Brainwashed
The
last of the possible Republican presidents was sent to unwittingly
assassinate the prudence and moderation of conservatism. Those who were
more Republican than religious forgave his glaring deficiencies and
immorality. They were the dominate minority who were sold on a
make-believe world that was wildly anti-establishment. It would have
been, and should have been. Their leader profiled others as “good” or
the worst in the world. He thought that America could be ordered to
have “our values”. We would be united under one God, but which one?
Gossip and trivia grew more important than substance. Anecdotal stories
were thought to be enough to change the fate of the world. Paranoia
replaced courage. The birds of a feather that flocked together heard
their news person say “probably” but they understood it to mean “is”.
Rumor made headlines because suspense had to be kept going. Profit
routed honesty. “Could have been” made conspiracy into fact. “Nobody
knows” is not evidence, but their blame did not need it. They searched
for the smoking gun that was never fired hoping to make a mountain out
of every molehill.
An Electrifying Encounter
Imagine
that you are a rancher and you have an electric fence which has kept
your livestock for twenty five years. Your neighbor is hiking, slips,
and breaks her fall by grabbing onto it. She gets shocked and drives to
the hospital emergency room. Finding no problem, they send her home.
Subsequently, her husband sues you, the maker of the fence charger, and
the vendors of the components used in it for millions of dollars.
The
lady would no longer have sex with him, wash dishes, clean house, make
the bed, and cook. She became mean and nasty. Each of these had a
price that her lawyers defined in writing. The lawyer’s deposition was
hundreds of pages long, containing confirmation by friends and
independent authorities, opinions from college professors, and diagnosis
by doctors.
It’s Imaginary
There
were unverified “personal facts” resulting from the electric
encounter. Human shortcomings complement incompleteness causing errors
of perception. We become authorities on everything we cannot
comprehend. We construct our truth actively and constantly, using a
tiny fraction of the information and knowledge needed for
understanding. What we are left with is internal, unseen, and
constantly in a process of becoming. An analyst explained that what is
said in a presidential debate does not matter. It is all about how it
is said. Polls show that policies account for only eight percent of how
we vote. Scandals are much more important.
Real
facts get in the way of beliefs. They make shades of grey.
Appearances are not facts. Simple assertions are not policies. They
are excuses that hide ignorance. Ann Coulter explained that a
presidential candidate needs no policies. Intentions are enough! But
that is not true for many jobs.
In
business, we were required to negotiate realistic goals with our
employees and to put them in writing. The agreement had to define
promises, overt behaviors, actions, and concrete measurable
accomplishments evaluated at a place and time, not everything on the
first or last day. This happened quarterly. Plans were adjusted then,
recognizing that the ability to keep trying is a better predictor of
success than never having failed. Every manager understands that they
will be held accountable for things that they do not directly and
completely control. Every politician fears visibility of what they
actually do. They know how to phrase goals so they cannot be measured.
Rants, raves, and lofty aspirations are not goals. A rubber ruler will
not do!
We
unfairly discriminate when we select without regard for merit. Polls
show that qualifications account for only three percent of how we vote.
Merit is not the lack of failure that comes from inexperience. That is
why it is important to have measurable objectives.
The Amateur
The
internet has broadened free speech by making it easy for anyone with an
opinion, regardless of how ill-informed, to alter public debate and
influence opinion. Short videos have replaced the journalism that once
promoted deeper thought and understanding. The wisdom of the web’s
crowd chatter is a form of artificial intelligence, not professional,
driven by algorithms that determine what comes up first in a search.
They are based on the number of site visits, proportional to popular
sensationalism, instead of verified facts and depth of analysis. Profit
comes before accuracy. The loss of the value of truth is serious. It
has led to the acceptance of inexperience, a disregard for evidence, and
a preference for amateurism over professionalism.
The Crowd’s Wisdom
The
chant of “USA, USA” resounded, but all that could be heard was “me,
myself”. They were forgetting that America could find itself only by
losing itself in service to others. Our economic problems cannot be
solved until we discover how to add value, what we can do for our
country instead of what our country can do for us.
Imagine
optimizing society by picking ideal levels for each of the variables;
economics, trade, defense, health, education, and immigration. Only a
fool thinks that these are not interdependent and full of reality demons
(reasons why you can’t do what must be done) or that a single strong
personality could control them.
Blind Leading the Blind
Trump
rallies are like a mob riot. The audience is not listening, they are
participating. They prefer shrill speech and irrelevancy. The loudest
dominate. What we need is a different venue, more than a funny book,
one that will help us understand alternatives, one that realizes that
life has become more complex and interdependent, one that chooses to be
“wonky”, one that confronts ambiguity and complexity instead of
obfuscating, manipulating and blaming.
Rigged?
Trump
claims that if he loses in Pennsylvania, it will be because the system
is rigged, unfair, and dishonest. His followers do not doubt that.
They cannot believe that there could be any shortcoming in his
character, style, or lack of understanding. They are convinced that
only he is on their side, and that he is, at heart, like them. They
should ask: What does he contribute from his unique self to others?
Robert Fuller, in his 2003 book, Somebodies and Nobodies,
reminded us that “we reach our full maturity and stature when we see
ourselves in our heroes and find our heroes in ourselves.” In Trump’s
world you get tough and cheat your competitors if you can get away with
it. Play dirty, just don’t get caught. If you win, denigrate the
losers. If you lose, disparage the winners.
A Feast of Fools
At the second annual Roast and Ride, August 27,
Des Moines, Iowa, Trump said, “WE ARE GOING TO SEND YOU SPECIAL
INTERESTS PACKING AND WE WILL ONCE AGAIN HAVE A GOVERNMENT BY AND FOR
THE PEOPLE… ON EVERY ISSUE OUR CAMPAIGN IS ABOUT MAKING LIFE BETTER FOR
WORKING PEOPLE. WE CAN’T ACCOMPLISH THAT GOAL WITHOUT BREAKING UP THE SPECIAL INTEREST MONOPOLY
AND GIVING THE POWER BACK TO ALL OF THE PEOPLE… THE RULE OF THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL BEGIN. LETS GET OUR GOVERNMENT WILL BE ETHICAL AND
RESPONSIVE. RULE BY SPECIAL INTERESTS WILL BE OUT.” Is there only
one special interest? One person, one vote, won’t work when complicated
issues, like health care and retirement, require expert help to
understand.
Lifestyles of the Poor and Obscure
The
tribe’s bumper sticker on the new truck reads, “Life is a Bitch”, and
don’t elect one. Perhaps life was not fair to him, but does that
justify being unfair to others? He hopes that Donald Trump will give
him a voice in the decisions that impact his life. We hope that they
will support America’s mutual concerns and serve life without
disregarding individual interests.
Many
feel trapped in their jobs, working like slaves without fair reward,
but how we feel about wealth inequality depends more on our view of
other people than economics. When Donald claims; we don’t know who they
are, where they are from, and whether their values are the same as
ours, he is not uniting our country as he proposes to do. Envy, fear,
and intolerance vanquish empathy and understanding.
Do
we live to develop a philosophy of life, or to become financially well
off? It was in the 1920’s, that Supreme Court justice, Louis D.
Brandeis proclaimed, “We can have democracy in this country, or we can
have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have
both.”
Karl
Marx saw humanity as motivated by materialism. To him, evil was the
consequence of inequality and social control by the wealthy.
Collectivism treated the individual as a means to achieve social
perfection. In contrast, capitalism made the strong individual
supreme. It recognized that competition and striving to get ahead are
nature’s rules, but that was at odds with conscience.
Conservatives
don’t like unions, but slavery still exists when barons take advantage
of undocumented immigrants. It can be found wherever people are
expendable nobodies, temporary, contingent, and lacking benefits. It
occurs in places that are not seen, and in degraded, exploitive labor
environments that ignore the suffering of others. To fix that, we have
to focus on the conditions of employment, not the resulting wage
inequality.
American
workers compete with foreigners. Globalization theoretically causes
our incomes to fall until all workers, world-wide, are paid the same for
similar work. The price of everything will go down in equal measure,
and we will all be happy, supposedly!
Nobodies
Nobodies
have given up. They don’t vote because they see nothing changing, but
that is a consequence of the rubber ruler. The world can’t run without
the ignored poor. Survival is their motivation. Neediness classifies
them as inferior. They are prey, the stuff of demagoguery, because they
are weak and the safest target.
Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous
Is
the sole measure of a person’s worth their financial wealth? If that
was so, most of us would be slaves. You can be the world’s worst
negotiator, but if you can get results you will be successful. It is an
illusion that money is more powerful than principle. There are many
examples of fortunes squandered.
Imagine
that you have finally made it, climbed to the top of the heap. How you
will you keep your place? Then maybe it is time to try something
different, something greater, something more spectacular. Why not run
for president?
Fame,
wealth, and power bestow one with high social rank and the potential
for leadership. Social rank can be increased with the right friends,
clothing, automobile, home, neighborhood, school, looks, and talent. A
person desiring high rank and a position of leadership will display
these things conspicuously for all to see.
We
are impressed with celebrities and often attribute to them qualities
that they do not deserve. They are not woven from a special cloth, but
we envy and admire them. The adoration of the rich and famous, the
wealthy and powerful, is no more justifiable than the denigration of
minorities, Muslims, women, and the weak.
High Rank
“Rankism”
occurs when a person uses their fame, wealth, and power, outside their
area of expertise, to put down another and take advantage of them.
People may put up with it for a while, but eventually they will rebel
and turn against it.
Debatable
The
outcome of the pending elections will say more about us than the
politicians. Good decisions cannot be made when extreme ideology and
emotion overwhelms an absence of concrete facts.
1 comment:
From the article: "In Trump’s world you get tough and cheat your competitors if you can get away with it. Play dirty, just don’t get caught. "
ROFLMAO... tell that to Lois Lerner, John Koskinen and James Comey!
Post a Comment