Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Tuesday, August 23, 2022

ALDOUS J. PENNYFARTHING: 'I don't say his name, ever': After the primaries, many GOP candidates run screaming away from Trump

Imagine waking up in bed next to Donald Trump. I don’t mean literally, of course. There’d be no recovering from that. Short of a brain transplant, anyway. And those don’t exist. Unless you’re Ron Johnson installing a fresh olive loaf once a fortnight, but that goes without saying. 

But imagine you’re a Republican candidate who “wakes up” next to Donald Trump after a debauched primary season and suddenly realizes, “Hmm, now I have to appeal to independents and suburban moms with this piquant rhino crotch effluvium hanging over my head for the next three months.”

Well, welcome to the 2022 midterm cycle—a unique election season in which it’s nearly impossible for a Republican to advance to the general without Trump’s imprimatur, but hanging onto his musty coattails could demolish one’s chances in purplish states and districts.

For Republicans, the old saw about the opposite sex seems to apply here: Can’t live with him, can’t live without him, and if you try to introduce him to your friends, they’ll take away your car keys and stage an intervention, because Jesus Gerbil-Sniffin’ Christ, dude, what the fuck are you even doing?

CNN: The man in charge of the House GOP's campaign strategy has been doling out advice to Republican candidates and incumbents in key battleground races as they prepare for the general election: Don't be distracted by Donald Trump on the campaign trail, and instead focus on the issues Republicans believe will be most salient to voters in the midterms. 

 The guidance from Rep. Tom Emmer of Minnesota, relayed by three GOP sources familiar with the internal conversations, reflects a tacit acknowledgment among Republican leaders that the former president could knock the GOP's midterm messaging off course as they seek to recapture the House majority this fall. It also represents a shift from the strategy deployed in many Republican primaries, where embracing Trump -- or at least not alienating him and his base -- was seen as essential to survival.

You mean “let’s listen to the guy who stole nuclear secrets whine incessantly about the election he lost” isn’t a winning message with middle-class voters? Go figure.

Of course, Republicans—having no real solutions for anything—are counting on voters’ pique over high inflation and gas prices to carry them to victory in November.

Unfortunately for them, inflation appears to have cooled, gas prices are falling, the death of Roe v. Wade has reset the table, President Joe Biden just signed historic legislation to address climate change, and Donald Trump is still looming over the body politic and demanding his Quarter Pounder of flesh.

But Emmer's recommendation may be increasingly tough to follow, especially if Trump announces a presidential run before the midterms -- something Republican leaders, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, are desperate to avoid. GOP leaders want the midterms to be a referendum on President Joe Biden and the Democrats, not Trump, even though the former president relishes in being the topic of conversation.

Gee, why wouldn’t they want their conquering hero to announce a presidential run before the midterms? So weird. It’s almost as if two-thirds of the country would prefer a fart in a Goober Grape jar be our next president.

While CNN notes that the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago raid has been “like rocket fuel” for GOP fundraising, it has also presumably created a problem for the party’s candidates, who are “wrestling with how much to invoke Trump back in battleground districts now that they are looking ahead to the general election, where appealing to moderate and suburban voters is crucial.” Guess that’s what happens when you spend seven years acting like a pack of frat rushees at their first wop party.

CNN also talked to “multiple” Republicans in battleground districts who are now desperately trying to learn the Trump Two-Step.

One admitted that they refuse to even mention the clammy sack of off-brand methane. “I don't say his name, ever,” said one Republican. “I just avoid saying his name generally. I talk about the policies of his that I like.”

Wait, he has policies? Seriously, what policies? Are conservative think tanks churning out white papers that just say “Be an asshole 24/7” now?

We can do this. The electoral tide seems to have turned a bit, but it’s still up to us to fulfill that promise. If you want to do your part in preventing a future right-wing dystopia, there are steps you can take. Volunteer to send letters to voters, or contribute to Democratic candidates up and down the ballot. And most of all: Remember to vote!

They're running away so fast his hair is blowin' in the wake.

Monday, August 22, 2022

ALDOUS J. PENNYFARTHING: Rudy says Trump didn't actually steal top secret docs, he was simply 'preserving' them

So if you or I had worked for the government and, upon leaving, squirreled away a few top secret nuclear documents in a Six Million Dollar Man lunchbox that we kept under a basement foosball table, we’d be sitting in brightly lit rooms asking if we could please get some unscented udder cream for our serially brutalized nipples. It’s unlikely we’d be able to trot out numerous contradictory excuses for our crimes and have roughly a third of the nation believe them. But Donald Trump is special.

And since his followers are 100% convinced he’s the bestest prezident since George Jefferson, anything he does must be holy, pure, and in the interest of all Americans. And when you have a stable of reliable sycophants like Tickle Me Nosferatu (the bullshit artist formerly known as Rudy Giuliani) at your beck and call, “creative” (read: terrible) rationalizations will flow like black-tar brain effluent down the withering cheeks of a weary nation.

So, yeah—this is the kind of excuse you come up with when you’re completely out of excuses:

GIULIANI: “And now they want to make him responsible for having taken classified documents and preserved them. Really, if you look at the Espionage Act, it’s not really about taking the documents, it’s about destroying them, or hiding them, or giving them to the enemy. It’s not about taking them and putting them in a place that’s roughly as safe as they were in in the first place.”

Yup, securing top secret nuclear documents in restricted, heavily guarded government facilities is exactly the same as leaving them in the hands of a guy well known for blurting out highly classified secrets in front of the Russian foreign minister, making calls on an unsecured cell phone, and tweeting sensitive satellite photos against the advice of every member of the intelligence community. Just like most of us prefer to store our life savings in a Folgers can instead of depositing it in a bank. Makes total sense.

Okay, so clearly, we’re not on the same page as Rudy. For one thing, we don’t hang out with pages. They’re minors, Rudy, and the musky melange of English Leather and Sanka breath is not the aphrodisiac you think it is. But—surprise!—what Rudy is blabbering here is simply not what the Espionage Act says. 

As Vox explained in the wake of this kerfuffle, “The Espionage Act is actually a series of statutes under 18 U.S. Code Chapter 37 related to the collection, retention, or dissemination of national defense or classified information. The Mar-a-Lago search warrant referred to Section 793—‘Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information,’ which doesn’t just cover ‘spying’ in the sense that many think of when they hear the term. Section 793 specifically states that people legally granted access to national defense documents—people like the former president—are subject to punishment should they improperly retain that information.”

Trump “retained” this information and refused to give it back, and in June, his lawyers told the government that he no longer held any classified documents at Mar-a-Lago—even though he clearly did. 

So how many excuses does this make now? At first, Trump wanted us to believe the FBI planted these documents. Then he claimed he’d declassified them—which only makes sense if he knew which documents the FBI had decided to plant. For a hot minute, Trump also tried to claim some of the documents fell under attorney-client privilege, and like the feckless fucknut he is, he demanded their return. 

Then there was the “standing order” excuse, wherein Trump tried to claim that anything he took home with him automatically alchemized from a closely held government secret into a public domain document every American has a right to see—unlike, say, the former pr*sident’s tax returns.

CNN made short work of that one, calling it "bullshit."

And now—according to Rudy—it’s all good since Trump didn’t destroy the documents or, as far as we know, give them to Russia or Saudi Arabia. Though I assume if we find out he did give them to Saudi Arabia, they’ll move the goalposts again—most likely next to a Krispy Kreme for our ex-POTUS’ convenience.

Of course, if all of this weren’t so horrifying, it would be endlessly amusing. But this is the safety and security of our planet we’re talking about now.

We are not amused.



Sunday, August 21, 2022

‘I think I know most of it’: Trump’s 1986 quote about nuclear weapon expertise is relevant today

Real estate developer Donald J. Trump rubs a "magic lamp" during the opening ceremony for his huge Taj Mahal casino, in Atlantic city, 05 April 1990. .Billionaire Donald Trump, who was born in 1946, Queens, New York, has gained notability for his celebrity lifestyle and his real estate successes. / AFP PHOTO / BILL SWERSEY        (Photo credit should read BILL SWERSEY/AFP via Getty Images)
Polishing a pretend gold genie lamp may be the only thing Donald Trump was ever qualified to do

As conservatives work around the clock to figure out how to spin the alleged discovery of nuclear secrets illegally hoarded away in Donald Trump’s Mordor lair Mar-A-Lago, many others point to Trump’s history of casually bringing up nukes at every opportunity. For as long as people have been nearby and attentive enough to record it, Trump has made a point to share his many thoughts on weapons and nuclear armament.

You may recall something about nuclear weapons from Bob Woodward’s many books on behind-the-scenes Trump administration disasters—and you would be right, but it goes back much further than that. In fact, it goes back to 1986, to the very first issue of Spy magazine.

When Spy magazine came out, Donald Trump was the Donald Trump we all know now, but with less global power. He was the New York real estate mogul who was all smoke and mirrors, a pig with women, a pig with the media, a pig with contractors, a pig that made pigs say, “Hey man, stop using that expression to describe Donald Trump.” As was detailed in the Daily Beast a few years ago, Trump hated Spy magazine because Spy magazine’s editors and writers loved to pick on him.

Even back in the 1980s, Trump said and did terribly embarrassing things because he’s an embarrassment of a person. It was Spy magazine that coined the “short-fingered vulgarian” moniker that reportedly got deep under Trump’s tissue-paper-thin skin. On Friday, former Spy magazine writer David Kamp tweeted an image from “The Very. First. Issue. Of Spy. 1986.”

The Very. First. Issue. Of Spy. 1986.

Image

 

 

 

The circled part reads: “It would take an hour and a half to learn everything there is to learn about missiles… I think I know most of it anyway.”

That was then, and this is now. According to Bob Woodward’s new book, Peril, Trump’s overall incompetence, combined with his weak emotional control, led Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley to secretly make “senior military officials in charge of the National Military Command Center” swear an oath to him that they would take no military action or nuclear action from Trump without involving Milley first. This was in the days after the Jan. 6 attempted coup d’etat.

Woodward has previously illustrated Trump’s lack of both sense and intelligence in his 2020 book, Rage. In that book, Woodward details a conversation he had with then-only-once-impeached President Donald Trump about military secrets that someone like Bob Woodward should not be hearing.

Trump reportedly blabbered, "I have built a nuclear—a weapons system that nobody's ever had in this country before. We have stuff that Putin and Xi have never heard about before. There's nobody—what we have is incredible."

Woodward says that this turned out to be true, and the military officials he spoke with were “surprised” Trump would reveal such a thing to Bob goddamn Woodward.

Such a smart guy.  Just ask him about nukes.

Saturday, August 20, 2022

Liz Cheney isn't the most important thing about her primary loss. It's about the Republican Party.

US Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) speaks to supporters at an election night event during the Wyoming primary election at Mead Ranch in Jackson, Wyoming on August 16, 2022. - Republican dissident Liz Cheney lost her US Congress seat August 16 to an election-denying conspiracy theorist, US networks projected, in the latest signal of her party's disavowal of traditional conservatism in favor of Donald Trump's hardline "America First" movement. (Photo by Patrick T. FALLON / AFP) (Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)
Rep. Liz Cheney

As expected, Rep. Liz Cheney lost her primary by a large margin Tuesday night, purely for the sin of speaking out against Donald Trump’s coup attempt. That was enough to have her Republican In Good Standing card stripped despite her reliably conservative positions on everything else. It just can’t be said enough: The desire to overturn an election, or at least the willingness to flirt with it, is a requirement for status in the Republican Party in 2022.

It’s not just Cheney, though she is the most prominent case. Ten House Republicans voted to impeach Trump in 2021. Just two will remain in Congress after this year, with four having lost primaries and four having decided to retire (before they could lose a primary).

Top Republicans didn’t just fail to support an incumbent in a primary. They didn’t just actively support a primary challenger to an incumbent. They actively and publicly celebrated Cheney’s loss.

“Congratulations to @HagemanforWY on her MASSIVE primary victory to restore the PEOPLE of Wyoming’s voice,” Rep. Elise Stefanik tweeted, noting that she had joined Trump and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy in endorsing Harriet Hageman. Stefanik, of course, replaced Cheney as the third-ranking House Republican when Cheney’s ex-communication from the party really got rolling.

”Girl, BYE,” was all Rep. Lauren Boebert had to say. Similarly, Sen. Rand Paul capped his tweet celebrating Hageman’s win with a “Bye Liz.”

This level of venom is spurred not by broad policy disagreement but by Cheney’s disloyalty in refusing to embrace the effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election, or at least keep her mouth shut about her opposition to that. That’s it. That’s all. It’s a staggering statement about today’s Republican Party.

There’s a lot of debate among Democrats about how to assess Cheney. Is she a hero? Is she just meeting the minimum bar of not supporting coups? But Cheney isn’t the point. The point is that, among Republicans, Cheney’s courage in adhering to the idea that the outcome of elections should be respected stands out, and her willingness to keep talking and name names stands out still more. Yes, everyone in office should be where she is on the basic question of whether the winner of the presidential election should become president, but they’re not. Far from it.

Cheney: Two years ago. I won this primary with 73% of the vote. I could easily have done the same again. The path was clear. But it would've required that I go along with president trump's lie about the 2020 election.. That was a path I could not and would not take.

 

 

Friday, August 19, 2022

Enough Politics Before Law: The US Must Abandon Presidential Privilege and Prosecute Donald Trump

Enough Politics Before Law: The US Must Abandon Presidential Privilege and Prosecute Donald TrumpDonald Trump and Richard Nixon (photo: Salon/Getty Images)
rsn.org reader supported news
Americans wanted to get over Watergate by letting Richard Nixon slink away quietly. Trump will do no such thing
Heather Digby Parton/salon 

When President Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon in 1974, many Americans were appalled. In fact, it's widely assumed to have been a decisive factor in Ford's 1976 loss to Jimmy Carter. Still, there was a general sense of relief among the public that the Watergate saga was over. Ford had wanted Nixon to show contrition as a condition of the pardon but the disgraced former president refused. Ford issued the pardon anyway, absolving him of all crimes committed while he was president. Nixon did eventually issue a fairly gracious acknowledgment after he received the pardon. It's the closest thing to an apology Richard Nixon ever gave the country:

I was wrong in not acting more decisively and more forthrightly in dealing with Watergate, particularly when it reached the stage of judicial proceedings and grew from a political scandal into a national tragedy. No words can describe the depth of my regret and pain at the anguish my mistakes over Watergate have caused the nation and the presidency, a nation I so deeply love, and an institution I so greatly respect.

Richard Nixon had made many political comebacks in his career, but, at this point, it was all over. He had resigned in disgrace and the country could move on, at least secure in the knowledge that he would never hold public office again. There would be no more comebacks.

The notion that it is wrong to prosecute former presidents for what they did while in office may have been around before all of that happened but it really seemed to take hold with Nixon. Many people were upset, of course, but the argument that there was something destabilizing about a new administration prosecuting its predecessor and having the taint of banana republic politics was pretty compelling. The shame and humiliation of a tarnished legacy were believed to be powerful deterrents to the kind of people who would seek the highest office in the nation. The ugliness of putting a former leader on trial and potentially in jail would change American politics forever and it made a whole lot of people feel queasy.

It's pretty clear today that that was a mistake. It may have once been OK to allow a disgraced president to resign and live in solitary obscurity to contemplate his crimes. The acute danger to the country was over, after all, the presidency was peacefully transferred and Congress enacted many reforms to deal with future presidential overreach. But those arguments do not apply to our current crisis. Donald Trump simply won't stop committing crimes and is determined to keep doing it as long as he can get away with it. Just try to imagine him putting out a statement like Nixon's.

Jack Goldsmith, former head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, wrote a piece for Lawfare this week in which he discusses this subject. He has long been one of those opposed to prosecuting former presidents for all the reasons I outline above but has reluctantly come to the conclusion that this situation may require it. Donald Trump is unlike any president in American history. Goldsmith was moved to write about this in the context of Trump's latest scandal — his inexplicable decision to illegally abscond with White House documents intended for the National Archives, some of which we now know were highly classified and which he refused to return. 

We may never know the contents of those documents but we do know that a grand jury has been hearing testimony about this issue for months and that the head of the counterintelligence division of the FBI was alarmed enough to apply for a search warrant citing laws governing obstruction of justice, removal or destruction of records, and violation of the Espionage Act. Goldsmith believes that whether this was a wise move by the DOJ depends on the contents of the documents and whether it is proven that Trump refused to cooperate. I think he's missing the forest for the trees.

It may turn out that the documents are not as sensitive as they thought and all that will happen is that they are returned to the National Archives. But you have to look at this in the context of Trump's years-long crime spree to see that they had no choice but to take this extraordinary step. His contempt for the rule of law is so brazen that if they didn't, we might as well just officially declare that he has blanket immunity from criminal prosecution in perpetuity and call it a day.

Consider the long list of crimes that the Justice Department was precluded from prosecuting because of the policy against prosecuting a sitting president. The Mueller Report alone listed almost a dozen instances of obstruction of justice just in the first two years of Trump's presidency. He tried to bribe a foreign leader for personal political gain and was impeached for doing it. His abuse of presidential power to punish enemies and reward cronies is unprecedented. As we speak, he is under investigation for attempting a coup and disrupting the peaceful transfer of power.

And he's running for president again, with the full backing of tens of millions of loyal followers who are convinced that Trump is being persecuted simply for being their hero.

Trump has slithered out from under the law and managed to evade accountability for his misdeeds his entire life. He has been committing crimes and dealing in corrupt practices at an ever-increasing pace since he entered politics, believing that it shields him from legal liability. In fact, he believes that being president allows him to literally do anything he chooses.

So everyone is rightfully worried about what will happen if Trump is held accountable for his crimes. After all, he has already unleashed his violent supporters on the FBI and is saying publicly that something terrible is going to happen because of his supposed persecution. His cult-like following is talking about civil war.

But part of the reason he has all those followers in the first place is that he seems to be invulnerable. They see him as a super-hero, still standing after all the slings and arrows dished out by the legal authorities and the political opposition. It's just possible that if the rule of law prevails for once, the veil might fall and some of them will see him as the frail narcissist he really is. Let's just say, it's worth a try. It's not like letting him off the hook has worked up until now.

 

Now for the 'Probable Reason' those Docs were Adamantly held at Mar-a-Lago

 Screen Shot 2019-02-27 at 7.26.53 AM.png

... It's Saul Gone ... making amends.

Documents that he was told repeatedly he had to return, by White House Counsel.  To which Trump said:  Nope!  ... “It’s not theirs, it’s mine” ...

Trump Had a Plan for Secret Documents if He Was Arrested: Ex-Lawyer

newsweek.com — 8/17/2022

Donald Trump's former personal attorney Michael Cohen believes that the former president's alleged possession of "sensitive" classified documents at Mar-a-Lago was kept deliberately as a "get out of jail free" card should he be arrested for potential felonies.

[...]

"The second they would put him in handcuffs, he would turn around and say I have the documentation showing, for example, where our nuclear launch pads are," Cohen told CNN. "This is what I believe: He would use it and say, if you proceed with this, I'm telling you right now there are 20 of my loyal supporters, you don't know who they are, but we will release that information to Russia, to Iran, to whoever it might be."

Cohen added that Trump would carry out this plan because he "doesn't care about this country."

[...]

getoutofjail.jpg
Wouldn’t put it past him. It’s a ploy “straight out of the Trump Playbook”

This is from the guy who testified about the Trump Organization for hundreds of hours — testimony which has resulted in a dozen investigations.

This is from the guy who told us that “Trump would never concede, if he lost the Election.”  Well, Cohen was right about that prediction.  He knows of the Mob-Boss of which he speaks.

Michael Cohen told us a few days ago, exactly why Donald Trump took the Fifth over 400 times, in one of those investigations:

He took the Fifth over 400 times, because Donald Trump doesn’t know how to tell the Truth. Donald Trump never tells the Truth. The result is they would then have a Perjury case against him [if he did not take the Fifth].

Michael Cohen has also told us  ‘Trump Is the Greatest Grifter In the history of the United States’.  That ‘Donald Trump is like a Mob Boss, who talks in Code’.

Maybe we should listening more closely to what Michael Cohen has been saying, about his former Boss, who by all appearances is a career criminal.

A few thoughts about Cohen and his credibility, be that what it may:

I’m glad he turned over a new leaf in life.

The guy even did his time, for his own crimes — without complaint.

Everyone deserves a second chance.   Especially those trying to correct their mistakes of the past.

Look how happy he was the evening that Justice knocked on Trump’s door with a warrant:

“Finally!  ... this man who has avoided any responsibility for anything, is now going to be held accountable.”

New leaf — with a healthy dose of celebratory payback.

Cohen predicts Trump's next move following Mar-a-Lago search — CNN, Aug 16, 2022

(Reuters — Feb 27, 2019) - President Donald Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen said at the end of congressional testimony on Wednesday that he fears Trump will not allow his successor to peacefully take control of the White House if he loses the 2020 presidential election.

“Given my experience working for Mr. Trump, I fear that if he loses the election in 2020, there will never be a peaceful transition of power,” Cohen said during his closing remarks before the House of Representatives Oversight Committee.

We were warned.

"sensitive" classified documents at Mar-a-Lago … kept deliberately as a "get out of jail free" card …

Donald Trump … doesn't care about this country.

The former Trump-fixer would know.



Monday, August 1, 2022

ALDOUS J. PENNYFARTHING: Ivana Trump was buried at her ex-husband's golf course, and he can grimly reap the tax benefits

Screenshot of Ivana Trump interviewing with CBS.

Until today, I thought the most absurdly crass thing Donald Trump ever did was cancel his gravely ill nephew’s health insurance out of spite. Or maybe it was mocking a disabled reporter. Or calling a former Miss Universe pageant winner “Miss Piggy.” Or gradually morphing into Mrs. Doubtfire right before our eyes.

Okay, that’s a lot of things. I only meant to list one, but once you get started, it’s hard to stop. It’s sort of like Pringles that way. Or fentanyl lollipops. Or catfishing Chuck Grassley with old movie stills of Hedy Lamarr. 

That said, we may have a new winner. It’s possible—and by “possible” I mean “nearly certain”—that the Trump family buried the family matriarch at a golf course in order to reap the tax benefits.

No, seriously. I’m not kidding about this.

So Ivana Trump, Donald Trump’s first wife and the terrestrial birthing vessel for roughly two-thirds of his noxious hell spawn, recently died. She was found unresponsive at the bottom of a flight of stairs—but where she ultimately ended up seems far less dignified: The family buried her at a brand-spanking-new plot near the first hole of the golf course at Trump’s Bedminster, New Jersey, club. 

Oh, but that’s not all!

Insider:

Ivana Trump, former President Donald Trump's ex-wife, is the first person known to have been buried at the Trump-owned golf course.

Under New Jersey state tax code, any land that is dedicated to cemetery purposes is exempt from all taxes, rates, and assessments. Cemetery companies are also specifically exempt from paying any real estate taxes, rates, and assessments or personal property taxes on their lands, as well as business taxes, sales taxes, income taxes, and inheritance taxes.

In the New Jersey Law Revision Commission, a "cemetery company" is defined as "a person, corporation, association or other entity that owns or operates a cemetery, but does not include a religious organization that owns a cemetery which restricts burials to members of that religion or their families unless the organization has obtained a certificate of authority for the cemetery."

Okay, so the Trump family may have gotten tax breaks on their golf property by dumping their ex-wife’s/mother’s body there. But maybe it’s just a coincidence! 

I mean, look how beautiful the gravesite is! How could the family possibly pass on this location?

Yeah, for some reason I think it’s more likely they were interested in the tax implications than the bucolic charm and beauty of their cherished mother’s eternal resting place:

But what do I know? Grief makes you do weird things.

I’ve long past given up trying to find the bottom of Donald Trump’s bottomless mug of evil. But somehow, amazingly, he can still surprise me.

Consider me (mildly) shocked.

I'll bury my damn ex-wives anywhere I please.  You have no idea how much that woman cost me.