Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Friday, December 8, 2023

Dear GOP: You’ll Never Wash the Stink of Trump Off You or Your Party. Never.

133e7f85-8877-45cc-8ba4-fc8d69bda7af.jpg
Image by Robert Owen-Wahl from Pixabay

By thomhartmann

Community

Daily Kos

Dear Republicans,

After the corruption of the Coolidge and Hoover administrations crashed the world economy, kicking off the Republican Great Depression in 1929, it took your party decades to rid itself of the stink.

After Nixon extended the Vietnam War to get himself re-elected, unnecessarily killing over 20,000 American soldiers and a million Vietnamese civilians, and then got busted for Watergate and the bribes he solicited in the White House, it took you almost a generation to rid yourselves of the stink.

But you’ll never rid yourself of the stink of Donald Trump. At least never in the lifetime of anybody around today. Trump’s stench is a tragic part of American history that will last generations.

The entire world knows the foetor of his whipping up a crowd of thousands to try to assassinate the Vice President of the United States and the Speaker of the House.

Trump’s minions urinated on the carpets in the hallowed halls of Congress, smeared feces on the walls, damaged priceless paintings from the founding era of our country, and murdered police officers protecting our nation’s Capitol. That stink will never fade, no matter how often his allies try to rewrite history, blur faces, or tell stories about bizarre “deep state” conspiracies.

Did you think Americans would forget the stink of the 30,000+ documented lies he told America and the world while he was president? Or the lies he routinely spouts every time he speaks in public, so frequent now that even Fox “News” has to correct the facts when covering him?

How about the reek of his dictator-like pronouncements that he will destroy the American Civil Service and fill our government with corrupt toadies, then imprison his political enemies and send the military into the streets like Maduro has done in Venezuela and tinpot dictators do all across the world?

Do you really believe that we would forget the stink of his sucking up to murderous dictators like Putin, MBS, and Kim? Now that effluvium is being smeared all over Republican politicians, one after another, as they follow Trump’s orders — which he no doubt received from Putin — to abandon Ukraine.

You are cowards, all. Covered in your wretched, cowardly, unpatriotic stink.

This is the man who tried to blackmail a democratic ally into manufacturing dirt on his political opponent, withholding aid to Ukraine in the face of Russian attacks. The stink of that crime was so heinous he was impeached for it.

What about the stink Trump created when he referred to mostly-Black nations as “shithole countries” and our veterans who’d died in war as “suckers” and “losers”? When he told General Mark Milley he didn’t want to again share the stage with an injured veteran because such heroes don’t “look good”?

Or when, at the height of the pandemic in April 2020, Trump ordered people back to work and began to ridicule wearing masks, leading to hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths (according to his own science advisors: the British journal Lancet put the number at around a half-million)?

At that time, most Covid deaths were in Blue states (CT, NY, WA, NJ) and Trump agreed with Jared that they could politically benefit by blaming the deaths on Democratic governors. An “effective political strategy” they called this decision redolent with the stink of mass death.

That same son-in-law, by the way, who Trump helped hustle $2 billion from the Saudis in exchange, apparently, for downplaying the murder of a Washington Post journalist and looking the other way at how they oppress women. Do you think we failed to notice the reek of nepotism and corruption?

Speaking of women, do you really believe that stink of your support of a man credibly accused of rape and sexual assault by over 20 women, including one as young as 13, would just go away? Even after he was found by a court of law to have raped the first woman whose case finally made it through the courts?

As average working Americans struggle to pay their taxes, Trump pushed through an odious $2 trillion tax cut for himself and his billionaire buddies, creating the largest budget deficit by any president in the history of the nation. Do you think America will forget?

Or the stink of his multiple business frauds? He was convicted and forced to pay millions in restitution to victims of his Trump University fraud; they shut down his phony New York charity; now he’s been found by a New York court to have committed bank, tax, and insurance fraud: they’re just trying to figure out how big the stink is so they can quantify it as a fine.

How about the overwhelming stench of tearing babies from their mothers’ arms at the border and then trafficking them into phony “Christian adoption” services that then vanished, leaving over 1000 grieving families still not knowing the whereabouts of their little girls and boys to this day? 

Or the stink from the naked campaign lies he blithely told to get votes, promising a new national healthcare system, a revitalization of America’s infrastructure, or his claims that he supported organized labor at the same time his appointees to the Department of Labor were working to block unionization efforts across the nation?

Even worse, this adulterer — who had affairs outside his marriage with every one of his three wives and never goes to church but still claimed to be a Christian — told sincerely religious people he was their champion. Not noticing the sulfurous smell that surrounds Trump, many believed him and still do. In actual fact, he was only championing the hypocritical multimillionaire TV preachers who shared their hustle with him: he supported their violations of tax law in exchange for their endorsement from the pulpit.

Then he tried to overthrow an election he knew he lost by 7 million votes, and is today threatening to try it again. The whole world is aghast at the stink of that tinpot dictator effort, and terrified that he may succeed the next time.

Germans still struggle with the stink of a leader who referred to his political opponents as “vermin” and promised he was going to “root them out.” Who attacked the press because they told the truth about him. Who played on and amplified people’s fear of “the other.” You will, too, for generations after Trump himself has shuffled off this mortal coil.

Pathetically, you Republican members of Congress have now smeared yourselves with the slime that has surrounded Donald Trump his entire criminal life. Have you noticed how many of your colleagues are fleeing? Do you really think you can ever wash off yourself the reek of your association with treason, an attempt to betray and overthrow America, even worse than what Benedict Arnold tried?

Seriously, Republicans, do you not think America can smell what’s going on? Trump bragging that he ended women’s rights to bodily autonomy? His promotion of guns and assault weapons because the racist nutcases who follow him think they’re going to be soldiers in a coming civil war? His refusal to do anything about the climate change that is now killing Americans every day?

America has had a few truly awful presidents. Andrew Jackson “The Indian Killer.” Andrew Johnson who tried to undo Lincoln’s legacy. Warren Harding and Teapot Dome. Richard Nixon’s criminality, Ronald Reagan’s commitment to destroy America’s middle class, George W. Bush lying us into two wars as part of his 2004 re-election strategy.

But none stink as bad as this miserable cartoon of a man, with his bizarre orange spray-tan, absurd comb-over, and compensatory phallic-length red ties.

America is not going to forget, and many Americans will never forgive.

You will never wash the stink of Donald Trump off yourselves or your party. Never.


"America has had truly awful presidents...but none stink as bad as this miserable cartoon of a man, with his bizarre orange spray-tan, absurd comb-over, and compensatory phallic-length red ties."

Thursday, December 7, 2023

Taylor Swift is Time's person of the year and the far right is big mad about it

 no image description available

By Laura Clawson for Daily Kos

Daily Kos Staff

at 1:32:09p MST

REPUBLISHED BY:

Blue Country Gazette Blog

Rim Country Gazette Blog

Taylor Swift is Time Magazine’s person of the year, a choice that makes perfect sense. Swift’s Eras Tour is on track to break global records for tour earnings. A concert film also smashed records for that genre and provided the AMC movie theater chain with its highest single-day ticket sales ever. She was Spotify's most-streamed artist globally for 2023, following three years in which Bad Bunny took that title. Swift’s romance with NFL player Travis Kelce has increased ratings for Kansas City Chiefs football games while sales of his jersey spiked by 400%. She is as dominant a figure as they come these days—exactly what Time’s person of the year is supposed to recognize.

Prominent far-right influencers are very unhappy. “And just like clockwork, @taylorswift13 (as I warned you all about) is being further activated by the media and the Democrats to interfere in the 2024 election,” Laura Loomer tweeted, tying it back to her earlier just-asking-questions conspiracy theory: “Has @taylorswift13 made a deal with George Soros and Alex Soros to get the rights to her music back in exchange for getting Zoomers registered to vote Democrat against President Trump ahead of the 2024 Presidential election?” (This is a particularly odd theory given that Swift has spent years rerecording her early albums to reclaim ownership.)

 Pizzagate conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec also weighed in. “The Taylor Swift girlboss psyop has been fully activated. From her hand-selected vaccine shill boyfriend to her DINK lifestyle to her upcoming 2024 voter operation for Democrats on abortion rights,” he tweeted. “It’s all coming.”

Posobiec also offered up the Soros conspiracy thery: “Thinking about when Taylor Swift called out the Soros family in 2019 for buying the rights to her music and then how she came out a super liberal in 2020.”

Time’s person of the year interview with Swift makes clear just how ridiculous this idea is of her as a Soros puppet—or anyone’s puppet. Swift is forceful and direct. She is very much a person who knows her own mind and is charting her own course. Again, this is someone who responded to the loss of control of her artistic product by rerecording it over a period of years while continuing to put out new music and then launching one of the biggest, if not the biggest, tours of all time.

In the interview, Swift models support for other highly successful women in entertainment, refusing to be drawn into competition. She described her tour, Beyoncé’s tour, and Greta Gerwig’s “Barbie” movie as ”a three-part summer of feminine extravaganza.” She praises both Gerwig and Beyoncé, in particular the latter:

“She’s the most precious gem of a person—warm and open and funny,” Swift says. “And she’s such a great disrupter of music-industry norms. She taught every artist how to flip the table and challenge archaic business practices.” That her tour and Beyoncé’s were frequently juxtaposed is vexing. “There were so many stadium tours this summer, but the only ones that were compared were me and Beyoncé,” she says. “Clearly it’s very lucrative for the media and stan culture to pit two women against each other, even when those two artists in question refuse to participate in that discussion.”

Swift even offered an analysis of how gender is at play in the economics of popular culture. This is not some blank slate being “activated” by the media/Democrats/Soros. She’s not just a singer and performer: She’s a songwriter and a major entrepreneur. At just 33 years old, she’s been navigating fame for more than 15 years. In that time has she learned an enormous amount about how the public responds to what she says and does.

Take her relationship with Kelce, another target of right-wing rage. Before the relationship went public, she told Time, “we actually had a significant amount of time that no one knew, which I’m grateful for, because we got to get to know each other. By the time I went to that first game, we were a couple. I think some people think that they saw our first date at that game? We would never be psychotic enough to hard launch a first date.” This is someone who has from a very early age had to see every detail of her life through the filter of how it might be reported and how her fans and haters might react. If she didn’t have an enormous amount of self-knowledge, she would not be the star she is, because she would have crashed and burned.

People like Posobiec and Loomer, who look at everything as a conspiracy, look at Swift and see only a conventionally attractive young woman and pop star and simply cannot wrap their heads around any of that. But even if you’re not especially a Swift fan (here I raise my hand), any assessment of her that’s grounded in reality has to acknowledge her intelligence and independence.

Are you surprised that these clowns have a problem with a strong, independent woman who speaks the truth?

Tuesday, December 5, 2023

‘Whatever it takes’: Cheney using her national book tour to bury Trump, Republicans in 2024

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 15: Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) speaks during the Washington Post Global Women's Summit at the newspaper's headquarters on November 15, 2022 in Washington, DC. The inaugural summit featured a collection of speakers ranging from activists to politicians gathered to discuss issues pertaining to women. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Former Rep. Liz Cheney completed a series of interviews over the past week about her new book, "Oath and Honor."

By Kerry Eleveld

Daily Kos Staff

The Republican Party has become such an existential threat to American democracy that former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming is using her national book tour to promote Democratic control of Washington.

“I believe very strongly in those principles and ideals that have defined the Republican Party, but the Republican Party of today has made a choice and they haven’t chosen the Constitution, and so I do think it presents a threat if the Republicans are in the majority in January 2025,” Cheney told "CBS Sunday Morning."

Cheney, once the third-ranking Republican in the House, is methodically leveraging her national platform to pull back the curtain on her former colleagues in her new book, "Oath and Honor." In the CBS interview, Cheney said she “absolutely” considers House Speaker Mike Johnson a collaborator in Donald Trump’s coup plot, adding that Johnson knew that overturning the 2020 election would be wrong.

When CBS’ John Dickerson asked what would happen on Jan. 6, 2025, if Republicans were still to have the majority and Johnson is still speaker, Cheney wouldn't even entertain the scenario.

“He can’t be,” Cheney replied. “We are facing a situation with respect to the 2024 election where it’s an existential crisis, and we have to ensure that we don’t have a situation where an election that might be thrown into the House of Representatives is overseen by a Republican majority.”

Amen to that.

Cheney particularly called out former colleagues who once objected to Trump but now "embrace him" despite him being an even bigger threat to "our freedoms" now.

"I don't know how those people look themselves in the mirror in the morning," Cheney said.

This is exactly why Republicans ousted Cheney: She was a walking, talking mirror they had to face every day at their jobs. They simply couldn't allow her to remain, and it had nothing to do with their electoral fortunes.

Dickerson followed up on Cheney's point by specifically mentioning Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida as someone who "understands the stakes of the presidency" since he sits on the Senate intelligence and foreign affairs committees.

"He knows better," Cheney replied, adding, “People whose families fled regimes like Castro's Cuba have a particular obligation" to safeguard American democracy.

"People who have fled tyranny and come to this country had this country to come to," Cheney pointed out, "and if we go down this path of the destruction of democracy in the United States, that means there's no place that's safe."

And in the event that Trump is the GOP's 2024 nominee, Cheney also effectively endorsed President Joe Biden's reelection by default.

“I will never vote for Donald Trump, and I will do whatever it takes to make sure that Donald Trump is defeated," Cheney said.

“Including a vote for Biden?” NBC News' Savannah Guthrie responded.

“I will do whatever it takes."

This time he plans to take down the whole damn country.  Just ask him.

Monday, December 4, 2023

With Santos expelled, the House GOP dumpster fire continues unabated

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 11: U.S. Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks as Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) listen during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol May 11, 2022 in Washington, DC. Boebert held a news conference to discuss 'defunding the Homeland Security Department's Disinformation Governance Board.” (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
From left to right: Rep. Jim (young boy rassler) Jordan, House Speaker Mike (Trump suck-up) Johnson, and Rep. Lauren (the groping vaper) Boebert

A freshly ousted George Santos had a parting message for reporters as he exited the Capitol Friday morning.

"I no longer have to answer a single question," Santos told the assembled media, noting he was no longer a member of Congress.

Sayonara, scribes!

Santos, who is facing federal charges for election fraud and campaign finance violations, may have appeared less encumbered following his dramatic exit, but he left a GOP conference in upheaval. Rank-and-file House Republicans were reportedly exasperated over their leadership's botched handling of the fateful vote, according to Politico.

Instead of leading on the matter, Speaker Mike Johnson and his team declined to whip the vote count or push a position, framing it as a vote of conscience. That non-position backfired, with the Republican conference splitting nearly in half on Santos' ejection and voting 105 in support to 112 against it. Democrats tipped the balance to seal Santos’ fate.

Just before the vote Friday morning, the speaker came out against expelling Santos. Johnson's last-minute maneuvering was a lose-lose situation, exposing his inability to bring the weight of the conference with him while enraging his colleagues on both sides of the debate.

More moderate-minded anti-Santos Republicans blasted GOP leadership for stooping toward the lowest common denominator.

“Had leadership had its way, we would have reset the bar on standards of conduct at a level that we would live to regret," Rep. Steve Womack of Arkansas told Politico. "I am thankful that there were enough thoughtful members of Congress, on both sides of the aisle, that recognize that there was only one course of action here.”

Republican members of the House Ethics Committee, which leadership directed to investigate Santos' conduct, felt abandoned after they found "sufficient evidence" of criminality to support Santos' ejection.

"We were tasked to do this. We came out with a report. … If this was not the standard to remove someone, why even have an Ethics Committee?” wondered Rep. Andrew Garbarino of New York, who voted for expulsion.

The pro-MAGA faithful, on the other hand, were enraged that any Republican would stoop so low as to hold one of their own to a higher standard.

"The swamp won this battle," declared Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana, who also defended Johnson's handling of the vote.

But some MAGA media influencers like Mike Cernovich ripped Johnson.

"Told y'all what you'd get from the new Speaker. Exactly nothing," Cernovich tweeted.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia called the vote "Shameful!!!"

Despite her rage, Greened managed to get something right.

"We now have a 3 seat majority and have another Republican resigning soon, and will have a 2 seat majority, as long as every Republican shows up when we are in session," Greene tweeted.

Correct! Rep. Bill Johnson of Ohio is vacating his seat next year for a new job that begins in mid-March, whittling Republicans' House majority to just two seats until a special election can be held to fill it.

All in all, it was another stellar week of House Republicans coming together to make a real impact on the lives of everyday Americans.

Can't imagine why the favorability ratings of GOP members in battleground districts continue to crater.

Of all the train wrecks in the House, Marjorie Taylor Greene is the loudest - and Megaphone Mouth doesn't even need a microphone.  Putin can hear her all the way to Russia.  Yes, that's a thumbs-up from the butcher.

Sunday, December 3, 2023

After Sen Kennedy calls Chicago a "shooting range," a doctor gives him Louisiana's murder stats

ScreenShot2023-11-28at3.50.15PM.png

By TheCriticalMind

Community

Daily Kos

REPUBLISHED BY:

Blue Country Gazette Blog

Rim Country Gazette Blog

The Senate Judiciary Committee met today to discuss “The Gun Violence Epidemic: A Public Health Crisis.” One of the witnesses was Dr. Megan Ranney of the Yale School of Public Health. One of her interrogators was Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA).

No one who follows these things foresaw a substantive discussion aimed at lowering America's stratospheric gun death rate. Kennedy did not buck the prediction. As sure as the sunrise, he brought up Chicago.

Kennedy laid the groundwork for his distraction with vivid but inflammatory language designed to appeal to emotion over reason — “largest outdoor shooting range.” He also added dog whistle racism. Hunters vs. inner-city gangbangers? Guess who MAGA identifies as the white group.

“Let me ask you this. Why do you think that Chicago has become America's largest outdoor shooting range? Do you think it's because of Chicago citizens, who have no criminal record, but who lawfully have a gun in their homes for protection, or perhaps for hunting? Or do you think it's because of a finite group of criminals who have rap sheets as long as King Kong’s arm?”

His most egregious misdirection was statistical. Chicago is the conservative poster child for democratically-run cities with lots of murders. In terms of absolute numbers, this is fair. With 692, Chicago had more homicides than any other US city in 2022 — higher than NY with 433 and Los Angeles with 382.

However, meaningful comparisons require per capita statistics. And by that metric, Chicago is behind 13 other US cities in homicide rate. Two of these killing fields (I take my cues from Kennedy) are from Kennedy’s home state. New Orleans is #4. Baton Rouge is #5. Both of these outdoor shooting ranges have murder rates twice that of Chicago.

Dr. Ranney made the same statistical point at the state level:

“So Mississippi, Louisiana, Missouri actually have higher firearm death rates, obviously there's certain … ”

Kennedy interrupted her. He was not going to let facts distract from his polemic. For the record, Louisiana is the second most murderous state. It is also the third lowest in life expectancy — one of the nine red states on the top ten list of places where citizens die young.  

Ranney replied it was not her area of expertise. Nevertheless, Kennedy was determined to keep the focus away from the violence in his own backyard.

Kennedy: “What about Chicago?”

Ranney: “So I don't live in Chicago. It's not my primary area of research.”

Kennedy: “You don't have an opinion on that?”

Ranney then made the point that gun deaths are caused by guns. She also, being an academic and not a politician, tried to answer the question she was asked.

“I think there is easy access to firearms, combined with environmental conditions and lack of great education. There have actually been studies showing that when you green vacant lots and repair abandoned buildings in urban neighborhoods, you see decreases in gunshots and violence as well as decreases in stress and depression in the neighborhoods around them.”

Kennedy, well aware that his intended audience wanted smackdowns, not discussion, dissed Ranney while piously insisting he was not dissing her:

“No disrespect Doc, but that sounds a lot like word salad to me.”

What word salad? Ranney’s answer was grammatical, well-structured, responsive, and easily understandable. Kennedy knew it. So he slimed it. Not just with his words. He offered his dismissive scorn while ignoring her and riffling a sheaf of papers for no purpose beyond theatrics.

When liberals look at the Republican wasteland in the Age of MAGA, they see orange ass-kissing, low-IQ loudmouths baying at the moon. It is a reasonable analysis. Rabid self-promoters are the most clangorous conservative demographic. But other zealots play a quieter game. Many are intelligent, well-educated, and mercilessly dedicated to restoring an antebellum America.

One is John Kennedy.

This cotton-chewing, aw-shucks, good old boy would love you to think him a hick. He is not. He may have been raised near South Louisiana’s swampland, but he bettered himself. He went from high school co-valedictorian to president of his senior class at Vanderbilt. There he was named to Phi Beta Kappa and graduated magna cum laude.

He received a JD from the University of Virginia Law School of Law, where he was an executive editor of the Virginia Law Review and elected to the Order of the Coif. Ultimately, he earned a Bachelor of Civil Law degree, with first-class honours from Oxford University. There are few better-educated politicians in America.

But none of his schooling taught him to be honest or polite. And politics has rendered him no more morally upright than the high-school dropout Lauren Boebert. They may not look alike, but they share the same DNA.



Saturday, December 2, 2023

Biden blasts Boebert in her Colorado district as he touts economic agenda at giant wind tower plant

FILE - President Joe Biden speaks during an event on the economy, from the South Court Auditorium of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex, Oct. 23, 2023. Biden has a lot of unfinished business from his first term that he intends to continue if reelected.. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

President Joe Biden hit a trifecta during his visit to a wind tower turbine manufacturing plant in Rep. Lauren Boebert’s home district in Colorado on Wednesday: He managed to rib Boebert and fellow MAGA extremists in Congress, tout the increased investment in manufacturing created through the Inflation Reduction Act, and link clean energy policies to job creation.

Biden visited the Pueblo, Colorado, factory of CS Wind, which describes itself as the world’s largest wind turbine tower manufacturing plant. In April, the South Korean firm announced plans to expand its Pueblo plant and hire at least 850 new workers by 2026. CS Wind directly attributed its new $200 million investment in the plant to the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which includes tax incentives for clean energy projects, according to a White House statement.

The Pueblo stop was part of an Investing in America Tour that the Biden-Harris administration kicked off last month to show how “investments in infrastructure, clean energy, and manufacturing are creating jobs and opportunities in communities across the country.”

In his 23-minute speech on Wednesday, Biden called out Boebert and other MAGA lawmakers for opposing the Inflation Reduction Act. In the background, cranes were decorated with banners reading “Bidenomics/Investing in America.”

RELATED STORY: UAW's win is a big plus for Bidenomics and a total repudiation of Trump's faux right-wing populism

Biden said:

“When I took office, I vowed I’d be president for all Americans, whether you live in a blue state or a red state, whether you live in rural or urban areas.  And … we’re delivering on that promise. “But, folks, we haven’t gotten a whole lot of help from some members of Congress — on the other side of the aisle in the United States Congress. “The historic investments we’re celebrating today is in Congresswoman Boebert’s district.”

At the mention of Boebert’s name, Biden paused for a moment and made the sign of the cross, drawing laughter from the audience. He continued:  

She’s one of the leaders of this extreme MAGA movement.

She, along with every single Republican colleague, voted against the law that made these investments and jobs possible. … And then she voted to repeal key parts of this law. And she called this law a “massive failure.”

You all know you’re part of a massive failure? (Laughter.) Tell that to the 850 Coloradans who get new jobs in Pueblo at CS Wind thanks to this law. Tell that to the local economy that’s going to benefit from these investments. …

I got around the plant today. To those who I got to talk to, you’re changing America. You’re changing America.

It all sounds like a “massive failure” in thinking by the congresswoman and her colleagues.

Biden’s remarks drew attention in the national media. The Washington Post wrote:

Biden’s visit was aimed at creating a contrast between what he portrays as his efforts to strengthen the economy and what he paints as Republicans’ embrace of chaos and conspiracy.

The House Republican conference in the past two months has deposed a speaker, struggled to elect a new one and twice flirted with a government shutdown.  …

The Biden campaign is also seeking to portray Trump and other potential Republican presidential nominees as extremists. But regardless of whom the president’s GOP opponent is, the campaign has signaled that it will hold up the House GOP, with its attention-grabbing cadre of hard-right conservatives, as part of what he is running against.

And The New York Times wrote:

The tour on Wednesday amounted to a choreographed political appearance for Mr. Biden, designed to both highlight investments in an eroded manufacturing base as well as to hit back at the president’s most vocal opponents as his polling has sagged in the 2024 race.

But what’s perhaps even more significant is the widespread coverage that Biden’s appearance in Pueblo garnered in the Colorado media. The headline on the Denver Post story read, “At Pueblo wind tower factory, President Joe Biden cites economic progress: ‘We’re investing in Americans. And it’s working.’”

And the Colorado Politics website wrote:

Tony Salerno, the plant manager who introduced Biden, thanked the president and CS Wind for investing in the Pueblo plant. Salerno, who has worked at the plant since 2013, said it struggled in 2021 and credited CS Wind and the Inflation Reduction Act for turning things around.

“We had recently been through a layoff and our future was questioned,” said Salerno, who noted the factory's acquisition by CS Wind. "The factory began the process of expansion, and it has provided countless members of this community with good-paying jobs.”

Colorado Politics also noted that before his speech, Biden toured the factory, where employees demonstrated some of the processes for making wind turbine towers.

In his speech, Biden also mentioned some of the other clean energy jobs that the Inflation Reduction Act helped create in Colorado. The Danish firm Vestas plans to invest $40 million to expand its Windsor plant, which it says will create roughly 1,000 more jobs in northern Colorado, and Swiss solar manufacturer Meyer Burger intends to build a facility in Colorado Springs, which is expected to bring in around 350 jobs. Biden said:

It’s simple.  As I’ve said for a long time: When I think climate … I think jobs.  Jobs. That’s what climate is about—not only saving lives and saving the environment, but jobs.  

And the president also touted his administration’s efforts to build the country’s infrastructure.

We’re also making the most substantial investment in American infrastructure since President Eisenhower built the interstate highway system. We’re investing in roads, bridges, ports, airports, clean water, affordable high-speed Internet.

And for those who say that Biden does not have any plans for his second term, the president concluded his speech by talking about economic inequality and his proposal to tax billionaires at a  minimum 25% rate, which he said would raise $440 billion over the next 10 years:

One thing I said after we passed all these major pieces of legislation was that the next big battle is going to be whether the very wealthiest among us began—and the biggest corporations begin to start paying their fair share. ... Let me be clear: The speaker, Donald Trump, and the MAGA Republicans here in Congress are committed to protecting their outrageous tax cuts for those at the very top. And they’re going to continue to oppose investing in all those programs that help people, whether it’s in education, health care, or whatever. …

You know, we had about 750 billionaires in America before the pandemic. Now, there are a thousand. You know the average rate those billionaires pay in their federal taxes? Eight percent.  …

That’s why I’m proposing a billionaire minimum tax … 

Imagine what we could do if we just made these billionaires pay their taxes like everyone else.  We could use it to strengthen the Social Security and Medicare system instead of cutting them like … Trump and Boebert want to do.

Biden’s visit was not billed as a campaign event, but it just happened to take place in Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District, which Democrats consider one of their top pickup opportunities as they try to regain control of the House, which Republicans control by the narrowest of margins.

While Biden was in Pueblo, Boebert was back in Washington firing off a series of posts on X, formerly known as Twitter, attacking both Biden and Adam Frisch, the Democratic opponent who almost unseated her in 2022. Colorado Politics cited some of Boebert’s taunting posts:

“I hope there’s not a silver alert that goes out for him” during his trip. The alert can be sent for missing elderly people with dementia. ...

"Working-class families in Pueblo and across the 3rd District deserve so much better than the Bidenomics pushed by Joe Biden and Aspen Adam," she said, referring to her Democratic opponent who once served on Aspen’s City Council. ...

"Joe Biden is taking a break from his lavish vacations to come to Pueblo to talk about what he calls 'clean energy,'” she said in another post on X. ... "He should be coming here to apologize for his all out war on fossil fuels and his Green New Deal agenda which have cost the great people of Colorado’s 3rd District dearly."

But there was a piece of good news on Thursday for Boebert, who had to be removed from a Colorado theater in September for vaping and groping her date during a performance of the musical “Beetlejuice.” The entertainment website Deadline reported that production has wrapped on “Beetlejuice 2.” It’s scheduled for fall release in 2024, just weeks before Election Day.

Always on the trampy side, Lauren Boebert, struts her stuff, flashing an insult of the president across her slutty ass.  To her left, the one, the only, the man who would be president by stealing the election.

Friday, December 1, 2023

Ukraine Update: Assisting Ukraine is the best U.S. defense program in decades

no image description available
The HIMARS assembly line in Camden, Arkansas, which also produces its ammo, like GMLRS and ATACMS rockets.

You can read more great Ukraine coverage by both staff and community members here.


The list of reasons why assisting Ukraine is good for the United States is a long one. There’s the immense damage to the Russian military, the revitalization and expansion of NATO, the restoration of America’s position as a leader in the fight for democracy, the strengthening of diplomatic ties, and even a giant shift away from Russian-supplied oil and gas.

Also, defending a peaceful democratic nation against an illegal invasion by an aggressive, authoritarian military force is simply the right thing to do. And doing the right thing now and then is good for everyone.

But there’s another way in which helping Ukraine is helping the United States: It is revitalizing the American defense industry, generating innovation, and creating jobs in America.

An evaluation from the Center for Strategic and International Studies shows what should have been obvious from the start: When we talk about assistance to Ukraine, most of it involves the transfer of existing weapons systems that have already been built. Many of those systems are older, like the 1,669 Humvees and 300 M113 armored personnel carriers the American military has shipped to Ukraine.

But when shipments to Ukraine involve either systems or ammunition that need to be replaced, or new systems that are seeing their first use in combat, that generates orders to defense contractors. And those defense contractors aren’t in Ukraine: They’re in the U.S.

In fact, The Washington Post reports that of the $68 billion in military assistance Congress has approved following Russia’s invasion, almost 90% has gone to Americans. The locations where these systems are being built are scattered across the nation.

Bradley fighting vehicles are built in Pennsylvania and Alabama. HIMARS rocket launchers come from Arkansas. Switchblade drones come from California.

Both Abrams tanks and Stryker combat vehicles roll off United Auto Worker lines in Ohio. This means that Republicans like Sen. J.D. Vance and Rep. Jim Jordan aren’t just voting against democracy when they try to block assistance to Ukraine, they are actively voting against jobs in their own home state and district.

I’m a big believer in many of the things President Dwight Eisenhower had to say in his farewell address. No one should cheer the spending of a single penny on military hardware that might otherwise be spent on infrastructure, health care, or any peaceful purpose. And guarding against the influence of what Eisenhower called the “military-industrial complex” is at least as important today as it was in 1961.

But Eisenhower understood that, in an age where war could reach around the world in minutes, the risks of a robust defense industry had to be weighed against the cost of being unable to respond when necessary. It wasn’t a situation that he wanted. It shouldn’t be a situation that anyone wants. But if the United States is going to spend money on acquiring weapons so that Ukraine can fight against the invading might of Russia, it’s a very good thing that the money is being spent in the United States.

So far, Ukraine’s use of those weapons systems looks like a bargain, by anyone’s accounting. Over the last 643 days, Russia’s efforts to illegally invade and subjugate Ukraine have been a disaster for Vladimir Putin and his dreams of a renewed Soviet empire. Ukraine now estimates that Russia has lost 5,538 tanks in the conflict, over 2,500 of which have been independently visually confirmed. Add to that over 10,000 armored vehicles, over 8,000 artillery and MLRS systems, more than 300 military helicopters, and over 300 jet aircraft. All that’s on top of losing a sizable fraction of the Black Sea Fleet, the rest of which is now cowering in ports they hope are outside of Ukraine’s reach.

Russia has also lost at least 20 generals, thousands of lower-ranking officers, and an estimated 300,000 soldiers. Putin can call up all the conscripts he wants, scour the weeds for rusting tanks, and turn up the dial on his nation’s miserable industrial capacity, but Russia will spend decades recovering from the losses it has suffered in Ukraine. It may never recover.

Of course, the cost to Ukraine is measured in far more than dollars. They’ve also suffered tremendous losses and seen whole cities leveled by Putin’s insatiable appetite for destruction.

One of these days, money to assist Ukraine is going to be spent in Ukraine. Because that money won’t be for weapons: It will go to rebuilding homes, restoring vital services, and replacing lost schools and hospitals.

Let’s get to that day as fast as we can.

Long may she wave.