Climate Progress / News Investigation
Published: Wednesday 17 September 2014
The controversial technique of hydraulic
fracturing is “directly linked” to the increase of earthquakes
throughout the U.S. And the likelihood of these quakes getting stronger
is in our future.
A team of scientists with the U.S. Geological Survey
have found evidence “directly linking” the uptick in Colorado and New
Mexico earthquakes since 2001 to wastewater injection, a process widely
used in the controversial technique of hydraulic fracturing, or
fracking, and conventional drilling.
In a study
to be published in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
on Tuesday, the scientists presented “several lines of evidence [that]
suggest the earthquakes in the area are directly related to the disposal
of wastewater” deep underground, according to a BSSA press release.
Fracking and conventional natural gas companies routinely dispose of
large amounts of wastewater underground after drilling. During fracking,
the water is mixed with chemicals and sand, to “fracture” underground
shale rock formations and make gas easier to extract.
The USGS research is just the latest in a string of studies
that have suggested the disposed water is migrating along dormant fault
lines, changing their state of stress, and causing them to fail.
For their research, the four California-based USGS scientists monitored the 2,200 square mile Raton Basin,
which goes from southern Colorado into New Mexico. They pointed out
that the Basin had been “seismically quiet” until 1999, when companies
began “major fluid injection” deep into the ground. Earthquakes began in
2001 when Colorado wastewater injection rates were under 600,000
barrels per month, and and since then there have been 16 earthquakes
that could be considered large (above a magnitude of 3.8, including two
over a 5.0 magnitude), compared with only one — a 4.0 magnitude quake —
in the 30 years prior.
CREDIT: RUBENSTEIN ET. AL.
“These earthquakes are limited to the area of fluid
injection, they occur shortly after major fluid injection activities
began, and the earthquake rates track the fluid injection rates in the
Raton Basin,” the paper said, noting the scientists’ comparisons of the timing and location of earthquakes with the timing and location of injected wastewater. By the mid-2000s, Colorado’s wastewater injection rates were up to 1.9 million barrels per month.
Raton Basin,” the paper said, noting the scientists’ comparisons of the timing and location of earthquakes with the timing and location of injected wastewater. By the mid-2000s, Colorado’s wastewater injection rates were up to 1.9 million barrels per month.
Taking that and the unexpected frequency of the
earthquakes into consideration, the paper noted that it was “highly
unlikely” that the quakes could have been due to any random fluctuations
underground.
“Detailed investigations of two seismic sequences places
them in proximity to high-volume, high-injection-rate wells, and both
sequences occurred after a nearby increase in the rate of injection,”
the study’s accompanying press release said.
“A comparison between seismicity and wastewater injection in Colorado
and New Mexico reveals similar patterns, suggesting seismicity is
initiated shortly after an increase in injection rates.”
The study does note that despite the strong and direct
link, the findings are not definitive, echoing language often used by
climate scientists to describe why it’s nearly impossible to say that
individual weather events are caused by climate change. “Although there
are many lines of evidence showing that the seismicity in the Raton
Basin has been induced by wastewater injection activities in the area,
it is very difficult to say whether an individual earthquake was caused
by injection because natural seismicity has also been recorded there,”
the study says. “For future research, a longer-term study with dense
network coverage on both sides of the border would be especially useful
in understanding the inducing relationship between the earthquakes and
fluid injection in the Raton Basin.”
The U.S. government announced
back in May that it would begin to track the risks that so-called
“frackquakes” pose, and start including them on official maps that help
influence building codes. Before then, the USGS had never taken man-made
earthquakes into account during its regular quake mapping activity. It
made the decision to do so after finding
that two strong earthquakes in heavily-drilled areas of Colorado and
Oklahoma in 2011 might have been the result of wastewater injection.
“For future research, a longer-term study with dense network coverage on
both sides of the border would be especially useful in understanding
the inducing relationship between the earthquakes and fluid injection in
the Raton Basin.”
Since then, drilling for natural gas and fracking has
proliferated across the country, as have earthquakes in the places where
those booms are occurring. Oklahoma, a hotbed for fracking, is currently experiencing anywhere from 5 to 20 small earthquakes every day, according to the state’s Geology Survey. What’s more, Cornell University scientists have linked more than 2,500 small earthquakes that have hit Oklahoma in the past five years to the wastewater disposal process.
These quakes are usually too small to be felt, but scientists have warned that they stand to get stronger as more wastewater injection happens — a likelihood considering the growing expansion of fracking.
No comments:
Post a Comment