Campaign for America's Future
ourfuture.org
Corporations get enormous benefits that regular “persons” do not. One of the biggest is limited liability. This means that the shareholders are not liable for the debts of the corporation. A corporation can get in a lot of trouble, financial and otherwise, and then just close up shop, divide its assets to its creditors, and the shareholders can just walk away losing only the money they originally put in. While it might be a “person” to certain members of the Supreme Court, there is no person to be made to work off the debt or to put in jail.
Corporations also enjoy lower tax rates than people do. (Except for the people who make a gain from the shares: they get a special, even lower tax rate called “capital gains.” Why is this? The capital gains tax rate is lower because the wealthiest make most of their income from capital gains, and the wealthiest make most of their income from capital gains because the capital gains tax rate is lower.)
And of course, corporate “persons” never have to die.
In return, we the people of the United States ask corporations to pitch in to help pay for the roads and courts and schools and scientific research and government contracts and the rest of the things that have helped make them the prosperous entities they are. But a number of American corporations are so fed up with the idea that should pay their taxes that they are actually renouncing their U.S. citizenship. These corporations are “leaving” the U.S. to dodge taxes—but their executives, employees, offices, stores, customers etc. are still here. The only thing that is really leaving the country is the requirement to pay U.S. taxes.
These corporations are able to “leave” the U.S. by engaging in something called inversion. Explaining an inversion is a bit complicated. A U.S. company buys or merges with a non-U.S. company, and the result is that the U.S. company can be considered to be a company from the other country. But at the same time the company keeps most of its operations, etc. inside the U.S. The result is that it might still owe taxes on income reported as made in the U.S., but it owes no taxes on income elsewhere.
Here are five companies – only a handful of the total — that have or are trying to renounce their U.S. citizenship to avoid paying taxes to help cover the benefits they receive.
1. Walgreens
Walgreens is the U.S.’ largest pharmacy retailer with 8,200 stores and locations in all 50 states, and the company is currently deciding whether to renounce its U.S. corporate status and instead claim on paper to be a Swiss company. According to Americans for Tax Fairness, this move would mean Walgreens avoids paying $4 billion in U.S. taxes in the next five years.
Americans for Tax Fairness points out that “Walgreens receives nearly a quarter of its income from taxpayers through government programs. Of its $72 billion in 2013 sales, an estimated $16.7 billion, or 23 percent, came from Medicare and Medicaid.” (See Is Walgreens Trying To Leave The U.S.?)
2. Medtronic
Medtronic Inc., a medical device maker with $17 billion in annual sales, is in the middle of purchasing Ireland’s Covidien for $42.9 billion as a tax-avoidance scheme.
One reason Medtronic is doing this, from the NY Times’ Dealbook:
Both companies are in the medical device business, but analysts and investors have said the deal makes sense largely because Medtronic can tap its $12 billion in overseas cash without paying United States taxes.
Medtronic has been keeping its non-U.S. profits “out of the country” to avoid the taxes it owes on that money. Now it is using the funds to buy itself out of the U.S. for good. Of course, it will still have the same offices, employees and customers here. Our tax laws let it get away with this.
Usually a company claims it is doing this “for the shareholders.” But in this case it is going to cost Medtronics’ shareholders big-time. The IRS is going to declare this counts as shareholders selling their Medtronics stock, and will hit them with a tax bill for the gains. However, Medtronics executives will have their tax bills covered by the company.
3. Perrigo
Perrigo is, according to Fortune Magazine’s report, Top American corporate tax avoiders, “the world’s largest seller of over-the-counter store-brand drugs.” It is “headquartered in Michigan but incorporated in low-tax Ireland.” Perrigo is suing the Food and Drug Administration “(for which the company doesn’t pay its fair share) for allegedly not moving quickly enough to allow its testosterone gel to be sold without a prescription.”
4. Ingersoll-Rand
Ingersoll-Rand renounced its citizenship just one month after 9/11, claiming it really was headquartered in Bermuda. Later it moved to Ireland. Even though it is not an American company anymore, Fortune Magazine’s report points out that doesn’t mean it doesn’t receive the benefits of being American. “CEO Michael Lamach says one place Ingersoll Rand gets its engineering and technical talent is “our U.S. military veteran recruiting program.”
Bloomberg News took a comprehensive look at how Ingersoll-Rand “left” the country and was still able to receive lucrative government contracts from the U.S. government, in its report, How to Win Billions in Federal Contracts on a Permanent Tax Holiday. According to Bloomberg:
American manufacturer Ingersoll-Rand Co. (IR) forged the tools that carved the Panama Canal and shaped Mount Rushmore. When it shifted its legal address to Bermuda in 2001 to reduce taxes, the maneuver sparked bipartisan outrage in Congress.
… Ingersoll-Rand continues to score federal work worth hundreds of millions of dollars, touting projects for the Army and Navy in sales brochures. The company’s strategies have even included trying to piggyback on the eligibility of other companies, according to two former Ingersoll-Rand employees.
One of several examples of the company getting contracts from the government,
In March 2010, an Ingersoll-Rand unit received a contract to maintain equipment at supermarkets on military bases from Texas to Hawaii. Funded by a 5 percent surcharge on purchases at the stores, the contract has already paid more than $100 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
5. Eaton Corp
Here is one with a lot of gall. Eaton took $90 million in taxpayer-financed subsidies to build a headquarters in Cleveland, then moved itself to Ireland to avoid paying U.S. taxes. But Eaton and its CEO are part of the notorious Fix the Debt campaign, a campaign to persuade Congress to cut Social Security and impose austerity on 99% of us — because the U.S. doesn’t collect enough in taxes!
That’s right, a company that claims to be Irish to avoid paying U.S. taxes is lecturing Americans on how we need to cut back on the things government does for us. Fix the Debt says we have to do this because of a shortfall in tax collections… from companies like Eaton!
We Can’t and Shouldn’t Stomach This
These are just five of so many examples of companies scamming us to avoid their taxes. This chart from the Congressional Research Service shows the companies as well as the accelerating pace of inversions. (Click for full size.)
So who is paying the taxes as corporations shirk their responsibility to help fund the benefits corporations receive? Michael Hiltzik at the LA Times explains in Corporate tax scam watch: The ‘inversion’ craze,
In 1952, about 32% of federal revenues came from the corporate tax, 42.2% from the individual income tax, and 9.7% from the payroll tax. Today, the individual income tax still accounts for nearly the same percentage, but the corporate tax has declined to 8.9% of tax revenue and the payroll tax is up to 40%. Seen in that light, payroll taxpayers–that is, America’s working men and women–have financed the decline in the corporate tax burden (which benefits mostly wealthy shareholders).
Isaiah J. Poole, in Corporate Tax Behavior So Bad Even Fortune Magazine Can’t Stomach It, writes,
One thing we should do is push for passage of legislation introduced by Sen. Carl Levin and Rep. Sandy Levin (both Michigan Democrats) that would make it harder for American corporations to merge with foreign corporations in a way that enables them to operate as if they are American corporations while claiming to be foreign for tax purposes.
Solutions
In early July the House passed an amendment by a vote of 221-200 denying federal contracts to American companies that have reincorporated in Bermuda or the Cayman Islands. This is not yet law, but is attached to the Energy/Water appropriations bill. It is a beginning, but only lists these two tax haven countries and won’t affect Walgreens, should it make itself appear to be a Swiss company.
The Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2014 is a more comprehensive effort that “increases the needed percentage change in stock ownership from 20 percent to 50 percent and provides that the merged company will nevertheless continue to be treated as a domestic U.S. company for tax purposes if management and control of the merged company remains in the U.S. and either 25 percent of its employees or sales or assets are located in the U.S.”
Republicans will obstruct the bill. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the legislation would save $19.5 billion over 10 years.
This would be a start toward fixing this problem. A small start, admittedly, but a start.
ourfuture.org
Corporations get enormous benefits that regular “persons” do not. One of the biggest is limited liability. This means that the shareholders are not liable for the debts of the corporation. A corporation can get in a lot of trouble, financial and otherwise, and then just close up shop, divide its assets to its creditors, and the shareholders can just walk away losing only the money they originally put in. While it might be a “person” to certain members of the Supreme Court, there is no person to be made to work off the debt or to put in jail.
Corporations also enjoy lower tax rates than people do. (Except for the people who make a gain from the shares: they get a special, even lower tax rate called “capital gains.” Why is this? The capital gains tax rate is lower because the wealthiest make most of their income from capital gains, and the wealthiest make most of their income from capital gains because the capital gains tax rate is lower.)
And of course, corporate “persons” never have to die.
In return, we the people of the United States ask corporations to pitch in to help pay for the roads and courts and schools and scientific research and government contracts and the rest of the things that have helped make them the prosperous entities they are. But a number of American corporations are so fed up with the idea that should pay their taxes that they are actually renouncing their U.S. citizenship. These corporations are “leaving” the U.S. to dodge taxes—but their executives, employees, offices, stores, customers etc. are still here. The only thing that is really leaving the country is the requirement to pay U.S. taxes.
These corporations are able to “leave” the U.S. by engaging in something called inversion. Explaining an inversion is a bit complicated. A U.S. company buys or merges with a non-U.S. company, and the result is that the U.S. company can be considered to be a company from the other country. But at the same time the company keeps most of its operations, etc. inside the U.S. The result is that it might still owe taxes on income reported as made in the U.S., but it owes no taxes on income elsewhere.
Here are five companies – only a handful of the total — that have or are trying to renounce their U.S. citizenship to avoid paying taxes to help cover the benefits they receive.
1. Walgreens
Walgreens is the U.S.’ largest pharmacy retailer with 8,200 stores and locations in all 50 states, and the company is currently deciding whether to renounce its U.S. corporate status and instead claim on paper to be a Swiss company. According to Americans for Tax Fairness, this move would mean Walgreens avoids paying $4 billion in U.S. taxes in the next five years.
Americans for Tax Fairness points out that “Walgreens receives nearly a quarter of its income from taxpayers through government programs. Of its $72 billion in 2013 sales, an estimated $16.7 billion, or 23 percent, came from Medicare and Medicaid.” (See Is Walgreens Trying To Leave The U.S.?)
2. Medtronic
Medtronic Inc., a medical device maker with $17 billion in annual sales, is in the middle of purchasing Ireland’s Covidien for $42.9 billion as a tax-avoidance scheme.
One reason Medtronic is doing this, from the NY Times’ Dealbook:
Both companies are in the medical device business, but analysts and investors have said the deal makes sense largely because Medtronic can tap its $12 billion in overseas cash without paying United States taxes.
Medtronic has been keeping its non-U.S. profits “out of the country” to avoid the taxes it owes on that money. Now it is using the funds to buy itself out of the U.S. for good. Of course, it will still have the same offices, employees and customers here. Our tax laws let it get away with this.
Usually a company claims it is doing this “for the shareholders.” But in this case it is going to cost Medtronics’ shareholders big-time. The IRS is going to declare this counts as shareholders selling their Medtronics stock, and will hit them with a tax bill for the gains. However, Medtronics executives will have their tax bills covered by the company.
3. Perrigo
Perrigo is, according to Fortune Magazine’s report, Top American corporate tax avoiders, “the world’s largest seller of over-the-counter store-brand drugs.” It is “headquartered in Michigan but incorporated in low-tax Ireland.” Perrigo is suing the Food and Drug Administration “(for which the company doesn’t pay its fair share) for allegedly not moving quickly enough to allow its testosterone gel to be sold without a prescription.”
4. Ingersoll-Rand
Ingersoll-Rand renounced its citizenship just one month after 9/11, claiming it really was headquartered in Bermuda. Later it moved to Ireland. Even though it is not an American company anymore, Fortune Magazine’s report points out that doesn’t mean it doesn’t receive the benefits of being American. “CEO Michael Lamach says one place Ingersoll Rand gets its engineering and technical talent is “our U.S. military veteran recruiting program.”
Bloomberg News took a comprehensive look at how Ingersoll-Rand “left” the country and was still able to receive lucrative government contracts from the U.S. government, in its report, How to Win Billions in Federal Contracts on a Permanent Tax Holiday. According to Bloomberg:
American manufacturer Ingersoll-Rand Co. (IR) forged the tools that carved the Panama Canal and shaped Mount Rushmore. When it shifted its legal address to Bermuda in 2001 to reduce taxes, the maneuver sparked bipartisan outrage in Congress.
… Ingersoll-Rand continues to score federal work worth hundreds of millions of dollars, touting projects for the Army and Navy in sales brochures. The company’s strategies have even included trying to piggyback on the eligibility of other companies, according to two former Ingersoll-Rand employees.
One of several examples of the company getting contracts from the government,
In March 2010, an Ingersoll-Rand unit received a contract to maintain equipment at supermarkets on military bases from Texas to Hawaii. Funded by a 5 percent surcharge on purchases at the stores, the contract has already paid more than $100 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
5. Eaton Corp
Here is one with a lot of gall. Eaton took $90 million in taxpayer-financed subsidies to build a headquarters in Cleveland, then moved itself to Ireland to avoid paying U.S. taxes. But Eaton and its CEO are part of the notorious Fix the Debt campaign, a campaign to persuade Congress to cut Social Security and impose austerity on 99% of us — because the U.S. doesn’t collect enough in taxes!
That’s right, a company that claims to be Irish to avoid paying U.S. taxes is lecturing Americans on how we need to cut back on the things government does for us. Fix the Debt says we have to do this because of a shortfall in tax collections… from companies like Eaton!
We Can’t and Shouldn’t Stomach This
These are just five of so many examples of companies scamming us to avoid their taxes. This chart from the Congressional Research Service shows the companies as well as the accelerating pace of inversions. (Click for full size.)
So who is paying the taxes as corporations shirk their responsibility to help fund the benefits corporations receive? Michael Hiltzik at the LA Times explains in Corporate tax scam watch: The ‘inversion’ craze,
In 1952, about 32% of federal revenues came from the corporate tax, 42.2% from the individual income tax, and 9.7% from the payroll tax. Today, the individual income tax still accounts for nearly the same percentage, but the corporate tax has declined to 8.9% of tax revenue and the payroll tax is up to 40%. Seen in that light, payroll taxpayers–that is, America’s working men and women–have financed the decline in the corporate tax burden (which benefits mostly wealthy shareholders).
Isaiah J. Poole, in Corporate Tax Behavior So Bad Even Fortune Magazine Can’t Stomach It, writes,
One thing we should do is push for passage of legislation introduced by Sen. Carl Levin and Rep. Sandy Levin (both Michigan Democrats) that would make it harder for American corporations to merge with foreign corporations in a way that enables them to operate as if they are American corporations while claiming to be foreign for tax purposes.
Solutions
In early July the House passed an amendment by a vote of 221-200 denying federal contracts to American companies that have reincorporated in Bermuda or the Cayman Islands. This is not yet law, but is attached to the Energy/Water appropriations bill. It is a beginning, but only lists these two tax haven countries and won’t affect Walgreens, should it make itself appear to be a Swiss company.
The Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2014 is a more comprehensive effort that “increases the needed percentage change in stock ownership from 20 percent to 50 percent and provides that the merged company will nevertheless continue to be treated as a domestic U.S. company for tax purposes if management and control of the merged company remains in the U.S. and either 25 percent of its employees or sales or assets are located in the U.S.”
Republicans will obstruct the bill. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the legislation would save $19.5 billion over 10 years.
This would be a start toward fixing this problem. A small start, admittedly, but a start.
This post originally appeared at AlterNet.
No comments:
Post a Comment