By Daniel Ward
Editor
Language Magazine
Los Angeles, CA
www.languagemagazine.com
It's been over a month since Team USA 4th
Grade did their coaches, American public school teachers, proud by
coming fourth in the world’s reading rankings. Yet, there’s been very
little celebrating in this country of ours so famous for making the most
out of success in international competition. An Olympic Bronze in
synchronized swimming would have garnered more praise.
According to the 2011 PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study), the only countries with better 4th
Grade reading levels are Russia, Finland, and Singapore. Hong Kong was
also listed as outperforming us, but it’s not a country. This is a
remarkable success for U.S. public education, especially when you take
into account that we have 48 million public school students of which at
least 10% are English Language Learners – that’s about five million
students – almost equivalent to the total population of Finland.
In
addition, U.S. schools and teachers have to deal with disproportionate
levels of poverty, and research has proven unequivocally that poverty is
the most important determining factor in educational outcomes.
According to census statistics, more than 16 million American kids
(nearly 25%) live in poverty, whereas Finland’s childhood poverty rate
is about 5%. There are no official statistics out of Singapore but the
wealthy city-state offers a relatively comprehensive social safety net
for locals, borne out by the fact that 80% of Singaporeans live in
public housing, the purchasing of which is subsidized, so 90% own their
own homes. Reliable Russian poverty statistics are elusive but anecdotal
evidence suggests that poverty levels may be high but education is
prioritized.
Fourth
may not be a medal spot but surely some good news about the educational
achievements of our “failing” public schools warrants at least a pat on
the back of our oft-maligned teachers.
Of
course, the value of these international comparisons based upon
standardized tests is questionable. However, when U.S. students perform
poorly on such comparisons, we never hear the end of it. What happened
to South Korea which the President recently hailed as having an
exemplary education system? Indeed, the nation’s whole attitude to
schools and teachers is based upon the presumption that our schools are
overfunded and underperforming compared to their overseas counterparts.
A whole industry is based upon this presumption – Waiting for Superman’s
Michelle Rhee has pledged to raise $1 billion through her lobbying
organization, StudentsFirst, to overhaul the public education system
according to her reform tastes. Raising that kind of cash will be tough
enough without having to deal with the adverse publicity that U.S.
educational success might create.
Contrary
to accepted wisdom, and many reports, we’re not spending relatively
more than other countries to get these results. According to a new
report the Economist Intelligence Unit, the U.S. spends less than 22% of
its GDP on education compared to Finland’s 30% and the UK’s 26%.
Figures are unavailable for Russia or Singapore but even Hong Kong
clocks in at 23.5%.
It is vital for us to recognize the successes as well
as the failures of our schools. Too many people are being misled by
biased reports about the condition of our educational system. In turn,
this is leading to bad decisions and the misuse of public funds to fix
things that ain’t broke. Of course, we should always be striving to
improve our schools but we must also recognize what does work and give
credit where credit’s due.
No comments:
Post a Comment