Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Pritzker tirade inspires Dems, angers Repubs

A fiery speech delivered by the governor of Illinois on Sunday night in Manchester is drawing big responses on both sides of the aisle.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker appears to have touched a nerve, inspiring Democrats and angering Republicans.

"Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption – but I am now," Pritzker said in his speech at the McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club dinner.

The governor drew cheers from the crowd as he took the gloves off in his speech.

"These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace," he said. "They have to know we will fight their cruelty with every megaphone and microphone that we have. We must castigate them on the soapbox and then punish them at the ballot box."

The calls for disruption and for Republicans to not know a moment of peace did not go unnoticed.

"Those Chicago gangster tactics just don't play here in New Hampshire, where Granite Staters expect us to get to work solving problems," said Republican Majority Leader Jason Osborne. "Having riots in the street, shouting in megaphones, burning cities down like we saw for six months back in 2020, that's not what Americans want. That is not what they elected us to do."

Pritzker was swarmed after his speech. Young Democrats in particular said they did not expect to be so fired up by the governor of Illinois, who is also a billionaire.

Analysts said that in this earliest stage of the next first-in-the-nation primary, potential presidential candidates are attempting to channel the intensity of feelings in the party base.

"What Democrats want is someone who's going to take action, sometimes almost in a physical way, and they want to see someone who's going to be fighting on the front lines, and he's taking that lane where Democrats can see a governor here fighting Trump at every opportunity," said Neil Levesque, of the New Hampshire Institute of Politics.

 

Time to take off the gloves and come out swinging.

Monday, April 28, 2025

Only one thing is going to stand in Trump's way — and he knows it | Opinion



"Nothing. Will. Stand. In. Trump’s. Way. Except We The People."

Opinion by Thom Hartmann
April 28, 2025

It didn’t happen in some shadowy back alley or under the cover of night.

It happened in broad daylight — in the heart of an American courthouse.

Federal agents, acting without even the decency of a signed warrant, stormed into Judge Hannah Dugan’s courtroom on Friday morning and dragged her away like a common criminal. No warning. No legal process. No respect for the law she had spent a lifetime upholding.

But they made sure the cameras were there, so America could see what they were doing. Because this was not about justice. This was about terror.

This was a warning shot aimed directly at the beating heart of America’s judiciary:“Fall in line — or you’re next.”

In that moment, the world’s oldest democracy lurched closer to the edge of authoritarian rule. In that moment, America became a little less free — and a lot more like the nightmare Vladimir Putin always hoped we’d become.

The FBI arrested Judge Hannah Dugan last Friday without even having a legal arrest warrant; this is as outrageous and police-state illegal as an administration can get.

And Pam Bondi’s performance Friday — after her federal agents swarm-raided this county judge — wasn’t staged for the general public.

The real audience was a very small, select group: America’s judges.

Their message is very simple: “P--- us off, judges, and you could end up in prison, too.”

Trump has already pacified the Article I branch of government — Congress — and now he’s in the process of pacifying the Article III branch, the Judiciary.

There are only 3 branches to our government: cowing both Congress and the nation’s Judiciary will leave only the president in charge of the entire country under all circumstances in all ways.

Nothing and nobody else will be able to stop him, short of a military coup (and he’s already decapitated the senior leadership of the military) or unending demonstrations in the streets (demonstrators who may soon face live ammunition).

That is called dictatorship. Real dictatorship. Vladimir Putin-style dictatorship where you are punished for the smallest deviation from orthodoxy and can find yourself in prison or sued into bankruptcy if you dare speak out in public.

It appears more and more every day that Putin is Trump’s mentor, if not his handler. Trump is doing everything he can, with help from a South African billionaire, to destroy the historic American infrastructure (which has been an example for the world for 250 years) and turn us into the newest member of the dictators club, joining Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, Belarus, Hungary, North Korea, and the rest of the fascist and authoritarian world.

To get there, now that they’ve pacified every single Republican member of Congress (most recently, Don Bacon criticized Trump’s schizophrenic tariffs; a day later he started talking about retiring), they only have to seize control of the Judiciary, and then nothing except We The People will stand in their way.

Nothing. Will. Stand. In. Trump’s. Way. Except We The People. And he knows it.

Look at the striking parallels between Putin’s strategies and Trump’s actions:

From installing Trump’s loyalists in the military and the federal police agencies of the Department of Justice and FBI, to his open threats against freedom of the press, to the GOP’s efforts to rig elections and purge voters, Trump’s subversion of US democracy looks eerily familiar.

He’s taking pages directly from the autocrat’s handbook.

 Trump has openly quoted and praised autocrats like Putin and Hungarian strongman Viktor Orbán, who has presented his leadership in speeches to the GOP and CPAC as a model of an “illiberal” state.

Trump’s not hiding his admiration for dictators; he’s flaunting it. And now he’s putting the final stages of their script into action.

Trump’s movement toward authoritarianism follows “a known playbook. It’s unfolded in many other countries,” as journalist Anne Applebaum notes. “These are democratically elected leaders who characterize themselves or describe themselves as deserving of no opposition. So I am the true Hungarian, or I am the only real American.”

In a mere matter of weeks into his presidency, Applebaum says, Trump and his allies “have managed to push America into that space somewhere between (no longer) democracy and full-scale autocracy.”

The speed is shocking, but it shouldn’t be surprising. It only took Hitler 53 days to completely end democracy in Germany. Others, like Lukashenko, Orbán, Putin, Mussolini, Duterte, El-Sisi, and Erdoğan took longer (none longer than two years), but you could argue that Trump has been working at this project for 9 years now.

Harvard professor Steven Levitsky, who studies how democracies slip into authoritarianism, warns that we’re heading toward what experts call “competitive authoritarianism”: regimes that “constitutionally continue to be democracies” with regular elections and legal opposition, but where “systematic abuse of power tilts the playing field against the opposition.”

Make no mistake about what’s happening: Trump and his allies are methodically working through a four-step process to establish complete autocratic control, which will turn America into a one-man dictatorship.

1. Terrorize Congress: Trump’s already largely succeeded here. Republican lawmakers now march in lockstep with his agenda, afraid to oppose him even when their consciences scream otherwise. The V-Dem Institute already warns that Trump’s actions are “extremely worrying” for American democracy.

2. Terrorize the Media: Trump has, as The Washington Post writes, “relentlessly attacked the free press, another pillar that allows democracies to stand above authoritarian regimes,” as political scientists have noted. “He has echoed the worst dictators in history, calling journalists the ‘enemy of the people.’” With help from Elon Musk and other billionaires, he’s creating a media and social media environment where truth itself is under assault. And last week his administration threatened to arrest journalists and charge them with treason, an offense for which they could be executed.

3. Terrorize Judges and Lawyers: What we witnessed Friday with the raid on a county judge and the arrest of a retired judge earlier in the week is just the beginning. The final step in this process will be intimidating the Supreme Court, and if Trump’s minions can first terrorize the entire federal judiciary, it will be much easier to terrorize members of the Court itself, just like Putin and Orbán have done. This follows dangerous cracks in democracy’s pillars that experts have been warning about.

4. Terrorize Citizens: Once the above institutions are captured and there’s no more Constitutional opposition to Trump, the final phase begins: crushing individual dissent through fear, persecution, and potentially violence. This is the playbook Malcolm Nance detailed in his work analyzing Putin’s strategies to undermine American democracy and has already started against immigrants and student visa holders. If history tells us anything, American citizens will be next.

Most of this is already in place; time is running out fast.

Trump and his fellow fascists know their time is running out because elections are coming in a handful of months and their popularity is already crashing. They are at maximum power right now, and it is already beginning to decline.

This is another reason why they are pushing so hard to frighten judges, so they can implement the final destruction of any Constitutionally-based opposition to Trump’s one-man rule.

If Trump can consolidate authoritarian rule as quickly as some other historical dictators did, the complete (albeit hopefully temporary) end of American democracy could happen very rapidly, possibly even in the next few weeks or months. The window for action is closing fast.

But there’s still hope, because we’re still We The People. As long as our protest movement continues to grow and demand a stop to the damage Trump and Musk are doing to our democratic republic, we may be able to slow or even stop this anti-American cabal and reclaim our republic.

Our protesting in the streets and reaching out to legislators may encourage resistance within the media and courts, and might even inspire a handful of Republicans to stand against this wannabe dictator.

When democratic institutions fail, the last line of defense has always been citizens willing to take to the streets. Ukraine provides the most powerful recent example of how a determined populace can rescue democracy from Russian-inspired authoritarianism.

During Ukraine’s Euromaidan protests in 2014, over half a million people joined demonstrations in Kyiv to defend democracy against creeping authoritarianism. Those protests ultimately ended Viktor Yanukovych’s Russia-backed puppet regime (and kicked out its Russian-funded American advisor, Paul Manafort, who later became Trump’s 2016 campaign manager) and became known as the Revolution of Dignity.

Ukrainians stood firm in the streets despite violence and intimidation, and their courage changed history.

Ukraine’s later Orange Revolution similarly empowered ordinary citizens to engage in mass protests,

with some lasting continously more than two weeks. This peaceful revolution successfully defended Ukraine’s democratic aspirations against Russian influence and showed the world that people power can overcome autocratic manipulation.

Putin fears democracy, particularly at his doorstep like in Ukraine and the Baltic states. He knows that democracy is contagious, and any spread near Russia, he believes, poses an existential threat to his autocratic rule. That’s why he invaded Ukraine, and that’s why he spent millions on social media trolls to support Trump’s election and his assault on our democratic institutions.

As Ukrainian historian Hanna Perekhoda warns, “If we let Russian authoritarians win, it will mean that the authoritarian forces also in our countries, in the U.S., for example, will grow stronger.”

If this assault on the Courts (and the implied intimidation of all judges including those on the Supreme Court) succeeds, and the media continues to bow down, the only thing left will be us in the streets.

The time for half-measures, “very strong letters,” and polite political disagreement has passed. We are watching in real-time as our 250-year experiment in democracy is being dismantled by a would-be dictator taking his cues from — or, at least, modeling his presidency on — Vladimir Putin.

This is not hyperbole. This is not partisan exaggeration. This is the stark reality facing our nation today. Fascism and dictatorship are at our doorstep.

Just last week, it was reported that Trump has now deported three American citizens, including a child taking cancer therapy.

Not content to just pull student visas and ask them to leave the country, Trump’s goons have been imprisoning students for writing OpEd articles for weeks. And now they’re show-arresting judges.

The arrest of Judge Dugan is not an isolated incident; it’s part a broader strategy to intimidate the judiciary and consolidate power.

When judges are arrested for upholding the principles of due process, the very foundation of democracy is at risk. This moment demands vigilance and action from all who value the rule of law.

The preservation of our democratic institutions depends on our collective response to such unprecedented challenges.

Buckle up, America. Democracy itself is on the line, and if the courts fall, we’ll be its last defenders.

NOW READ: Behind the 60-year Republican plot to destroy American democracy

Sunday, April 27, 2025

Website For MAGA-Friendly Businesses Backfires As People Use It For Boycotts

  Michael Seifert, founder and CEO of PublicSquare, speaks at the Republican Party of Florida Freedom Summit.

ONE USER'S TAKE: “It’s like you’re helping the trash take itself out.”
 
Story by Jennifer Bendery
April 27, 2025

WASHINGTON – A few years ago, Jeff was working for a California bank that asked him to look into getting the business listed on a website called PublicSquare.

The bank’s leaders were big supporters of Donald Trump, and PublicSquare was an ideal place to advertise it: Its website, which bills itself as “the anti-woke online marketplace,” is a hub of tens of thousands of businesses nationwide that want people to know they align with MAGA views and oppose so-called “progressive priorities” like women’s reproductive rights and diversity initiatives. 

In order to list your business on the website, you first have to confirm that you will “respect the core values of PublicSquare” and agree not to “support causes that are in direct conflict with our core values.”

“For far too long, American consumers and business owners who cherish family values and God-given liberty have been overlooked by mainstream businesses,” the company’s website states. “It’s time to embrace this community of customers and merchants by providing platforms, products, and services that enrich the way of life they hold dear.”

The company also acknowledges its purpose of letting people use their dollars as political and cultural leverage. “PublicSquare is on a mission to restore the culture through the power of commerce,” its website says under a section called “Purpose with every purchase.” “This isn’t about boycotts, it’s about helping you switch to something better.”

As a consumer, PublicSquare’s website is easy to use. You just enter your ZIP code and it pulls up businesses near you that want to be publicly associated with Trump and his values. The company, which launched in 2022, has direct connections to Trump, too: Its board of directors includes Donald Trump Jr., who also is an investor.

Kelly Loeffler, President Trump’s administrator of the Small Business Administration, also was on the board until she was confirmed to her current post in February.

Jeff, who requested using a pseudonym for this story out of concerns of being targeted by Trump supporters in his community, doesn’t know if that bank joined PublicSquare. He soon left that job and went on to launch a communications firm. 

Fast-forward to February 2025, when Trump is back in the White House and destroying virtually everything he touches. He’s tanking the global economy. He’s hollowingout the federalgovernment. It is not hyperbole to say he’s pushing American democracy to its breaking point.

Jeff, a regular user of the social media platform Reddit, started noticing people in his San Diego community posting messages desperate for ways to fight back against Trump’s recklessness. Some called for boycotting MAGA-friendly businesses but didn’t know how to identify companies that support Trump’s views. So Jeff, who had extensively researched PublicSquare at his previous bank job, tossed in a note about it.

“MAGA has made it easy for all of us to avoid their businesses,” he wrote under his Reddit name, Hour-Abbreviations18. “A couple years ago, they introduced a website – publicsq.com — to promote MAGA businesses. We can use that same tool to make informed purchasing decisions.”

“If a business is listed on the site, it’s not a fluke,” he wrote. “It’s on purpose.”

He got several responses to his post, so out of curiosity, Jeff searched Reddit for instances of people outside of his local community who were looking for ways to avoid pro-Trump businesses. He cut and pasted his spiel about PublicSquare into those threads, too.

His message took off, spreading to Reddit threads all over the country by people eager to do something — anything — to reject Trump. Ironically, people began finding solace in the very thing PublicSquare offers its supporters: a chance to align your spending with your values. Except in this case, people are using PublicSquare to decide where not to spend.

“Is there a list for 2025 so we can pass around to the worthy peace loving humans?” one Reddit user in Oregon asked in a February thread, “MAGA Businesses in Oregon to BOYCOTT.” Jeff tossed in his description of PublicSquare, and his post got “upvoted” 263 times, meaning it got pushed to the top of the thread for more people to see.

Jeff pasted his post into another Reddit thread based in Long Beach, California, titled, “MAGA Businesses to Avoid.” It was upvoted 65 times.

“My god I just found out my dog’s vet is on there,” one user wrote in response. 

“THANK YOU FOR THIS LIST,” wrote another user.

Jeff’s posts about PublicSquare, or offshoots of them, have popped up on Reddit in cities and towns inIllinois, Colorado, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Maine, North Carolina and in general Reddit forums. The idea of using PublicSquare for boycotts has gainedattention in local news stories. 

Last month, a TikTok user with 19,000 followers filmed himself describing PublicSquare and directing people to its website to find MAGA-friendly businesses to cut off. His video has gotten more than 348,000 “likes.”

“PublicSquare is basically the Green Book, but for conservatives,” this TikTok user, who goes by dapper.delinquent, says in his video. “The Green Book was a book passed around Black communities that was a list of stores and businesses that were safe for Black People to use. PublicSquare is the same thing for conservatives.”

“It is a website that conservatives will register their business on to show they are anti-woke, pro-conservative and especially pro-life,” he says.

Another TikTok user posted a similar message last month, calling PublicSquare the “anti-woke business finder” and saying he’s glad it exists so he knows where not to shop. “It just means that they do not care about our rights and they stand with Trump,” this user says in his video. His post got 32,000 “likes” and was shared 11,000 times.

Trump critics also have been talking about PublicSquare on other platforms like Threads and on Facebook, where a group called The 50501 Movement organizes people around Trump protests, rallies and boycotts. The group, which has 164,000 members, flagged PublicSquare for its followers last month.

“Helpful for deciding which small businesses to avoid!” reads a post within the group.

Some people have sought out PublicSquare’s own Facebook page to let them know their site has been a huge help to people eager to do something to protest Trump’s policies.

“After a local article was published, our community is using PublicSquare to see which businesses to avoid,” one user wrote in a comment on a PublicSquare post earlier this month. “It’s like you’re helping the trash take itself out.”

“Vulgar INSURRECTIONISTS, Fascists and those who despise anything non-white, male and straight,” another user posted this month on the company’s Facebook page. “You are the very same as the German Christians who worshipped Hitler.”

It’s not clear what financial impact, if any, people’s boycotts are having on the businesses listed on PublicSquare, or on PublicSquare itself. The publicly traded company, which is led by founder, CEO and president Michael Seifert, has seen its stock value plummet by more than 50% since the start of the year. Even before Trump announced his tariffs earlier this month, which have hurt economies globally, PublicSquare was down by 12%.

The company appears to make its revenue through fees paid out by businesses on its website, along with “a commission per transaction.”Still, there’s no way to directly link the company’s finances to people actively using the site to find businesses to stop supporting.

A PublicSquare spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment about people using their website to find businesses not to patronize or about the company’s financial woes.

Jeff doesn’t presume he’s the only anti-Trump person who knew about this website before this year, but said he’s been blown away by how many people told him they’d never heard of it — and how happy they are to know about it. Most people he’s engaged with said they plan to use PublicSquare to make sure they don’t give money to Trump-aligned businesses, but a few said they wanted to use the site as intended, to support such companies.

“The vast majority of people said, ‘I had no idea. I can’t believe this or that business is on there. I’m never going there again,’” Jeff said. “I’d say 90% of responses are of that ilk.”

He emphasized his efforts to spread the word about PublicSquare aren’t about punishing businesses but about helping people make informed decisions.

“Right now, so many decisions are being made that affect our lives that are outside of our control, and many people feel helpless,” Jeff said. “The ability to make purchasing decisions that align with our values is one thing we can do.”

That’s definitely how Janet Koenig feels. The 62-year-old California resident recently came across one of Jeff’s posts on Reddit, so she went to PublicSquare’s website and entered her ZIP code. To her dismay, one of her favorite coffee shops came up. She was horrified.

“I was like, you’ve got to be kidding me,” Koenig said. “I just assumed they were one of the good guys. I’ll be sure to tell all my friends not to go.”

Now she regularly checks PublicSquare before buying products. She’s also been sharing a link to its website with as many people as she can, most of whom, like her, had no idea this company existed and at least some of whom plan to use it to make sure they don’t inadvertently give money to Trump-aligned businesses. She said she feels like her efforts may not be having much of an impact, but she feels a new sense of empowerment.

“I just feel like I have to do something. Because businesses now control our votes, you know?” Koenig said. “I feel like, you know what, if they control our votes, I’ll do whatever I can do to only support the ones that vote the way I want. It’s about disgust, honestly. I’m disgusted by the way our votes can be bought by business.”

“I sleep well at night knowing I’m not accidentally donating to the bad guys,” she said.

What would Nancy do?  Diss the whole lot of them.

Saturday, April 26, 2025

Trump gets front row seat to his own humiliation at Pope's funeral Mass

U.S President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron and first lady Brigitte Macron attend the funeral Mass of Pope Francis in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, April 26, 2025. REUTERS/Dylan Martinez 

"Anybody who builds walls instead of bridges is not Christian"

Story by Adam Nichols / Raw Story / April 26, 2025

Donald Trump got a front row seat to his own humiliation Saturday as he was verbally attacked in a homily at Pope Francis’ funeral.

Trump, who traveled to Rome Friday, sat with world leaders at the service as his signature policy was rebuked to an audience of millions watching live around the world.

“Pope Francis incessantly raised his voice, imploring peace and calling for reason and honest negotiation to find possible solutions,” Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, who gave the homily, said.

Want more breaking political news? Click for the latest headlines at Raw Story.

“‘Build bridges, not walls,’ was an exhortation he repeated many times.”

The statement was clearly aimed at Trump’s promise to build a wall between Mexico and the USA to halt illegal immigration.

It — along with many other Trump policies — was frequently criticized by the pope, who said anybody who thought of building walls rather than bridges was “not Christian” — which prompted Trump to call that statement “disgraceful.”

It’s unknown how Trump reacted to the homily.

Pope Francis had Trump's number from the get-go.

Friday, April 25, 2025

The Supreme Court Has No Army So It's Up to Us

 The Supreme Court Has No Army  The judiciary has some tools to enforce presidential compliance, but their effectiveness depends ultimately on the vigilance of the American people. (photo: Getty)

“Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women.” We all have a role to play in seeing that it does not die. 

Thomas P. Schmidt / The Atlantic  
 

A more direct affront to the rule of law is hard to imagine: About a month ago, federal agents secretly loaded three planes with passengers and spirited them away to a notoriously brutal prison in El Salvador. The operation was carried out quickly enough to prevent the passengers—now prisoners—from invoking their right, under the Constitution’s due-process clause, to challenge the legal basis for their removal from the country. 

The Supreme Court has since confirmed that this was unlawful, and the Trump administration itself has conceded that at least one of the passengers, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, was sent to the prison by mistake, in direct violation of an order by an immigration judge. But both the administration and the government of El Salvador now profess to have no power to return anyone who was wrongfully removed.

Nothing in the Trump administration’s legal logic would prevent it from snatching citizens off the street, sending them to a foreign prison for life, and then disclaiming the power to do anything about it. Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, a distinguished appellate judge appointed by Ronald Reagan, wrote of the government’s position: “This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear.” So far, however, the Trump administration continues along a path of stubborn resistance rather than accommodation, part of a broader pattern that is not confined to the deportation cases.

The situation raises a very basic question about our constitutional order: Can courts force a president to comply with their rulings? After all, the president commands the executive branch and the military. As one Harvard law professor has pointedly asked, “Why would people with money and guns ever submit to people armed only with gavels?”

Although the federal courts have some tools to enforce compliance, their effectiveness depends on democratic cultural norms—and those norms in turn depend ultimately on the vigilance of the American people.

The judiciary does have a few “guns”—its own powers of coercion—to force recalcitrant executive officials to obey. A federal court can mandate officials to answer questions under oath and to sit for depositions. 

It can discipline government attorneys, including referring them for disbarment. It can impose escalating fines upon an official personally for each day an order goes disobeyed. It can order that officials be imprisoned. 

It can even set in motion criminal contempt cases against especially culpable officials. All of these measures, beyond their direct coercive effect, can do lasting reputational damage to the attorneys and officials involved.

Many of these tools are currently on display. Judge Paula Xinis, who is overseeing the Abrego Garcia case in Maryland, excoriated the Trump administration for doing “nothing” to bring the wrongly deported man home, and ordered several officials to answer questions under oath both in writing and in oral depositions. “There will be no tolerance for gamesmanship or grandstanding,” she said. Meanwhile, Judge James E. Boasberg in Washington, D.C., found that the administration had willfully violated his orders and that “probable cause exists to find the Government in criminal contempt.”

But what if the executive branch continues its defiance despite these or other sanctions? At that point, the courts could direct the U.S. Marshals Service to carry out their orders. The marshals have a statutory duty to do so. But the U.S. Marshals Service is part of the Department of Justice, which is under the supervision of Attorney General Pam Bondi. And Bondi, who is a named defendant in many cases against the administration, could instruct the marshals not to enforce an order against her or others in the administration. 

It is not clear how individual marshals would resolve a conflict between their statutory obligation and an order from the attorney general. Donald Trump could also try to thwart any contempt prosecutions, or simply pardon officials accused of criminal contempt. These uncertainties reflect something Alexander Hamilton observed long ago: The judiciary “must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.” That becomes an issue when the executive arm is the target of its judgments.

So the judiciary’s coercive power alone can’t guarantee that the executive branch will obey court judgments. And yet presidents have historically done so. Why? Because there is an unbroken norm, stretching back at least to the Civil War and followed by both parties, that presidents comply with court orders. The glue of constitutional democracy is not the U.S. Marshals Service but a political culture that demands respect for the rule of law. Because of this culture, the very threat of contempt has the power to shame officials into compliance with the courts.

History is full of examples of this culture in action. When the Supreme Court ordered President Richard Nixon to hand over tapes recorded in the Oval Office, Nixon voluntarily complied; the Court did not need to coerce compliance through contempt sanctions. Nixon resigned soon after. 

Similarly, when the Supreme Court in the famous Youngstown case ruled that President Harry Truman had unlawfully seized the steel mills during the Korean War, Truman voluntarily—and immediately—complied with the ruling, despite strenuously disagreeing with it. Again, what caused Truman to submit to the Court’s judgment was not the U.S. marshal knocking on his door but a shared commitment to self-government under a constitution.

William Rehnquist, the future Supreme Court chief justice, was a law clerk to Justice Robert H. Jackson the year that Youngstown was decided. He later wrote that the “tide of public opinion,” which had turned against the government, “had a considerable influence on the Court.” 

One lesson from past cases is that, in a constitutional democracy, public opinion is the bedrock on which rests the norm of official compliance with federal court judgments. Recent polling suggests that this norm is still robust and bipartisan, though with some alarming cracks. Public opinion is not a one-way street: The courts can influence and inform public opinion not only through their orders but also through hearings and discovery that make plain the government’s misconduct.

A second lesson is that the courts need to be clearer in their directives. The Trump administration has shown that it is willing to twist any arguable ambiguity in a court order to its advantage—such as, in the Abrego Garcia case, the government’s implausibly narrow interpretation of facilitate. The courts should respond by making their directives unmistakably clear. The Supreme Court seems to be moving in that direction; in an unequivocal order issued in the middle of the night over the weekend, it flatly prohibited further deportations from a district in Texas under the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act.

Finally, the political branches matter too. Open defiance of an order from the Supreme Court would be grounds for impeachment. Any indication from Republicans in Congress that such defiance will not be tolerated—communicated publicly or through back channels to the administration—would help ensure that it does not happen.

In the end, courts can do a lot to protect our constitutional values and liberties, but they can’t do everything. As Judge Learned Hand once famously said, “Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it.” We all have a role to play in seeing that it does not die.

"We all have a role to play in seeing that our values and liberties do not die."

Thursday, April 24, 2025

Trump’s Plan to Sell Out Ukraine to Russia

His proposal to end the war isn’t a peace plan—it’s a reward for aggression. (photo: Yehor Kryvoruchko)

(photo: Yehor Kryvoruchko)

His proposal to end the war isn’t a peace plan—it’s a reward for aggression.
 
Tom Nichols / The Atlantic /  

Donald Trump said on the campaign trail that he would make peace between Ukraine and Russia in a day. 

Three months later, he’s behind schedule, and his plan now is to end the fighting quickly by selling out Ukraine and its people to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The proposal that Trump, Vice President J. D. Vance, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are pushing is not a framework for peace, but a rich and bloody reward to Moscow for three years of aggression and war crimes.

The Russians might do some performative caviling, but the Americans are offering Putin a dream of a deal. If Trump has his way, Washington will lift sanctions against Russia; both sides will accept a cease-fire in place (leaving Russian troops on newly conquered Ukrainian territory), and the United States will agree to recognize Crimea as part of Russia (leaving the Kremlin with full ownership of previously conquered territory).

For this, Ukraine gets basically nothing, except a vaporous security guarantee from an American president who has made clear his hostility to Ukraine and its leaders, an animus that became especially clear when Trump and Vance ambushed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a White House meeting last month. The Trump “peace” plan is no such thing; it is an instrument of surrender, and the Ukrainians are unlikely to accept it.

Trump’s proposal would functionally destroy Ukraine, which would limp away from the deal as a vulnerable rump state, shorn of some 20 percent of its territory and millions of its citizens. It would cede control over its foreign policy by promising never to join NATO—an ironic Russian demand, given how starkly Putin’s invasion has reminded the world why alliances such as NATO must continue to exist. 

But NATO membership is a distant issue compared with the immediate problem: If Kyiv agrees to Trump’s proposal, whatever is left of the Ukrainian state will soon be an easy target for the Kremlin. 

Once the Russian economy recovers and Russia’s forces catch their breath, Putin will finish the job of conquering Ukraine with even greater vengeance and violence. Time and space are on Moscow’s side, and Trump intends to give Putin plenty of both.

The Americans have threatened to walk away from the process if either side refuses Trump’s deal, but no one can believe that this is even a token attempt to pressure Moscow. 

The White House is aiming its rhetorical fire squarely at Zelensky. Earlier today, Trump ranted at Zelensky on his Truth Social media platform, telling the Ukrainian president that he “can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country. We are very close to a Deal, but the man with ‘no cards to play’ should now, finally, GET IT DONE.” Zelensky, for his part, continues to insist on an “immediate, full, and unconditional cease-fire” before he agrees to further negotiations, a position Trump will likely use as a pretext for abandoning further talks.

Vance, meanwhile, has adopted a classic position of moral equivalence, as if the people shooting at each other—and their reasons for fighting—are indistinguishable. “The only way to really stop the killing,” he said in India today, “is for the armies to both put down their weapons, to freeze this thing, and to get on with the business of actually building a better Russia and a better Ukraine.”

(The vice president might just be toeing Trump’s line, but if his previous statements on international affairs are a guide, he really does seem to have a dismally simplistic understanding of geopolitics. He showcased this strategic shallowness during his embarrassing speech in Munich in February, when he scolded America’s allies about their domestic politics, as if the Europeans were merely a collection of unimportant U.S. congressional delegations.)

We need not invoke World War II comparisons to recognize the moral and political vacuity of the Trump-Vance position. Instead, imagine intervening in other wars of aggression, such as the Korean War in 1950, and telling the embattled southern forces after Pyongyang’s massive invasion that both sides “need to put down their weapons and build a better North and South Korea.” 

Or perhaps after Iraq attempted to erase Kuwait from the map in 1990, America and the United Nations should have told the states of the Persian Gulf that sometimes countries just disappear, and that both Saddam Hussein’s army and what was left of Kuwait’s forces needed to put their guns down.

Trump is not a fair broker: He is acting as a de facto Russian ally and making demands as Moscow’s proxy. Perhaps Europe and other nations will be able to fill the void left by American cowardice, but no one should blame the Ukrainians if they refuse to bow to Washington’s demand that they accept a grim destiny as Moscow’s newest serfs.

AMBUSH: The Oval Office Dressing Down

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

'Confused, forgetful, incoherent': Move over, Joe


Trump's age-related decline documented in startling new report

Donald Trump's age-related issues, which have seemingly accelerated during his third run for the White House, received a thorough analysis by the New York Times on Sunday which came to the conclusion that the former president appears to have debilitating memory issues along with bouts of confusion.

Long criticized for blanket coverage of President Joe Biden's decline following his alarming debate performance with Trump in June that led to the president stepping aside for Vice President Kamala Harris to run in July, on Sunday the Times' Peter Baker and Dylan Freedman scrutinized Trump's downward spiral over time.

As they noted Trump recently rambled on about the audience at his debate with Harris applauding his every move –– despite the fact there was no audience.

ALSO READ: Why Trump is barely campaigning

As the report notes, "Anyone can misremember, of course. But the debate had been just a week earlier and a fairly memorable moment. And it was hardly the only time Mr. Trump has seemed confused, forgetful, incoherent or disconnected from reality lately. In fact, it happens so often these days that it no longer even generates much attention."

Adding Trump "rambles, he repeats himself, he roams from thought to thought — some of them hard to understand, some of them unfinished," the Times reporters reported that an analysis of Trump's speeches before adoring crowds revealed some alarming signs of cognitive decline.

"Proportionately, he uses 13 percent more all-or-nothing terms like 'always' and 'never' than he did eight years ago, which some experts consider a sign of advancing age," the Times is reporting. "Similarly, he uses 32 percent more negative words than positive words now, compared with 21 percent in 2016, which can be another indicator of cognitive change."

According to one former ally who has known Trump for years, there are definitely signs of cognitive problems.

ALSO READ: Protesters outside New York Times demand newspaper 'stop normalizing Trump'

"He’s not competing at the level he was competing at eight years ago, no question about it,” explained Anthony Scaramucci. “He’s lost a step. He’s lost an ability to put powerful sentences together.”

Former Trump White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews agreed, telling the Times, "I don’t think anyone would ever say that Trump is the most polished speaker, but his more recent speeches do seem to be more incoherent, and he’s rambling even more so and he’s had some pretty noticeable moments of confusion. When he was running against Biden, maybe it didn’t stand out as much.”

With the Times report adding, "Experts said it was hard to judge whether the changes in Mr. Trump’s speaking style could indicate typical effects of age or some more significant condition," Dr. Bradford Dickerson, a neurologist at Harvard Medical School explained, "That can change with normal aging. But if you see a change relative to a person’s base line in that type of speaking ability over the course of just a few years, I think it raises some real red flags.”

"His speeches in 2015 and 2016 were more aggressive, but still clearer and more comprehensible than now, and balanced with flashes of humor," the report notes before cautioning, "Now his rallies are powered as much by anger as anything else. His distortions and false claims have reached new levels. His adversaries are 'lunatics' and 'deranged' and 'communists' and'“fascists.' Never particularly restrained, he now lobs four-letter words and other profanities far more freely. The other day, he suggested unleashing the police to inflict 'one really violent day' on criminals to deter crime."

Too long has lived the King.