Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Wednesday, June 30, 2021

Whether it's Biden or his policies, nothing the GOP tries seems to stick

US President Joe Biden holds a press conference after the US-Russia summit in Geneva on June 16, 2021. (Photo by PETER KLAUNZER / POOL / AFP) (Photo by PETER KLAUNZER/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Here's a surprise: Republicans are already dedicating millions in digital advertising to attacking President Joe Biden on everything under the sun.

The GOP list of complaints is long; however, it’s not particularly pithy according to Politico. Biden wants to spend too much on infrastructure, he wants to raise taxes, he's the puppet of dark money forces, something about how he's responsible for rising crime and gun violence even though it's Republicans who are blocking gun reform. Here are a few others from predictable detractors:

  • Ted Cruz claimed Biden was trying to pack the Supreme Court with "radical leftist justices" after Biden ordered a commission to study the courts.
  • The National Republican Congressional Committee bemoaned Biden halting construction of the border wall.
  • The Trump fundraising committee has been calling Biden a “washed-up, career politician who has no clue what he is doing.”

The everything-and-the-kitchen-sink barrage suggests one of two things: Republicans are still desperately searching for the magic spell that will affix imaginary horns to Biden in the minds of all their voters; or it means that while no one particular Biden smear has stuck, they have found microtargeted attacks that speak to certain voters.

Democrats think it's the former, calling it a "spray and pray" approach to lowering Biden's 50-plus approval rating before the midterms. And frankly, most strategists say there's nothing ideal about not finding a single line of attack to hammer away at. The bottom line is, attaching Biden's name to something simply doesn't mar it.

“If you wanna stop legislation, you do not call it the ‘Biden Voting Rights Bill’ because for the broader electorate he’s ... Joe Biden,” said GOP digital strategist Eric Wilson.

One place Biden's name has anecdotally produced, reports Politico, is in the arena of fundraising off the right. But other than that, the GOP’s criticism is unusually diffuse.

In many ways, Republicans’ scattershot approach has freed up the White House to simply continue playing offense rather than returning fire on a multitude of issues that don't appear to be getting traction.

“We are laser focused on putting an end to the virus, on improving the lives of Americans, and on getting our economy back up and running,” Deputy Press Secretary Chris Meagher said.


Tuesday, June 29, 2021

BOYCOTT TOYOTA for funding insurrectionist Republican lawmakers, then doubling down

Trump Supporters Hold "Stop The Steal" Rally In DC Amid Ratification Of Presidential Election

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 6: Trump supporters clash with police and security forces as people try to storm the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC. Demonstrators breeched security and entered the Capitol as Congress debated the 2020 presidential election Electoral Vote Certification. (photo by Brent Stirton/Getty Images)
Toyota is donating to the Republican instigators of this.

In the immediate aftermath of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, corporate America responded, stopping corporate PAC donation to the 147 Republican lawmakers who voted to block the results of the presidential election. It eventually became clear that they were playing both-sides games and stopped giving to Democrats, too, after Republicans raised hell about it.

But many corporate PACs did cut back or zero out the funding they had been giving to those Republicans, although nearly three dozen of them have given at least $5,000 to those insurrectionist lawmakers. Then there's Toyota. The car company (with significant operations in Mitch McConnell's home state of Kentucky, go figure) has given $55,000 to 37 of the insurrectionist lawmakers so far this year. That dwarfs the donations of the remaining corporate donations—it's more than double what the number two company, Cubic Corp., has given this year. That puts them in league with the likes of Koch Industries, telecom giant AT&T, health insurer Cigna and tobacco company Reynolds American for resuming donations to insurrectionists, but Toyota still leads.

"We do not believe it is appropriate to judge members of Congress solely based on their votes on the electoral certification," a Toyota spokesperson said in a statement emailed to Axios Sunday. "Based on our thorough review, we decided against giving to some members who, through their statements and actions, undermine the legitimacy of our elections and institutions." Except for like, Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona. According to "Stop the Steal" organizer Ali Alexander, Biggs was one of the four behind plotting the insurrection.

"I was the person who came up with the Jan. 6 idea with Congressman Gosar, Congressman Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) and then Congressman Andy Biggs," Alexander said a few days after the attack. "We four schemed up of putting max pressure on Congress while they were voting so that who we couldn't lobby, we could change the hearts and the minds of Republicans who were in that body hearing our loud roar from outside."

Toyota doubled down on that statement Monday, refusing to address the clear problems with their statement.

This is the same company that makes a big deal out of flying a rainbow flag at their Plano, Texas, headquarters every June. The company that has been the darling of progressives for its early introduction of the Prius hybrid. They're supporting the same party that wants to disincentivize the sale of those hybrids by slapping extra fees on their drivers to pay for infrastructure.

Since Toyota refuses to see the error of its ways, maybe a decline in sales will make it clear to the Japanese automaker not to drive around with insurrectionists.

...buying a Toyota because the Japanese automaker gave $55,000 to 37 insurrectionist lawmakers.

Monday, June 28, 2021

William Barr dishes on McConnell's cowardice, Trump as 'madman' in self-serving version of events

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 15: U.S. Attorney General William Barr speaks as President Donald Trump listens in the Oval Office of the White House after receiving a briefing from law enforcement on "Keeping American Communities Safe: The Takedown of Key MS-13 Criminal Leaders" on July 15th 2020 in Washington DC.  (Photo by Anna Moneymaker-Pool/Getty Images)
A real loyal soldier, right up to the point where it looked like Trump's crew truly intended to topple government and he was going down with the ship when they failed.

In The Atlantic, journalist Jonathan Karl gives us a short look at Trump attorney general William Barr's last weeks in power according to William Barr himself, who was kind enough to grace Karl with a series of interviews out of the innate goodness of his heart. Oh, and because Barr is now seen by many as the most thoroughly partisan and corrupt attorney general in a generation, which is going to seriously cut down on future speaking fees if he can't figure out how to massage the record back into something vaguely defensible.

The actual news out of it is Not Damn Much, but this is a good opportunity to revisit the First Rule Of News Consumption: Be aware of the source. From the nation's top powerbrokers to man-on-the-street interviewees, anyone talking to a reporter about their own doings is going to tell that reporter the most flattering version of events they think they can get away with. Many of the most important details about what Trump and his core team did in their attempts to overturn a United States election remain murky because those most in the know, like ex-House Republican turned chief of staff Mark Meadows, are clamming up.

What we can learn from the Atlantic story is that according to William Barr, William Barr is great. He's always the bravest and most integrity-filled person in the room, doing the right things despite pressure on all sides and so on and so forth. This isn't exactly news. What might be news is that the put-upon Barr believes the time is right to mete out a bit of punishment on everyone else.

Here's what we learn from Karl's interviews with Barr, then:

First, Barr wants you to know that Sen. Mitch McConnell is a gutless coward. Barr is willing to recount several conversations with McConnell in which McConnell, who in public spent most of the post-election period dodging questions about Trump's increasingly outrageous and dangerous claims claims, pleaded with Barr to be the one who contradicted Trump by telling the world that Trump's election "fraud" claims were utter bullshit.

McConnell told Barr in mid-November that Trump's hoaxes were "damaging" to both the country and to the Republican Party—no guesses on which of those was the more pressing concern, for Mitch—but Republicans "cannot be frontally attacking [Trump] right now," because Mitch and the others were trying to keep on Trump's good side for fear an open declaration of Biden's victory would result in an angry Trump sabotaging Republican election chances in the two Georgia Senate runoff races. Barr was "in a better position to inject some reality" into Trump's claims of election fraud.

Barr replied, according to Barr, that he was "going to do it at the appropriate time." So here we have one slightly interesting tidbit, then: Even in Barr's own accounting, he was urged to combat Trump's "damaging" election hoaxes and could only muster up an assurance that he would be getting right on that ... eventually. After it played out a bit more. In Barr's account, he was bravely using the Department of Justice to gather evidence of which claims might be true or might be false; in the actual news stories of each day, the claims being peddled by Trump's minions were brazenly fraudulent to begin with.

The second tidbit is that William Barr is, along with multiple other people inside Trump's inner circle, perfectly willing to tell Karl that after Barr eventually did publicly nix Trump's claims Trump became quite batshit unhinged, when finally meeting Barr again. Trump had "the eyes and mannerism of a madman," sez a source, which we can probably take to mean "even more than usual," and Barr compared him to the madman brigadier general of Dr. Strangelove.

"You must hate Trump. You must hate Trump," Trump is said to have told Barr, which is a pretty dead-on example of a malignant narcissist in the throes of a decompensating episode. You there, who have asserted that reality is something other than what I have claimed it to be? You must have been plotting against me all along.

Great, super. So again we have a situation in which everyone around Trump was pretty damn certain he had gone off the rails, jumped the trolley, sprung a brain-leak, and had become devoid of marbles but nobody in government, from Secret Service on down, was willing to toss him in a burlap sack, tie it shut, and declare that Mike Pence was taking charge because the sitting president had developed a serious case of bananapants.

The rest is not of note. Barr says Barr acted with integrity, despite everyone else in Trump's orbit pressuring him to help topple the national government. Barr says Mitch was a spineless weasel who wanted someone else to save the country from potential violence so Mitch wouldn't have to. Barr says Trump was an unhinged, raging monster but Barr, having Integrity and stuff, was loyally willing to stay and then two weeks later was forced to resign because of the same Integrity after Trump continued to push the same hoaxes and the likely consequences of those acts began to become more and more concrete.

How do we sum all this up, then, properly taking into account Barr's actual record of assisting Trump in hiding evidence from Congress, in fishing expeditions against Trump's prime political foe, in using the resources of his office to help discredit American intelligence officials and in assisting Trump's government-wide purge of inspector generals, watchdogs, and other whistleblowers—all the petty corruptions William Barr didn't see fit to highlight, in his own interpretation of those last days? It appears that William Barr decided after Donald Trump's loss that no matter what else William Barr was willing to do for conservatism, he wasn't going to go to jail for Trump or get caught up in actual crossfire if Trump succeeded in goading violent revolution.

Not so much "integrity," then, as a decision that he wasn't going to go down with a sinking ship. Self-interest is the usual reason powerful people recount their lives to waiting reporters, and Barr has more damage control to do than most.

"What, me worry?  I'll just change my tune when the going gets tough."

Sunday, June 27, 2021

The Republican Party Has Turned Fascist – It Is Now the Most Dangerous Threat in the World

A rally for Donald Trump and the Republican Party. (photo: Guardian UK)
A rally for Donald Trump and the Republican Party. (photo: Guardian UK)

By Patrick Cockburn, The Intercept

26 June 21

readersupportednews.org

By taking control of elections and voter suppression, Republicans are destroying American democracy

he G7 meeting focused attention on many challenges facing the world, but it did not address the most dangerous threat of them all, which is the transformation of the Republican Party in the US into a fascist movement.

When Donald Trump was in the White House there was much debate about whether or not he could be called a fascist in the full sense of the word, and not merely as a political insult. His presidency showed many of the characteristics of a fascist dictatorship, except the crucial one of automatic re-election.

But Trump or Trump-like leaders may not have to face this democratic impediment in future. It was only this year that the final building blocks have been put in place by Republicans as they replicate the structure of fascist movements in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s.

Two strategies, though never entirely absent from Republican behaviour in the past, have become far more central to their approach. One is a greater willingness to use or tolerate violence against their opponents, something that became notorious during the invasion of the Capitol by pro-Trump rioters on 6 January.

The other change among Republicans is much less commented on, but is more sinister and significant. This is the systematic Republican takeover of the electoral machinery that oversees elections and makes sure that they are fair. Minor officials in charge of them have suddenly become vital to the future of American democracy. Remember that it was only the refusal of these functionaries to cave in to Trump’s threats and blandishments that stopped him stealing the presidential election last November.

Many of them will be unable to perform the same duty in future elections. The Republican Party across the country is replacing or intimidating them so they are giving up their jobs or are being forced from their posts. In Pennsylvania, a state which played a crucial role in Trump’s defeat, a third of county election officials have changed as have numerous others in swing states like Michigan and Wisconsin. Their places are frequently being taken by conspiracy theory zealots who will have the power to nullify election results that are not to their liking. A survey by the Brennan Center for Justice shows that one in three local election officials say that they are being subjected to harassment and other pressures.

Speeding up this exodus are Republican state legislatures that have passed laws mandating heavy fines – $10,000 in Iowa, $25,000 in Florida – for election supervisors who make minor technical mistakes. Republican officials who refused to say that Trump won the election are being removed by their party. The Republicans should be able to do in 2022 and 2024 what they failed to do in 2020, which is to nullify election results at will so the true outcome of a poll can be ignored. Put simply, the will of the people will no longer count for anything.

Authoritarian regimes across the world have found that it is much easier and more certain to announce the election result they would like than to go to all the trouble of suppressing votes and gerrymandering constituencies. Once control of the electoral machinery is obtained then democracy poses no threat to those in power. Fascist leaders may use democratic processes to obtain office, but once there, their instinct is to pull up the ladder and let nobody else climb up it.

Nullification of elections is only the latest step in the Republican Party’s strange voyage towards becoming a genuine fascist party. Other steps have a much longer history, notably the moment half a century ago when President Nixon adopted his “Southern Strategy” whereby the Republicans capitalised on the Civil Rights acts to make a political takeover of the American South. The old slave states became the strongholds of the Republican Party which had once freed the slaves and defeated the Confederacy.

It is worth listing the chief characteristics of fascist movements in order to assess how far they are now shared by the Republicans. Exploitation of ethnic, religious and cultural hatreds is probably the most universal feature of fascism. Others include a demagogic leader with a cult of personality who makes messianic but vague promises to deliver a golden future; appeals to law-and-order but a practical contempt for legality; the use, manipulation and ultimate marginalisation of democratic procedures; a willingness to use physical force; demonising the educated elite – and the media in particular; shady relations with plutocrats seeking profit from regime change.

One by one these boxes have been ticked by the Republicans until the list is complete. The Tea Party movement was an important staging post on the road to Trumpism. Trump himself possesses all the classic features of a fascist leader, though he was somewhat hemmed in by the institutional and political divisions of power. Yet these impediments will be less in future as local legislatures, courts, electoral machinery and Congress itself are colonised by Trumpian Republicans. This erosion of democracy has a precedent, given that Al Gore in 2000 and Hillary Clinton in 2016 were denied the presidency though each won a majority of the popular vote, but it is becoming all pervasive

American fascism differs from its European, Middle Eastern and Latin American variants because of the history of America, with its legacy of slavery, and the Civil War still remaining as a great divider. Slavery was abolished, the Confederacy lost the war, but in many respects the civil war never ended.

The civil rights legislation of the 1960s provoked a white counteroffensive that still goes on. Opposition to racial equality has never ceased. The key provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which declared that changes in state election laws must have federal approval, was invalidated by Republican appointed judges on the Supreme Court in 2013. “Our country has changed,” said chief Justice John G Roberts in a majority opinion, which declared that racial minorities no longer faced barriers to voting in states with a history of discrimination. The absurdity of this was immediately demonstrated as Texas introduced a previously blocked voter ID law.

Voter suppression has ballooned ever since, but never more than this year. Some 14 Republican controlled states have passed 24 laws criminalising, politicising and interfering in elections to their own advantage.

What explains the descent of the Republican Party into fascism? Racial division explains much. The division of American culture along the same geographical lines as the civil war explains more. Add to this the frightening dislocation imposed on white working- and middle-class Americans by technological change and globalisation. Powerful forces are let loose similar to those that once propelled the rise of European fascism and is now doing the same in America.

Those were the good old days.  But after what they did to Black Wall Street, Tulsa deserved to host this Trump rally flop.

 

Saturday, June 26, 2021

Republicans want to love the military, but it just won't toe the white supremacist party line

 WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 9: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and Secretary of Defense Mark Esper testify during a House Armed Services Committee hearing on July 9, 2020 in Washington, DC. Esper and Milley were scheduled to testify about the role of the Department of Defense in civilian law enforcement. Active duty troops aided local law enforcement around the country at protests last month in the wake of George Floyd's death. (Photo by Greg Nash-Pool/Getty Images)

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley.

On Thursday evening, Tucker Carlson—whose combat experience seems to be limited to that time he was kicked out of an elite Swiss boarding school—decided it would be great to go after Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley. Carlson declared that the general was “a pig” and “stupid” and “not brave,” all because Milley had the gall to say that understanding the history of racism is not a bad thing. This comes a month after Carlson and other right-wing pundits launched a series of tirades about how the military had become “woke” and after Fox News played up a Russian commercial as showing that America is “doomed.” 

This follows the years of Donald Trump in which Gold Star families were treated as traitors, military prisoners gathered scorn because Trump “liked people who weren’t captured,” and Americans who died in battle were either “losers” or “suckers,” take your pick. Trump called John McCain a “loser” for being a prisoner in Vietnam. He also called George H. W. Bush a “loser” for being shot down in World War II. He lined up a whole stack of generals to give his White House some semblance of credibility, then threw them out one by one when they refused to go along with his degradations of democracy. Oh, and when Trump was looking for some place to get funds for building his “wall,” he took the money that had been dedicated to building homes, schools, and hospitals for military families.

A proper modern Republican hates the generals, hates the troops, hates the veterans, hates their families, and hates their survivors. Those same Republicans are, of course, extremely pro-military. 

All of this is just one example of how Republicans are drawing a heavy line between what they think of as Real America™ and real America. In one of these, Republicans are the brave upholders of a stainless Anglo-Saxon tradition that has brought light to the savages and represents the last best home of civilization. In the other, they are building on top of a racist foundation with blocks of ignorance that are actively working to make the lives of every individual in the nation worse while deliberately risking the sustainability of the republic. Guess which one is which?

When they claim to be pro-military, Trump, Carlson, Fox News, and the rest don’t mean the actual military. They certainly don’t mean the thousands of officers and enlisted who have served with Milley around the world. Or the thousands of sailors who served under Navy Captain Brett Crozier before he was removed for actually trying to protect his crew.

Republicans don’t support that military, They support the Real Military™. The animated G.I. Joe military. The John Wayne military. The fictional military that exists only to provide drama and color for a world full of guys who feel their time at fake military prep schools is more than adequate to educate them well above those who had to face enemy fire in the field. The military that is made up only of scrappy white kids who love their nation so much that they would happily pitch in to overthrow democracy whenever the Real President™ asks.

Even Republicans who were in the real military feel obliged to play up the Real Military™. Just ask former Marine J.D. Vance, who wrote a whole book about how his fellow recruits were “Black, white, and Hispanic” and how many of his fellow Marines were “staunch liberals.” That was then. Now Vance is out there slugging away with claims about how Southern, rural, white conservatives are carrying all the burdens of the nation. For the sake of a little untrademarked reality, California is the biggest source of military recruits; Blacks, Latinos, Asians, and Native Americans all serve at a higher level, than their percentage in the population; though the upper ranks are “disproportionally white”; it’s true that the state with the highest percentage of military recruits is a red state; but it’s also true that the state with the lowest percentage of military recruits is a red state.

Republican claims to be pro-military are all part of their broader claim to be the party of patriots. It’s what The Washington Post described as the “shadow reality world” in which the Republican Party is fighting against a series of imagined threats to protect Real America™.

It’s the reality that’s presented in low-budget films by Dinesh D’Souza, Mike Lindell, and Overstock.com Chief Executive Patrick Byrne. All of them are selling an expanded version of the QAnon mythology, in which Donald Trump is a Christ-like figure at the center of a fight against the semi-infinite forces of darkness. It’s the reality in which OAN can suggest that tens of thousands of Americans spread across a half dozen states, many of them Republican officials, were united in a secret conspiracy to throw the election—and follow up by suggesting that those tens of thousands of Americans need to be executed.

It’s a world in which “conspiracy theories that grow more dizzyingly complex by the day” and where Donald Trump will be back in March, make that August, make that September, and remember …  the Storm is coming!

For white supremacists, it’s a pleasant fantasy world in which their every failing is the fault of radical Marxists, AOC’s fashion choices, and critical race theory. Ultimate redemption is always right around the corner, right around the corner, right around the … anyway, it’s never more than a Friedman Unit before Hillary will finally go to jail. It’s a world where the most abhorrent thoughts about torture and murder are welcome, and where the most outlandish theories get praise. One where expertise and experience are to be disdained.

“They have their own version of YouTube, their own message groups. They have their own whole set of publications … You have to wonder what percent of America is even aware of this shadow reality world,” said elections expert Harri Hursti.  Unfortunately, the answer is nearly 100%. Because while Republicans may be living in Real America™, their actions are impacting real Americans.

Now, let’s all go watch a movie about a sniper who shoots down brown-skinned terrorists from miles away and never misses while coming home to his hawt blond wife and driving a pickup on weekends. The military. We love those guys.

If Republicans had their way, this dude would be the Supreme Commander of the U.S. military.

Friday, June 25, 2021

'Are you saying OAN is not a credible news source?' Arizona Senate President Karen Fann

us-appletv-3-one-america-news-network_1_.png
OAN: Official Execution Sponsor of the Arizona Audit

Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican, declined several invitations from CNN to appear on air, to explain the cockamamie circus in Maricopa County (as if she could), so their reporter Kyung Lah caught up with Fann in the Arizona Capitol parking lot. In the course of the five-minute interview, Lah notes that all of the cameras and video feeds at the Coliseum are controlled by One America News Network (OAN), the “official broadcast sponsor” for the audit. Lah’s tone is skeptical, prompting Sen. Fann to ask, “Are you saying OAN is not a credible news source?”

“Yes,” says Lah, that’s exactly what she’s saying. Fann gets pissy and says, “Oh, I’ll remember that, CNN says OAN is not credible.” How could anyone think this is not a credible news outlet?

That’s right, Sen. Fann, your official news sponsor for this sham audit is calling for executions. For readers who can’t watch the video, OAN’s Pearson Sharp ends by asking:

“What are the consequences for traitors who meddled with our sacred democratic process and tried to steal power by taking away the voices of the American people? What happens to them? Well, in the past, America had a very good solution for dealing with such traitors: Execution.”

If anyone still thinks Cyber Ninjas and the other bamboo-sniffing kooks who stole our ballots (some voter records ended up in Montana) won’t find fraud, they’re dreaming. Of course they will! Chief Ninja Doug Logan said early on there was fraud and suggested trump was cheated of 200,000 votes in Arizona, while most of the “auditors” his firm hired came from a cellar full of conspiracy boobs. So when they find invent fraud, which they will (trump is already banking on it), what next? Executions, sez OAN.  

I thought it was bad enough when OAN reporter Christina Bobb, a former Trump groupie with no journalism background, started a fundraising campaign for the audit, reportedly bringing in around $150,000.

The host of a program on a pro-Trump cable news network that has repeatedly peddled conspiracy theories and false information about the 2020 election is raising money to pay for the Arizona Senate’s audit of the 2020 election in Maricopa County.

To summarize: OAN is raising money for the thing they are ostensibly covering, but their coverage is far from objective. In fact, they’re already gaslighting a level of corruption that leads “radical Democrats” to the scaffolds. In today’s Arizona Republic Laurie Roberts lays the entire clusterfuck at Fann’s doorstep:

She, alone, is responsible for ordering an election audit despite no evidence of a problem here.

She, alone, is responsible for turning Arizona into a laughingstock and for giving hope to Trump that he’s going to be reinstated.

And now, for supplying oxygen to QAnon whack jobs who fantasize about summary executions of deep staters who organized the supposed coup.

To absolutely no one’s surprise, OAN is reporting on election fraud in other states, where again they can be the Official Broadcast Sponsor, since Republicans deem the lies, propaganda, conspiracies, and now death threats “credible.”
OAN: If we execute enough people for voter fraud (see crosses in background) we can reincarnate our dear leader.  Heil Trump!

Thursday, June 24, 2021

Nothing says good ole' time like lots of arrests, a slit throat, a strangulation, and Trump fans

Truck participating in the 2021 Redneck Rave rocking a "Fuck Biden" flag 
"No need to worry about global warming here.  We can't even see the sun. "

If you were to ask me how I wanted to spend my week, I can think of few things I would enjoy less than spending it among people who tried to sell the former guy a “campaign theme song” and spend a lot of time celebrating the idea of mixing “mudding” (which is actually somewhat enjoyable) with drunk driving, combined with assaulting women and maybe slashing a throat here and there. If you ask me, that sounds far more like the plot in a horror movie than anything I want to join in on. But in Kentucky’s Blue Holler Offroad Park, that’s exactly the kind of action attendees were welcome to enjoy. Welcome home, Mitch McConnell!

What more could you ask for, really? There are certainly attendees who were not on a Biden-hating bring-back-the-confederacy tilt, but a quick search of Facebook and YouTube turned up mostly images of vehicles with Confederate flags, pro-Trump memorabilia, or anti-Biden and anti-Harris statements. Well, hey, if you’re going to roll around in the mud, I guess you might as well show who you are, really. The details are grisly.

From The Daily Beast:

By the end of the five-day bash, dubbed the “Redneck Rave,” one man had been impaled, one woman had been strangled to the point of unconsciousness, and one throat had been slit. In all, Edmonson authorities arrested 14 people, and charged four dozen people from five states.

Oh my! I really want that! That sounds so entertaining! The opportunity to listen to terrible music, get yelled at by drunks, and then impaled. Awesome

Yahoo News goes into depth:

A five-day party in Kentucky ended in 14 arrests and 48 people charged with drug and alcohol, traffic, and assault-related offenses over their participation in what was billed as an occasion of “mud, music, and mayhem.”

Numerous others were cited by police, and some were injured after partygoers descended on Blue Holler Offroad Park in Edmonson County from June 16-20 for the “Redneck Rave,” an event that reportedly was held twice last year and during which one person died.

“The first vehicle that came through, we found meth, marijuana, and an open alcohol container,” Sheriff Shane Doyle, who set up checkpoints in anticipation of trouble, said, according to the Lexington Herald-Leader. “And then one of the occupants had two active warrants ... We were like, ‘Well, this doesn’t bode well for the weekend.’”

Doesn’t bode well for the weekend? Just the weekend? I worry it doesn’t bode well for the hometowns where the attendees will be returning if they aren’t still locked up or in recovery programs.

Meanwhile, back in the big city, Q-Anonsense is on the ropes.

Wednesday, June 23, 2021

An incoherent Sinema defends her unprincipled decision to let Mitch McConnell rule the nation

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 08: U.S. Sen. Kirsten Sinema (D-AZ) heads back to a bipartisan meeting on infrastructure in the basement of the U.S. Capitol building after the original talks fell through with the White House on June 8, 2021 in Washington, DC. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said they are now pursuing a two-path proposal that includes a new set of negotiations with a bipartisan group of senators. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Kyrsten Sinema, the Senate's biggest pretender.  If she weren't from Arizona, where her opponent was a complete boob, she would never have been elected.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, the Arizona Democrat—who apparently has decided that securing the legacy of mavericky John McCain for herself is … doing Sen. Mitch McConnell's work?—chose the eve of the procedural vote on the most consequential legislation for restoring our democracy to double down on her support for the Jim Crow filibuster with an op-ed in The Washington Post. In it she exposes just how unserious she is about this job she has taken on, ignoring history, oblivious to reality, and yet glibly triumphant in declaring principles that are absolute bunk.

It mostly boils down to one idea: Democrats shouldn’t pass things because Republicans might rescind them. What that translates into in practice with the For the People Act is that the rights of the Senate minority are more important than the voting rights of millions of Americans. The Senate will vote on a motion to proceed to debate on the bill Tuesday afternoon.

"Arizonans expect me to do what I promised when I ran for the House and the Senate: to be independent—like Arizona—and to work with anyone to achieve lasting results," she writes. (They probably also expected her to look out for their economic interests, but look where that got them.) "Lasting results," she continues, "rather than temporary victories, destined to be reversed, undermining the certainty that America’s families and employers depend on." The way to achieve "lasting results," she apparently believes, is gridlock. "The filibuster compels moderation and helps protect the country from wild swings between opposing policy poles," she says.

To those who want to eliminate the legislative filibuster to pass the For the People Act (voting-rights legislation I support and have co-sponsored), I would ask: Would it be good for our country if we did, only to see that legislation rescinded a few years from now and replaced by a nationwide voter-ID law or restrictions on voting by mail in federal elections, over the objections of the minority?

See how she works in the part where she's co-sponsoring the bill to restore voting rights, while she's working as Mitch McConnell's tool to make sure it doesn't become law? Nice. We can't do good things for the country, she says, because that might make bad things happen. Her argument is really that flimsy. It's also ignoring the reality that Republicans legislatures all over the country—and in some cases gerrymandered majorities—are enacting voter suppression laws with completely partisan votes, shutting the minority Democrats out of the process entirely. But Democrats should stop that from happening now because a theoretical future Republican majority might do what those states are already doing.

To those who want to eliminate the legislative filibuster to expand health-care access or retirement benefits: Would it be good for our country if we did, only to later see that legislation replaced by legislation dividing Medicaid into block grants, slashing earned Social Security and Medicare benefits, or defunding women's reproductive health services?

She's forgetting that Medicare, Medicaid and other spending programs can be completely eliminated with just 51 votes with a budget reconciliation. And that Republicans used budget reconciliation to jam a repeal of the Affordable Care Act through with a simple majority. Who stopped that? Who stood up against McConnell? John McCain, whose mantle she's trying to assume.

The fundamental incoherence here is mind-boggling. The argument goes something like this: Democrats should give the minority Republicans a veto over very popular legislation because it's possible that the new law will be unpopular and elect more Republicans who will reverse the law. So by letting the minority veto bill is preventing them hypothetically repealing that law later.

She's arguing that the gridlocked status quo is better than allowing the majority—that was elected by huge majorities in the popular vote—to do what voters elected them to do. That hypothetically any majority shouldn't be able to enact its policies and then stand or fall with the electorate in future elections on the basis of that work. In that, she's disenfranchising voters as much as the Republican legislatures. The voters chose President Joe Biden. The voters chose a Democratic House and Senate—again, with huge popular vote margins. She's nullifying every single vote every Democratic senator received, handing them over to McConnell and the Republicans because . . . bipartisanship. No, really.

But bipartisan policies that stand the test of time could help heal our country's divisions and strengthen Americans' confidence that our government is working for all of us and is worthy of all of us.

You answer violent insurrectionists and a Republican juggernaut running through the states working to make sure no Democrat ever wins an election again by . . . letting them do it so Republicans like you and let you sit with them at lunch.

Sinema has done herself no favors with this effort. She sounds desperately out of touch with the reality of the Trump Republican Party. Like, just clueless. She says she wants to be the next McCain. She can't even touch that. McCain, after all, stood up to McConnell.

Kyrsten broke her foot running some kind of race and there are prosthetics for those kinds of things.  It's a good thing she doesn't use her head for mobility because there is no prosthetic for mush.