Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Trump Has Picked a Fight With FBI. He'll Be Sorry.

Donald Trump. (photo: Getty)
Donald Trump. (photo: Getty)

By Eugene Robinson, The Washington Post
06 February 18
readersupportednews.org
 
residents don’t win fights with the FBI. Donald Trump apparently wants to learn this lesson the hard way.

Most presidents have had the sense not to bully the FBI by defaming its leaders and — ridiculously — painting its agents as leftist political hacks. Most members of Congress have also understood how unwise it would be to pull such stunts. But Trump and his hapless henchmen on Capitol Hill, led by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), have chosen the wrong enemy. History strongly suggests they will be sorry.

The far-right echo chamber resounds with wailing and braying about something called the “deep state” — a purported fifth column of entrenched federal bureaucrats whose only goal in life, apparently, is to deny America the greatness that Dear Leader Trump has come to bestow. It is unclear who is supposed to be directing this vast conspiracy. Could it be Dr. Evil? Supreme Leader Snoke? Hillary Clinton? This whole paranoid fantasy, as any sane person realizes, is utter rubbish.*

The bureau has no political ax to grind, and the attempt by Nunes and others to portray it as some kind of liberal cabal is comical. But it does have great institutional cohesion, a proud sense of mission, and a culture that inculcates the “us vs. the world” attitude that is so common among law enforcement agencies.

I’m old enough to remember the days when J. Edgar Hoover ran the place like his own private Stasi — wiretapping civil rights leaders such as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., infiltrating anti-Vietnam War groups with informers and provocateurs, seeking or manufacturing damaging “evidence” against those he targeted, keeping copious files on the peccadilloes of the politicians who were theoretically his masters. Presidents from Franklin D. Roosevelt through Richard Nixon coexisted warily with Hoover, afraid to fire him for fear of all the beans he might spill.

Harry S. Truman was an especially bitter opponent. “We want no Gestapo or secret police. The FBI is tending in that direction,” he said. “They are dabbling in sex-life scandals and plain blackmail. . . . J. Edgar Hoover would give his right eye to take over, and all congressmen and senators are afraid of him.”

But when Truman left office, Hoover was still FBI director. He held on to the job from the FBI’s founding in 1935 until his death in 1972 — six weeks before the Watergate break-in.

The day after what Nixon’s spokesman would call “a third-rate burglary attempt” took place, the FBI’s major-crimes duty officer, a supervisor named Daniel Bledsoe, opened a federal wiretapping investigation. According to Bledsoe, he received a phone call from Nixon aide John Ehrlichman ordering him to shut down the probe. His simple reply: “No.”

It was another FBI man — Mark Felt, then an assistant director — who became the famous source Deep Throat, secretly meeting Post reporter Bob Woodward in a parking garage to guide the paper’s illumination of the president’s crimes.

In 2004, according to journalist Tim Weiner’s book “Enemies: A History of the FBI,” President George W. Bush was confronted by the man he had appointed to lead the bureau: Robert S. Mueller III. In Weiner’s telling, Mueller threatened to resign unless Bush curtailed some aspects of the domestic electronic surveillance that was taking place in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. Bush reportedly agreed to put the program on a more legal footing.

Now comes Trump. His oafish attempts to neutralize the FBI director he inherited, James B. Comey — trying to extract a Godfather-style loyalty pledge, asking him to drop the investigation of Michael Flynn, ultimately firing him — are potential fodder for what may be an obstruction-of-justice case against Trump being assembled by Mueller.

Comey wrote everything down. The FBI always writes everything down.

Do you see a pattern here? The idea that the likes of Trump and Nunes are going to put a scratch on the FBI with ludicrous innuendo — we’re supposed to believe the bureau is a nest of Bolsheviks? — and selectively edited memos would be laughable, if Mueller and his team were the laughing kind. Which they’re not.

The Trumpists were so proud of themselves when they found evidence that Peter Strzok, an FBI agent originally on Mueller’s team, thought Trump would be a bad president. Now, however, someone has leaked to CNN that Strzok drafted the “October surprise” Comey letter that reopened the bureau’s investigation into Clinton’s emails — without which Trump probably would have lost the election.

Trump and his minions seem to think they can out-leak the FBI. Obviously they haven’t been paying attention.

Monday, February 5, 2018

Trump, in a panic over dud Nunes' memo, says Adam Schiff 'must be stopped'



Rep. Adam Schiff in interview with Jake Tapper on "State of the Union"
Donald Trump’s tweets at the end of last week were still attempting to push the memo his staff created in collaboration with that of Devin Nunes as if it represented some major reversal of the Russia investigation. But over the weekend, it apparently became clear — even to Trump — that the two reactions to the memo his team spent weeks building up was: “Is that it?” and “What a dud.” The contents not only defined the term “weak,” they showed that Republicans had followed Trump off a cliff, burning a relationship with the FBI that dated back to the agency’s founding. for less than nothing.

On the Sunday talk circuit, even Republicans like Trey Gowdy spent their morning stepping back from the memo and dismissing it’s importance. The whole affair turns out to be nothing but another in a line of embarrassments for Trump, and Nunes, and the party as a whole. Rather than damaging the reputation of the FBI and DOJ, as designed, it showcased the ugliness of Trump’s tactics. Far from “totally vindicating” Trump, the memo acts as a fresh indictment of Trump and Nunes and undercuts any the case they were hoping to make. Far from making it clear that the basis of the investigation was the Steele “dossier,” the memo made it clear that it wasn’t. 

And now comes the part of the story where Donald Trump needs to find someone to blame.

The idea that Schiff has been spreading information from the House Intelligence Committee hearings has been a popular one among Republicans, though they’ve yet to produce any evidence of facts behind these claims. Since Trump’s tweets over the weekend have been limited to praising the team of royal ego soothers on Fox and Friends, it’s likely Trump picked up the idea of attacking Representative Schiff from that source.

But just as the affair of Trump’s memo did turn out to represent a scandal — for Trump, his tweet about Schiff shows who is really the bigger man.

By signing this form, you are agreeing to receive occasional emails on this and related campaigns from Daily Kos. You may of course unsubscribe at any time. Here's our privacy policy.

Naturally, for Trump, what makes Schiff a “liar” is that he says things Trump doesn’t like, such as Schiff’s role in writing a Democratic alternative to the Trump–Nunes dud and helping to get word out in advance that the memo was selling a distorted, dishonest version of actual events. Schiff’s words are “lies” in the same way that news stories showing Trump’s attempts to save himself as the expense of the nation are “fake news.”

That Trump is resorting to calling Schiff “little” demonstrates not only Trump’s pettiness, but showcases the slim pickings in his cabinet of adjectives. Remarking on someone’s height seems to be a go-to Trump response. It doesn’t matter if the opponent is a foreign leader or an opposing candidate, Trump tries to belittle people by “littling” them.” If Trump really thinks that being taller makes him better, Little Donald should have that conversation with the six-foot eight James Comey.

The idea that Schiff “must be stopped” would seem to suggest some level of assault, even violence against Schiff. But Trump might want to think twice about that. Not only has Schiff’s greater visibility over the last year come from his tireless efforts to fight the lies pressed by Trump and Nunes, he also happens to be an accomplished triathlete.

If Trump wants to stop Schiff, he’s going to need a faster golf cart.

Sunday, February 4, 2018

It Will Soon Be Trump's Time in the Barrel

President Donald Trump greets evangelical ministers in the Oval Office of the White House. (photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)
President Donald Trump greets evangelical ministers in the Oval Office of the White House. (photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)

By Marc Ash, Reader Supported News
2 February 18
readersupportednews.org
 
ohn Musgrave comes into view for most Americans in Ken Burns and Lynn Novick’s documentary, Vietnam. In 1967 Musgrave, an 18-year-old Marine rifleman, served at, among other places, Con Thien, an outpost two miles south of the DMZ and 14 miles from the coast, viewed by U.S. commanders at the time as strategically important.

Musgrave, who would later somehow manage to survive wounds that by all rights should have killed him, recalls in the documentary a phrase that seems to be re-emerging in today’s political discourse. Describing the relentless barrage of artillery and rocket fire, he remembered, “Con Thien was extraordinarily small. That’s one of the things that made it so intense. We called it time in the barrel because we were like fish in a barrel.” Thus it came to be rued by the Marines stationed there as “Time in the barrel.”

Trump confidant, unofficial advisor, and longtime Republican dirty-trickster Roger Stone has taken to Tweeting in advance that key Democratic figures would soon face their time in the barrel. Apparently something Stone delighted in. First he posted his ominous prediction on Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, “Trust me, it will soon the Podesta’s time in the barrel. #CrookedHillary.” He later appears to have known in advance that Democratic senator Al Franken would soon face time in the barrel.

Now it’s Donald Trump’s time in the barrel.

More words of wisdom from Roger Stone, as he further opines that Trump should at all costs avoid a direct interview with Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his team, calling it a “perjury trap.” It would, however, better be described as a rock and a hard place.

Donald Trump, in a formal setting with Mueller, could absolutely blunder or bluster and incriminate himself. It’s well within his makeup and he’s certainly done it many times before. But it isn’t likely that is what Mueller and his staff are preparing for.

It’s far more likely that since Mueller has made the call to move ahead with an interview of a sitting president, he is in possession of evidence that implicates Trump personally and criminally. It is legally, constitutionally, and historically an extraordinary step. Mueller would not go there unless he already had solid evidence in hand. The evidence being the key.

It’s those pesky underlying facts that former acting attorney general Sally Yates referred to in testimony before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee in May of last year rearing their ugly heads again.

Mueller is playing a chess game, and he’s playing to win. He’s putting Trump between a rock and a hard place. If Mueller has evidence Trump has engaged in criminal activity, then Trump only has two options under questioning, both bad.

He can admit to criminal activity (the rock) or lie to federal investigators, a felony unto itself (the hard place).

Trump and his lawyers have two options of their own: refuse to cooperate with Mueller’s interview request and/or subsequent subpoena, or move to have someone, anyone, at the Justice Department fire Mueller. Two more bad options.

If he chooses the “Just say no.” option, that likely lands in the Supreme Court’s inbox on a fairly expedited basis. Given the sea of ill will Trump has created between his administration and the Judicial Branch, the court, political leanings notwithstanding, would not be likely to rule against the Constitution and issue Donald Trump a free pass.

In the alternative, should Trump one Saturday night decide to organize a massacre, call it Saturday Night Massacre II, that would be difficult. But if he and his inner circle were willing to burn all the political capital they have left, they could probably get it done. Barely. The blowback, however, would be visible from outer space.

Pissed off FBI agents do not necessarily constitute a Deep State, and it probably is not fair to conclude that the counsel’s investigation is a vendetta, but if Mueller is removed you can bet it will get downright personal, quickly. The probe will continue, and all of federal law enforcement will be highly motivated to see it through.

There is a third option. Trump could assert his rights under the Fifth Amendment. But it would be seen politically and perhaps even legally as tantamount to an admission of guilt and do nothing to make the evidence go away.

Trump is between a rock and a hard place or a fish in a barrel, choose whichever analogy you like. In either case, it will be his turn soon.



Marc Ash is the founder and former Executive Director of Truthout, and is now founder and Editor of Reader Supported News.

Saturday, February 3, 2018

Memo exactly as big a dud as everyone predicted



WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 23:  Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes (R-CA) speaks to reporters after leaving a closed meeting with fellow committee members, on Capitol Hill March 23, 2017 in Washington, DC. ĂŠNunes has been under fire from committee members for informing President Donald Trump about the U.S. intelligence community's incidental collection of communications involving members of the president's transition group.  (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Now that Donald Trump and Devin Nunes have conspired to damage the FBI and DOJ by releasing a document that makes slanted, unsupported charges about bias and malpractice, it’s possible to see just how big a deal the underlying charges actually are. And … they are absolutely, completely, just as meaningless as previews of the memo had implied.

As expected, the focus of the three-page document is the FISA warrant application for Carter Page. The sum total of charges against the FBI and DOJ is that in the process of applying for a FISA warrant against Page, the FBI used a document from Christopher Steele. The memo then spends some time trying to make the case that Steele is a poor source because he was “suspended then terminated as an FBI source” for talking to the media. Which says not one thing about the validity of the incident that was cited.

In fact, the incident seems to have been Carter Page’s trip to Moscow, which not only happened, but happened with the full knowledge of the Trump campaign.

The other half of the memo is spent name dropping: Hillary Clinton, Sally Yates, Bruce Ohr, Fusion CEO Glenn Simpson, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, James Comey, and Andrew McCabe all make an appearance. Though none of them seem to have done anything wrong, except for Nunes’ contention that they didn’t like Trump.

The memo closes with a paragraph devoted to the idea that Papadopoulos and Page never talked to each other, so Page’s trip to Moscow and meeting with Russian officials couldn’t have had anything to do with Papadopoulos telling the Trump campaign that someone should go to Moscow and meet with Russian officials. Seriously. That’s how weak this whole thing is.

Friday, February 2, 2018

Politico: Trump's Saturday Night Massacre Happening Right Before Our Eyes


NixonTrump.jpg
History repeats itself ... as it always does.
Republicans are the “law and order” party, yet they seem to have no compunctions whatsoever about destroying the FBI, DOJ or endangering national security. In a worse case scenario the release of the Nunes memo could cause a seismic change in both institutions of government, a foreshadowing of which was given on MSNBC today by Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY), who said, “There's going to have to be a change to certain practices and there's going to have to be a change to some personnel towards the highest levels of the DOJ and FBI." Andrew McCabe left a few days ago and it has been speculated that Christopher Wray would leave the FBI, and a mass resignation of agents would follow him. This is not business as usual. 

The Nunes memo is just the latest escalation in an eight month long campaign to discredit the Trump-Russia investigation. Mueller’s team was accused of bias against Trump, first manifesting in the report that Mueller had illegally accessed copies of emails from the Trump transition. That accusation faded away when the General Services Administration said it had told the transition team that its emails wouldn’t be protected, and in the face of push back to absurd allegations, the Republicans gave up.

Then efforts were made to discredit the Steele Dossier. Next came the Strozk-Page frenzy, with the mention of secret societies and text messages that were purportedly deleted; again, there was a prosaic explanation and recently FBI forensics specialists recovered the text messages. Then Robert Mueller himself was accused of bias due to conflict of interests.

That takes us up to the heart of the issue, the Nunes memo, wherein it is claimed that the FBI improperly obtained authorization to conduct surveillance on Carter Page.

Christopher Wray, appointed by Trump himself, said that the memo was inaccurate, due to material omissions of fact. The memo was lacking in credibility before Nunes altered it, after the committee had approved its release. Furthermore, the memo was characterized by the New York Times as a “dagger aimed at Rod Rosenstein,” and that brings us up to the present moment and a discussion of another Saturday Night Massacre.  Politico via Common Dreams:
All this has built steadily toward a crisis for American democracy—a Saturday Night Massacre in slow motion. Press reports suggest the president may be contemplating using the memo to dismiss Rosenstein. That matters: If the president were to use his powers to insert someone lacking independence, that person could throttle the special counsel.
That move would, however, risk deepening the president’s obstruction of justice liability, and that of those around him who are involved in the decision. After all, firing Comey on dubious grounds with the alleged intent to hamper the Russia investigation led to an obstruction investigation. Cashiering Rosenstein would offer a matching bookend. That is particularly so in light of another startling report today: that the president sought details about the Russia investigation from Rosenstein, then asked him, “Are you on my team?” This echoes Trump’s demand for loyalty from Comey that helped kick off the obstruction investigation.
Rosenstein’s failure to provide sufficient answers has put his head on the chopping block, with the president reportedly preparing to use the memo as a pretext. This targeting of the deputy attorney general also makes clear the larger motivations of the smear campaign. It is plainly obstructive of the Russia investigation. From Trump on down, the hope seems to be that the best defense will prove to be a good offense. This is exactly the playbook Trump used to run when he was a slick up-and-coming Manhattan developer taking advice from the late Roy Cohn: attack, attack attack. But this is the presidency, and Trump has failed to learn the lesson of Cohn’s previous client and patron, Joe McCarthy. It’s not going to go the way he thinks.
Trump’s recent refusal to enforce sanctions against Russia, even though Congress unanimously voted for same, is in flat out opposition to the rule of law. The constitution provides that the president will enforce laws made by Congress. He doesn’t get to cherry pick which laws he likes. That is autocracy and fascism, not democracy.

This level of flouting the constitution certainly constitutes impeachable offense in and of itself, and when coupled with the smear campaign emanating from the White House against the Trump-Russia investigation, the handwriting is on the wall. At the very least, we’re looking at a constitutional crisis, perhaps beginning with another Saturday Night Massacre scenario.

Rep. Adam Schiff responds to Trump's memo tweet

GOP releases trumped up memo despite entreaties from Trump's own FBI director

By Devlin Barrett, Karoun Demirjian and Josh Dawsey

The Washington Post 

Feb. 2, 2018

GOP memo alleging surveillance abuses by the FBI has been released, intensifying a fight between the White House and Republican lawmakers, on one side, and the nation’s top law enforcement agency over whether the origins of a probe into Russian interference in 2016 were tainted by political bias.


President Trump had approved release of the memo without redactions Friday morning.

The four-page, newly declassified memo written by the Republican staffers for the House Intelligence Committee said the findings “raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain (Justice Department) and FBI interactions with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC),’’ calling it “a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.’’

The memo accuses former officials who approved the surveillance applications – a group that includes former FBI Director James B. Comey, his former deputy Andrew McCabe, former deputy attorney general Sally Yates and current Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein — of signing off on court surveillance requests that omitted key facts about the political motivations of the person supplying some of the information, Christopher Steele, a former intelligence officer in Britain.

The memo says Steele “was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations — an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI.’’

The memo is not an intelligence document and reflects information the committee has gathered, which Democrats, the FBI and Justice Department have criticized as incomplete and misleading.

Current and former law enforcement officials said a major concern inside the FBI is that the rules governing classified information will impede their ability to respond to the memo’s accusations when it becomes public.

The president told reporters in the Oval Office, “I think it’s a disgrace what’s happening in our country. . . . A lot of people should be ashamed of themselves and much worse than that.”

The FBI and the Justice Department had lobbied strenuously against the memo’s release. In a statement Wednesday, the FBI had said it was “gravely concerned” that key facts were missing from the memo, which, it said, left an inaccurate impression of how the agency conducted surveillance under the authority of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Friday morning, the president tweeted in anticipation of the memo’s release, saying: “The top Leadership and Investigators of the FBI and the Justice Department have politicized the sacred investigative process in favor of Democrats and against Republicans - something which would have been unthinkable just a short time ago.’’ He added: “Rank & File are great people!”

Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, tweeted in response, “No, Mr. President it’s worse than that. The country’s top elected leader has agreed to selectively and misleadingly release classified info to attack the FBI — that’s what would have been unthinkable a short time ago.”

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Memogate: Nunes's secret document yet another scheme from the Trump White House



WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 22:  House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) speaks to reporters after a meeting at the White House March 22, 2017 in Washington, DC. Nunes said that he has seen reports from the U.S. intelligence agencies that show communication from members of President Trump's transition team and the president himself were incidentally collected.  (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Asked if he had worked with the White House in crafting the #ReleaseTheMemo memo, The Daily Beast reports Devin Nunes’ telling reply.
During Monday’s contentious closed-door committee meeting, Rep. Mike Quigley, a Democrat, asked Nunes point-blank if his staffers had been talking with the White House as they compiled a four-page memo alleging FBI and Justice Department abuses over surveillance of President Trump’s allies in the Russia probe.
According to sources familiar with the exchange, Nunes made a few comments that didn’t answer the question before finally responding, “I’m not answering.”
In his earlier “unmasking” scandal, what Nunes presented as information revealed to him by his own sources within the intelligence community turned out to be a deception coordinated by Nunes, Michael Flynn protege Ezra Cohen-Watnick, and White House attorney Michael Ellis. As the farce that Nunes had returned to the White House to brief them on information that had been generated by the White House unraveled, Nunes was forced to step aside from further involvement in the Russia investigation and sent to stew on the sidelines.

And now it appears that this latest Nunes generated “scandal” really is a scandal after all—one involving Devin Nunes and the Trump White House in a scheme to deceive the public, damage the FBI, and interfere with the Russia investigation.

Nunes lied about both the source and the nature of his information last time. He’s doing it again. And the Trump White House is hurrying to get the information out before the whole ugly scheme comes crashing down around their ears. 

Seen it? John Kelly probably wrote it.

What Kelly means by “everything out” is, of course, just the release of the White House-created memo, without supporting information, and certainly without the Democratic response that the Republicans on the Nunes-chaired House Intelligence Committee voted to keep under lock and key.
“A misleading set of talking points attacking the FBI...yet another desperate and flailing attempt to undermine Special Counsel Mueller and the FBI,” Democrats characterized it in a Jan. 19 statement.
This isn’t just obstruction, this is OBSTRUCTION. This is the attempt to demean the FBI, subvert the Russia investigation, and plant false information with the America public. And it’s been done as yet another collaboration between the Trump White House and members of the Republican Congress.

Make that OBSTRUCTION and CONSPIRACY. One that has involved the Republican Congress, the Trump White House, Fox News, Breitbart, and thousands of Russian bots all in a prolonged, orchestrated effort to sabotage the Department of Justice and cripple the FBI so that no serious effort can be made to investigate Trump for any offense.
[Nunes] four-page surveillance memo has now far overshadowed the committee’s Russia investigation. As The Daily Beast first reported, it names Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, former FBI Director James Comey, and retiring Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. Every Democrat on the House intelligence committee has said Nunes’ memo manipulates the intelligence behind the surveillance request in order to exculpate Trump.
The memo reportedly focuses on the renewal of a FISA warrant for Carter Page and attempts to make the possible use of a memo from Christopher Steele as part of the massive warrant application into a political scandal. It’s a story just about as believable as the excuse Trump and Sessions forced Rod Rosenstein to write stating that Comey needed to be fired for being too mean to Hillary Clinton. Or the note that Trump wrote from Air Force One claiming that the Trump tower meeting was all about adoption. And even if you believe it all, it doesn’t absolve Trump.
Rep. Adam Schiff, the top-ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, says there is nothing in a classified Republican memo on the Russia investigation that vindicates President Donald Trump.
He says Rep. Devin Nunes of California, the committee chairman, is pushing a "misleading narrative" to undermine the FBI and special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election and whether Trump's campaign was involved.
One Tuesday, Rod Rosenstein and Christopher Wray came to the White House to state their objections to the letter. Even the FBI has taken the extraordinary step of making an official objection.
With regard to the House Intelligence Committee’s memorandum, the FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it. As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.
Any statement that Christopher Wray gave tacit approval to the memo’s contents either before or after the House vote are clearly a lie.

It’s no longer accurate to refer to this as the Nunes memo. It’s the Trump–Nunes memo. And it’s time to retire the #ReleaseTheMemo hashtag for one that’s more accurate.

#Memogate.