Economist, professor, author and political commentator Robert Reich. (photo: Richard Morgenstein)
24 March 14
e
are witnessing a reversion to tribalism around the world, away from
nation states. The the same pattern can be seen even in America –
especially in American politics.
Before the rise of the nation-state, between the
eighteenth and twentieth centuries, the world was mostly tribal. Tribes
were united by language, religion, blood, and belief. They feared other
tribes and often warred against them. Kings and emperors imposed
temporary truces, at most.
But in the past three hundred years the idea of
nationhood took root in most of the world. Members of tribes started to
become citizens, viewing themselves as a single people with patriotic
sentiments and duties toward their homeland. Although nationalism never
fully supplanted tribalism in some former colonial territories, the
transition from tribe to nation was mostly completed by the mid
twentieth century.
Over the last several decades, though, technology has
whittled away the underpinnings of the nation state. National economies
have become so intertwined that economic security depends less on
national armies than on financial transactions around the world. Global
corporations play nations off against each other to get the best deals
on taxes and regulations.
News and images move so easily across borders that
attitudes and aspirations are no longer especially national.
Cyber-weapons, no longer the exclusive province of national governments,
can originate in a hacker’s garage.
Nations are becoming less relevant in a world where
everyone and everything is interconnected. The connections that matter
most are again becoming more personal. Religious beliefs and
affiliations, the nuances of one’s own language and culture, the daily
realities of class, and the extensions of one’s family and its values –
all are providing people with ever greater senses of identity.
The nation state, meanwhile, is coming apart. A single
Europe – which seemed within reach a few years ago – is now succumbing
to the centrifugal forces of its different languages and cultures. The
Soviet Union is gone, replaced by nations split along tribal lines.
Vladimir Putin can’t easily annex the whole of Ukraine, only the
Russian-speaking part. The Balkans have been Balkanized.
Separatist movements have broken out all over — Czechs
separating from Slovaks; Kurds wanting to separate from Iraq, Syria,
and Turkey; even the Scots seeking separation from England.
The turmoil now consuming much of the Middle East
stems less from democratic movements trying to topple dictatorships than
from ancient tribal conflicts between the two major denominations of
Isam – Sunni and Shia.
And what about America? The world’s “melting pot” is
changing color. Between the 2000 and 2010 census the share of the U.S.
population calling itself white dropped from 69 to 64 percent, and more than half of the nation’s population growth came from Hispanics.
It’s also becoming more divided by economic class. Increasingly, the rich seem to inhabit a different country than the rest.
But America’s new tribalism can be seen most
distinctly in its politics. Nowadays the members of one tribe (calling
themselves liberals, progressives, and Democrats) hold sharply different
views and values than the members of the other (conservatives, Tea
Partiers, and Republicans).
Each tribe has contrasting ideas about rights and
freedoms (for liberals, reproductive rights and equal marriage rights;
for conservatives, the right to own a gun and do what you want with your
property).
Each has its own totems (social insurance versus
smaller government) and taboos (cutting entitlements or raising taxes).
Each, its own demons (the Tea Party and Ted Cruz; the Affordable Care
Act and Barack Obama); its own version of truth (one believes in climate
change and evolution; the other doesn’t); and its own media that
confirm its beliefs.
The tribes even look different. One is becoming blacker, browner, and more feminine. The other, whiter and more male. (Only 2 percent of Mitt Romney’s voters were African-American, for example.)
Each tribe is headed by rival warlords whose fighting
has almost brought the national government in Washington to a halt.
Increasingly, the two tribes live separately in their own regions – blue
or red state, coastal or mid-section, urban or rural – with state or
local governments reflecting their contrasting values.
I’m not making a claim of moral equivalence. Personally, I think the Republican right has gone off the deep end, and if polls are to be believed a majority of Americans agree with me.
But the fact is, the two tribes are pulling America
apart, often putting tribal goals over the national interest – which is
not that different from what’s happening in the rest of the world.
1 comment:
It was not a bad article up to the next to last paragraph where he decided to take the low road and point a finger. It amazes me that the Leftists, those who think big government and massive spending and control over the most private parts of our lives and who have trampled the Constitution, are the ones to blame the Conservatives, those who desire the country and government to run within the boundaries of the Constitution, as the cause of the problem.
Post a Comment