Rings of Saturn. They are the bycatch of our remorseless progress, like the roadkill of whom Barry Lopez, the great American nature writer, observed: “They are the ones you give some semblance of burial, to whom you offer an apology, who may have been like seers in a parallel culture.”

In an essay for the online magazine Aeon, Gary Kroll, professor of history at the State University of New York, wrote: “We must understand that getting in a car, plane or train, that ordering a book from Amazon – all are destructive acts … Wildlife deserves an apology.” We even suborn the weather. Storms are given human names, as if to announce our control over the climate, even as we destroy it. These are the ultimate anthropomorphisations: Storm Emma, the beast from the east. Weather forecasters talk about “useful weather”, as if the heavens had been invented for our utility.

But now, for a few days, that insatiable human speed has slowed down. Like a sudden fall of snow, it’s as if the turning has forced an amnesty between us and the rest of creation. In the interregnum that this end of the year creates, the natural world briefly resumes its sway. We have time to peer up at the moon, see shooting stars, smell air that isn’t filled with diesel fumes; some of us even dare to swim in the sea, relishing the barbaric cold for the way that it reminds us we are physical beings, alive and mortal, and the way that the tides determine another kind of timetable. It awaits a new start. Lying on our backs, we might look up at the night sky where stories began, as John Berger said.

That space and stillness might hold any kind of possibilities. The sea and the sky might be our last big vestiges of hope, for all that we have done to them. This is a sanctified time because it reconnects us with the animals we are. The instinct to hunker down, to hibernate, to be with one another, physically – not on a device.

Perhaps even to regain the ways we once navigated the world, our natural GPS, sensing magnetic fields in the way whales and birds do. A new sense of direction. A different kind of tracking. Wouldn’t that be a lovely gift to find left over, stuffed behind the Christmas tree?