Barack Obama. (photo: Shutterstock.com)
President pledges $3 billion for world climate fund
17 November 14
he White House announced today
that President Obama is going to pledge $3 billion to the U.N.’s Green
Climate Fund, throwing down another gauntlet at the GOP just three days
after his joint announcement with Chinese President Xi Jinping that the U.S. and China will pursue new emissions reduction goals.
The Green Climate Fund is intended to provide
assistance for developing nations in mitigating their carbon emissions
and preparing for the effects of climate change like rising sea levels.
It has thus far been severely underfunded. Some developed nations made
pledges at the U.N. Climate Summit in September, and the U.S. clearly
needed to step up.
Environmental groups offered fulsome praise for the administration’s move. Here’s a typical statement, from the Sierra Club:
President Obama’s pledge to the Green Climate Fund shows that he is taking the lead in creating a path to real progress in Paris. But, this commitment will do more than lay the groundwork for a strong international agreement. It will also help developing countries fund critical investments to reduce emissions and protect themselves from the devastating effects of climate disruption, helping stabilize their future while securing our own. The Sierra Club applauds the President for making this historic commitment.
Notice something strange? Like every other statement,
they seem to oddly assume that the funding will actually materialize. It
probably won’t. Congress appropriates money, and this Republican
Congress will not appropriate money for anything “green” or “climate.”
If there’s one thing Republicans hate more than sharing money with poor
people, it’s sharing money with poor people in other countries to combat
climate change.
As the National Journal reports,
“In a statement, Sen. Jim Inhofe, the incoming chairman of the
Environment and Public Works Committee, vowed to fight the pledge, which
he said was part of a climate-change agenda that’s ‘siphoned precious
taxpayer dollars away from the real problems facing the American
people.’”
Inhofe doesn’t think climate change is a “real problem.” (He calls
climate change a “hoax.”) A spokesperson for Republican Senate Leader
Mitch McConnell said of the pledge, “Just because the President
announces it doesn’t mean Congress will pass it.”
Environmental groups are nonetheless quite right to
cheer this news. Why? Because Obama is throwing down a marker, just he
did three days ago with the announcement with China. That too may fall
prey to congressional Republicans defunding measures, or be reversed by a
future Republican president.
But Obama is making a statement: Combatting climate
change is the central priority of his second term. He will try to reduce
U.S. emissions through executive authority under the Clean Air Act and
pursue a strong international agreement in the next round of climate
negotiations in Paris next year.
Republicans hate this,
especially because it puts them at a disadvantage politically. When
Obama moves ahead on climate change and sharpens the contrast with
Republicans, it leaves the GOP isolated domestically and
internationally.
Most of the American public accepts climate science and supports
federal emissions regulations. Republicans don’t. Our allies in Europe —
and now also China, the world’s biggest emitter — accept climate
science and have committed to reduce emissions. The stronger those
commitments, the more foolish Republicans look on the international
stage.
A Republican president in 2017 or 2021 reverse Obama’s
pledges, but it would undermine America’s international prestige.
Rather than just keeping the U.S. out of the fray, the GOP will have to
drag the country and its commitments backward, and that won’t look good.
The Republicans could still reverse our progress on
climate, but thanks to Obama’s announcement today, that will come at a
higher cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment