GEORGE TEMPLETON
COMMENTARY
By George Templeton
Gazette Columnist
Fearful
“Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil; for thou art with me…”
A
new Texas law allows licensed gun owners to openly carry their weapons
in any place that does not expressly prohibit it. The 2500 member First
Baptist Church of Arlington, merging guns and God, has jumped on the
bandwagon. It should not be a problem for their principled
congregations. Guns are a status symbol, associated with manhood and
courage. Legitimizing them in the public square teaches children by
example. It will help to craft a brave new world. Come Easter, those
spiffily dressed in their “Sunday
go to meeting” bulletproof suit will need to find a compatible
holster. The ladies will want pink assault rifles to match their
bonnet.
The
Arizona culture warriors, mixing God, guns, and the Constitution are at
it again! HB2170 permits concealed weapons on campus, but HB2186
restricts that to faculty. HB2494 offers state tax refunds to pay for
concealed weapon permits required in other states and settings. SB1063
requires public buildings without gun lockers to allow weapons inside
them. HB2339 allows guns even when lockers are available. HB2320
allows government agencies to be gun free only when there are metal
detectors and guards at each entrance. HB2431 prevents background
checks before selling a gun. Arizona, since 2010, allows concealed
carry without a permit. HB2337 requires police to have more than
suspicion before they can question a person about being armed. HB2338
increases the penalty for taking a gun away.
What is the greatest danger?
Terrorists
know that fear advances their cause. It rewires our brains. We closed
the entire L.A. school district, not two terrorists.
Fear
leads to bigotry. In 1846, Louis Agassiz, the great Harvard professor
wrote a letter: “In seeing their black faces with their thick lips and
grimacing teeth, the wool on their head, their bent knees, their
elongated hands, their large curved nails, and especially the livid
color of the palm of their hands, I could not take my eyes off their
face in order to tell them to stay far away.”
Terrorism
promotes fear. In 1919, Attorney General Palmer, following a terrorist
bombing, wrote about European immigrants: “Out of the sly and crafty
eyes of many of them leap cupidity, cruelty, insanity, and crime; from
their lopsided faces, sloping brows, and misshapen features may be
recognized the unmistakable criminal types.”
Oliver
Wendell Homes was not concerned that some child might be left behind.
He wrote: “It is better for all the world if instead of waiting to
execute degenerate offspring for crime, or let them starve for their
imbecility; society could prevent those who are manifestly unfit from
continuing their kind…”
Charles Davenport, author of a 1930’s college text, Heredity in Relation of Eugenics,
warned that “unless immigration stopped Americans would have darker
skin; grow more emotional; and become more given to crimes of larceny,
kidnapping, assault, murder, rape, and sexual immorality”.
William
Shockley, the 1956 Nobel laureate who invented the transistor, agreed
when he worried about the “genetic deterioration of the human race
through the lack of elimination of the least fit as the basis of
continuing evolution.”
Fear
widens the gaps between people, making those who warn us special, but
science denies that. We created false differences, allowing culture and
prejudice to dominate our classifications. There is much more genetic
variation within races than between races. Someday, there will be no
such thing as race.
What happens when culture fractures?
Culture
is a bias about how we act, think, and want. Sylvia Allen claims that
taxpayers will need to support Syrian refugees because they are not
above average like us. She says that Muslims would be more comfortable
in a society governed by Sharia law, but isn’t it a fact that we would
be more comfortable if we did not have to live with people having
different views?
Jeb
Bush’s strategy to defeat terrorism is simple: No Islam! A crusade
against one of the world’s great religions will never put to rest those
who hear the Almighty’s word and know they are going to paradise.
Marco
Rubio would cancel the Iran nuclear deal, restore sanctions, and
prevent the Iranians from having a nuclear bomb, but he does not explain
how.
Ted
Cruz promised to paint in bold instead of pastel colors. He will paint
with the blood of soldiers. The number of angels that can stand on the
head of a pin is an argument that cannot be won. Divisive religion
will be the Achilles’ heel of the Middle East.
Paul
Gosar speaks of fear, evil, and danger. He warns that Muslims believe
in an apocalypse but fails to mention that Christians also have a
version of the end times. He would lead, but where? Leadership is more
than getting revenge. It is smarter than the drunken cowboy who tried
to ride the rhinoceros at the Phoenix zoo. Gosar describes President
Obama as “scared”, suggesting that he is brave, noble, and wholesome
when he argues for an expanded war. Anyone who doubts is a coward on
the side of the enemy, but we have no skin in the game. Romney missed
an opportunity when he did not advocate youth service, like Mormon
missionaries, but with secular civic, geopolitical, and military
components.
The
recent Oregon federal wildlife refuge standoff illustrates domestic
terrorism that combines ranching, guns, and bible thumping patriotism.
On The Liberty Roundtable radio show Ammon Bundy said, “We read
in Genesis where God gives the earth to man. He did not give it to
government.” Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Ben Carson have supported the
Bundy family’s defiance of grazing fees and the BLM. Ted referred to it
as Obama’s “jackboot of authoritarianism”, though the courts have
repeatedly ruled against Cliven Bundy since 1994. Cruz has
hypocritically criticized liberals for no longer believing in law and
order. Fox news lambasted liberals for hiding behind procedure. It’s
the law, but the law is procedure. Emile Durkheim was concerned with
the tyranny of the majority. He felt that a stable society needed crime
to push against the intensifying coercion of uniformity.
Ben
Carson would have the Department of Education secretly monitor
universities to prevent bias. Would correcting a “biblically illiterate
society” be an example of bias? It was Cynthia Dunbar’s goal for the
Texas State Board of Education when she worked there. Now she is a
state co-chair for Ted Cruz’s campaign. Her words are about public
education dubbed government education, called socialized education that
deceives and indoctrinates. Education expresses our belief in what it
takes to join and compete in the world.
State
Senator Sylvia Allen, Chairman of the Education Committee and
Administrative Program Manager of a for-profit charter school, seems
suspicious of education that could lead to an uncomfortable choice
between literal sacred teachings and scientific fact. Industrialization
secularized education in the 1800’s, but in some agrarian southern
states religion remained in public education into the 20th
century. Now believers, who are rightfully concerned about America
losing the moral high ground, would retreat to the past. The
shortcoming of local control of schools is that the content of education
in the most backward areas of our country will be determined by
backward people.
More Than We Can Know
When
politicians encounter an uncomfortable truth, they claim the exact
opposite. They make us feel good by appealing to our greatness. The
“will of the American people” always seems to oppose the party in
power. Bandwagon propaganda and polls are tools that recognize our
desire to be on the winning side. They infect our minds.
Sigmund
Freud knew that we are more than what we think we are. Our conscious
is the superego, the Jiminy Cricket that was our parents, upbringing,
and the Holy Spirit. The id, our instincts, verified by our acceptance
of dirty jokes, is of Satan. Our rational Ego is what we thought we
were, but that is incomplete. We are subconsciously embroiled in a life
and death struggle between the desire to be a free individual and the
urge to be a good citizen. Carl Jung developed this further, assuming
that our minds are somehow more than brains. They contain instincts
that come from elsewhere. We strongly react to the world in ways that
exhibit our connection to each other. However, studies suggest that
only five percent of our decisions are conscious.
In
1951, Solomon Asch tried to measure independent thinking. His
experiment presented a picture of a line and a second picture with three
lines, differing greatly in length, with one being exactly identical to
the line in the first picture. A group of eight people voted verbally
to select the line in the second picture having identical length.
Unknown to the test subject, seven impostors were programmed to make
wrong decisions about which line was identical in length. Asch found
that three out of four test subjects voted with the obviously wrong
majority at least some of the time. The test subjects said they valued
freedom, but conformity was more important.
In
1963, Stanley Milgram experimented with obedience in a learning
situation. The “teacher” was ordered by an administrator to
electrically shock a hidden learner, who cried in pain when a wrong
answer was given. The strength of the shock was indicated by a large
voltmeter indicating “death” at its highest level. The teacher’s duty
was to follow the administrator’s instructions, which continued to
increase the shock until the learner finally grew silent. More than 62
percent of the teachers were willing to kill the learner. It was not in
their educational methods class! It shows how authority and conformity
can cloud the moral judgment of normal, sane people.
At
the end of the nineteenth century, Wilhelm Wundt and Gustav Fechner
began to explore how different things needed to be before we could
distinguish between them. Business contracts are applied transactional
ethics where the participants are assumed to be perfectly rational and
utterly self-interested. They require deliverables, but friendly loan
gives it to you, and then takes away more than you can pay. Donald
Trump wants the best outcome for himself, but he has not confided much
to us. He claims that “winners”, like himself, drive the improvement of
society. Chinese business is less concerned with measurable
objectives, focusing instead on a lasting relationship that cares for
you. These views overlap, but there is a difference.
We
wonder about Sylvia Allen’s ability to discriminate between individual
acts of kindness and government programs. While it is commendable that
Glen Beck provided refuge for 149 Christians in Slovakia, it cannot
solve the problem of more than nine million Syrians that have fled their
homes.
Destiny
C.
S. Lewis wrote, “The act of cowardice is all that matters; the emotion
of fear is, in itself, no sin.” Does America progress? To answer that,
we must consider what gives meaning to our lives, what our values are,
and how they are determined. It is not about terrorism, but is about
our response. We have experienced the silent majority and the moral
majority. Now it is time for the rational majority to step up.
No comments:
Post a Comment