Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Friday, May 14, 2021

Kevin McCarthy refuses to look at body cam video as Republicans call Jan. 6 a 'tourist visit'

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 6: Trump supporters clash with police and security forces as people try to storm the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC. - Demonstrators breeched security and entered the Capitol as Congress debated the 2020 presidential election Electoral Vote Certification. (photo by Brent Stirton/Getty Images)
Peaceful, patriotic tourists paying a normal visit to the Capitol.

On Wednesday, Republicans in the House showed that they were completely done with even pretending to be concerned about threats to democracy. First, with the expulsion of Rep. Liz Cheney from Republican leadership, Republicans made it clear that the Big Lie is now not just acceptable, but a required part of Republican canon. Then at the House Oversight hearing, Republicans fully embraced the Jan. 6 insurgency, declaring it a “normal tourist visit” and engaging in a session of ugly gaslighting that denied there was an insurrection, denied there were Trump supporters involved, and denied that there was any violence. Where Republicans are going could be best seen in the statements from Rep. Paul Gosar, who flipped the truth on its head and declared that even investigating what happened on Jan. 6 represented an assault by the “deep-state” on “law-abiding citizens.”

There’s absolutely no doubt: When it comes to be even the slightest bit embarrassed about supporting either Trump’s outrageous lies concerning the election, or the deadly attack on the Capitol in which insurgents attempted to find and execute congressional leaders, Republicans are more than done. Far from condemning efforts to end democracy, they’re embracing them. They’re all in. 

So it shouldn’t be a surprise that efforts by a member of the D.C. Metro Police to talk to Republican leader Kevin McCarthy are not going well. Officer Michael Fanone has been trying to get in touch with McCarthy for weeks. He wants the Republican leader to see what actually happened to him on Jan. 6, to see how the crowd of Trump supporters really acted. Fanone tried again this week, hoping that since it’s National Police Week, McCarthy might give him a few minutes. Instead McCarthy’s staff hung up on Fanone.  But last night, CNN released Fanone’s body camera footage.

In an interview two weeks ago, Fanone said, “I experienced the most brutal, savage hand-to-hand combat of my entire life. Let alone my policing career, which spans almost two decades. It was nothing that I had ever thought would be a part of my law enforcement career, nor was I prepared to experience."

“I experienced the most brutal, savage hand-to-hand combat of my entire life.”

Footage shot by one of the insurgents (starting around five minutes into the video below) shows Fanone being dragged down the Capitol steps after he was tased, beaten, and pulled away from a group of officers protecting a tunnel that led to Congressional chambers. As one man shouts, “I got one,” and the crowd exhorts his capture, another Trump supporter waves a “thin blue line” flag over Fanone’s unconscious form.

At that time, Fanone indicated that he wanted his body camera footage released, and it was this footage that he wanted to show to McCarthy. Only McCarthy refuses to talk to him. 

The body camera shows the exultant Trump supporters after Fanone has been tased and dragged from the building. Over and over, he tries to get through to the people who are carrying him away, crying out for his life and reminding them that he has a family as he is beaten and mocked. Part way down the Capitol steps, one person begins to shout, “Don’t hurt him,” and, “We’re better than this.” For a moment, it seems as if they’re listening to Fanone’s pleas and cries of pain. But then the assault resumes. Eventually Fanone is recovered by other officers and brought to safety behind the front lines of the assault.

By the time he’s recovered, the camera may still be running, but Fanone himself is unconscious.

Throughout the incident, Trump supporters are grabbing at Fanone’s gear, stripping away his protection, and attempting to make off with his gun. In several sections the camera is blacked out because Fanone has been flipped over face down while insurgents continue to beat him with fists and clubs. 

These are the images of what the GOP is now selling as “a normal tourist visit” from “patriotic Americans.” This is the event where even bothering to investigate is an effort by the “deep state” to repress the rights of “law-abiding Americans.”

Republicans are not just ignoring Jan. 6, they’re endorsing it. On that day, with insurgents still occupying the Capitol and searching for victims, Donald Trump sent out a tweet.

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!”

At the time, every line of that tweet seemed monstrous. Now Republicans have embraced it from beginning to end. Expect them to demand a statue—not for Fanone and the others who defended the Capitol, but for the people who dragged him screaming down the stairs.

There are no words to describe what Officer Michael Fanone suffered on Jan. 6.

Thursday, May 13, 2021

Donald Trump's vaunted attempt at a one-man social network is falling very, very flat

US President Donald Trump holds two thumbs up while meeting with service members of the United States Coast Guard to play golf at Trump International Golf Course in Mar-a-Lago, Florida on December 29, 2017..The President invited members of the Coast Guard to play golf to thank them personally for their service of patrolling the waters near Palm Beach and Mar-a-Lago. / AFP PHOTO / Nicholas Kamm        (Photo credit should read NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)
Feel the charisma.

If there is one thing that Donald J. Trump is certain of, it’s that the universe and all things within it revolve around Donald J. Trump. Wars, pandemics, mass murders, international terrorism: All are either plots to make Donald Trump personally look bad or are opportunities for Donald Trump to look good. This is what malignant narcissism does to a person. For anyone not born into money, it's a ticket to a rough, angry life; for a sociopathic little twit who can funnel enough of his wealthy father's cash into his own persona to support a lifelong stream of disposable, simpering yes-men, it’s a path to lifelong, now-calcified delusions in which all of the above plots against him are not only obvious but "proven."

Again, what is most impressive about Republicanism's new (ongoing) Dear Leader is that the man manages to be a terrible human being in not just most circumstances, but every circumstance. He is the worst person you have ever met, even if you have never met him. There is no "but he likes puppies" or "but he's good to his family" or "but at least he pays his son's Boy Scout $7 membership fee out of his own pocket, rather than ripping off a charity to do it." There's nothing. Ever.

All of that is a long-winded introduction to the unfortunate news that Dear Asshole Probably The Actual Antichrist Leader may have gotten his electoral butt handed to him after killing off a half million Americans through bored and delusional incompetence, but he is determined to remain relevant. This requires subjecting his subjects to his momentary thoughts on all possible subjects. So how's that been going? Not well.

After being permanently banned from Twitter for stoking violent insurrection through provably false hoaxes, and after Facebook begrudgingly and spinelessly decided they would kick a permanent decision on hosting the American fascist leader's violent musings down the road for another half-year—all part of a wider techwide reexamination of priorities in the wake of Trump provoking actual sedition rather than admit an election loss—Trump recently announced he would be forming his own social media platform, one with blackjack, and hoo—I mean, one consisting solely of his own word-burps, the all-important buttons allowing you to express appreciation for his word-burps, and not much else.

Yes, it's the Donald Trump future, and the future consists of a Myspace universe in which Donald Trump is the sole inhabitant, screaming at himself, forever.

Some metrics on Trump's new site are in, and the evidence suggests that Twitter and Facebook and PornHubButForFurries and DogsThatLookLikeChurchill have not a damn thing to worry about when it comes to being supplanted by Typhoid Hitler’s Daily Grievance. In the first week the blog "has attracted a little over 212,000 engagements" total "across Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and Reddit," reports NBC News. Compare that with Trump's previous 88 million followers on just Twitter alone, and you can see that only the most diehard members of Dear Ex-Leader's fascist base are tuning in to hear his thoughts on whether a racehorse is a "junky" or whether Marco Rubio's key-jingling was entertaining enough to calm restless Leader’s nerves.

The rest of America don't care. They may have cared enough to bleat approvingly when Donald insulted Ted Cruz or an equally important horse back on Twitter, but it was just one post flitting by in an endlessly spinning maelstrom of similar tacky crap. It's not important enough to them to go seek it out.

Mind you, somebody probably billed Trump an absolute fortune to set up an internet web page in which Trump could post Twitter-like thoughts even after Twitter could no longer stomach him. Trump's never going to pay that person, mind you, but at least in theory you're looking at, what, a quarter million dollars’ worth of greasy supplication?

All of this suggests that the absolute drop-dead certainty of party doom among Republican leaders and lawmakers if any one among them pulls a Cheney and refuses to go along with Trump's ranting, delusional insistence that he won his last election no matter how many times officials actually in charge of those elections confidently state he didn't, is … overstated? At best? Trump and the people whose own careers depend on Trump's favor are quite loud in warning lawmakers that "the American people" won't stand for Republicans who don't stand by Trump's every seditionist burp and rant, but the actual American people seem to be moving the f--k on and then some.

You there, reading these words: You're probably mad I'm even bringing him up. You were existing perfectly fine without knowing what Dear Eclipse-Looking Guy's website metrics currently looked like and resent having it wedged into your brain when you could be thinking about other things, things like deciding what your next meal will be or wondering whether Ted Cruz or Rand Paul would win in a fight if the weapons were soggy slices of ham and the reward was just one particularly gullible elderly man's email address. But you're reading anyway, because in your heart of hearts you know that the only way you can think about lunchmeat battles in the first place is if other people are begrudgingly keeping an eye on Typhoid Hitler's whereabouts to make sure he doesn't scuttle back to Munich with a new book to sell. Nobody wants to hear about Seditionist Treasonbag. It's just a thing we have to put up with.

As of the current moment, then, we can report that the vast majority of America appears to give about as much of a shit about Donald Trump as you do. Even among once-supporters, few people are actually seeking him out. This is how politics generally goes after losing an election, or even after retiring in victory. Nobody in the Republican base or leadership is spending even a moment of their day wondering what George W. Bush is currently doing. Is former House Speaker Paul Ryan even still alive? Do we know? Can we prove it? Eh.

Trump is attempting to buck that trend because Trump is a malignant narcissist. He is someone who might literally wither away without his demanded praise and attention; he cannot stomach it. Like Tinkerbell, he must receive constant attention or he will die. So, not quite like Tinkerbell, he is crashing weddings, cheating at golf, opining about the drug habits of sport horses, and making sure that every Republican lawmaker he ever so much as made eye contact with still knows that if they do not shine his shoes in every televised interview and public statement, he will personally devote himself to dragging them into the pits of primary hell. Him and his 200,000 "likes," that is.

The Republican base is moving on, at least so far. They have other heroes, heroes like neo-Nazi talking point machine Tucker Carlson and child sex trafficker Matt Gaetz. Heroes who are still allowed to advocate for crimes on Twitter. The party will not moderate—each of the new would-be heroes are just as hooked into white nationalism, sex crimes, corrupt acts, and "owning the libs" as the Trump clan itself, but it's not a certainty that Trump can retain his position as the party's top fascist dog.

He may yet succumb to the worst of all reality show endings: an audience that has gotten too bored to continue paying attention. Wouldn’t that be nice.

But it must be true.  He swears it on the Holy Bible.

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

White House reaches out, but Republicans are determined to kill Biden's jobs plan

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 17:  Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) talks to reporters about a sex trafficking bill that has stalled in the Senate with (L-R) Sen. Deb Fischer (R-NE), Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) following the weekly Senate Republican policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol March 17, 2015 in Washington, DC. McConnell said he will not move on to a vote to confirm Loretta Lynch, the nominee to replace Attorney General Eric H. Holder, until the Senate votes on the sex trafficking bill.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) 
Republicans play the Seven Dwarfs.  No, the woman speaking is not Snow White - she's Mouthy.  And Mitch is doing his best Sleepy.  The other five are dead ringers for Grumpy and Dopey.

Senate Republicans are reportedly weighing "going bigger" on President Joe Biden's jobs and infrastructure plan as the White House works to shepherd the plan through Congress, according to Politico. How big? As high as $800 billion—more than $200 billion higher than their initial $568 billion counter-offer to Biden's $2.3 trillion American Jobs Plan.

But no matter how high (or low, as it were) Republicans go, they've always got a poison-pill deal killer at the ready. Take Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, for example, who told CNN Tuesday that $800 billion is the "absolute upper limit" on what Republicans might be willing to support. But even if the White House managed to squeeze some good stuff into an extremely pared down bill to attract GOP votes, we find out those votes won't materialize anyway.

"There will not be one Republican vote" for raising corporate taxes, Wicker also promised in a Politico interview. Wicker, one of the Senate GOP negotiators, is actually parroting Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who has spent the last several weeks assuring everyone that not so much as a single Republican will ultimately support Biden's proposal.

This week, the White House is hosting a series of meetings on his proposals with both key Democrats and Republicans. On Monday, President Biden met with Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Tom Carper of Delaware. On Tuesday, he'll follow up with Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona. Biden is also scheduled to meet Wednesday with the "Big Four," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. On Thursday, Biden will be back at it with a group of GOP senators that includes Wicker, chief negotiator Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, and Sens. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, John Barrasso of Wyoming, Roy Blunt of Missouri, and Mike Crapo of Indiana. 

But no matter what Republicans ultimately offer up, Democrats like Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts will be focused on who they plan to leave out in a moment that's ripe for big action.

“I want to know what Mitch McConnell plans to cut,” Sen. Warren told Politico. “This is not a moment to say ‘We’ll repair half our roads. We’ll provide child care for half the mothers who want to go back to work. We’ll provide broadband for half the country that still doesn’t have it.’ This is the time to say ‘We’re going to make an investment in all of us.’”

Right. So the real question is, whether and how long the White House will invest in trying to cut a deal with Republicans that would almost surely result in an attempt to pass two separate bills—one with GOP support and one without it. That question is particularly urgent when Senate Republicans are already trying to paint Biden as a bad actor after he put years of mostly fruitless efforts into trying to negotiate with them during Barack Obama's presidency.

“I’d be lying if I didn’t tell you several people have told me that you’re just going to get burned in the end, [so] why are you sticking your neck out?” GOP Sen. Capito told the Washington Post. "Because it’s worth it,” she added.

In fact, in all likelihood, it's not only worth it, it's entirely necessary for Senate Republicans if they hope to have any chance of retaking the upper chamber next year. The fact that they are even at the negotiating table suggests that Biden's jobs/infrastructure plan was simply too popular to simply shoot down without at least pretending to lift a finger.

Meanwhile, across the aisle, a new day is dawning.  Coal is dead.  Renewables are in.  And Kamala reigns supreme.  With or without the Seven Dwarfs, let's mend those bridges - the real bridges - the ones that are falling down.

Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Arizona 'auditors' demand access to routers and passwords. County sheriff tells them to get bent

Cyber Ninjas owner Doug Logan, left, a Florida-based consultancy, talks about overseeing a 2020 election ballot audit ordered by the Republican lead Arizona Senate at the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum, as a Cyber Ninjas IT technician demonstrates a ballot scan during a news conference Thursday, April 22, 2021, in Phoenix. The equipment used in the November election won by President Joe Biden and the 2.1 million ballots were moved to the site Thursday so Republicans in the state Senate who have expressed uncertainty that Biden's victory was legitimate can recount them and audit the results. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

I’ve been more or less ignoring the Maricopa County, Arizona, election “audit” for much the same reason I don’t watch Keeping Up With the Kardashians to see if Kris Jenner finds the Higgs boson in her kombucha. All you’re likely to see is a passel of lunatics serving up increasingly large dollops of derp.

Case in point: Now these self-appointed election integrity crusaders, who will be kicked out of their venue long before they finish their count, are demanding things they have no business demanding.

Keep in mind, this is all happening fully six months after the election ended. Psst, wrap it up, dinguses.

HuffPo:

The private company conducting the GOP 2020 election recount in Arizona is now demanding access to government internet routers and passwords, which the Maricopa County sheriff blasted as “mind-numbingly reckless and irresponsible” and a threat to law enforcement.

Sheriff Paul Penzone (D) said in a statement that providing router information to a shadowy private company led by a conspiracy-embracing CEO would compromise sensitive and highly classified law enforcement data and equipment.

Hmm. Maybe they should finish scouring the ballots for bamboo before they embark on yet another apoplectic loon mission.

Another concern? Voters’ private information—including Social Security numbers—could be placed in the hands of a bunch of partisan deludenoids who can’t fathom how a kind, compassionate former vice president and all-around mensch could ever get more votes than a diseased, venal terror potato.

In response to Senate subpoenas last week, county attorney Allister Adel explained in a letter that turning over the requested routers or “virtual images” of routers not only poses a significant security risk to the sheriff’s office, it also “puts sensitive, confidential data belonging to Maricopa County’s citizens — including Social Security numbers and protected health information — at risk as well,” reported the Arizona Republic.

Access to the routers “might compromise county and federal law enforcement efforts and put the lives of law enforcement personnel at risk,” Adel added.

Make no mistake. This entire enterprise is nutty. Maricopa County’s ballots have already been audited, and the state of Arizona has long since certified its results. But some very stupid people, including this guy, still think something untoward might turn up.

It won’t, and it’s about time these clodhopping “ninjas” give it up before they really make themselves look foolish.

By god, if Sheriff Joe (Arpaio, one of Trump's pardonees) were still in charge, they'd get them gol dern passwords.  Penzone is Arpaio's successor - and a Democrat.

Monday, May 10, 2021

The Republicans are not just lying to us and their supporters. They are lying to each other.

We are all familiar with and frustrated by the lies, and the damned lies, that have been coming out of the Republican party for years. The lies that started years ago, but whose volume and frequency were amped up by tRump, who, although he refused to put any energy into helping the country, spent many of his waking hours lying, and lying again.

The Rs are continuing at the same ambitious level of lies set by the loser they love. And not just about results. And not just about vaccinations.

It turns out the Rs are lying to themselves about tRump’s support.

Here are some relevant paragraphs from an article about Liz Cheney in the Washington Post. (Michael Scherer, Josh Dawsey and Dan Lamothe)

The refusal to accept reality, she realized, went much deeper.

When staff from the National Republican Congressional Committee rose to explain the party’s latest polling in core battleground districts, they left out a key finding about Trump’s weakness, declining to divulge the information even when directly questioned about Trump’s support by a member of Congress, according to two people familiar with what transpired.

Trump’s unfavorable ratings were 15 points higher than his favorable ones in the core districts, according to the full polling results, which were later obtained by The Washington Post. Nearly twice as many voters had a strongly unfavorable view of the former president as had a strongly favorable one.

Cheney was alarmed, she later told others, in part because Republican campaign officials had also left out bad Trump polling news at a March retreat for ranking committee chairs. Both instances, she concluded, demonstrated that party leadership was willing to hide information from their own members to avoid the truth about Trump and the possible damage he could do to Republican House members, even though the NRCC denied any such agenda.

OK, it is no surprise that the Rs, who have lied so much to us and to their supporters, would lie to each other.

But what is interesting is why they have been lying so much. A lot of speculation has been that that is the only way to keep power. That is what Lindsey Graham has been saying.

But if the support is weaker than they have pretended it to be, if the Rs in leadership are not doing this because they are following the followers, there may be other reasons. Possibly it’s because they have no other plays. Possibly it’s the tRumpian threat to primary these folks, or to send his followers to threaten them in other ways. But possibly it’s because of kompromat. I have been wondering about Graham and kompromat for years.

Mark Twain made popular the phrase, “There are three types of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics.” But in this case, the Rs have hidden the statistics.

Remember "alternate facts"?  Some things just won't go away.

Sunday, May 9, 2021

Conservatives Say They Want to Help 'Parents' Stay Home. What They Really Mean Is 'Mothers.'

 A day-care center in the Congress Heights neighborhood in D.C. President Biden wants to expand universal prekindergarten options nationwide, but some conservatives say most parents would prefer to stay home with their kids instead. (photo: Jahi Chikwendiu/WP)
A day-care center in the Congress Heights neighborhood in D.C. President Biden wants to expand universal prekindergarten options nationwide, but some conservatives say most parents would prefer to stay home with their kids instead. (photo: Jahi Chikwendiu/WP)

By Jill Filipovic, The Washington Post

09 May 21

readersupportednews.org

Gender-neutral language sounds like progress. But look at Republican policy ideas.

n the long tail of a pandemic that has been financially devastating for working mothers, Democrats are pushing to expand child-care options and potentially bring the United States in line with much of the rest of the developed world in offering a universal child-care system.

In response, conservatives are freaking out.

The most visible anti-child-care Republican at the moment is J.D. Vance, author of “Hillbilly Elegy” and rumored to be considering a run for a Senate seat in Ohio. Vance went on a recent Twitter tear in which he leaned into gender-neutral terms — “parents,” “Americans,” “people” — while criticizing “corporate daycare” and arguing that “a healthy society should make it easier for parents to care for kids.” President Biden’s proposal for universal pre-K, Vance declared, was a “war against normal people” and their preferences for their households.

When Vance talks about the people who primarily care for children, and who struggle to raise kids and work for pay, he isn’t talking about “parents” or “Americans” or “people” or even “the working class.” He’s talking about mothers. And when it comes to the people whom Vance and other self-styled conservative populists imagine should be at home, it’s not “parents” but married women financially supported by their husbands.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), for example, compared universal day care to communism and went on Fox News to argue that by offering child care, Democrats were seeking to “incentivize women to rely on the federal government to organize their lives.” When Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced his “parent tax credit,” he noted that “millions of working people want to start a family and would like to care for their children at home, but current policies do not respect these preferences.” Neither, apparently, does Hawley: His bill has an earnings requirement, meaning the neediest families — disproportionately headed by single mothers — wouldn’t qualify because Hawley and other Republicans want to ensure they’re working for pay. And while Hawley said he’s pushing the bill because “American families should be supported,” his legislation wouldn’t support all families equally: It would give single-parent families, which are largely headed by women, half of what two-parent families receive.

On the surface, talking about “parents” rather than “mothers” might seem like progress. The fact that gender-neutral language has become more standard in these discussions does reflect a real shift in gender norms: Men are doing a lot more parenting than they used to; fathers increasingly say they want a better work-life balance and more time with their families; feminists have pushed for a world in which fathers do their fair share, women can work for pay, and it’s not presumed that women will be the primary caregivers for children.

Such language can reflect changing ideas and our hopes for the future. But it can also be slippery and evasive, a way to obscure whom policies would really affect. It’s mothers who still do the majority of child-care in the United States (and around the world) and who spend much more time with their children than fathers do with theirs. Mothers are much more likely than fathers to raise their children without a partner: The number of unmarried parents has exploded, but the proportion of unmarried parents who are solo dads hasn’t changed since the 1960s. One in four American children are now being raised in single-parent households, and overwhelmingly by single moms.

Solo moms who must put food on their kids’ plates need child care more than just about anyone. So far, no Republican has proposed paying them a full salary to stay home. Working-class and poor women are more likely than middle-class and wealthy women to have a child before getting married, if they marry at all. Despite a move to rebrand themselves the representatives of the working class, Republicans have never wanted to financially empower the many working-class solo mothers to have the choice to stay home. And even as they talk about “parents” having that option, they’ve certainly never pushed for dads to quit their jobs and become full-time homemakers.

The number of dads who purposefully quit jobs to raise their kids remains pretty tiny. In two-parent families where one partner stays home, that partner is almost always the mother. And while some fathers are the primary caretakers for their children, men are still much more likely to say they’re at home because they’re ill or disabled than to say they affirmatively chose to stay home to raise kids. Women, on the other hand, are much more likely to have left work specifically to raise their children. Only a quarter of stay-at-home dads intentionally left the workforce to care for kids, compared with three-quarters of stay-at-home moms.

It is mothers particularly, not parents equally, who do most of the work of raising America’s children. It’s mothers specifically, not parents generally, who are pushed out of the labor force when child care is unavailable or inaccessible. And when Americans say it’s better to have one parent at home full time with young children, a little digging shows that they overwhelmingly mean it’s better to have the mother at home full time: Very few say that’s an ideal situation for dads. When conservatives tout policies that would enable one “parent” to stay home, they’re really saying they want mothers to do so.

The disruptions of the pandemic have only magnified these inequities. With kids out of school and at home, it was working mothers who were suddenly charged with figuring out how to be full-time employees, full-time caregivers and full-time teachers. A lot of them couldn’t do it: More than 5 million women lost their jobs during the pandemic. Single mothers were hit hardest of all, and Black and Latina single mothers the hardest among them. Unemployed women were nearly three times as likely as unemployed men to cite child-care demands as the reason they were out of the labor force.

What self-styled pro-family conservatives rarely want to address is that women working is good for both women and families. It brings a wide assortment of financial and social benefits, such as children who do better in school, daughters who are more likely to be employed and boys who grow into more involved fathers. Working mothers are better off financially than their stay-at-home peers; they wind up with more retirement savings; they are less likely to say they feel angry and depressed; and they are better insulated from divorce, the death of a spouse, and other sad but common upheavals that leave all families reeling but put stay-at-home mothers in much more dire straits. A lot of data supports the conclusion that it’s good when women work outside the home. What’s not good is when working mothers are squeezed from all sides, juggling more-demanding workplaces, a dearth of affordable child care and ever-higher standards for what it means to be a good mom.

It’s far past time Americans had serious discussions about child care, and such debates about some of the most intimate and important parts of our lives will always force us to work through what we most value: female independence or long-enforced gender roles; the false promise of “choice” or the wide unknown of unrealized opportunity. But if we want to find solutions that meet the needs and desires of more Americans, we need to talk about what we’re actually talking about. All parents do not shoulder the burdens of parenting equally. When it comes to expectations about who forgoes income and the independence it brings, who gets pushed out of the workforce when child-care demands scale up, and whom conservatives expect to stay home with kids, we’re not talking about all parents, regardless of gender.

We’re talking about mothers.

Moms are willing to go to war for us.  Isn't it about time we returned the favor?

Saturday, May 8, 2021

GOP Rep. Mo Brooks has been hiding from process servers, after bragging about his role on Jan. 6

Republican Rep. Mo Brooks points at the Capitol during Jan 6 speech
Republican Rep. Mo Brooks directing Trump supporters to the Capitol during Jan. 6 speech

On Jan. 6, in the hours just before insurgents overran the Capitol, Republican Rep. Mo Brooks stood on the “Stop the Steal” stage and delivered a message designed to set the stakes for the already riled-up crowd. 

“I’ve got a message that I need you to take to your heart and take back home and along the way, stop at the Capitol,” said Brooks. “Today, Republican senators and congressmen will either vote to turn America into a godless, amoral, dictatorial, oppressed and socialist nation on the decline, or they will join us and they will fight and vote against voter fraud and election theft and vote for keeping America great.” And in case that invitation to “stop at the Capitol” was too subtle, Brooks made his intentions absolutely clear.

“Today is the day American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass,” said Brooks. “Our ancestors sacrificed their blood, their sweat, their tears, their fortunes and sometimes their lives to give us, their descendants, an America that is the greatest nation in world history. So I have a question for you. Are you willing to do the same?” Brooks then repeatedly shouted at the crowd, “Will you fight for America?” before saying, “We, American patriots are going to come right at them!”

In March, Brooks kicked off his campaign for senator in Alabama, with the goal of filling the seat left by retiring Senator Richard Shelby. As CNN noted at the time, Brooks has placed his support for the Big Lie and that speech on Jan. 6 right at the center of his campaign. Brooks is literally running on his support for the insurgency.

But when it comes to facing a court case based on charges of incitement, Brooks is running away.

As Axios reported on March 5, Rep. Eric Swalwell filed suit in U.S. District Court citing both Brooks and Donald Trump as being "responsible for the injury and destruction" of the Jan. 6 attack. That lawsuit states that the deadly attack on the Capitol, including the attempt to kidnap and execute members of Congress, came “As a direct and foreseeable consequence of the Defendants’ false and incendiary allegations of fraud and theft, and in direct response to the Defendants’ express calls for violence at the rally.”

More than a month later, Swalwell says Brooks is continuing to dodge process servers and refusing to be served with the lawsuit. Others charges in the suit, including Trump, have waived service—meaning that the case can proceed to court—but Brooks remains as a lone holdout. He has neither waived service, nor acknowledged the paperwork that has been delivered to his office.

 As Forbes reported earlier this week, Brooks is far from apologetic about his speech on Jan. 6. In fact, Brooks is using segments of that speech, and attempts by Democrats to censure him for his call to violence, as cornerstones of his campaign ads. 

On Jan. 6, Brooks put out a brief statement that he “always condemns violence.” However, he followed this almost immediately with a tweet insisting that the cause of violence was not the people he had just told to “kick ass” and “come right at them” in an effort to save the nation. Instead, wrote Brooks, the assault was conducted by “fascist ANTIFA”—a term that may set the record for cognitive dissonance.

Brooks has continued to repeat claims that antifa was behind the attack. However, in his campaign he has also highlighted scenes of the Jan. 6 rally and stated that on that day, “I did my duty for my country.” The level of ridiculous self-contradictory elements in Brooks’ statements may seem obvious, but then he is running as the most MAGA of a number of MAGA candidates vying for Shelby’s spot. Being ridiculous is part of the job description.

As Swalwell’s attorney noted, “It seems clear that Brooks is choosing to make a political stunt out of a part of the process that essentially is a formality, which is unfortunate.” But Mo Brooks doing something just because it would draw more attention to his campaign shouldn’t be a surprise. Neither should his unwillingness to go to court and discuss how he deliberately stirred up a crowd and told them to put their lives on the line, go to the Capitol, and prevent America from becoming a “godless, amoral, dictatorial, oppressed and socialist nation.”

Brooks previously ran for the Senate in 2017 in the hopes of capturing the seat that once belonged to Jeff Sessions. He enjoyed the support of Trump along with Fox News personalities Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity. He came in third in the Republican primary.

A gallows awaits Pelosi, Pence, and any other members of congress the hooligans and marauders can find.