“When you are old and grey and full of sleep,” the William Butler Yeats poem begins, “And nodding by the fire …”
Our culture has
always been emotional – sentimental, even – about old age. So when did
older people become The Enemy? Last week a judge ruled that Detroit
could move forward with its plan to cut pensions for retired city
workers. This week Washington is celebrating a budget deal that harms
older people economically in several ways.
And a society that grows teary-eyed with each new viewing of On Golden Pond seems okay with that.
In a December 5 opinion,
a U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled that Detroit could go forward with its
plans to cut city workers’ pensions. He did so despite a state law
making such cuts illegal, and despite his observation that Kevyn Orr,
Detroit’s unelected city manager, “did mislead the public about the
status of pensions in bankruptcy.”
In the kind of
Bizarro-world inversions common to today’s corporate-funded politics,
Orr and the Republican governor who appointed him argued against
the conservative principle of states’ rights in order to move forward
with their plan. When principles conflict with profits, apparently
profits win every time.
Detroit’s
manufacturing industry was outsourced, with no thought given to
preserving our industrial heartland – or, for that matter, to preserving
its covenant with working people. Wall Street banks were hired to
manage Detroit’s pension money, and large sums vanished from the fund.
Bankers may be asked to compromise on outstanding fees as part of a
pension deal, but they won’t be asked to account for the missing money –
and they’ve already been paid millions.
“Detroit ruling opens door to pension cuts across the nation,” said a headline
in the Los Angeles Times. That’s the point. Pro-corporate politicians
have been planning to break pension agreements all across the country,
and they’ve been looking to Detroit for a green light.
And yesterday it
was announced that Rep. Paul Ryan and Sen. Patty Murray had reached a
“bipartisan” budget deal that singles out older people in at least three
different ways: by requiring new Federal workers to pay more for their
pension, by reducing pensions for military personnel who retire before
the age of 62, and by cutting Medicare provider reimbursements (which
will make it harder for seniors to find participating doctors).
The budget deal
“opens doors,” too. Its “cost-of-living” cuts to military pensions
resemble the benefit cuts our “bipartisan” leaders have been trying to
impose on Social Security. Its Medicare cuts could be the first step
toward shifting the excessive cost of health care to America’s seniors.
And its pension changes for Federal employees suggest that the promise
of financial security after a lifetime of work is null and void.
Somehow we’ve
turned against older Americans. And since we’ll all join that group
someday – if we live long enough – that means we’ve turned against
ourselves.
In earlier, more socially responsible days – 1970 or so – the cartoonist Walt Kelly drew his Pogo
characters walking through a trash-filled swamp and saying, “We have
met the enemy and he is us.” (He was paraphrasing Commodore Perry’s
famous quote from the Revolutionary War: “We have met the enemy and he
is ours.”)
Kelly’s line, which was turned into a poster, emphasized our collective responsibility for the environment. But in today’s money-driven culture, apparently collective responsibility is for suckers – especially when those who are most responsible for a problem are underwriting most of our political leaders.
Kelly’s line, which was turned into a poster, emphasized our collective responsibility for the environment. But in today’s money-driven culture, apparently collective responsibility is for suckers – especially when those who are most responsible for a problem are underwriting most of our political leaders.
If we’re to take
responsibility for our ongoing economic crisis, we must take
responsibility for our failures to rein in the individuals and
institutions who created it. But it’s hard to do that when our political
leaders won’t step up – and why would they? Republicans are,
unequivocally, the Corporations Party. And now we have the spectacle of
the Democratic Party’s presumptive 2016 nominee reportedly arguing (for a fee estimated at $200,000 or more) that vilification of Wall Street is counterproductive.
It would be
reasonable to ask Wall Street to pay the lion’s share of the cost for
cleaning up problems they created through massive fraud – including
municipal bid-rigging and LIBOR interest rate fraud. But you can’t ask
them to pay up if you’re not allowed to criticize them. And if you can’t
blame Wall Street for our problems, who can you blame?
The elderly, apparently.
Which raises the
question: How, exactly, do self-interested executives, politicians, and
pundits convince an entire society to turn against its elders? Here’s
how: By dismissing the value of a lifetime’s work once it’s done. By
calling seniors selfish if they expect their government to honor its
part of a bargain they kept for half a century. By convincing frightened
Americans that their financial problems were caused, not by Wall
Street, but by the bus drivers on their city streets and the teachers in
their children’s schools.
They do it by
making older people “the Other,” the antagonists, the “greedy geezers.”
They do it blaming our economic misery, not on themselves, but on
municipal Detroit’s retired gardeners and security guards and police
officers and firefighters and secretaries. They do it by blaming our
problems on retired Green Berets, Park Rangers, and accountants, on the
people who, however “old and gray and full of sleep” they may be today,
once processed your paperwork and fought your wars and maintained your
roads and made your life better in a thousand unseen ways every day.
They’re trying
to convince us to break a lifetime’s promise to others, and to
ourselves, by telling us: We have met the enemy and she is old.
No comments:
Post a Comment