Join us at our brand new blog - Blue Country Gazette - created for those who think "BLUE." Go to www.bluecountrygazette.blogspot.com

YOUR SOURCE FOR TRUTH

Tuesday, June 5, 2018

Trump hammers home nativist fear-mongering as GOP's ultimate—and really only—midterm message



NASHVILLE, TN - MAY 29: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the Nashville Municipal Auditorium, May 29, 2018 in Nashville, Tennessee. Earlier in the day, President Trump held a fundraising event in support of Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), who is running for a U.S. Senate seat against former two-term Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen, a Democrat. They are competing for the Senate seat currently held by Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), who declined to run for a third term. Recent polling indicates a close race between Blackburn and Bredesen. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Donald Trump and the GOP have virtually nothing to sell the white working-class voters who helped elect him to office in 2016, other than his deep-seated racism and his commitment to immigrant bashing. It's an ugly populist playbook and Trump spent Tuesday night in Tennessee playing it to the hilt at a campaign rally for GOP Rep. Marsha Blackburn’s Senate bid.

Here's a brief montage of Trump’s anti-immigrant slurs from the Washington Post, including his broken campaign promise that Mexico will pay for wall that is clearly being funded by American taxpayers:
“In the end, Mexico is going to pay for the wall,” Trump said. [...] “They’re going to pay for the wall and they’re going to enjoy it,” Trump said. [...]
“The Democrats want to use [immigration] as a campaign issue, and I keep saying I hope they do,” Trump said. Accusing Democrats of wanting “open borders,” Trump added: “That’s a good issue for us, not for them.”
He focused on the Central American and U.S. gang MS-13 and what he claimed is Democratic inaction to confront it, asking the crowd at one point to repeat his characterization of the gang as “animals.”  "MS-13 takes advantage of glaring holes in our immigration laws to infiltrate our country," Trump said. [...]
“You have to vote for Marsha,” he said, adding that “Phil whatever-his-name-is, this guy will 100 percent vote against us every single time.”
Trump called [Democrat Phil] Bredesen “an absolute tool” of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and “MS-13-loving Nancy Pelosi,” a reference to the senior House Democrat.
Trump's hate-filled immigrant bashing is what the GOP has left after their tax cut for the 1 percent has failed to gain traction with the other 99 percent of Americans and gas prices are spiking. In fact, in House races across the country, GOP candidates are driving the very same messages.
Republicans have aired more than 14,000 campaign ads touting a tough Trump-style immigration platform so far this year.
Meanwhile, Democrats are largely running on platforms of increasing access to health care and shoring up Social Security.

Voters will have a choice: hating for the sake of hating, or voting for a party that's trying to improve their quality of life.

Oh, and Mexico's still not paying for the wall.
“President @realDonald­Trump: NO. Mexico will NEVER pay for a wall. Not now, not ever. Sincerely, Mexico,” [Mexican President] Peña Nieto said on Twitter, according to Reuters.

Your tax cut—such as it is—already eaten up by rapidly rising gas prices



MIAMI, FL - APRIL 09:  Customers pump gas into their vehicles as reports indicate that the price of gasoline continues to rise on April 9, 2018 in Miami, Florida. AAA forecasts the national gas price average will be as much as $2.70/gallon this spring and summer.  (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Donald Trump wants voters to go into November’s midterm elections feeling giddy with economic well-being from the tax law he believes—or just wants us to believe—is a game-changer for the average family. Most families, though, aren't seeing big benefits from the Republican tax plan. What they are seeing, though, is high prices at the gas pump, caused in part by Trump withdrawing from the Iran deal.
“Gas prices will reduce the benefits of the tax cut by at least one-third, but I think the impact may actually be much larger than that because the bulk of the tax cuts go to high-income households who aren’t going to spend much of it,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. “Gas prices mean less today than they did 20 years ago, but they still mean a lot, especially to those folks living on the margins in lower and lower-middle income groups.”
Not to mention, Trump voters are more likely to come from areas where getting around means driving a car. And TAAT (There’s Always A Tweet):
Gas prices are at crazy levels--fire Obama!

Monday, June 4, 2018

Taboo Word for Vagina Distracts From Inhumane Trump Child-Snatching Policy

Samantha Bee (left); Ivanka Trump (right). (photo: AP)
Samantha Bee (left); Ivanka Trump (right). (photo: AP)

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
04 June 18


We spent the day wrestling with the repercussions of one bad word, when we all should have spent the day incensed that as a nation we are wrenching children from their parents and treating people legally seeking asylum as criminals. If we are OK with that then really, who are we?

Samantha Bee acceptance speech, May 31, 2018


amantha Bee is a smart, talented, funny, incisive, edgy, 48-year-old Canadian/American mother of three. She is also the star of the TBS show “Full Frontal with Samantha Bee,” now in its third year. In 2017, Time magazine named her one of the 100 most influential people in the world. On May 31, 2018, the Television Academy’s annual awards for “outstanding programs that have leveraged the dynamic power of television to inspire social change” included Samantha Bee’s “Full Frontal.” The awards ceremony was closed to the media because, in the taped broadcast of “Full Frontal” the night before, in the context of castigating the Trump administration immigration practices, Samantha Bee had called Ivanka Trump a “feckless [taboo word for vagina],” setting off a cultural foofaraw over vulgarity, but without concern for children taken from their parents by government force.

“Full Frontal” was honored especially for its intensely supportive coverage of the #MeTo and Time’s Up movements, another policy area where the Trump administration has failed and where Ivanka Trump, as a woman, has apparently been feckless. (On April 5, 2017, Samantha Bee tweeted a show promo promising: “The Greatest Feminists in Feminism Herstory Hall of Lady Fame: Ivanka Trump.”)

In the May 30 episode of “Full Frontal,” at the end of a seven-minute immigration segment, Bee referred to a posed, sentimental photograph from Ivanka Trump’s Instagram page, showing Ivanka holding her son, their faces almost nose to nose, a deliberately charming image. (The page includes considerable commentary, some of it expressing heartless disregard for the children separated from their parents.) Bee juxtaposed this mother-toddler tease with a statement of Trump administration immigration policy and called on the uniquely positioned “special advisor to the president to step up and defend the values implied in her photo:

After decades of ignoring the issue, Americans are finally paying attention. Well, most of us. Ivanka Trump, who works at the White House, chose to post the second most oblivious tweet we’ve seen this week. Y’know, Ivanka, that’s a beautiful photo of you and your child, but let me just say, one mother to another: do something about your dad’s immigration policies, you feckless c***. He listens to you. Put on something tight and low-cut and tell him to f***ing stop it. Tell him it was an Obama thing and see how it goes.

Predictably, the next morning the White House reacted explosively to the taboo word for vagina and ignored the human suffering caused by its immigration practices. At 8:30 a.m. press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the “language used by Samantha Bee last night is vile and vicious.” Then she blurred the issue by claiming: “Her disgusting comments and show are not fit for broadcast,” logically equating a critique of government inhumanity with calling someone a feckless taboo word for vagina. That’s a morally indefensible opinion that went largely unnoticed in the hooha over the taboo word for vagina. Sanders also issued an implied call for Time Warner and TBS to fire Samantha Bee, perhaps tortiously interfering with their contractual relationship. It’s also very like an unconstitutional call for government censorship.

And Sanders did not gracefully let it go at that, but went on to try to make the taboo word for vagina a partisan issue: “The collective silence by the left and its media allies is appalling.” Trump’s been using the taboo word for vagina at least since 2004.

And Ted Nugent, who called Hillary Clinton a “toxic [taboo word for vagina]” in 1994 (without apology since), was a welcome guest at the Trump White House in 2017. And then there’s the Trump classic, “Grab ‘em by the pussy,” but enough already. Well, just two more allegations: Trump called both Acting Attorney General Sally Yates and financial reporter Jennifer Lin by the taboo word for vagina.

The same afternoon at 2:16 p.m., Samantha Bee tweeted her apology:

I would like to sincerely apologize to Ivanka Trump and to my viewers for using an expletive on my show to describe her last night. It was inappropriate and inexcusable. I crossed a line, and I deeply regret it.

Well, that seems fair enough, doesn’t it? Bee apologized to Trump for calling her a taboo word for vagina, even though that’s anatomically correct. But what about “feckless”? Shouldn’t she apologize for that, too, since Ivanka Trump, whatever else one may think of her, is hardly feckless as she globe-trots, merchandises out of the White House, and collects Chinese patents at a remarkable rate? Ivanka Trump has apparently not yet responded to Bee’s apology. When Trump’s initial mother and child photo post appeared on Instagram and she received a hail of negative reaction, she did respond obliquely to that with quasi-religious quotes from Marcus Aurelius:

If thou workest at what is before thee, following right reason seriously, vigorously, calmly, without allowing anything to distract thee… If thou holdest to this, expecting nothing, fearing nothing, but satisfied with thy present activity according to nature... thou wilt live happy. And there is no man who will be able to prevent this.

That was May 29, when Ivanka Trump also said more directly: “Focus on what is before you, on what you can control and ignore the trolls! Have a great week.” The next night “Full Frontal” aired.

At the Television Academy Honors event, having publicly apologized earlier in the day, Samantha Bee described what had happened as she saw it:

Stories about 1,500 missing unaccompanied migrant children flooded the news cycle over the weekend. So last night we aired a segment on the atrocious treatment of migrant children by this administration and past administrations. Sometimes even the ones who look best in swim trunks do bad jobs with things. Our piece attracted controversy of the worst kind….

I can tell you, as long as we have breath in our bodies and 21 minutes of airtime once a week, repeats on Saturdays, that we as a show will never stop shouting [about] the inhumanities of this world from the rooftops and striving to make it a better place. But in a comedy way.

The next day, the president doubled down on his press secretary’s implied threats, calling for Samantha Bee’s firing. TBS has indicated support for Bee, saying she did the right thing in apologizing and also accepting some responsibility for allowing the taboo word for vagina on the air. Fox and fellow festerers continue to call for Bee’s scalp. Her program has lost some advertisers, Autotrader (with dishonest, inaccurate comment) and State Farm (with a wishy-washy comment). Neither company took issue with US treatment of immigrants that amounts to a crime against humanity. The New Yorker has published an entertaining piece explaining that, for centuries, the taboo word for vagina was actually in happy, common usage (in Hamlet’s reference to “country matters,” for example). Only in the past century or so has the word become taboo and “dirty.” The piece also quotes two tweets from contemporary actresses supporting Samantha Bee (edited here for clean living), much to the distress of right-wing virtuecrats.

Sally Field:

“I like Samantha Bee a lot, but she is flat wrong to call Ivanka a [taboo word for vagina].

“[Taboo words for vagina] are powerful, beautiful, nurturing and honest.”

Minnie Driver:

“That was the wrong word for Samantha Bee to have used. But mostly because ( to paraphrase the French ) Ivanka has neither the warmth nor the depth.”

The biggest problem with calling anyone a taboo word for vagina or any other insult is that it’s lazy, meaningless, distracting, and dumb. A good insult has substance, not just derogation. “Israeli snipers are killers” may be true but it’s easily dismissed, unlike, say, “That Israeli sniper should not have assassinated that unarmed nurse when she was tending to a wounded man on the ground 200 yards away.”

Samantha Bee calling Ivanka Trump a “feckless [taboo word for vagina]” may have felt good (and has some cultural relevance), but it’s wrong, just on timid civility grounds, but more so on the ground that it distracts from Ivanka Trump’s actual complicity in the real crimes of the Trump White House against not just immigrants but almost everyone on the planet. Samantha Bee is reportedly preparing to address this issue further in her next show, June 6. This is not some poly-bigot (blacks, Jews, Arabs) like Roseanne Barr, blaming her bigotry on her medication. Samantha Bee is a serious person who actually wants to know, “Really, who are we?”



William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theater, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Sunday, June 3, 2018

Cartoon: The view from Trump's brain




If you enjoy this work, it’s more important than ever to support it— join Sparky’s List! And remember, if you missed out on the sold-out Kickstarter career compilation, the second edition is now available from IDW Publishing.

Parkland Parents Launch a Super PAC to Go After Politicians and the NRA

Mark Rodriguez holds a sign with #enough during a candlelight vigil at Pines Trails Park & Amphitheater for shooting victims from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Tuesday, February 15, 2018. (photo: Al Diaz/Miami Herald)
Mark Rodriguez holds a sign with #enough during a candlelight vigil at Pines Trails Park & Amphitheater for shooting victims from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Tuesday, February 15, 2018. (photo: Al Diaz/Miami Herald)

By David Smiley, McClatchy DC
 
tarting Wednesday, some Parkland families are raising money for a campaign to push the National Rifle Association out of politics and ban assault weapons, bump stocks and high-capacity magazines in the U.S.

Following the lead of their children, parents from the community where 17 died in a Valentine's Day shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School have joined together to form Families vs Assault Rifles, a nonprofit and political action committee founded to be a counterweight to the NRA. Jeff Kasky, the father of March For Our Lives' student activist Cameron Kasky, says the group is quickly gaining support and has already received commitments from "financial backers" willing to match grassroots donations.

“The NRA purchases for cash money political favors," Kasky said in an interview. "That needs to stop."

The organization, according to its website, was created to "remove the NRA from our political system" and fight for gun-control policies by amending the National Firearms Act of 1934. The Super PAC registered with the state and federal governments on May 18 — the same day as a shooting that killed 10 at a high school in Santa Fe, Texas — and evokes a March For Our Lives motto that people should "either change the law or change the lawmakers."

The parents' Super PAC is soliciting $17 donations, one dollar for each life lost in the shooting.

Amy Harwood, a Boca Raton parent and friend of Kasky's, said the PAC is nonpartisan and won't be supporting candidates. She said the committee will target politicians who take NRA money and hammer them with "negative" ads during the midterm elections.

Harwood helped establish the committee when she helped introduce Kasky to Matt Gohd, a political strategist with Tipping Point Analytics. Kasky said Gohd is running point for the parents' Super PAC, but said most of the people involved in the efforts, including a number of families from Parkland, are helping out as volunteers.

"We don't have any skin in this game other than the actual skin of our kids and our families," Kasky said.

In an email, Gohd said the PAC has a $10 million fundraising goal, and then "mega donors" will be asked to match the amount. He said the committee is targeting competitive federal races.

The creation of the Super PAC continues existing efforts by Parkland parents to become involved politically. Two parents, Lori Alhadeff and Ryan Petty, are running for the Broward County School Board. Three, including Petty, sit on a state commission created to review the shooting at Stoneman Douglas. Several have created their own nonprofits to fund school safety measures and gun awareness, among other issues.

Like his son, Kasky has been a harsh critic of politicians who resist gun-control efforts, and has been especially pointed with U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. The day after the Santa Fe High shooting, the committee's Twitter account responded to a post about Rubio repeatedly offering prayers for shooting victims by asking if it was too soon to begin calling Rubio "little prayer bitch."

Kasky said he probably shouldn't have used that language on Twitter, but said he refuses to give respect to people he feels don't deserve any.

"They're all sellouts," he said. "Somebody's gotta call it for what it is."

Saturday, June 2, 2018

Mueller investigation cost $16.7M over the first year, Trump's golf trips cost $67M

The Justice Department has released a reporting showing the cost of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into foreign entanglements of the Trump campaign. Through just over a year, the total comes in at $16.7 million.

Naturally, this resulted in a morning tweet from Donald Trump. Trump had previously pegged the cost of the investigation at $20 million, an exaggeration modest enough that he likely had someone at the DOJ check the books for him. And while Trump may be wishing he had that cash so he could grab some Florida real estate for a Russian oligarch, the cost of the ongoing investigation does seem … perfectly reasonable.

Compared to the estimated $67 million the government has spent providing Trump with trips to Mar-a-lago to play golf, Mueller’s investigation comes off as quite a bargain. Or the $3.5 million that the EPA spent on a single year of Scott Pruitt’s personal SWAT team.

It would probably be possible to pay for the Mueller investigation either out of first class flights by Pruitt, or Ben Carson’s decorating budget. In just the first nine months of 2017, Donald Trump personally charged the Secret Service $137,000 to rent golf carts. So they can protect Donald Trump. That’s in addition to the $2.4 million that the Secret Service paid Trump to rent space in his own building.

But if Donald Trump is really concerned about the cost of the Mueller investigation costs, we could hold a national Kickstarter. At the special bonus add on could be an orange jumpsuit.

Friday, June 1, 2018

While the media and justice system sleep, Trump is building autocracy one 'slice' at a time

On a Tuesday night rally in Nashville, Trump once again made a pitch to the crowd that the FBI had “infiltrated” his campaign, saying that “nothing like this has ever happened in the history of our nation.” Then he went on to lead the crowd in booing John McCain.

Trump’s attack on the investigation and the investigators may seem like just another repetition of the kind of blatant lie he has using against Robert Mueller’s team for weeks. It is. And it’s the same kind of attack he’s using against former FBI director James Comey. And former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe. And Sally Yates. And James Clapper. And John Brennan. And pretty well every official who has so much as voiced disagreement with Trump.

Meanwhile, Robert Mueller and the FBI have proceeded as they always do—quietly, step-by-step, working behind the scenes, avoiding publicity, and ignoring Trump. Which is exactly what Donald Trump wants.

Trump’s attacks on Meuller’s investigation are a mirror of the way Trump has, day in and day out, gone after the press. Trump has regularly claimed that any story that uncovers uncomfortable facts is “fake news.” He regularly states that even the most rapidly growing platforms are “failing.” And he paints all media sources outside the Fox-verse as joined in a left-wing conspiracy.

By doing this, he’s been enormously successful in undermining the role of the press as a gatekeeper and alarm for the public. He’s been successful expressly because much of the traditional media is still caught up in whether it’s appropriate to call a lie a lie, while Trump races ahead, gleefully tossing bombs over his shoulder.

On one hand, there is a justice system plodding stolidly onward, building a case behind the scenes. On the other hand, there is a media that’s all too readily distracted by the latest shiny object, unwilling to stay focused on any of Trump’s outrages because it would take away from following the new outrage, and unwilling to go after Trump on his own terms because it’s beneath their idea of journalistic dignity. Far ahead of both is Trump, who is willing to do anything, because issues like dignity and appropriateness never enter his thoughts.

Which is why Trump is winning. Why he is, as Jonathon Chait points out in the New Yorker, carving away America democracy one slice at a time. So that when Mueller finally emerges, and the press finally wakes up, it could be far too late.
Hungarian communist leader Mátyás Rákosi invented the phrase “salami tactics” to describe how his party established a dictatorship. The phrase has come to describe a way of taking power in increments, by forcing your opponent to repeatedly choose between either giving up a small concession – a slice of the salami – or staging a total confrontation.
Think of where America was even on the day of Trump’s inauguration, when the the argument of the day was about crowd sizes. Or where we were the following March when Jeff Sessions actually consulted with legal experts and recused himself. Or where we were that May when the firing of James Comey generated enough outrage that even Congressional Republicans supported the appointment of Robert Mueller as a special counsel and praised him as a thorough and impartial investigator.

We are not now that nation.

Slice, by slice, by slice … scandal by scandal by scandal … Trump has eaten away the core of both the justice system and America’s sense of justice. Despite every form of corruption from misuse of public funds to plain old bribes, Scott Pruitt is still there. Despite every form of corruption, Ryan Zinke is still there. Despite the disastrous mishandling of hurricane response in Puerto Rico that by any measure was far worse than what happened with Katrina, it took a Harvard study to reveal the massive death toll … and America seems to be okay with that.

This is the country where immigrant children are ripped away from their families and American citizens are left to die in the dark. Because Trump knows what every autocrat in history has known: Most people will go on ignoring what is happening around them, until it’s far too late to take action. And that includes the people who are caught up in following normal procedures in the middle of an emergency.
So now Giuliani is simultaneously all but conceding that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, and calling the entire investigation illegitimate. Trump’s defensive line on the facts of the case is retreating at the same moment his procedural attack on the investigation is advancing. Republicans are converging on the position that they have the right to decide which laws matter and who should be investigated.
Trump is making a day to day calculation. Is what remains of the ability of the free press and the justice system small enough that he can now discard the investigation? No? Take another slice. How about now. Slice. Or now.

He may eventually calculate incorrectly. It may be that either firing Mueller, or allowing Mueller to present his case, results in the kind of outrage that ultimately diminishes Trump’s power, if not removing him from office completely. But that is far, far, far from a sure thing. In the meantime, Trump is already destroying the ability of the nation to respond to this — or the next — assault.